-
Replies to Putantour
[QUOTE=Putantour]Hey man! You have made really good reports, thank you very much.[/QUOTE]I try to do my best to return back to this community. Thank you for the comment.
[QUOTE=Putantour]You don't have to justify the fact that you've liked so much Julia, anyone likes what is in his taste. Certainly, I've never been at Palace, but reading from Ortos about this Julia, it remember me Sunny at Oase...and you've hit also Sunny, and you liked it...[/QUOTE]Thank you for the support Putantour. Yes funnily enough I have seen both Julia at Palace and then Sunny at Oase and did more than one session with eqach. They just clicked my buttons visually.
[QUOTE=Putantour]My first 2 times in FKK I was looking for the girls supermodel-pornstar type, but with some more experience I've knew that I prefer another type of approach and performance. [/QUOTE]I admit that as I am new to this game that I have to go for the good visuals as I do not know much different. If I can find a girl with great visuals that appeals to my discerning taste or non discerning taste for that matter and excellent service then I have hit the mother lode and I wil be forever coming back to spend all my hard earned cash.
[QUOTE=Putantour]I've miss her, times ago, only because I try to treat the price for 1 hour "all inclusive", and she started screaming like a demon, and I've sent her to hell.[/QUOTE]Sounds like there was a bit of conflict over negotiations. I understood that although thee are standard extras that the girls are independents and so its possible to drive a different bargain. Sorry to know that flexibility in pricing is not possible.
[QUOTE=Putantour] After that I've been a pair of time at Oase, and look at her best record: the longest session I've seen, stand up from the bar to return back with the "lucky guy" it's been 13 minutes. The shortest 7, and I bet that she gained 150...[/QUOTE]That sounded like what Julia was processing at Palace. I think she was doing rapid succession of guys in 7-15 minutes. When I was waiting in between rounds for Julia I would see her go off with a guy then feel down as I had to wait half an hour for her again then 10 minutes later see her back in circulation from the room. LOL. My mind suggests that they were all quick suck and fuck sessions for 50€.
[QUOTE=Putantour]I'll be passing from Frankfurt the night of 24 April, and I don't know what to hit: I already know Oase, but never been at Palace or World. Friend of mine told me that he prefer so much World,... please some suggestion, and maybe meet someone there! [/QUOTE]I am starting my 5 day NRW tour on 24 April so I am sorry I cannot join you in Hessen. I have posted my reports on Oase (I understand that you have seen my report there)and Palace but also have my World report to come with particular emphasis on the public transport I took getting there. I have also my reports for my two other Oase visits and Palace visit that I just need to sit down and nail. Hopefully these reports may help you decide.
All I can say if that if the curiosity is biting at you its probbaly better to go and see for yourself rather than rely on what others are saying. You will always having that nagging doubt that you have missed something. Unless you liked your tried and true venue. I forced myself to do all three Palce, Oase and World before circliing back to the ones I liked.
One man's meat is another man's poison as I have oft heard quoted here.
Kind regards
Londonbasketcase
-
LondonBC
Yes, I'm sure I'll finish to World, also because I'll be coming down from Hannover in the afternoon (and is "most on the road"), and I'll have the car + GPS, so no problem with transport.
I'll be i Koln the night of 23 April, and I'll go to Traum-Paradies.
Have fun.
-
2 photos
Just to clarify: This is Julia (Gulia) from Romania, formerly FKK-World and at Palace for the last 2 or 3 years.
HB
-
[QUOTE=Hessen Bub]Just to clarify: This is Julia (Gulia) from Romania, formerly FKK-World and at Palace for the last 2 or 3 years.
HB[/QUOTE]These 2 photos seem to be crops from private photos!
You think it is a good idea to publish those here in a Sex Forum. Do you have explicit permission to do so from Julia?
I don't know if Julia is her true name, but when we write here our reports, we write about our impressions and we use names, that are nicknames, and we mention names, that are nicknames.
But her face is her face, independant of any name!
If I had a photo of you, hessenbub (which of course I have in my mind!), I would publish it right now here too. So it would be obvious for Julia or other girls, who publishes these photos, because they know your face very well! :-)
How would you feel about that?
If Julia would like to have photos in the internet to support her business, she could do so easily via the website of the Palace in Frankfurt and she would have the choice in which way she wants to present herself!
I strongly recommend removing those photos immediately!
-
[QUOTE=Nick The G]These 2 photos seem to be crops from private photos!
You think it is a good idea to publish those here in a Sex Forum. Do you have explicit permission to do so from Julia? [/QUOTE]
These pictures come from a public website, I would call the site very questionable. There's more pictures from Julia and other Romanian girls, with and without clothes. If the pictures there are posted with her knowledge and permission I do not know. If an admin wants me to give provide the link, I will do so. But I will not provide the link here in public.
Anyway - Julia is NOT her real name, that's for sure. If the picture should be removed - do so.
And by the way: I do not have any picture of me published on a public website, so there would be a difference if you would post a picture of me here or in any other webspace.
HB
P.S.: I have reported my post with the pictures to the moderators in order to decide whether to keep the pictures or not.
-
[QUOTE=Hessen Bub]These pictures come from a [B]public website[/B], I would call the site very questionable. ..... But I will not provide the link here in [B]public[/B].[/QUOTE]Are you confused :-) or are you trying to confuse us? :-(
To refer to another site, is a bad excuse, you don't want to be responsible for what you do. [B]You[/B] posted the photos here!
I think the answer is pretty simple, ask yourself just the two questions:
What is the difference (in value) between a private photo of you in this forum and a photo of Julia?
Why are you interested in posting (or why do you post) a photo of Julia here and why are you afraid that a photo of you could be shown here?
Since I work a lot with photos professionally, I would like to remind everybody here in this forum to respect the personal rights of a private person.
in english:
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_release[/url]
The following rules of thumb are valid in most cases:
"The act of taking a photo of someone in a public setting without a model release, or of viewing or non-commercially showing such a photo in private, generally does not create legal exposure, at least in the United States."
"as soon as the person can recognise itself, the picture is not allowed for sale and publication without the needed written agreement / contract with the model. Publishing an identifiable photo of a person without a model release signed by that person can result in civil liability for whoever publishes the photograph.
in german:
[url]http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~uzadow/recht/raebild.html[/url]
[url]http://www.fotorecht.de/publikationen/paparazzi.html[/url]
[url]http://www.sakowski.de/skripte/eig_bild.html[/url]
[QUOTE=Hessen Bub]If the pictures there are posted with her knowledge and permission I do not know.[/QUOTE] Simple solution: why not ask her the next time you meet her in Palace? :-) :-)
-
[blue]Hi Nick the G and everyone else,
Nick, with all due respect, your argument is refuted by your own quote:
[quote]The following rules of thumb are valid in most cases:
"The act of taking a photo of someone in a public setting without a model release, or of viewing or non-commercially showing such a photo in private, generally does not create legal exposure, at least in the United States."
[/quote]The photos posted by Hessen Bub were clearly taken in a public place.
In the future, I wound sincerely appreciate it if you would refrain from chastising Forum Members and otherwise discouraging them from posting photos.
Additional, in this case
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue]
-
[QUOTE=Admin][blue]Nick, with all due respect, your argument is refuted by your own quote: The photos posted by Hessen Bub were clearly taken in a public place.[/QUOTE]Sorry, with all due respect, you just took from what I cited what you want to see!
So please read again: The first sentence was only about [B]taking[/B] photos, the other two about [B]publishing[/B] those photos (after they have been taken :-) !
With regards to legal matters, this is really a big difference! Like it or not!
To be precise: it is allowed to take those fotos for private use. It is not allowed to publish them, e.g. in a print medium or in the internet without the explicit consent (best in written form) given by the person who can be identified on those photos. If a person finds out, that his or her photo has been published (e.g. in this forum) without explicit consent, they have the right to ask/force you to remove it. I'm pretty sure you know that.
A minimum sort of consent can be stated when the person depicted on the photo was willing to accept money for the purpose of those photos with his/her body or her/his face on them to be taken!
I understand that many of the guys here don't like this message! :-)
Using for example the Google search engine, all reports and all text in this forum can be searched with the respective key words. This is really public, worldwide! Personally, I find it is a big difference, if we post written reports here. Nobody knows if the stories are true that have been written and posted. Nickname X fucks with artist name Y. A huge amount of talent - alone with names - around here! A maze of worldwide phantasies on the art of buying and practicing sex. With lots of supermen and superwomen. :-)
But when it comes down to showing photos in worldwide accessible data bases (like this forum here), those people on the photos can be clearly identified and related to this very special context of PaySex. This is exactly what violates their personal rights. And what really noone of us writers wants to happen to ourselves too!
If a person clearly expresses its will, that it want it, then o.k.
-
[QUOTE=Nick The G]
Simple solution: why not ask her the next time you meet her in Palace? :-) :-)[/QUOTE]
Hey,
Since I am too damn dumb to understand even the simplest aspects of any legal system, I will refrain from commenting on the legality of HB's photo sharing.
Also I am way too morally bankrupt to be able to fairly comment on THAT aspect of this situation.
I will say this: Knowing Julia somewhat and having had a session or two with her in the past, I am almost willing to bet that if these photos appearing in this or any other forum make it possible for her to score a bit more whomp 'em from a customer or three, then I suspect she wouldn't care.
She's a business woman and LONG past being innocent or naive. The days of sweet, innocent Julia are long since vorbei. She is pretty hardcore now.
Cheers,
Dedalus
-
There is not really a distinction between taking photos and publishing them, as long as the photos were taken in a public place. If there were, paparizzi would not be able to publish those photos. I know there is a bit of difference between public figures and the general public, but I don't this would apply here. Also, there is nothing to imply that HB is disparaging the person.
I have much more problem with people photographing window girls in the RLD of Amsterdam and publishing them.
-
[QUOTE=Nick The G]
I understand that many of the guys here don't like this message! :-)
[/QUOTE]
Dude, posting photos is done all over this forum. Just go to the Brazil part and you will see daily posts of photos.
But I accept that you have higher moral standards. That's OK by me. What I do not understand is why you keep logging in to this site ...
euro (who has never posted a photo and doesn't even own a camera)
-
[QUOTE=Dedalus]I am almost willing to bet that if these photos appearing in this or any other forum make it possible for her to score a bit more whomp 'em from a customer or three, then I suspect she wouldn't care.
She's a business woman and LONG past being innocent or naive. The days of sweet, innocent Julia are long since vorbei. She is pretty hardcore now.[/QUOTE]Maybe with these sentences you are talking more about Dedalus than Julia ! :-) :-)
True, she is old enough to take care of her own business, very true! So why you want to take away that responsibility from her? I wouldn't be so sure that she likes this kind of "help" offered by Hessenbub and you. :-)
I just looked again on the website of the "Palace", there are no photos of Julia (Giulia) there. Need more explanations?
When Hessenbub was posting the photo of Adriana, it was a different situation because everybody can see this and two other beautiful and erotic photos of her on the website of Palace. So all of us can enjoy visually the beautiful body and the long hair.
But you will not see Adrianas face there! Why? Because she doesn't want it! Her photos were obviously taken for the purpose to support her business.
Like all of us here, she and Julia have a private life too.
@ Akibono and Euro 100:
As I said: I am working professionally with photos and I was talking about the legal situation. This has nothing to do with "higher moral standards".
I understand that - in this respect - there are mostly amateurs around here who hide themselves behind their nick names and don't like to know and don't care about what they are allowed to do with photos.
If anyone wants to be informed, it is quite easy nowadays, lots of information on that topic can be found on the websites of foto databases, photographers organisations or lawyers in the internet.
[QUOTE=Euro100]Dude, posting photos is done all over this forum. Just go to the Brazil part and you will see daily posts of photos. .....
What I do not understand is why you keep logging in to this site ...[/QUOTE]If I were Dedalus, I would answer in his style:
I cannot comment on this since I only contribute in the german FKK section. :-)
Personal rights of people are mistreated in many ways all over the world, day by day. It is our decision if we support this or not, true.
Please read carefully what I posted. You will notice, that I make a clear distinction between
a.) the anonymous art of writing about sex phantasies using nick names
b.) showing photos of real people, especially when the can be identified easily by that photos (face, tattoos, ...).
As we are adult people, we are responsible for what we do. I have contributed enough now with regards to this topic.
-
Take a chill pill
Nick,
You really need to relax & get some poon. We all read your statements & the administrator has told you to drop the issue. I think most of us understand your point of view & some will either agree or disagree. Who cares! Let's get back to the topic of sex, hot looking women & more sex!
-
[QUOTE=Nick The G]Maybe with these sentences you are talking more about Dedalus than Julia ! :-) :-)
[/QUOTE]
Hey Nick,
Trust me, my friend. You would need more than those few written snippets to peak into my sick, twisted and bent mind.
[QUOTE=Nick The G]
True, she is old enough to take care of her own business, very true! So why you want to take away that responsibility from her? I wouldn't be so sure that she likes this kind of "help" offered by Hessenbub and you. :-)
I just looked again on the website of the "Palace", there are no photos of Julia (Giulia) there. Need more explanations?
[/QUOTE]
I have long since stopped providing Julia with help. Weder Finanziell, noch geschäftliche Beratung. I have no stake or real interest either way. I just sit back and observe. As to explanations for Julia's actions; I cannot say. Odd bird that one. Why was she once a great session and is now a substandard shark? Why did she buy a set of headlights when her figure was already quite sexy? Why, why, why? Truth be known, its not really my worry.
[QUOTE=Nick The G]
When Hessenbub was posting the photo of Adriana, it was a different situation because everybody can see this and two other beautiful and erotic photos of her on the website of Palace. So all of us can enjoy visually the beautiful body and the long hair.
But you will not see Adrianas face there! Why? Because she doesn't want it! Her photos were obviously taken for the purpose to support her business.
[/QUOTE]
If I read HB's post correctly those shots came from a website and not his private collection. It would seem that none of us need HB's photos or this site to see pics of her.
[QUOTE=Nick The G]
Like all of us here, she and Julia have a private life too.
[/QUOTE]
No doubt. If I were her, then I would guard my privacy a bit better. Her choice, though.
[QUOTE=Nick The G]
If I were Dedalus, I would answer in his style:
I cannot comment on this since I only contribute in the german FKK section. :-)
[/QUOTE]
Ah, my friend. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. No doubt that whoever you are truly imitating is overwhelmed by such sycophancy.
Cheerio,
Dedalus, again, truly and morally bankrupt
-
wow, what a discussion. the pictures do come from a public website. i've never had a sexual relationship with that woman. ;-) (yes, not even a blowjob). if the pictures are not in line with the board rules - take them of. i don't mind, i do know julia/gulia and will avoid her.
i do know to many stories about her, her "friend" anna (former fkkw, then palace, not working just now), [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord901][CodeWord901][/url], carina & co. to feel sorry to have posted these pictures. it is a risk you take when you have lots of pictures posted on shady websites - and that's where they come from. the only thing i did was to make the linkage between the picture and her "nickname" at palace.
hb
p.s.: the difference between a photo of julia and a photo of me: she does look much better ...