Stupid shit in Medellin

[QUOTE=Villainy;2685644]Apparently you didn't read the news. Christine Blasey Ford didn't accuse Kavanaugh of rape, she accused him of sexual assault. (you couldn't even spell his name, no wonder you didn't know the facts). She was 15 and he was drunk and assaulted her. [B]"The story wasn't cooked up"[/B]. Ford apparently talked about the incident in 2012 with a therapist. (6 years before Kavanaugh was nominated) and later presented the session notes to support her claims. She also took a polygraph which was administered by a former FBI agent who concluded that Ford was being honest when attesting to the accuracy of her allegations[/QUOTE]Appears you have subscripted to revisionist history or Democrats' talking points. The therapist's notes did not include Kavanaugh's name, only students "from an elitist boys' school". She didn't recall what year it supposingly happened, nor where it happened. The results of the polygraph test concluded that Ford was being truthful when she said a statement summarizing her allegations was accurate, not the actual allegations. The statement used by the former FBI agent hasn't been made public. Were the allegations what she told her therapist in 2012 or what she told her attorney in 2018?

[QUOTE=FunLuvr;2685701]Appears you have [B]subscripted[/B] to revisionist history or Democrats' talking points. The therapist's notes did not include Kavanaugh's name, only students "from an elitist boys' school". She didn't recall what year it supposingly happened, nor where it happened. [B]The results of the polygraph test concluded that Ford was being truthful when she said a statement summarizing her allegations was accurate,[/B] not the actual allegations. The statement used by the former FBI agent hasn't been made public. Were the allegations what she told her therapist in 2012 or what she told her attorney in 2018?[/QUOTE]Well thanks for your version of reality. BTW what is subscripted? So she disclosed the assault to a therapist in 2012, more than 30 years after it happened. You say that she didn't disclose the name of the boy who assaulted her in their therapy session? She was very clear on what year it happened it was the date she was unclear about. If you read the totality of the Wikipedia article you see that she did disclose the polygraph results and the former FBI agent's evaluation.

So let's see if we can summarize what really happened:

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford grew up on the East coast and her parents were registered Republicans. She claims that she was sexually assaulted at a party she attended when she was 15 years old.

She claims Brett Kavanaugh was the boy who assaulted her. She later went on to earn Bachelor's, Master's and a PhD degrees. Since 1998 she worked as a research psychologist and biostatistician at the Stanford School of Medicine. Since 2011 she has taught Psychology at a collaborative program between Palo Alto University and Stanford. In 2012 Dr. Ford attended couples therapy with her husband and during these sessions disclosed the sexual assault. The therapist didn't include the boys name but Dr. Ford's husband recalls that his name was disclosed in the sessions.

Dr. Ford disclosed the incident to Senator Diane Feinstein after Kavanaugh was nominated to become an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. [B]She stated in the letter that she expected her story to be kept confidential.[/B] She took a polygraph test that was administered by a former FBI agent, who concluded Ford was being truthful.

Here is where the story gets really seedy (in my opinion). A little later a periodical reported (without using Ford's name) that Feinstein was withholding a document from Judiciary Committee members. Obviously the only person who knew other than Dr. Ford and her husband and the former FBI agent was Senator Feinstein. I wonder who leaked the story?

Feinstein referred Dr. Ford's letter to the FBI. Who in turn sent the letter to the White House who in turn sent the letter to the full Judiciary Committee. The FBI was asked to further investigate but did not conduct another polygraph test. They could have but chose not to. I wonder if they really wanted to uncover the truth? In all fairness, it might not have been possible to positively prove what happened one night 35 years ago.

So, now a woman who was married with two children with a very successful career was pressured into testifying when she never wanted to endure that process. During that time she was threatened, verbally attacked and forced to hire security to protect herself and her family. Oh yeah, it's 4 years later and she hasn't written a book.

So I guess if you are a partisan Republican this all seems made up. But what was her motive?

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2685694]When you are really in love, money does not matter, just making the woman happy does and vice versa.[/QUOTE]Meanwhile you are using your money to make that woman happy. Don't pay that rent in Cartagena and see how in love you guys really are.

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2685849]Meanwhile you are using your money to make that woman happy. Don't pay that rent in Cartagena and see how in love you guys really are.[/QUOTE]We all pay, even my buddy Elvis. Some pay more sone pay less. The key, to find an arrangement that all parties are happy.

I have sone super rich clients that are married. Trust me they pay and probably a hell lot more then me.

[QUOTE=DramaFree11;2685855]We all pay, even my buddy Elvis. Some pay more sone pay less. The key, to find an arrangement that all parties are happy.

I have sone super rich clients that are married. Trust me they pay and probably a hell lot more then me.[/QUOTE]All these posts about "falling" deeply in love with 3rd world putas via total commitment on a mongering site (no less) not a shrinks couch is deeply disturbing.

I will even say creepy!

Even worse than JKs.

"I don't seek them out. But if a girl is sexy, why exclude her? Why be prejudiced against someone based on what some doctor said 20 years ago?

So what if the doctor says she is dead? Not really dead? Just dead for a couple days, dead? Or what if he says "she" is actually a puppy? Or cat? Donkey? Take you pick.

As some like to say around here, its your dick and your money!

[QUOTE=Villainy;2685825]Well thanks for your version of reality. BTW what is subscripted? So she disclosed the assault to a therapist in 2012, more than 30 years after it happened. You say that she didn't disclose the name of the boy who assaulted her in their therapy session? She was very clear on what year it happened it was the date she was unclear about. If you read the totality of the Wikipedia article you see that she did disclose the polygraph results and the former FBI agent's evaluation.

So let's see if we can summarize what really happened:

Dr. Christine Blasey Ford grew up on the East coast and her parents were registered Republicans. She claims that she was sexually assaulted at a party she attended when she was 15 years old.

She claims Brett Kavanaugh was the boy who assaulted her. She later went on to earn Bachelor's, Master's and a PhD degrees. Since 1998 she worked as a research psychologist and biostatistician at the Stanford School of Medicine. Since 2011 she has taught Psychology at a collaborative program between Palo Alto University and Stanford. In 2012 Dr. Ford attended couples therapy with her husband and during these sessions disclosed the sexual assault. The therapist didn't include the boys name but Dr. Ford's husband recalls that his name was disclosed in the sessions.

Dr. Ford disclosed the incident to Senator Diane Feinstein after Kavanaugh was nominated to become an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. [B]She stated in the letter that she expected her story to be kept confidential.[/B] She took a polygraph test that was administered by a former FBI agent, who concluded Ford was being truthful.

Here is where the story gets really seedy (in my opinion). A little later a periodical reported (without using Ford's name) that Feinstein was withholding a document from Judiciary Committee members. Obviously the only person who knew other than Dr. Ford and her husband and the former FBI agent was Senator Feinstein. I wonder who leaked the story?[/QUOTE]You really think 36 years later, 36 fucking years later! That Kavanaugh as a 17 year old kid! Should be held accountable because he tried to take this girls clothes off? Even if you could prove he did it, which you can't, or anyone can, and the law has stated there is no sufficient evidence to ever bring charges against him. You really still think this guy should not be a Supreme Court Justice? You not even for a second don't think this is just a Democratic led smear campaign? You spend your life paying for sex which is illegal in the USA, yet because a 17 year old kid tried to take a 15 year old girls clothes off, 36 years later you want charges brought against him? Dude, no and I mean no one with half a brain can even come close to taking that serious. There are many Democrats who have twisted hearts because they cannot cope with their own transgressions from their own personal societal failures which they have no one to blame but themselves and are thus incapable of trying to assess situations like these without extreme bias, those Democrats who advocate for smear campaigns like these are destroying the country. The extremists on both sides, "much more so in my opinion on the Democratic side" have split the country in two and weakened it significantly and until people learn to eliminate their bias and start trying to advocate for policies which are productive and useful, then the country will continue to weaken and fail. As we have seen since Biden has been in office, when the USA weakens and fails, Evil around the world begins to thrive again. Look at how crime has risen across America. That NYC subway shooter had been arrested 12 times and yet he was free to walk the streets due to policies advocated for by Democrats who only want to win votes rather than focus on what is healthy for their communities.

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2685865]All these posts about "falling" deeply in love with 3rd world putas via total commitment on a mongering site (no less) not a shrinks couch is deeply disturbing.

I will even say creepy!

Even worse than JKs.

"I don't seek them out. But if a girl is sexy, why exclude her? Why be prejudiced against someone based on what some doctor said 20 years ago?

So what if the doctor says she is dead? Not really dead? Just dead for a couple days, dead? Or what if he says "she" is actually a puppy? Or cat? Donkey? Take you pick.

As some like to say around here, its your dick and your money![/QUOTE]Yes, but I think what Elvis is saying is being love is not a bad thing.

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2685849]Meanwhile you are using your money to make that woman happy. Don't pay that rent in Cartagena and see how in love you guys really are.[/QUOTE]Mr. E, I did not pay her rent the first 6 months when she lived in Bogota. She was living on Covid pay. She had the chance at a new job in a city where I would see her much less. Was this a tact to get money out of me and pay her rent? Maybe, but if it was, the offer was a bargain, a whopping $500 a month. Anything above that $500 was my choice. If my gal was in NYC and selling herself, she would get that in half an hour.

That said, her brother passed us by in a nice car. We went to a nice sushi place and split the bill. My part was like $30. He told us about his upcoming trips to Orlando and Spain. Her mother lives in an apartment a few blocks from us in the same nice neighborhood, and you are implying a gal like this can be bought for $500 a month? LOL. You are nuts.

Yeah, you are right. If I cut her off, she would leave, but it would be because the action is cruel. You could say the same about her and sex though right? And your point is what? What is the point of cutting off someone I care about or who she cares about? To prove to people like you that what we have is real? No thanks. You can see that in a second.

If you are making a lot more than your partner, DF is right, you will be paying for it. Why would you not want your partner to live in more comfort? Still, you are looking at from a man's perspective. It is scary to be dependent on one other person and it is an honor for her to trust me to care for her. Even now, there are no asks for money, no pushing for marriage, no demands. She is preparing to be independent, and I support her doing so. She should have the skills to get a great job if something were to happen to me.

And supporting her was not easy for me. I talked to my friends about it, and they were unanimous in telling me to support a good woman. They were all like, "You would never get that quality here. She is worth it. " Like I said, they have seen me speak with her via video chat, seen the video of her bringing me cake and balloons at the airport for my birthday. They see what we have is real.

So let me turn that around. You have not found a woman you are willing to spend $500 a month to support? What does that say about you? And what does that say about the women you meet?

[QUOTE=DramaFree11;2685855]We all pay, even my buddy Elvis. Some pay more sone pay less. The key, to find an arrangement that all parties are happy.

I have sone super rich clients that are married. Trust me they pay and probably a hell lot more then me.[/QUOTE]No we do not all pay. That is a cliche. If you are paying then it is because you are choosing to pay, not because you have to pay. Nothing wrong with a paid arrangement, but some people mistake their paid arrangement for love.

Funny that a topic today in a facebook group that I am in is:
Ladies: Why is it that most women feel theyre giving the gift of sex when its a mutual act, and in a lot of cases women want it just as much as we do(men)?

One woman answered: Because men look at pussy as a prize and women took that and ran with it.

That is absolutely what I see in the ISG threads. For some reason guys look at pussy as a prize greater than themselves that they must win or pay for in some kind of way. In other words they put pussy on a pedestal and deem themselves only worthy of it if they use money.

[QUOTE=Villainy;2685825]She was very clear on what year it happened it was the date she was unclear about.[/QUOTE]The Washington Post reported "She said she believes it occurred in the summer of 1982, when she was 15, around the end of her sophomore year at the all-girls Holton-Arms School in Bethesda. ".

[QUOTE=Villainy;2685825]If you read the totality of the Wikipedia article you see that she did disclose the polygraph results and the former FBI agent's evaluation.[/QUOTE]Do you know the source of what is on Wikipedia? It is users' reports. One of the original founders of Wikipedia recently said it has become a liberal-biased site. It most likely was her attorney, who told her to take the polygraph, who disclosed the results.

[QUOTE=Villainy;2685825]Dr. Christine Blasey Ford grew up on the East coast and her parents were registered Republicans.[/QUOTE]She is and has been a life-long registered Democrat.

[QUOTE=Villainy;2685825]She claims Brett Kavanaugh was the boy who assaulted her. She later went on to earn Bachelor's, Master's and a PhD degrees.[/QUOTE]That is not true. Her first claim that it was Kavanaugh, if you want to believe her husband, was in 2012. That was after she earned those degrees.

[QUOTE=Villainy;2685825]Here is where the story gets really seedy (in my opinion). A little later a periodical reported (without using Ford's name) that Feinstein was withholding a document from Judiciary Committee members. Obviously the only person who knew other than Dr. Ford and her husband and the former FBI agent was Senator Feinstein. I wonder who leaked the story?[/QUOTE]I don't have to wonder. It was obviously Sen. Feinstein. And she did it just before the confirmation hearing was scheduled to close, after all committee investigations were completed.

[QUOTE=Villainy;2685825]So I guess if you are a partisan Republican this all seems made up. But what was her motive?[/QUOTE]Her motive was to prevent Kavanaugh from being on the Supreme Court.

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2685888]No we do not all pay. That is a cliche. If you are paying then it is because you are choosing to pay, not because you have to pay. Nothing wrong with a paid arrangement, but some people mistake their paid arrangement for love.

Funny that a topic today in a facebook group that I am in is:
Ladies: Why is it that most women feel theyre giving the gift of sex when its a mutual act, and in a lot of cases women want it just as much as we do(men)?

One woman answered: Because men look at pussy as a prize and women took that and ran with it.

That is absolutely what I see in the ISG threads. For some reason guys look at pussy as a prize greater than themselves that they must win or pay for in some kind of way. In other words they put pussy on a pedestal and deem themselves only worthy of it if they use money.[/QUOTE]Well, you're well-entrenched on this site, and you pay for it. Right? So, why are you here (with your thousands of posts), and why do you pay for it too then? Not that I believe you put pussy on a pedestal. You don't. But you do pay for it too, and yet you seem to be critical of those who use the site when you yourself are one of the most prolific posters of all time here. You know what they say. We are the company we keep.

[QUOTE=DramaFree11;2685883]Yes, but I think what Elvis is saying is being love is not a bad thing.[/QUOTE]"Yes, but I think what Elvis is saying is being love is not a bad thing".

With whom? 3rd world putas met online?

And look at the divorce rate, and I believe 80% of them are filed by the females ROTFLMMFAO.

Being in "romantic love" for females is usually a pretty "good deal".

For modern men its an archaic con game, that only the lamest betas still engage.

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2685888]No we do not all pay. That is a cliche. If you are paying then it is because you are choosing to pay, not because you have to pay. Nothing wrong with a paid arrangement, but some people mistake their paid arrangement for love.

Funny that a topic today in a facebook group that I am in is:
Ladies: Why is it that most women feel theyre giving the gift of sex when its a mutual act, and in a lot of cases women want it just as much as we do(men)?

One woman answered: Because men look at pussy as a prize and women took that and ran with it.

That is absolutely what I see in the ISG threads. For some reason guys look at pussy as a prize greater than themselves that they must win or pay for in some kind of way. In other words they put pussy on a pedestal and deem themselves only worthy of it if they use money.[/QUOTE]We all pay, in on form or another. Some are in denial.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2685884]So let me turn that around. You have not found a woman you are willing to spend $500 a month to support? What does that say about you? And what does that say about the women you meet?[/QUOTE]That says I am no dummy and that the women I meet are adults that are miraculously able to support themselves. My own daughter is 25 and asks me for nothing. You think I am fool enough to monetarily support some other grown woman? Hell no. Not my style. But more power to whoever sees fit to do it.

I have always said you guys do it to yourselves. You volunteer to support these women, then when she or you want to call it quits you find yourself in court with her saying well he always paid for everything and the judge decides well he needs to keep paying for everything in that case. Then you want to talk bad about the woman and the system when it was you that dug your own grave by playing Cake Daddy in the first place.

[QUOTE=DramaFree11;2685919]We all pay, in on form or another. Some are in denial.[/QUOTE]There are costs but that is not the same as paying. I had to buy a car, gas, insurance, tag all to have a way to get to work. So why am I going to work since evidently to you that means I had to pay to have a job. I am not giving my job money the same as I am not giving a woman who is not a hooker money. So yes there are costs to everything, but that does not mean one is paying for that which they are partaking.