Lima

Kelly just posted a video of her dog on Facebook, so she seems to be at liberty.

[QUOTE=JimmyBoy99;1823586]Kelly just posted a video of her dog on Facebook, so she seems to be at liberty.[/QUOTE]After all this noise I am left wondering, if she was pimping their kids for USD $12,000 how could be she in dire poverty.

[QUOTE=Cons68;1823763]After all this noise I am left wondering, if she was pimping their kids for USD $12,000 how could be she in dire poverty.[/QUOTE]It was Connie, not Kelly asked to pimp her kids by the Government agent.

[QUOTE=LifeIsABeach;1823911]It was Connie, not Kelly asked to pimp her kids by the Government agent.[/QUOTE]Sorry, question remains. How someone pimping kids for $12,000 is in such poverty.

These may be of interest.

1. A Utah NGO takes some of the credit for bringing down "child sex traffickers in Peru": [URL]http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865644509/Utah-group-helps-in-rescue-of-sex-trafficking-victims-in-Peru.html[/URL].

2. This one is a little hard to figure out: [URL]http://www.caretas.com.pe/Main.asp?T=3082&S=&id=12&idE=1240&idSTo=0&idA=74083[/URL]#. VpGWCvkrKUm It appears to be an editorial, rather than objective reporting. I think some or most of the claims are greatly exaggerated. What is of interest is that child pornography charges by the government may be significant, from Brown's perspective. For those who don't speak Spanish, here are the main claims:

a. Brown managed pornographic networks that distributed images of little girls jumping rope, and giving oral to a black man with a huge penis; also of young boys who should be thinking about Star Wars, being penetrated bareback by an big bellied old man, followed by his friend. These images were seen by en exclusive club of connoisseurs. (Note: I have no idea whether "images" means photos or films.)

b. Marilyn (Connie) Salazar was put in charge of finding an appropriate house, not too close to any others. Something big, with a huge garden, and amenities worthy of one of Donald Trump's properties. Brown had parties there, with the best liquor and cocaine. With disco music in the background, the guests would violate the children with their fingers, their tongues, or, with the minors that were able, sex, in the vagina and the rectum. The next day it was like Cinderella, everything converted into an enormous pumpkin, like programmed amnesia.

c. Brown's most profitable business was taking tourists to classic destinations, like Iquitos, Cuzco, and Lima itself, and keeping them entertained with landscapes of little legs.

d. Salazar was Brown's right hand man. She included two little girls on the menu, a seven year old for $5,000 and a four year old for $7,000. Salazar said when she was a girl, she had been raped at several of these parties, and afterwords became involved in the business.

3. Finally, here's Department of Homeland Securities press release: [URL]https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-peruvian-authorities-rescue-36-sex-trafficking-victims-including-11-minors[/URL]. As to Jockey16's comments below, it does highlight that people should be cautious. If you think a provider may be a minor, stay away!

[QUOTE=Cons68;1823965]Sorry, question remains. How someone pimping kids for $12,000 is in such poverty.[/QUOTE]Very easy, she may have had a pimp herself or someone else took a cut of the money before she got it.

[QUOTE=RunMann;1823985]Very easy, she may have had a pimp herself or someone else took a cut of the money before she got it.[/QUOTE]According to this, Marilyn Connie Salazar Lopez's husband was the accountant for Brown's gang: [URL]https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-peruvian-authorities-rescue-36-sex-trafficking-victims-including-11-minors.[/URL] He claims he had no knowledge that she was planning to rent out their four and seven year old children for sex. Take a look about 2 minutes 40 seconds into the video.

I screwed up the translation below and it's too late to edit. The little girls were not actually jumping rope in the park in the video, but rather the writer is saying that's what they should have been doing instead of performing sexual acts. And the boys, on the other hand, were probably thinking about Star Wars while they were being penetrated.

[QUOTE=Tiny12;1824281]According to this, Marilyn Connie Salazar Lopez's husband was the accountant for Brown's gang: [URL]https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-peruvian-authorities-rescue-36-sex-trafficking-victims-including-11-minors.[/URL] He claims he had no knowledge that she was planning to rent out their four and seven year old children for sex. Take a look about 2 minutes 40 seconds into the video.
.[/QUOTE]As he should, why would he say he had knowledge and implicate himself? In cases like this where several people are involved, its every man or woman for themselves. Even if that means ratting out others to save yourself or deny knowing anything about this serious allegations as he did.

[QUOTE=Cons68;1823965]Sorry, question remains. How someone pimping kids for $12,000 is in such poverty.[/QUOTE]We do not know what was going on. Was it the first time for Connie, we do not know. But there appears to be a history somewhere it is alleged that David killed two kids. Why? Wait for the facts to unfold.

[QUOTE=RunMann;1824315]As he should, why would he say he had knowledge and implicate himself? In cases like this where several people are involved, its every man or woman for themselves. Even if that means ratting out others to save yourself or deny knowing anything about this serious allegations as he did.[/QUOTE]Run Mann, I agree with everything you wrote.

I linked to the wrong web site BTW, sorry. Look 2 minutes 40 seconds into this video: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEcOglbG8s0.[/URL] You'll see Connie Salazar and her husband, Joel Carrera Rosales, on film. At the risk of being repetitive, this is fucking sick.

It's been a while, but I left years ago after being disgusted that the forum had devolved into people kissing David33's arse and his ego replying. It's finally going to have to change.

One thing that I have learnt over these years is that you look for places (and cultural structures/local conditions) NOT people.

FKK's in North Rhine-Westphalia, Dolly in Surabaya, Adultwork in the UK and the Troco / Bote complex in Lima.

Peru has chongos and hundreds of them. Every town of 10-20+k has one, cities have a few, some cities have many. Lima / Tacna / Chiclayo / Iquitos. Run by the local government and scam free. 20-50 S / a time.

Nightclubs and strip joints exist in every city in the world and they are full of scams and 200-300 S / up.

What brought me to Peru were the field reports of RT Gooch. He was the man.

Let's get back to Places not People and never let this forum go back into that trap again.

I hope to come back in few months or at least the end of the year so hope we have some great exploring by then.

A Lima resident and one time member of ISG told me several days ago that he was told that it is no longer possible to access ISG website when in Peru, including Lima.

This is due to the blowback regarding David 33's arrest and the implication that ISG was a conduit for certain members to procure illegal sexual services of minors from David33 (aka Johua Brown).

Is this the case?

[QUOTE=Tomasb;1830410]A Lima resident and one time member of ISG told me several days ago that he was told that it is no longer possible to access ISG website when in Peru, including Lima.[/QUOTE]This is 2016. He can still use a proxy server can't he?

[QUOTE=Tomasb;1830410]Is this the case?[/QUOTE]Definitely not yesterday or today.

My point was it appears that the Peruvian government may have blocked normal Internet access to ISG within Peru. Prob the same way they do it within Indonesia. I was trying to confirm that occurred. According to the most recent posting, it's still accessible.

My Lima friend is too busy and no longer a member of ISG and has no interest in rejoining the site; proxy or otherwise. He had encountered David33 a few times and did not have a favorable opinion of him. In fact, avoided him like the plague.

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;1830482]This is 2016. He can still use a proxy server can't he?[/QUOTE]