Beautiful Moments in History...
[QUOTE=Mr Enternational;2857621]Yes and the majority of them were White. Do you think the movement would have gone anywhere without the White majority? [/QUOTE]
Congratulations, I see it took you a while though, to consult [b]the real[/b] history books. Yes, what a beautiful "Kum-ba-yah" moment it is, when people throughout history come together to, [b]"DO the RIGHT THING",[/b] and turn a so called "fantasyland" idea/movement into REALITY.
Although again, just to be clear, [b]black leadership[/b] was very prominent in the movement:
[QUOTE=History Channel]...Most [u]early abolitionists[/u] were white, religious Americans, but some of the [u]most prominent leaders of the movement[/u] were also Black men (ie. [b]Frederick Douglass[/b]) and women (ie. [b]Harriet Tubman[/b]) who had escaped from bondage. ... helping escaped enslaved people reach the North via the Underground Railroad network...
[b]Abolitionist Movement[/b]
[URL]https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/abolitionist-movement[/URL][/QUOTE]
But good on you and your [i]"coming to Jesus moment"[/i], with regards to [b]the facts[/b] and having the courage to admit it.
[QUOTE=Mr Enternational;2857621]It would have been dead in the water pimp.[/QUOTE]
As for the "pimp" aspect of your post, well that was nice of you to say, but I think [b]someone else[/b] on these Brazilian forums, has taken claim to that name and I would hate for you to offend and [u]pis-s off more[/u] ISGers, with [u]more[/u] unfounded claims and [u]more[/u] misplaced name calling.
So while calling me "pimp", may have been well-intentioned (methinks NOT), I'm afraid you'll ONLY upset that other ISGer, who truly and most assuredly loves being called, "a pimp".
Once again, 'twas good of you to provide the correction to the forum and [b]kudos for you brushing up on your Black History[/b], and it ain't even February yet. (...kkkk!)
What a beautiful moment in your history that most have been, for you?
Hypocrisy of "the ask"...
[QUOTE=Axel Heyst;2894008]Hey Spidy,
Please keep the political shit in the American politics or the stupid thread where it belongs. There is no legitimate reason to contaminate this thread or any other with political bias of any kind. It will only lead to pointless arguments and hatred.[/QUOTE]
Okay so I was asked, to take my Brazilian politics over to the "Stupid Shit in Brazil" thread. So here I am...hooray! But let's not get ahead of ourselves!
If ONLY that is, to highlight the hypocrisy behind said [b][i]"ask".[/i][/b] BTW, FWIW to be clear, my Brazilian eco-social politics, were appropriately posted in the correct thread, IMHO. But yes, this can always be somewhat very subjective.
Anywho, to be honest, [i]"the ask"[/i], if it were NOT for the hypocrisy, it would have been a fair ask, for the most part.
But when you "ask" of others to stop doing, when you yourself, have criticize other people's politics as "shit" and/or politicize other works of art/tv shows as [b]"woke dumb",[/b] you are being a hypocrite and a political hypocrite at that!
[QUOTE=Axel Heyst;2890118] [b]Time out for the Arts[/b] ...
Avoid the 1st Season of White Lotus at all costs, however. KKK. [b]It was [u]woke dumb.[/u][/b] I mean really dumb shit.[/QUOTE]
Really though, does the "woke arts" and "woke TV Shows" talk, belong in the Rio Thread?
Don't get me wrong, you're entitled to your [b]"woke/anti-work"[/b] opinions (as am I) and as such, they are welcomed anytime you wish, in a debate/discussion, w/r to any such arguments you care to bring to the table on such topics.
But don't tell me, [b][i]"There is no legitimate reason to contaminate this thread or any other with political bias of any kind. It will only lead to pointless arguments and hatred.",[/i][/b] when you're doing exactly the same thing in another thread.
BTW, perhaps [u]YOU cannot[/u], but I can perfectly carry a civilized debate/discussion (political or otherwise), without supposed said "hatred" or "animosity", to my fellow ISGers/debaters.
As for the [b][i]"pointless arguments"[/i][/b] and [b][i]"contamination"[/i][/b], I will leave that up to you.
My last communique to the hater
Let's see. I checked your recent posts on ISG. It took me around 30 seconds and guess what? Only 2 out your last 60 posts on the International Sex forum have anything to do with girls or travel. And those 2 posts were not original reports containing any useful information to be passed on to fellow members but were merely thanks for posting types to the original BM's. In other words, less than 3% of your output in the last 3 months have anything to do with mongering and 97% of your posts are political diatribes and personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with you. And so, true to your nature, you attack me for what? Posting an honest film review? Go fxxx yourself little man.
By the way, to put it in context, my mentioning of "White Lotus" came about thanks to an ongoing conversation I was having with another BM who had recommended several books by a famous Brazilian author that happened to have working girls in the story lines. I brought up the work of Federico Fellini, one of the greatest film directors of all time, who had prostitute characters in 4 of his master works including "Nights of Cabiria" (1957) which feature a prostitute with a heart of gold as the main character.
Then to bring conversation back up to the present time, I mentioned and gave a favorable review to White Lotus 2nd season which had 2 delightful Sicilian prostitute characters featured in that story line. But not to mislead anyone, I mentioned that the 1st season of "White Lotus" sucked ie it was not so good due to its "wokeness" because I didn't want to mislead anyone into seeing the 1st season based on my positive review of the 2nd season. Got it? So, instead of attacking me, you should be thanking me for turning you on to "White Lotus" 1st season. The story line is right up your alley. You are welcome, A-hole.
Lastly, do I have to remind you that the name of this forum is the "International Sex Forum" and that its main reason for its existence and popularity is that it provides a space where heterosexual men (mongers) can exchange stories, reviews, trip reports, girly information, insights, and travel info related to OUR favorite sport. The key defining words: sex between heterosexual men (XY) and natural born girls (XX). Hence this website is anti-woke by its very nature. In fact, one of the rules of the ISG is no posts are allowed relating to ladyboys or Trannys, no reports on tranny sex, tranny brothels, massage parlors, escorts or their procurement of any kind. Did you miss the memo?
Obviously, you support the tenants of Wokism since you attack anyone who opposes the Woke doctrine or even mentions Wokism in a passing, negative light. This is very interesting because one of the fundamental tenants of Wokism is that there is no difference between a man and woman. That any man (XY) or boy (XY) can be a woman (XX) or girl (XX) whenever he or she feels like it. Nature has nothing to say on the subject. Nature is irrelevant. KKK. Thus, a man can compete in woman's sports, shower in girl's high school bathrooms, and 3rd parties are encouraged to indoctrinate minors in grade school with this insane ideology and even give minors sex changing hormones at a very early age all without parental approval. It is truly shameful! P.S. The Wokes insist on changing the English vocabulary to eliminate what they consider offensive pronouns like "he" or "she". Did I miss anything?
So once again, I ask, what the fuck is a Woke ideologue believer like yourself doing on the International Sex Forum posting nothing but radical left wing talking points and attacking anyone who disagrees with you? And simultaneously never posting personal trip report or reviews that have anything related to heterosexual mongering? It is a fair question and before you launch another one of your personal attacks at me, I will add that you know nada about me. For all you know, I may have scores of ladyboy sexual romps in my more than 30-year experience in Thailand. 555/ KKK. You know nada. So, I will end this, my final communique to you, with one more fact: when a monger asks a BKK Sukhumvit ladyboy street walker if she is a girl, 99% of the time the ladyboy will say no, she is not a girl. Ha Ha! Ladyboys apparently have a firmer grip on reality than American Wokes.