FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2950326]Just wondering if any hobbyists here actually put much weight into the girl's nationality if physical traits are relatively similar. Obviously, if you're looking for a black girl, an Asian girl, or a burly German Helga, not many Romanians will fulfill those preferences. But within most of the European spectrum of women, the variety of Romanians fit into most of the stereotypical looks found in European nations.

If there was a girl from Iasi, the Moldovan region of Romania with many Slavic blondes. Do you care that she is Romanian and not Russian or Ukrainian? Or 185 cm Kelly who speaks great English as well as German. You wouldn't be able to tell her from a Brit if she didn't want to reveal her nationality. Girls like Rahel look like a typical western European. Tiny Simona can pass for Indian. Several can pass for Spanish or Italian. Obviously the Balkan and neighboring countries share the same look. The darker skin tone ones can pass for Turkish.

So besides perhaps not liking some Romanian cultural elements, does anyone actually care that they are Romanians?[/QUOTE]I just look for skinny, slinky white chicks. All of the eastern euro girls look the same to me anyway, I just want them long and lean with an accent.

[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2950326]Just wondering if any hobbyists here actually put much weight into the girl's nationality if physical traits are relatively similar. Obviously, if you're looking for a black girl, an Asian girl, or a burly German Helga, not many Romanians will fulfill those preferences. But within most of the European spectrum of women, the variety of Romanians fit into most of the stereotypical looks found in European nations.

If there was a girl from Iasi, the Moldovan region of Romania with many Slavic blondes. Do you care that she is Romanian and not Russian or Ukrainian? Or 185 cm Kelly who speaks great English as well as German. You wouldn't be able to tell her from a Brit if she didn't want to reveal her nationality. Girls like Rahel look like a typical western European. Tiny Simona can pass for Indian. Several can pass for Spanish or Italian. Obviously the Balkan and neighboring countries share the same look. The darker skin tone ones can pass for Turkish.

So besides perhaps not liking some Romanian cultural elements, does anyone actually care that they are Romanians?[/QUOTE]I agree with you. Nationality or ethnicity and physical appearance do not always have to be strongly correlated. Especially ethnically diverse nationalities. Similarly, individual personality can and usually tumps cultural traits or stereotypes. Having said that, there is a third factor your post does not mention. And I would say perhaps it's the most important one. And that is peer pressure. The Romanians are by far the largest group, they share their social circles, gossip, outside friends, work ethics, prices, ect ect ect. Other nationalities like the Germans or maybe a few Bulgarians have their smaller groups who also tend to share the same traits when it comes to their work-dynamics. Knowing this, it's a rare treat when you come across a lone wolf. A solo Polish, Ukrainian, Latin, whatever. These girls tend not to get roped into whatever scams are being perpetrated around the clubs among the larger girl-gangs on any particular day. Solo girls tend to play fair, care about their reputation, and just generally own that they are different from the rest of the riff-raf. Some German girls work as lone wolves too because they know that girl-gangs are not a good look. This is true in any club but is especially visible in Sharks.

[QUOTE=FakeIt;2950422]I agree with you. Nationality or ethnicity and physical appearance do not always have to be strongly correlated. Especially ethnically diverse nationalities. Similarly, individual personality can and usually tumps cultural traits or stereotypes. Having said that, there is a third factor your post does not mention. And I would say perhaps it's the most important one. And that is peer pressure. The Romanians are by far the largest group, they share their social circles, gossip, outside friends, work ethics, prices, ect ect ect. Other nationalities like the Germans or maybe a few Bulgarians have their smaller groups who also tend to share the same traits when it comes to their work-dynamics. Knowing this, it's a rare treat when you come across a lone wolf. A solo Polish, Ukrainian, Latin, whatever. These girls tend not to get roped into whatever scams are being perpetrated around the clubs among the larger girl-gangs on any particular day. Solo girls tend to play fair, care about their reputation, and just generally own that they are different from the rest of the riff-raf. Some German girls work as lone wolves too because they know that girl-gangs are not a good look. This is true in any club but is especially visible in Sharks.[/QUOTE]Yes, great point. You said it in better detail than me as I simply just said culture but examining the peer aspect gives it better nuance. The solo girls are almost always a better bet and has been my experience as solo girls make up a significant majority of my regulars over the past decade. Perhaps 2 our of 3 regulars and then most of the rest had one single friend but they were on an island of their own.

Your point might be the most helpful advice that never gets mentioned. Thank God, for once.

[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2950326]Just wondering if any hobbyists here actually put much weight into the girl's nationality if physical traits are relatively similar. Obviously, if you're looking for a black girl, an Asian girl, or a burly German Helga, not many Romanians will fulfill those preferences. But within most of the European spectrum of women, the variety of Romanians fit into most of the stereotypical looks found in European nations.

If there was a girl from Iasi, the Moldovan region of Romania with many Slavic blondes. Do you care that she is Romanian and not Russian or Ukrainian? Or 185 cm Kelly who speaks great English as well as German. You wouldn't be able to tell her from a Brit if she didn't want to reveal her nationality. Girls like Rahel look like a typical western European. Tiny Simona can pass for Indian. Several can pass for Spanish or Italian. Obviously the Balkan and neighboring countries share the same look. The darker skin tone ones can pass for Turkish.

So besides perhaps not liking some Romanian cultural elements, does anyone actually care that they are Romanians?[/QUOTE]I find that different nationalities yield different physical traits generally. For example, I prefer German girls to Romanian, their physical traits differ, I believe, without me having to go into detail. Similarly, in South America, I prefer the Argentinian over the Brazilian, for example, and the Brazilian over the Colombian. With regards to Romanian, Russian or Ukrainian I have no hesitation in choosing Ukrainian over Russian and Russian over Romanian. Its a matter of personal taste and obviously in general terms as there are many instances where I may choose a non-preferred nationality over, a preferred nationality as aforementioned.
In the far east my preference is Indonesian over Chinese, Chinese over Thai and Thai over Filipina.

In fact, the girls currently working at Sharks claim to be Romanian, but over 50% are actually of Tzigane or gypsy (Roma) descent. Some Tourists and Asian Americans often cannot tell the difference, so they assume Gypsy women are Romanian, leading them to conclude that Romanian girls are less attractive than German or other Eastern European women.

I don't feel the need to judge whether this viewpoint is right or wrong.

I usually categorize the girls into two groups: non-Gypsy and Gypsy. While I tend to prefer non-Gypsy women slightly, I have never rejected the beauties of Gypsy women.

For example,

Gypsy decent:

Claudia and Bibi are of Gypsy descent, but they are still very attractive.

Catelea is half Gypsy and half Romanian, yet she was my favorite for a period of time.

The most popular, Rachel, is also of Gypsy heritage, though she denies it, but her skin tone suggests otherwise. Her friend Lina is fully of Gypsy descent.

Simona, the top #1 optics for EscArt taste, is also Gypsy. She has a resemblance to Indian as EA implied.

Non-Gypsy:

Davina is undeniably a true Romanian beauty.

Stacy and Victoria have no connection to Gypsy heritage; they are beautiful Moldovan girls.

Lola and the new Betty are both Romanian girls.

Florina, from Bulgaria, has typical Central Asian Turkish features, but she is my favorite.

Ceiline, with her beautiful green eyes and fair skin, embodies the essence of a true Romanian beauty.

Kitty, the girl who once both captivated and frustrated me, is a quintessential Romanian beauty. She is coming back to club.

Megan, Evita, and Helen represent the peak qualities and beauty of Romanian women During the pre-Covid era from 2015-2019.

[QUOTE=HappyTour;2950604]In fact, the girls currently working at Sharks claim to be Romanian, but over 50% are actually of Tzigane or gypsy (Roma) descent. Some Tourists and Asian Americans often cannot tell the difference, so they assume Gypsy women are Romanian, leading them to conclude that Romanian girls are less attractive than German or other Eastern European women.

I don't feel the need to judge whether this viewpoint is right or wrong.

I usually categorize the girls into two groups: non-Gypsy and Gypsy. While I tend to prefer non-Gypsy women slightly, I have never rejected the beauties of Gypsy women.

For example,

Gypsy decent:

Claudia and Bibi are of Gypsy descent, but they are still very attractive.

Catelea is half Gypsy and half Romanian, yet she was my favorite for a period of time.

The most popular, Rachel, is also of Gypsy heritage, though she denies it, but her skin tone suggests otherwise. Her friend Lina is fully of Gypsy descent.

Simona, the top #1 optics for EscArt taste, is also Gypsy. She has a resemblance to Indian as EA implied.

Non-Gypsy:

Davina is undeniably a true Romanian beauty.

Stacy and Victoria have no connection to Gypsy heritage; they are beautiful Moldovan girls.

Lola and the new Betty are both Romanian girls.

Florina, from Bulgaria, has typical Central Asian Turkish features, but she is my favorite.

Ceiline, with her beautiful green eyes and fair skin, embodies the essence of a true Romanian beauty.

Kitty, the girl who once both captivated and frustrated me, is a quintessential Romanian beauty. She is coming back to club.

Megan, Evita, and Helen represent the peak qualities and beauty of Romanian women During the pre-Covid era from 2015-2019.[/QUOTE]I have no difficulty in assuming that there are many dudes who prefer the looks of Gypsy women to that of other Romanians or other Europeans for that matter. Its personal taste.

Are girls in Oase and Sharks these days generally, younger, more natural looking with less silicone than at Globe?? The girls also looked older at Globe than what I remember vs the late teen early 20's girls I had become accustomed to in Germany Sharks and Oase.

[QUOTE=StarletVoyager;2950998]Are girls in Oase and Sharks these days generally, younger, more natural looking with less silicone than at Globe?? The girls also looked older at Globe than what I remember vs the late teen early 20's girls I had become accustomed to in Germany Sharks and Oase.[/QUOTE]For looks, Germany is higher level than Globe. For public sex, Globe is better. If you need rules like at Globe or Bruggen before to get from girls, when I prefer to play with my talent with more fresh girls in Germany. Tough game at Magnum.

[QUOTE=HappyTour;2950604]In fact, the girls currently working at Sharks claim to be Romanian, but over 50% are actually of Tzigane or gypsy (Roma) descent. Some Tourists and Asian Americans often cannot tell the difference, so they assume Gypsy women are Romanian, leading them to conclude that Romanian girls are less attractive than German or other Eastern European women.

I don't feel the need to judge whether this viewpoint is right or wrong.

I usually categorize the girls into two groups: non-Gypsy and Gypsy. While I tend to prefer non-Gypsy women slightly, I have never rejected the beauties of Gypsy women.

For example,

Gypsy decent:

Claudia and Bibi are of Gypsy descent, but they are still very attractive.

Catelea is half Gypsy and half Romanian, yet she was my favorite for a period of time.

The most popular, Rachel, is also of Gypsy heritage, though she denies it, but her skin tone suggests otherwise. Her friend Lina is fully of Gypsy descent..[/QUOTE]Many Latin types like Italians or Spanish or Portuguese are not gypsy and exactly same in Romania. Rachel really doesn't have gypsy face, even fake blond. Tall Katalea also really doesn't have gypsy type, when Claudia has. If Sabrina makes tanned skin, she will remain Slavian type, probably from Moldavian roots, maybe why some girls claim to be Moldavian, when they feel from roots, but couldn't work in Germany, just arriving from Chisinau. Mold. Gypsy doesn't mean not being Romanian on ID. In Romania, Slavian, Latin and gypsy types, like in some other countries In Russia, Siberians and very different latin Tatar and even Asian types. Yes, no face like Megan now at Sharks, but quantity of average looks with small pussy asking too expensive for their value. Disappointing casting for my picky eyes, when I find prettier in NRW.

[QUOTE=StarletVoyager;2950998]Are girls in Oase and Sharks these days generally, younger, more natural looking with less silicone than at Globe?? The girls also looked older at Globe than what I remember vs the late teen early 20's girls I had become accustomed to in Germany Sharks and Oase.[/QUOTE]On a recent visits in September to both, can tell you hands down Globe outshone Oase on friendliness, attractiveness and age range But I believe Sharks has more younger ladies (been a couple months). Bi did not find a huge difference in "naturalness" between G and O.

[QUOTE=Tintin1;2951191]On a recent visits in September to both, can tell you hands down Globe outshone Oase on friendliness, attractiveness and age range But I believe Sharks has more younger ladies (been a couple months). Bi did not find a huge difference in "naturalness" between G and O.[/QUOTE]You mean girls are older at Oase than Globe? When some oldies at Globe.

[QUOTE=Sirioja;2951167]If You know Rachel or Kity or Katalea at Sharks, are there such looks at World? Then I would manage for level for sex, as I'm always used to make the job. [/QUOTE]Rachel, Kitty and Catelea are all on my sharks beauties list which I have repeatedly emphasized and confirmed since last year. I remember you constantly belittling the girls on this list, thinking they weren't worthy. So how did they suddenly become the women of your top choice? Are you copying or imitating my preferences?

[QUOTE=HappyTour;2951756]Rachel, Kitty and Catelea are all on my sharks beauties list which I have repeatedly emphasized and confirmed since last year. I remember you constantly belittling the girls on this list, thinking they weren't worthy. So how did they suddenly become the women of your top choice? Are you copying or imitating my preferences?[/QUOTE]Don t worry, I listed just about look, but when I tried Kity on beginning of 2022 before her duck lips, she was not on my GFE standard, even not a small pussy but good potential for fucking, but it was before her asian business. Rachel doesn t seem to be your fav, when I supported her lovely behavior, even limited for my size. I had weekly rooms with Katalea on Summer 2021 for 150/60 when she just arrived, but she lost freshness on face and in mind. 3 Girls I named at Sharks, even prettier than Lola or Stacy or Ariana, just show no wow level at Sharks among quantity. Without duck lips and if able for GFE, maybe Kity could be interesting, if no upselling. For real GFE and if still able for sport in bed, she may be the only one worthing 200/60 , when I don t see any other.

Following a tip from Shark16, I chose FKK Sharks on my first day since it was a Tuesday. I expected a rather weak lineup when I arrived at about 4 pm, but was pleasantly surprised. It is now about two years since my last visit, and there were very few changes to see. The atmosphere was just like it usually is, but there were a lot of new girls. I didn't recognize more than a very few, which I think was a bit surprising.

I like slightly more mature ladies, and I think most of the Sharks are in the youngest team for my taste. But they are really great to look at, I could count at least five very pretty girls. After observing the market for a while my choice fell on Monica, 29 who claimed she was Spanish. Maybe that's correct, I don't really care where the girls are from as long as they offer what I want. Monica was good in the room, but seemed a bit unhappy and not so cheerful, it was a bit silly. She looks good with glasses and gave me what I asked for. Decent price for the event, unfortunately I don't remember the sum.

I like the sauna, and relax well there. I think the food was better than last time, but I'm not there primarily to eat food.

As an FKK tourist, I have been to Sharks 15-20 times in the last ten to fifteen years. The experience has been pretty much the same every time, I'm pretty happy every time I leave the place, but never have the big "wow" feeling.

Tips in this forum made me go to Oase the next day, it turned out to be a better place for me. I will tell about that in the Oase thread. Although Sharks has ended up being "okay" every time, I think I will wait quite a while before visiting again. I should try a few more places, and I'm looking forward to that. Finally, I must mention that I actually saw "legendary" Sylwana, she must be at least 70 years old now? She doesn't appeal to me, and I don't think she looked good at all. It's surprising that she's still there, I guess it means that someone is actually buying her services, I think that's strange.

Went with Yasmin 3 weeks back. With her high heels, she seemed to be around 6'6" tall, perhaps the tallest girl in the club. She looked absolutely gorgeous. Agreed for BBBJ and DATY for 100430. Overall great experience. DFK and COF was not on offer though.