Bangkok Reports

FL Hawk,

The mamasan saying 4 hours is completely useless. Just conning you. If you were experienced you would know you will never get a 4 hour ST unless the girl just happens to be crazy about you.

Some Girls from RB4 try to get away with 30 min quickie STs in the past.

The best you can hope for is 2 hours. Many girls will try to leave after 1 pop.

I never use mamasans to negotiate, it just doesn't help me. Unfortunately masasans are supposed to help the communication but won't give you a good deal. I am firtunate to be able to speak Thai and completely bypass mamasans.

Anyway the girl would not know necessarily what bullshit the mamasan told you.

[QUOTE=EihTooms;1963974]It was actually a very early and easy night for me. I chose a girl, the first girl I even paid attention to because she happened to be dancing right in front of the random seat I took, in the first bar I entered on a Friday night. 495 baht for drinks, 30 baht tip to the server, 1,500 baht for the barfine, 80 baht for two motorbike taxi rides, 2,500 baht to the little lady for a very, very satisfying job well done in my apartment, and another 40 baht to her before she hopped on a motorbike taxi to return to the bar about 2 hours later, totalling 4645 baht for the 3 hours or so of drinks, go-go girl watching, mild cuddling and kissing, and the ultimate rewarding experience in the room. I'm fine with that. I slept really good last night and feel great this morning.[/QUOTE]Thanks for sharing the report. I have similar all-is-well post-coital feelings these days when a girl actually delivers on promises. Getting a girl that delivers an "80% of what I desire experience" is more than half the battle here. On the other hand, it is a stark reality of the BKK scene that 4000 b (bar fine plus girl fee) to bareback a 21 yo Isaan MILF is happening. Nothing to criticize about what was paid (no price police) or what was received (I like it raw too), but something just seems incongruous. Enjoy BKK, AsianRain.

WTF is wrong with you guys! Why are you willing to BB these girls? HIV is a huge problem in SEA. Cover your buddy, always!

If you are 100, I guess you've got nothing to lose, but if you are under 90, wrap it up!

Look, we all need to be safe when we monger. It's the same thing as agreeing on a given price. If we work together, it makes the entire scene better. Running without rubber is a quick way to spread stuff that none of us wants. Don't do it!

[QUOTE=RobertLong;1964294]I am 70 going on 55. Live in Hawaii so I am in great shape surfing and windsurfing for over 20 years. I have stayed in the Ambassador many times because of location. The ladies don't care about your age. The younger ones might resist but most never do. If you look really old, with a beer belly and your bent over and have a lot of hair growing out of your ears, you can still get laid. Like they say "Money talks, bullshit walks". Go for it and don't look back.

RL.[/QUOTE]I am much nearer 70 than 60 and must admit to being a few kg over weight. I have been coming here now for over 25 years.

In my opinion age is no bar to spending some quality time with a MUCH younger Thai girl. The Thai's seem to rather like the older guys laid back approach rather than the wham bam thank you ma'am of the young studs (or perhaps they know that us old guys mean less wear on the money maker!

I also used to believe that the "no money, no honey" rule applied but now I seem to be able to attract 20/30 year old civilians who seem happy to spend some time with me eating, drinking and screwing without even the mention of "how much you pay me?

OK, there is no such thing as a complete freebee as in addition to the food and drinks I always slip some money in the purse before they leave but I really do believe that in Thailand, getting old is nothing to worry about.

Enjoy, I do.

Hotman.

Was in BKK this weekend and what I noticed since my last visit 4 months ago is that the bar fines are getting out of hand.

In Nana some places now charge 700 baht but we where quoted 1,100 bar fine at Rainbow the one with one stage 3rd floor. WTF and 3,000 baht short time 5,000 LT. If you are going to pay those kind of prices I recommend the lords the best soap land in BKK in my opinion. Didn't go to Soi but has their bar fines gone up as well?

[QUOTE=FLHawk;1964360]
But when she comes out she is dressed and says she is leaving. What?! I said no, we still have at least 2 more hours. She acts like she doesn't understand. I say, fine, but I will only give your 2000 as I am only getting half my time. She doesn't object so I get up and go over by the door to give her the money. I do, she looks at it, and say she needs 3000. I say if you want 3000 then stay the 4 hours. Well, ok, you know how it goes when trying to renegotiate with a Thai who knows little English. She just wanted her 3000, and perhaps she felt the time was ST for 2 hours. I repeated the mamasan said 4 hours. No budging on her part. Argh. I started to get dressed, saying we could go back and talk to the mamasan, but then I realized what would happen if I did that? I would then be surrounded by Thai bar girls thinking I was cheating HER, so I just threw the remaining 1000 at her, then went to the door and opened it up in a symbolic kicking her out. Frustration. I am good natured and never get angry, but I was a tad upset here!

[/QUOTE]I've never heard of a 4 hour short time in Bangkok. It was your misunderstanding as a result of you not doing basic research. Probably the mamasan said 'for hour', not 'four hours'. They don't have articles like 'a' and 'the' in Thai so most Thais don't include them when trying to speak English. You're lucky to get 2 hours so there was no need to get yourself all frustrated and start treating the girl like shit.

[QUOTE=Adrena;1964499]WTF is wrong with you guys! Why are you willing to BB these girls? HIV is a huge problem in SEA. Cover your buddy, always!

If you are 100, I guess you've got nothing to lose, but if you are under 90, wrap it up!

Look, we all need to be safe when we monger. It's the same thing as agreeing on a given price. If we work together, it makes the entire scene better. Running without rubber is a quick way to spread stuff that none of us wants. Don't do it![/QUOTE]Do you have a link for studies showing how many heterosexual clients of female sex workers in South East Asia acquired HIV from those sexual encounters? I can't find anything on it. The closest I could find were a few studies that within their texts sometimes lump Female Sex Workers (FMW) with "and their clients", but show zero stats on how many of their clients supposedly acquired HIV from having sex with them. The texts then go on to discuss how the FSW likely acquired HIV and it is almost exclusively the result of having sex with People Who Inject Drugs (PWID), as in people (men) who acquired HIV by sharing needles, most typically their husbands or boyfriends. Maybe that is also how some of "their clients" acquired HIV and not from having vaginal or oral sex with them. The studies simply do not break it down into those specifics even though they most certainly could do so.

Otherwise, there isn't even an acronym in any of the HIV incidence studies or write-ups for someone like me or, I imagine, most of the guys on this site discussing P4 P mongering; heterosexual men who only have sex with women and do not share needles.

Even the USA CDC studies through 2014 could not find enough heterosexual white men who have acquired HIV via sex (presumably with women, since they're talking about heterosexuals) to include that category in their New HIV Diagnoses charts. Not sure why such studies would find anything different among white heterosexual men who travel to Thailand or anywhere else in SEA. In fact, I am sure heterosexual men who routinely travel to SEA were among the USA studies that did not show enough of them having acquired HIV via sex with females to even cite them in the charts:

[URL]http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html[/URL]

[QUOTE=EihTooms;1964630]Do you have a link for studies showing how many heterosexual clients of female sex workers in South East Asia acquired HIV from those encounters? I can't find anything on it. The closest I could find were a few studies that within their texts sometimes lump Female Sex Workers (FMW) with "and their clients", but show zero stats on how many of their clients supposedly acquired HIV from having sex with them. The texts then go on to discuss how the FSW likely acquired HIV and it is almost exclusively the result of having sex with People Who Inject Drugs (PWID), as in people (men) who acquired HIV by sharing needles, most typically their husbands or boyfriends. Maybe that is also how some of "their clients" acquired HIV and not from having vaginal or oral sex with them. The studies simply do not break it down into those specifics even though they most certainly could.

Otherwise, there isn't even an acronym in any of the HIV incidence studies or write-ups for someone like me or, I imagine, most of the guys on this site discussing P4 P mongering; heterosexual men who only have sex with women and do not share needles.

Even the USA studies through 2014 could not find enough heterosexual white men who have acquired HIV via sex (presumably with women, since they're talking about heterosexual white men) to include that category in their New HIV Diagnoses charts. Not sure why such studies would find anything different among white heterosexual men who travel to Thailand or anywhere else in SEA:

[URL]http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html[/URL][/QUOTE]I read clearly:

[QUOTE]
Heterosexual contact accounted for 24% (10,527) of estimated HIV diagnoses.

Women accounted for 19% (8,328) of estimated HIV diagnoses. Diagnoses among women are primarily attributed to heterosexual contact (87%, or 7,242) or injection drug use (13%, or 1,045).

An estimated 6% (2,635) of HIV diagnoses were attributed to injection drug use.
[/QUOTE]So heterosexual contact claimed four times as much new HIV cases as injection drug use. Out of the 10000 or so new cases, little over 8000 were women and almost 2000 were men.

These men are people known to have had heterosexual sex with women that either have HIV or are in a high risk category (such as drug users). They never shared needles or had other such risky behavior as that would have put them in a different category. People diagnosed with HIV but who had only contact with women (including prostitutes) whose HIV status is unknown are lumped in an 'unknown' (aka 'No Identified Risk') category and then statistically redistributed over all other categories. (see p. 16 of the report: "Persons whose transmission category is classified as heterosexual contact are persons who have ever had heterosexual contact with a person known to have, or to be at high risk for, HIV infection (e. G. , an injection drug user). " and "Because a substantial proportion of cases of HIV infection are reported to CDC without an identified risk factor, multiple imputation is used to assign a transmission category"). This is entirely logical: it is impossible to acquire HIV unless from someone who has HIV, so a category 'transmitted through heterosexual contact from someone without HIV" cannot exist in this kind of statistics and all 'No Identified Risk' cases are added to the other 'Identified' cases.

So, saying 'Even the USA studies through 2014 could not find enough heterosexual white men who have acquired HIV via sex' is wrong: 24% of the new cases have actually heterosxual sex as their main mode of transmission. But these studies never tried or aimed to calculate or estimate the risk of getting HIV through heterosexual intercourse [B]in general[/B]. Quoting these studies as "proof" that there is no risk to get HIV from prostitutes is wrong.

[QUOTE=Adrena;1964499]WTF is wrong with you guys! Why are you willing to BB these girls? HIV is a huge problem in SEA. Cover your buddy, always!

If you are 100, I guess you've got nothing to lose, but if you are under 90, wrap it up!

Look, we all need to be safe when we monger. It's the same thing as agreeing on a given price. If we work together, it makes the entire scene better. Running without rubber is a quick way to spread stuff that none of us wants. Don't do it![/QUOTE]You made your point in some threads already. Shouldn't you relocate to the appropriate thread? Please?

[QUOTE=BananaBoi;1962175]I went to Bangkok Beat last month and it was a bunch of old ladies working in there. Did I miss something?[/QUOTE]No, you didn't! I was there earlier this year (my first time) and I left within 30 seconds. I'm sure you know MIXX? I think you'd like it!

[QUOTE=KoperenKlaas;1964694]You made your point in some threads already. Shouldn't you relocate to the appropriate thread? Please?[/QUOTE]Boasting about unprotected sex is inevitably going to lead to a reaction so why are guys coming on here doing that? If they want to go bareback, do it but why try and convert others? It seems that some people's psychiatric issues are being played out on this forum at the moment.

[QUOTE=Wolvenvacht;1964649]So heterosexual contact claimed four times as much new HIV cases as injection drug use. Out of the 10000 or so new cases, little over 8000 were women and almost 2000 were men.[/QUOTE]Yes, and apparently every one of them was a black heterosexual man. Which is essentially the number that shows up on their chart for that category; 2108.

[QUOTE]So, saying 'Even the USA studies through 2014 could not find enough heterosexual white men who have acquired HIV via sex' is wrong: 24% of the new cases have actually heterosxual sex as their main mode of transmission. But these studies never tried or aimed to calculate or estimate the risk of getting HIV through heterosexual intercourse [B]in general[/B]. Quoting these studies as "proof" that there is no risk to get HIV from prostitutes is wrong. [/QUOTE]No, it is not wrong. If there were some 2,000 heterosexual white men whose likely mode of contracting HIV was through heterosexual sex, there would be an entry for it on that chart. But there isn't one. There is an entry for heterosexual white women as low as 1,115. So even if there were as few as 1,115 heterosexual white men who likely contracted HIV from sex, it would have been logical to include an entry for it on that chart. But there isn't one.

And I didn't post that link as "proof" that there is no risk of getting HIV from prostitutes. I posted it to show there is not even a category for someone like me with enough cases of contraction to include it on their charts. You can produce a chart showing that someone got hit by a falling meteorite. So there is definitely a risk of it happening. But I wouldn't start wearing full body armor while sitting in the living room to watch tv every night because that happened somewhere to someone.

But far be it from me to try to convince anyone else from not wearing full body armor anywhere and everywhere at all times just in case. Please do so. But don't try to convince me I am being evil, foolish or perhaps have "psychiatric" problems (not you, but others) for not doing so.

[QUOTE=FLHawk;1964108]Bangkok Trip Report Day 1.

ut then I got hammered for tips. Heck, a working girl at another table wanted me to tip her. I said no. Later, a dude at the table she was standing by leans over to me, saying they are wondering why I don't tip her, then exclaims "why don't you just tip her, man?" I just stared at him for a few seconds, like why would I tip a girl who isn't doing anything for me? Then after I paid the BF, she wanted me to tip the woman who arranged it, who I thought was the manasan. I sighed as I paid. But as we exited the door, she pointed to another woman I had never seen and told me to tip her, as she was the manasan. I grumbled about why am I tipping these people?? I at least refused to tip one!

......

We leave the place then she finds some friends outside and talks to them for a bit. I am starting to get a little upset, and close to walking away. But she is cute and returns to me and asks where my hotel is. It is a just a short walk and we end up there. She has forgotten to bring her ID but the hotel says it is ok. In my room, she sits down and gets on her phone. Fine, I will catch up on emails. I work for a while then when she seems to be off the phone and just lying there on the couch, I say I need a shower, but she says she is fine. I come out of the shower and she seems to be asleep. OK, I don't really need sex, so I will let her be . . . . [/QUOTE]You have listed some of the reasons why I generally do not bother girly bars. When I want sex, I head to one of the many massage places which provide multiple pops and take my pick. No tips to other people, no nonsense. I know what I pay, she knows what I pay I get laid. Everyone is happy. If you don't like the beds or the ambience, you can always do takeout to your place. It will at least guarantee that you get laid and probably at a price much cheaper than what you have to pay for bar fines, food, tips, drinks for her friends and having to cough up 3 or 4,000 baht for one shot because of a "misunderstanding. ".

My pal likes to live the 5 star life and he gets girls to his hotel from an escort service. He never has any complaints either. More expensive but he claims that the ladies are real lookers.

I sometimes take a freelancer home but only if I am sure there will be no nonsense. At the first sign of nonsense, I cut her loose.

I like to have a drink and therefore I go to bars where they serve good quality alcohol and the conversation is better. As opposed to the girly bars where they serve fake vodka or crap Thai beer.

Yes, I know that there are some go-go bars where the ladies don't mess around too much but they are expensive.

[QUOTE=Simian;1964765]You have listed some of the reasons why I generally do not bother girly bars. When I want sex, I head to one of the many massage places which provide multiple pops and take my pick. No tips to other people, no nonsense. I know what I pay, she knows what I pay I get laid. Everyone is happy. If you don't like the beds or the ambience, you can always do takeout to your place. It will at least guarantee that you get laid and probably at a price much cheaper than what you have to pay for bar fines, food, tips, drinks for her friends and having to cough up 3 or 4,000 baht for one shot because of a "misunderstanding. ".

My pal likes to live the 5 star life and he gets girls to his hotel from an escort service. He never has any complaints either. More expensive but he claims that the ladies are real lookers.[/QUOTE]Hi Bro.

Will visit Bangkok in Jan for two days before heading to Phuket. I will arrive in BKK at 11:10 pm. I guess by the time I get into my hotel near Nana plaza, All the massage place will be closed. I would like to use the escort services. Could you recommend one or two that will provide good services?

Thanks.

Jb.

[QUOTE=JudeBright;1964790]Hi Bro.

Will visit Bangkok in Jan for two days before heading to Phuket. I will arrive in BKK at 11:10 pm. I guess by the time I get into my hotel near Nana plaza, All the massage place will be closed. I would like to use the escort services. Could you recommend one or two that will provide good services?

Thanks.

Jb.[/QUOTE]Even when the MPs are closed, the bars and agogo clubs will still be in full swing. No need to run the risk of escorts.