JK you are drawing out your kindred spirits!
Printable View
JK you are drawing out your kindred spirits!
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2683781]So you like young women? Define young.[/QUOTE]Why? You don't understand what young is? Usually relates to smthg that has not yet aged. In relation to women, a woman that has not physically matured to middle age.
[QUOTE=Gabacho;2683491]Medellin has the upper hand when it comes to food besides tacos. Bandeja Paisa, Pollo Broaster, Costillas, Punta de Anca, Solomo, Sancocho, Arepas, the list goes on and on. The weather is perfect, not too hot, not too cold like Bogota, afternoon rain showers that are refreshing and never seem to last too long, cleaner streets, mountains, tons of shit to go do (guatape day trip, Parque de las aguas, parque del Norte, parque explora, comuna 13) tons of Centro comerciales, Poblado, as mentioned there is a casa scene, the ground zero / Botero centro scene, parque lleras, Venezuelan women are way better looking and give way better service than Mexican women, and also the Colombianas. The people are nicer, the culture is more open and inviting, the place is amazing.
Mexico City: trash everywhere on the streets, especially anillo de circunvalacion. The hotels have fucking cockroaches, so many people everywhere you have to walk in the fucking streets bcuz you can't squeeze in on the sidewalks, same deal with the metro, 50 people in the doors 50 people out the doors all at the same time, with people pushing and shoving you.[/QUOTE]I have spent a lot of time in both Mexico and Colombia. It's this simple: If you don't have good Spanish and you have any kind of budget, for most people they will enjoy Colombia / Medellin more. It is far easier to find quick, cheap, decent pussy in Colombia. Now if you speak Spanish and you are very well off financially- Mexico, "especially Guadalajara, Monterrey, and CDMX", is slightly better. It has better food, safer, people are friendlier and won't look at you half the time like a sex tourist. The top talent girls are just as hot as the Colombians, but their attitudes are just more pleasant and I enjoy the personalities of the Mexicanas over the Colombianas. They are better company outside of sex and that is usually very important to someone paying top dollar for talent. For anyone wanting to do a multi-city trip, again if your budget permits, the beach cities of Cancun, Puerta Vallarta, and even Mazatlan are all much nicer than Cartagena. Cartagena has a ton of hot women you can score at cheap prices, but the city is kinda dirty and the people just hassle the fuck out of you nonstop. I still love Cartagena too, its just if you have a large budget like some ISG members, I would much rather stay in Cancun with a few sugar babies vs the hussle-fuck of Cartagena. All that being said, I am sure there are plenty of dudes, no matter the budget who would still pick Colombia over Mexico, some people like the more gritty urban environment of Colombia and Medellin does have the best weather of any city I have ever been too. In terms of views though, nothing and I mean nothing tops the Mountains you will see at Sunset riding through Monterrey or riding through the Sierra Madres into Mazatlan, I wouldn't trade have the putas I have fucked for those memories.
Unlimited Budget and Spanish Speaker= Mexico.
95% of ISG / Budget / Shitty Spanish= Colombia.
[QUOTE=JustTK;2683998]Why? You don't understand what young is? Usually relates to smthg that has not yet aged. In relation to women, a woman that has not physically matured to middle age.[/QUOTE]Can you throw out a number.
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;2684010]I have spent a lot of time in both Mexico and Colombia. It's this simple: If you don't have good Spanish and you have any kind of budget, for most people they will enjoy Colombia / Medellin more. It is far easier to find quick, cheap, decent pussy in Colombia. Now if you speak Spanish and you are very well off financially- Mexico, "especially Guadalajara, Monterrey, and CDMX", is slightly better. It has better food, safer, people are friendlier and won't look at you half the time like a sex tourist. The top talent girls are just as hot as the Colombians, but their attitudes are just more pleasant and I enjoy the personalities of the Mexicanas over the Colombianas. They are better company outside of sex and that is usually very important to someone paying top dollar for talent. For anyone wanting to do a multi-city trip, again if your budget permits, the beach cities of Cancun, Puerta Vallarta, and even Mazatlan are all much nicer than Cartagena. Cartagena has a ton of hot women you can score at cheap prices, but the city is kinda dirty and the people just hassle the fuck out of you nonstop. I still love Cartagena too, its just if you have a large budget like some ISG members, I would much rather stay in Cancun with a few sugar babies vs the hussle-fuck of Cartagena. All that being said, I am sure there are plenty of dudes, no matter the budget who would still pick Colombia over Mexico, some people like the more gritty urban environment of Colombia and Medellin does have the best weather of any city I have ever been too. In terms of views though, nothing and I mean nothing tops the Mountains you will see at Sunset riding through Monterrey or riding through the Sierra Madres into Mazatlan, I wouldn't trade have the putas I have fucked for those memories..[/QUOTE]Totally Correct, great report!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2683741]We start talking and I tell her that I doubted I would get married again. I also told her that I will not commit to one woman but I do not expect that commitment back. She then tells me, "Oh, I could never date a man like that. "[/QUOTE]Women trip me out with shit like that. I always ask well what happened to the last man you dated that was not "a man like that?" If it was all that then you would still be together. So maybe it does not matter as much as you think. Maybe you need to stop being selfish and you can stay with someone. That gets them thinking.
Yesterday my girl in Philippines asked me to marry her. Uhhh, No. I guess it was worth a try though.
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;2684010] some people like the more gritty urban environment of Colombia and Medellin does have the best weather of any city I have ever been too. In terms of views though, nothing and I mean nothing tops the Mountains you will see at Sunset riding.[/QUOTE]Plenty of Mexico is touch as nails and poor as church mice. The rats of Mexico City are something else, armies of them, big as cats. Hookers carry sticks around to ward them off.
You only see the mountains after it rains. That is why most Mexicans FK off at weekend, to escape the stew-fog.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2684022]Can you throw out a number.[/QUOTE]Do you mean a range of numbers? Young encompasses a range of years. What ages exactly? It depends on the individual. Some girls look young in to their 30's. Some look middle aged by their late 20's.
What do you prefer? I will send you my Grandmother's telephone number if you like? I must warn you though, she's been dead 20 years.
[QUOTE=JustTK;2684063]Do you mean a range of numbers? Young encompasses a range of years. What ages exactly? It depends on the individual. Some girls look young in to their 30's. Some look middle aged by their late 20's.
What do you prefer? I will send you my Grandmother's telephone number if you like? I must warn you though, she's been dead 20 years.[/QUOTE]You're the one that stated he prefers young females? Young is a subjective word.
I'm asking for you to be more specific, don't be scared, throw out a minimum and max in numbers.
We are just a bunch of anon mongers here LOL.
Why are you asking me what I like? Do you always deflect by answering a question with a question.
Shut off Echo and the Bunnymen and man up LOL.
[QUOTE=Villainy;2683736]What about beautiful women?
[URL]https://www.scoopwhoop.com/inothernews/countries-beautiful-women/[/URL]
They rate Colombia as #5 for the most beautiful women. I think there might be some favoritism in that ranking. But this is something that is ALWAYS subjective.[/QUOTE]No man, Colombian girls aren't so beautiful. In terms of quality Sao Paulo is much better than Medellin. And, in general, I found Brazilian girls more participative. Even thought, there are many missiles in Brazil as well. In Brazil I got laid with a girl I met on Tinder, for free, in Medellin I always had to pay. Medellin is good because you can get girls on Facebook, and it's also good for El Centro, since you can find some pearls there. I can't speak for Mexico because I have never been there. But I would never pick up Colombia if it wasn't so cheap, not if I have to choose in relation to the beauty.
[QUOTE=Osteoknot;2683850]My subject line was a joke because your set-up was too good to ignore, and if you can laugh at yourself then there is still some hope for you, jeje.
You weave a path that I won't say is wrong because I am not going to take the time to look up data for stuff that is empirically obvious to me. Let's just say my experiences are different. I don't see how PV Monger's statement that obesity in Latin American countries can be a sign of being able to provide for others is "egotistical'. I think you meant "ethnocentric" but I would disagree on both accounts. I already commented the same thing in this string about how in certain cultures obesity is a sign of affluence, and I have personally seen it in Africa, too.
Comparing the poor people in Colombia where the poverty rate is at least eight times higher than in the USA is also full of pitfalls. In a nutshell, poverty is the exception to the rule in North America, while here in Colombia, poverty rules. Very different socioeconomic culture.
I somewhat agree with your assessment of the average mongerer from the USA, but again don't see the parallel you try to draw to people here being the same way. Maybe this was one of your points, hard to tell, that the the sex workers are doing a legal vocation here and on average are better off than their fellow citizens. You also commented about the subset of people we meet in the sex industry and projected that to other users here and the general population in Medellin. What that really means is that you don't know what is going on with the majority of the population in Colombia, by your own admission.[/QUOTE]I didn't expect an essay on the subject but I'll focus on a few comments since I don't want to bloat page eviscerating the misinformation.
Your understanding of poverty in the United States is laughable and, yes, very egotistical so I'd argue you need to spend some time learning rather than using your "obvious empirical observations" because it is clearly misinformed. Others have pointed out how foolish your statements are but if you think that poor people are fat because of "all of the free food" then you are clearly talking without thinking. There is usually a large distinction between homeless and severe poverty and general concept of poverty that also encapsulates the working poor. For general poverty, it is fairly well correlated with obesity in the modern and developing world because cheap, long-lasting, and accessible food is usually bad for you. Combined with worse education and less ability to live a healthy lifestyle and you see obesity spring up in those communities. This is not a forum to educate people on the basics of terms like working poor, living wage, and food scarcity so I'll leave those with you and hopefully you focus some of your wit to read a bit.
In China, people drink hot water rather cold. Many westerners go there and pontificate on how it must be an artifact of the past where the water was dirty and, therefor, it was safer to drink boiled water. But they learn that is not the case and it's actually just a cultural phenomena relating to "humors" of the body, balance, and other concepts codified during Confucian times due to the purported health benefits of tea. My statements on the point of South American thoughts on fatness and weight relate to this as it is not a history of "not having enough to eat" or idolizing the Romanesque figure ala the middle ages but rather a simple cultural outgrowth of bad health education, a sexual culture that values busty-ness and thickness due to inherent body types, and the staple foods that are historically prevalent. Hispanic culture actually has shifted somewhat in South America over the past few decades to one of somewhat better eating, but more under the notion of working out to counteract it, rather than a strict dietary regime. Under your misguided metrics of "poverty" and skipping meals, the people of Asia would be pounding out food and "valuing" fatness and yet you don't see any semblance of that whatsoever. So yes, you are right that it is somewhat ethnocentrism (you may not be aware of historical trends of these countries) but it is also ego (ascribing outdated feudal beliefs to people you perceive as poor and lesser and not desiring to spend the time to actually learn).
I, as well, will leave it here since any further comments are irrelevant to this forum. My next post will be on the experiences I have had here. My post is a bit harsh and I understand that, but it feels relevant for fellow mongers to better understand the places they are going to avoid bad encounters. My best advice to people is to imagine if you were poor tomorrow, would you just inherently value an obese woman or even find them more attractive solely by that metric? I think we all know the answer to that. Good luck.
[QUOTE=Osteoknot;2683850]You are also a little confused about the archaic term "third world" which you mix with more appropriate terminology, "developed" nations. There is more than one person here confused about that. For the record, Colombia is an undeveloped nation on the tipping point of becoming a developed a nation, and that transition only occurs once in a country's history. There is too much that goes into that to explain further here.[/QUOTE]We'd hardly want you to explain anything further given your propensity for inaccuracies. And given that you are a stickler for using the correct terminology, Colombia would be classified as a "developing nation," and one quite far along when compared to others in the same class. From Investipedia:
"Colombia meets every criterion of an emerging market economy. Its GDP per capita, at $6,428.676 as of 2019, falls well below the developed country threshold but ranks much higher than most of its peers in the developing world. 65279; Its 2020 HDI was 0.767; again, insufficient for a developed country but not far behind."
[URL]https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/090915/colombia-emerging-market-economy.asp[/URL]#text=Colombia%20 meets%20 every%20 criterion%20 of, country%20 but%20 not%20 far%20 behind.
[QUOTE=Osteoknot;2683850]Comparing the poor people in Colombia where the poverty rate is at least eight times higher than in the USA is also full of pitfalls. In a nutshell, poverty is the exception to the rule in North America, while here in Colombia, poverty rules. Very different socioeconomic culture. [/QUOTE]Not even close. The poverty rate for Colombia according to measures from 2019 was 35.7 percent. That's far from "eight times" the US rate of about 11%. It's also far from demonstrating that "poverty rules" in Colombia as such exists among a minority. Do some research rather than pontificating conclusions based on the places where you spend your time, Botero Plaza El Centro Medellin, $8 barrio hotels, etc. Such is an obligation of someone with the educational attainments that you claim to have.
[URL]https://databank.worldbank.org/data/download/poverty/987B9C90-CB9F-4D93-AE8C-750588BF00QA/AM2020/Global_POVEQ_COL.pdf[/URL]
[QUOTE=DramaFree11;2683949]Nope, I was there 91 days and hated. Sorry, MDE is glorified GTO. Most of the major cities in Mxico are so much better then MDE.[/QUOTE]Paulie is attacking you because you have posted bad stuff about Biden. Just put him on ignore.
[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2684047]Women trip me out with shit like that. I always ask well what happened to the last man you dated that was not "a man like that?" If it was all that then you would still be together. So maybe it does not matter as much as you think. Maybe you need to stop being selfish and you can stay with someone. That gets them thinking.
Yesterday my girl in Philippines asked me to marry her. Uhhh, No. I guess it was worth a try though.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I think we have different views on money. I had this stunning wife and as soon as I made good money, she was like, "I can be a witch now because a divorce is going to cost you". Because my wife was a witch, I did not have the incentive to save money because she was going to get half of it. That is why guys do not get a divorce. In my case, I felt like it would be hard on my son and I would have lost a lot. The thing about the ex was not only did she not deserve half because she was draining me emotionally and financially.
I had a friend tell me "she really loves you a lot". In fact, she said it the last time I talked to her, and she still looks good. Putting up with a woman like this who "loves me and is not just there for money" was worse than anything. I enjoyed being around my SBs. I could not stand being around my ex, and I still cannot. She is mad at herself for blowing it with me and takes it out on me.
So with both the women, the one I had a "date" with and your chick who was asking about marriage, I would throw both in the trash. That gal asking for marriage is telling me she is a ho. The gal I was with I wanted to say to, "Honey, you are not that great. You are not worthy my monogamy. Even more so, you are not worth my time. This date was charity. You have a massively inflated opinion of your self-worth."
So maybe Mr. E you can put up with these crazy witches and keep the money in your pocket. I just cannot, and my take on money is much different than yours, and I will make it a different post.
Translation key:
Sugar baby = ho.
Seeking girl = ho.
Student = ho.
Semi-pro = ho.
Part-timer = ho.
Greedy ex-wife = ho.
Ho, ho, ho. Merry Christmas. That's the difference between Tiger Woods and Santa Claus. Santa stops after three hos.