Florida and other red states take the lead
[QUOTE=CrowExplorer;2570861]But all those blue cities and states were locking down and forcing mandates full on gestapo chi-com style. Shouldn't there have been a much lower case and death rate compared to red states like Florida, who let their peasants, err, I mean citizens live their life a way in which they choose?[/QUOTE][B]Heres Where COVID-19 Cases Are Rising and Falling[/B]
June 15, 2021.
[URL]https://www.healthline.com/health-news/here-are-the-states-where-covid-19-is-increasing-2[/URL]
[QUOTE]..For the week that ended Sunday, 20 states reported increases in COVID-19 cases, compared with three states the previous week.
Missouri had the highest increase with a 101 percent jump to 4,517 new cases.
The CDC reported that Florida had the most new cases in the past 7 days with 10,676. Thats about 3,000 less than the previous week.
Texas was second with 8,421 new cases this past week, about 200 fewer than the previous week.
Colorado was third with 4,137 cases. California was next with 3,967 new cases and Washington was fifth with 3,833.
The CDC reports that on a per capita basis, Wyoming leads with almost 80 cases per 100,000 residents over the past 7 days.
Colorado is second with 71 cases per 100,000 residents, followed by Missouri with 62 cases per 100,000 residents. Next is Utah with 59 cases per 100,000 residents and Arkansas with 52 cases.
There were 21 states that reported an increase this past week in COVID-19 deaths, compared with 11 states the previous week.
Florida recorded the most COVID-19 deaths over the past 7 days with 232.
Texas was second with 217 reported deaths. That was followed by Georgia with 172, Pennsylvania with 130, and Illinois with 118 deaths.
[/QUOTE]
Paulie the Democratic douche
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2570875]But simplistic and misleading arguments have been part of the playbook of Trumpism for a long time, aimed at leading along the gullible and bigoted with tunes they find pleasing. I'll add that New York after a very rough start smashed the curve from May through October of 2020. As expected they had a winter surge but still kept deaths relatively low. Scroll down and check the graphs. Wow. You'll never hear about this though in the Fox evening propaganda hours.[/QUOTE]New York has the second highest death rate in the USA and you are bragging about how they handled it?
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2570875]And how did NY do it? The answer is obvious, with sound policies and compliance with the same, masks, social distancing, etc. Just common sense stuff, the same stuff that worked many places in Asia and in Scandinavia, excepting Sweden.[/QUOTE]Except it didn't work. [URL]https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eci.13484[/URL].
The most restrictive nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for controlling the spread of COVID- 19 are mandatory stay- at- home and business closures. Given the consequences of these policies, it is important to assess their effects. We evaluate the effects on epidemic case growth of more restrictive NPIs (mrNPIs), above and beyond those of less- restrictive NPIs (lrNPIs). Methods: We first estimate COVID- 19 case growth in relation to any NPI imple-mentation in subnational regions of 10 countries: England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, South Korea, Sweden and the United States. Using first- difference models with fixed effects, we isolate the effects of mrNPIs by subtracting the combined effects of lrNPIs and epidemic dynamics from all NPIs. We use case growth in Sweden and South Korea, 2 countries that did not implement mandatory stay- at- home and business closures as comparison countries for the other 8 countries.
Conclusion: While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs. Similar reductions in case growth may be achievable with less- restrictive interventions.
End of quote.
Maybe you can quote the wrong study again, douche!
You know all that name calling and stupidity you launched at Trump about what he could or should have done differently?
Truth is it didn't fucking matter. A virus does not care who is in political office.
And while you idiots are still fingering pointing at Trump, one of the people you elevated to deity status, Anthony Fauci, looks like one of the three "scientists" most responsible for the creation of this novel corona virus in the first place.
"There is no evidence in leaked from the lab" you bellow while the circumstantial evidence, a mountain of evidence, shows no other theory that is even in the ball park of the lab leak theory. Hell, even Jon Stewart went off on what is so obvious.
A novel respiratory corona virus epidemic starts up right next to a lab named novel respiratory corona virus? There is no proof it leaked from the lab?
No, anyone who says that is racist conspiracy theorist who hates Asians.
There is a point and time to say another person is just fucking crazy, and that time is now for you and all the other Democratic douches. You literally are too stupid to argue with.
Elvis 2008, please stop calling your opponents "douchies"
While calling people names tells more about you than them, please refrain from insulting people for having different political views.
Infantile Name Calling...
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2571478]While calling people names tells more about you than them, please refrain from insulting people for having different political views.[/QUOTE]That should go double for other BMs that peddle in such infantile and juvenile name calling, of their fellow BMs. As if that somehow wins the argument. Who know who you are...