One for you. Ten thousand for me.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;2523653]Oh, you mean Lula the Silva the criminal. He sure made a great job "uplifting" his own personal economy.
Too bad he fucked over the Brazilian people to enrich himself.[/QUOTE]Finally someone here gets it right. I used to have a driver in Rio who also had the transportation contract for a major convention hotel (academics love spending those student loan funded dollars in Rio). One day he shows me a huge wad of Reais and says he is having lunch with the manager in charge of awarding the transportation contract. Payoffs happen all the time. Something people should take into account when voting for a president.
When the right-wing political establishments, can't win at the Ballot-Box
[QUOTE=Exec Talent;2523783] One for you. Ten thousand for me. Finally someone here gets it right...Payoffs happen all the time. Something people should take into account when voting for a president.[/QUOTE] Lula is a great man and is a great former Brazilian president. I strongly disagree, with your [i](and others) [/i] characterization and portrayal of President Lula as a criminal, who was corrupt and took bribes.
President Lula was politically railroaded, persecuted, prosecuted, imprisoned and jailed, yes. But he is NOT a criminal, he is a political prisoner.
His jailing was [b]nothing more than a right-wing power grab[/b] on Brazilian democracy, knowing that given a just and fair election, they could not win against the PT Party, at the ballot-box, if Lula ran for president.
Six (6) months before the election, [b]Lula leads by 31% in the polls[/b], followed by Bolsonaro with 15%. [i]At the time of his imprisonment in April 2018, [b]Lula was far ahead (of Bolsonaro)[/b] and leading the 2018 presidential polls.[/i]
It wasn't hard to coerce Odebrecht executives to lie and include Lula in Moro's dragnet, with the promise of lighter jail sentences. That goes double for disgraced judge Sergio Moro, who was awarded Minister of Justice and is now under investigation for non-partiality and judicial misconduct, surrounding for his role in "Lava Jato".
The authorities, have NEVER found the hard evidence linking Lula, to the said allegations and proof of wrongdoing. The circumstantial evidence put forth, was flimsy, weak and incoherent, requiring you to have some kind of "leap-of-faith" to connection the dots, back to Lula.
[u]Consider the role of Brazilian "Special Investigator" Prosecutors: [/u]
• Judge Sergio Moro was one of these "special investigator" prosecutors. He presided over operation "Lava Jato"
• An investigating judge, like judge Moro, gets to target the suspects he wants, orders their telephones to be taped, their offices to be raided, their houses to be searched..etc.
• He then gets to charge his suspects, with whatever crimes he see fit and then gets to be the trial and sentencing judge. [b](How fucked up is that?)[/b]
• Basically, Moro, is "judge", "jury" and "executioner". [b](How is that impartial?)[/b]
• Any reasonable judicial system, gives the most important right of any defendant, the right to be heard by an impartial judge, other than their accusers. [b](Not so much in Brazil.) [/b]
I submit when one man/office has this much power to adjudicate on all levels of justice, it's hard to imagine, that impartiality can still be maintained and therefore easily susceptible to influence, coercion, bribery or even a gross abuse of power.
Lula now released from from prison with regards to his appeal. Hopefully, he gets a real "impartial" judge, that adjudicates over evidence rather than conjecture and right-wing influencers
One for you... One Hundred Thousand for me
[QUOTE=ExecTalent;2523783] One for you. Ten thousand for me. Finally someone here gets it right. ...[/QUOTE]It also occurred to me, that when you say [I][b]"one for you...ten thousand for me"[/b][/I], you perhaps mean president Bolsonaro (or "Bozo", affectionately named by the Brazilian people), must be using the same "accounting irregularities" as a recently impeached Brazilian ex-president. The article after all, has him boldfaced admitting and saying [I][b]"the country is broke" [/b][/I].
If president "Bozo", is using the [I][b]"one for you...ten thousand for me"[/b][/I] accounting rules, then perhaps you are absolutely correct when you say:
[QUOTE=ExecTalent;2523783] [i]Payoffs happen all the time. Something people should take into account when voting for a president.[/i][/QUOTE]With the county being broke, I couldn't agree more.
I guess he is putting those "presidential skills" and newly found "accounting skills" and to work. Hopefully followed by impeachment.
Brazil on the Cheap again?
[QUOTE] With state subsidies to fight poverty now ended, Brazil's far-right President Jair Bolsonaro on Tuesday said his country is "broke" and he is unable to do anything about it...
[url]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/brazil-s-president-says-country-is-broke/ar-BB1cvsfw [/url] [/QUOTE]Brazil is broke and president "Bozo" says, [B][i]"Brazil is broke, I cannot do anything," [/i][/B]. What a surprise!
Much like the unprecedented COVID-19 deaths in the Amazon and all throughout Brazil, it won't be long before you hear him say, [B][i] "...So what, Brazil is broke!". [/i][/B]
On the upside, international investors, may be able to pickup Brazil on the cheap again, in the next few years, if they can stomach the turmoil ahead.
Achieve Herd Immunity by October
I hope all countries can achieve this goal.
[URL]https://riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/miscellaneous/covid-19/brazil-has-negotiated-vaccine-doses-to-achieve-herd-immunity-by-october/[/URL]