This is why we call you a nurse here on ISG. Because not even a wannabe doctor educated partly through fake facts would not know about CRISPR in 2018. Or maybe it was in 2019. I cannot remember.
Printable View
This is why we call you a nurse here on ISG. Because not even a wannabe doctor educated partly through fake facts would not know about CRISPR in 2018. Or maybe it was in 2019. I cannot remember.
[QUOTE=Mursenary;2552630]Question. Are you an anti Vaxxer? Or just against the covid ones?[/QUOTE]I'm NOT against vaccinations and I'm vaxxed against the 'normal' things like Polio, Smallpox and Measles.
There are however thoroughly tested vaccines, unlike the EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation.) Covid "vaccines" which have barely been tested.
Polio, Smallpox and Measles are serious diseases, however Covid19 is mostly no problem for people around my (young) age and has a 0,15% Infectious Mortality Rate for people under 70, so why should I get vaxxed with some experimental drug? To make Big Pharma companies richer? So that corrupt politicians can please their Big Pharma lobbyists?
[QUOTE=PaulInZurich;2552616]Out of 80 million fully vaccinated people in the US, how many got reinfected?[/QUOTE]We'll find out in autumn when the flu season starts and the Covid19 virus has spent all summer mutating.
[QUOTE=RockyV;2552629]And yet after more than 1 year of this shit there are still people who don't know the difference between testing positive for Covid-19 and developing Covid-19 disease. These people also don't understand that the lockdown measures are only meant to avoid the saturation of hospital ICU beds and, therefore, if people would only test positive without developing the disease, there would be no need for lockdowns. The same people also think that the vaccine will provide you with a Star-Trek-like energy barrier that will not make you come into contact with the virus. Wow![/QUOTE]1) Hospitals in Germany never got close to being overwhelmed.
2) The media and politicians mark "positively tested" people are "infected" even though they have no symptoms, and they use this as a scaremongering basis for their "measures. " You can't move the goalposts by now suggesting that 'it's no big deal if they don't display the symptoms. ' If it's no big deal then why have we people quarantining asymptomatic yet "PCR positive" people for 2 weeks since January last year? So are you now finally admitting that Covid19 is a big hoax?
P.S. As a matter of fact, this is exactly what Geert vanden Bossche is warning for: vaccinated (but not necessarily symptomatic) people are shedding a more dangerous and mutated virus. Watch his videos and learn!
[QUOTE=PaulInZurich;2552616]Out of 80 million fully vaccinated people in the US, how many got reinfected?[/QUOTE]Another question is if the elderly residents became symptomatic and to what degree. Data collection is a middle step of scientific reasoning. Conclusions made when comparing data to background information is the end goal.
[QUOTE=Pistons;2552602]I have a question to the wannabe gang of nurses and Satan spawns here:
How does it feel to be called out regarding your 0 knowledge about quantum biology?
I noticed a certain amount of silence after my posts about it.
Are you clueless, or are you just clueless nobodies with absolute no balls?[/QUOTE]Basically you're constantly throwing random arguments to flood the thread and I don't have the time or the will to read all of them. And you never answered the real question, actually you're constantly dodging it: where does your 8 % figure comes from, why is it never related to your sources and why is it so different from all the figures from the real agencies: around 1 death for one million of injections.
[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2552689]I'm NOT against vaccinations and I'm vaxxed against the 'normal' things like Polio, Smallpox and Measles.
There are however thoroughly tested vaccines, unlike the EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation.) Covid "vaccines" which have barely been tested.
Polio, Smallpox and Measles are serious diseases, however Covid19 is mostly no problem for people around my (young) age and has a 0,15% Infectious Mortality Rate for people under 70, so why should I get vaxxed with some experimental drug? To make Big Pharma companies richer? So that corrupt politicians can please their Big Pharma lobbyists?[/QUOTE]Yeah, I thought so. Just checking. Thanks for clarifying!
[QUOTE=Pessimist;2552651]I am 44, will be 45 soon; I was 38 six years ago, I will be 50 in 6 years. Age is THE most predictable, forecast-able number. I was not celebrating 6 years ago nor will I be despondent in 6; but your posts are littered with references to your age. Not particularly an accomplishment that you worked hard to achieve. And for someone who lectures profusely about race and other woke ideas, you exhibit a generous amount of ageism. It would behoove you to reflect on it. Ageism is a much bigger blight in today's corporate, workplace America than race is and any number of 55+ crowd can tell you that from personal experiences.
As for accumulating wealth. The toughest part of doing so is showing the requisite financial discipline, in addition to obviously earning sufficient amounts annually. It is meaningless to claim that one can get to 7 or 8 figures if only one did x, why, and z. When it is exactly those x, y, z that are tough to pull off. The median 401 K balances are much less than $100 K for every age bracket and keep in mind many people don't even have a 401 K or barely fund it. Warren Buffett is not the smartest guy in the world, far from it, it is even possible that there are dozens of super sharp 20 something analysts at elite hedge funds that have more raw IQ horsepower than Buffett does, but none of them will ever get to his wealth level 60 years from now.[/QUOTE]If I came across as bragging about my age, that was never my intent. 38 means healthy but in decline and old enough to be the fathers of girls you could legally fuck. But I do enjoy being in a position of "older peer" by the younger generation while also seasoned enough to be taken seriously by older ones.
But perhaps I stated some realities that a 25 year old would less likely be attracted to a 50 year old than a 38 year old. Likewise, I wouldn't be offended if someone said that 25 year olds would more likely be attracted to 31 year olds than 38 year olds nearing 40. I like my age but wouldn't mind being younger as to have a better shot of banging nonpro 25 year olds. #Realites.
But to protest your assertion describing me with the tendencies of the "woke, justice warrior" trope, let me clarify my position on the social justice warrior spectrum. It's my belief that within specific societies, some races enjoy higher perceived social value than others, unearned social value tends to lead to some tangible benefits, some races also shoot themselves in the foot by scapegoating injustices too much, some injustices are real, racist jokes are funny, activists are often annoying as fuck, activists are sometimes needed for progress, the average Muslim does not support terrorism, Islam is still one of the dumber world religions, Old people are some of the most valuable members of society, but I will keep using terms like Boomer lightheartedly, and regarding your objections to that term, "Fuck your feelings".
I disagree that the blueprint to 7 figures is meaningless because x, y, z is "tough" to pull off. Tough is subjective. In my subjective view, not purchasing a half million dollar home, not buying the brand new $70 K car, not opting for the Marriott when an Ibis (or a large rental car) is all I need, those are easy decisions for me. I understand that many people make different choices but I have a hard time personally understanding how those decisions are "tough". As a westerner myself, I don't think most westerners know what tough really is.
But instead of just saying that is tough, perhaps most people are actually just bad at math and have never mapped out their finances calculating the power of power of compound interest. I bet if retirement planning was a mandatory high school course, the median net worth would be orders of magnitude higher.
[QUOTE=PaulInZurich;2552502]Funny you write about "real facts" yet you never post anything else than your ramblings without anything to back them up.
It was never a matter of discussion if they speak French in the Romandie. Again you change the subject since you have zero facts behind your "opinions."
After claiming for years that you were not speeding in Switzerland, you yourself said that you were speeding, you got several fines in the mail that you just ignored. Then you wondered when once you got pulled over by the police. The links show to anybody who cares about facts in this situation that: the Swiss law holds the owner of the car responsible for fines, that this was litigated in Swiss Federal Court and even more so that several other countries as well hold the owner of the car responsible for fines (unless the owner credibly identifies the driver), that a similar law in Netherlands was litigated up to the European Court of Human Rights.
Now you start rambling how you know lawyers. Funny that you didn't use any of these lawyers when you claim that your human rights are violated. Maybe these lawyers told you something about credibility. You know, when somebody's first five claims are proven wrong, nobody believes any other claim.[/QUOTE]Swiss administration don't let you give a call, I had to insult them for 2 days to get only one, when I disappeared like in China, but you can't know when you never experienced. At least, I was there, in Aarau, then Zurich police prison, then Meylin, don't they exist? Same like Gran San Bernardino to climb turning legs.
[QUOTE=Mursenary;2552635]Is France a religious country?[/QUOTE]Many French believe in religion, not all being catholic, I think I m more close to devil.
[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2552689]P.S. As a matter of fact, this is exactly what Geert vanden Bossche is warning for: vaccinated (but not necessarily symptomatic) people are shedding a more dangerous and mutated virus. Watch his videos and learn![/QUOTE]And why doesn't it happen with Smallpox, polio, measles? Any arguments?
[QUOTE=Pistons;2552683]I But I already wrote it twice here that France is a catholic country.
Calling France is a religious country means slightly something else. That was not my words. But the society in France and its laws are highly shaped Catholicism. And so they still are a catholic country.[/QUOTE]It was true one century ago. Not anymore. France is not Poland.
So the risk from dying from a general anasthetic is about 8 x larger. Wow. And BTW: it is mostly women younger 50 years.
[QUOTE=BigBuddy69;2552696]Basically you're constantly throwing random arguments to flood the thread and I don't have the time or the will to read all of them. And you never answered the real question, actually you're constantly dodging it: where does your 8 % figure comes from, why is it never related to your sources and why is it so different from all the figures from the real agencies: around 1 death for one million of injections.[/QUOTE]
Simple:
* clubs will be obligated to check if you have been vaxxed, so that you cannot infect anybody else.
otherwise:
* you will not be given entrance..
[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2552689]Covid19 is mostly no problem for people around my (young) age and has a 0,15% Infectious Mortality Rate for people under 70, so why should I get vaxxed with some experimental drug? [/QUOTE]
People who do not have backgrounds in molecular biology do not know that CRISPR was a term that was around before its association with gene editing.
Prior to 2010, CRISPR was a molecular biology term used to describe genetic elements and processes involved in a bacteria's immune system against viruses. Only in the last several years did the use of the term CRISPR shift to refer to gene editing and become associated with clinical human therapies.
Many medical doctors today still have yet to take the time to simply google CRISPR gene editing because it still has yet to gain federal approval for therapeutic use. Therapies for sickle cell and thalassemias are still in clinical trials.
With all of the continuing education required to keep up with latest protocols, pharmaceuticals, interventions, billing, and legalities, most actively practicing clinicians would find little benefit in educating themselves in something that was so far down the pipeline.
At this current stage, knowledge about CRISPR has more use for me in financial investment than actual professional practice.
The knowledge deficit in didactic education will inevitably change and it is likely that medical students today are already getting some introductory education on the subject.
One day CRISPR will be incorporated in medical practice, likely outpatient first. Until then, I'll just throw more money into ARK Invest's ARK Genomics ETF.
[QUOTE=Kuni042;2552738]So the risk from dying from a general anasthetic is about 8 x larger. Wow. And BTW: it is mostly women younger 50 years.[/QUOTE]Higher Estrogen levels are already a risk factor for coagulation, possibly / likely also for CSVT. Women taking oral contraceptives or on menopause hormone replacement brings even more risk to that demographic. Considering that, any vaccination process stimulates the immune response which only increases coagulation events in the body, the combinatory effects of higher estrogen and increased inflammation in immune response can very well be deemed a contraindication.
But then again, the 1 per million CSVT incidence is still much less than the 4-5 per million seen in the general population.
I think I broke Piston's heart when I told him that I didn't want to be his friend in real life. Poor baby. He'll find a friend one day.
Life is short guys. Surround yourselves with people who bring value to the table.