Fatalmodel vs GPArena and more
Confrades,
Here's an interesting find that confirms how inflated Fatalmodel prices are:
- "Anninha" on Fatalmodel (FM) charges are $550 per hour: [URL]https://fatalmodel.com/acompanhante/1932056/anninha-1932056[/URL].
- Same chick is advertised as "Lara Ricci" on GPArena for are $350 per hour: [URL]https://gparena.net/td-show.php?t=13948[/URL].
-- FM price is a whopping 60% higher.
-- FM is be easier to navigate with its filters (and being in English), but this comes at a cost.
-- ADVICE: If you find a garota you like on FM, make sure to research her on GPArena. Search function sucks on GPArena but the last 4 digits of the phone number are usually a good identifier.
-- ADVICE: Like in this case, you may not only find the same girl under a different name at a substantially lower rate (she'll know from where you came depending on how you address her and will charge accordingly), but may also be able to avoid scams (see "ANGEL" below).
覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧.
Other research findings:
"LARA RICCI": GPArena also has its downsides.
- I was looking forward to testing her based on the positive GPArena reviews and the very hot pics (huge fan of young, slim natural chicks with big unbutchered tits and no / few tattoos).
- Coincidentally stumbled over her pics on Fatalmodel.
-- One big downside of GPArena is that age is rarely mentioned. Turns out she is 30 as per FM (which is most likely also a lie).
-- One pic of FM shows her boobs the way they probably really are: [URL]https://files.fatalmodel.com/shared/pr/media/16322783/16322783_20240730115834.jpg[/URL].
-- Tits are saggy and appear much smaller than on the other pics, which were either taken ages ago or more likely stolen (areolas look different). That in combination with age made her fall out of my list. Moreover, her FM video shows that she is far from being as tight as her GPArena pics may suggest.
-- Only in a very recent TD on GPArena, a tester mentions that the pics are "way overrated". Previous entries were. It seems. Overly positive.
-- ADVICE: Skimming through GPArena reviews with the hope to find a few more critical testers is helpful to gauge how accurate pictures really are. I am mostly looking for reviews that speak to that accuracy. Unfortunately most just focus on bragging what studs they are, while fishing in an aquarium.
-- ADVICE: It may take more than just a handful of positive GPArena reviews to better assess a girl. If she just has 1-2 reviews, you are gambling. She might be a winner, new to the business and unspoiled by hundreds of dicks, but chances of fake or at least highly unbalanced reviews and, in consequence, possible unpleasant surprises, are also much higher.
覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧
"ANGEL" on Fatalmodel:
- Looks extremely hot for my taste, I would even not mind the small boobs [URL]https://fatalmodel.com/acompanhante/2346225/angel-2346225[/URL].
- BUT: Checking on GPArena, she seems to be fishy: [URL]https://mail.gparena.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=144042&hilit=6083[/URL]#p144042.
- Text reads: "A GP named Angel, with a phone number ending in 6083, directly asked the Arena member (100% reliable) who had posted their report to remove it. Of course it was a lie, and she even threatened him. Out of respect for him and his request, we took it down. So watch out for this person and that number so you don't get into trouble, folks. The truth really hurts."
-- Reaffirms how checking against GPArena is a good thing.
-- However, GPArena seems to regularly take down profiles reviews, most usually based on request of the hoars or the guys behind them, so *not* finding chicks that are popular on other sites on GPArena is at least a yellow flag.
-- Given that GPArena's search is so crappy, it's not as easy as it should be to find these takedown messages.
-- That said, this takedown was based on a single person's complaint (she might just as well have refused to suck his dirty old crooked cock without protection), and maybe she's legit.
-- QUESTION: She has 10 reviews on FM. Does someone have an idea how trustworthy these are compared to GPArena? Did anyone meet her?
覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧
"SOFIA BLEDES".
- Extremely hot pics and videos on Riosexsite and Private 55: [URL]https://www.riosexsite.com/escort/SofiaBledes[/URL]
- However, nothing to be found on GPArena or GPGuia. Very high chance of fake.
-- QUESTION: Did anyone test her or know more about her?
覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧覧
"MISTICA MASSAGENS": [URL]https://misticaterapias.com.br/[/URL]
- Lots of highly appealing profiles, especially Sthe (Thaina and Anne.
- No reviews to be found on GPArena or GPGuia. Might be that they just massage (absolutely fine for me if "massagem mtua" is an option), but still suspicious.
- Pics might be as AI enhanced as those at PRISMA (unfortunately) seem to be.
- Good thing about massage places is that you can go, see the lineup and leave if they are hideous (unless they do that stupid tablet thing like at palms. A strong reason not to go there)
- Question: Has anybody ever been there? And if so, tested any of the girls named above?
I continue to search for true stunners (happy to shell out are $ 1 k or more for astonishing beauties), but it's not easy. Any recommendations (Rio and SP) more than welcome!