FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

[QUOTE=Craiova;1748543] So when the management changed at Sharks around one and a half year ago the new CEO had some strange new ideas... She told me the new CEO called her and other girls with regular clients and long time bookings and explained he doesn't want anymore long time bookings. The girls should do more 50 euro rooms.[/QUOTE]This might have been a serious consideration 2 years ago under the new management, but the longtime bookings are still very popular if you think of Sandra, Dina, Janine, Mia, Aurelia and some more.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1748457]
When it comes to body, I think her posture was not what I liked, not what I think of as feminine posture(same for the interaction). I personally am not into overly skinny which another person think is just perfect. Janine isn't skinny, but not really erotic when it comes to how her body figure looks at initial glance. Then again hard to tell since she's usually just sitting there.[/QUOTE]PL,

Gratuitous rambling negativity about a girl you haven't fucked (or have you? If your English was just a little worse, I would think it was a Sirioja post. LOL For me, her body was not so perfect, that I simply had to do her. However definitely one of the very good looking girls. I remember we had Janine mania on the forum for a while. I can't criticise her too much since I haven't sessioned and haven't even chatted to her.

There are hundreds of girls that don't appeal to you or to me. I guess she gets singled out because acts differently and seems to be wasting her good looks. If she wants to waste a lot of time chatting to her favourite guys, why should we care?

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1748677]PL,

Gratuitous rambling negativity about a girl you haven't fucked (or have you? If your English was just a little worse, I would think it was a Sirioja post. LOL For me, her body was not so perfect, that I simply had to do her. However definitely one of the very good looking girls. I remember we had Janine mania on the forum for a while. I can't criticise her too much since I haven't sessioned and haven't even chatted to her.

There are hundreds of girls that don't appeal to you or to me. I guess she gets singled out because acts differently and seems to be wasting her good looks. If she wants to waste a lot of time chatting to her favourite guys, why should we care?[/QUOTE]Wait, so there can't be opinions on the forum? Only positive information? I've been with her and expressing my impressions, no more or less.

So, it's better to repeatedly post about the same girls over and over again. As recommended girls, and other girls are flamboyant, and aggressive? That's positive?

On the topic of management suggesting to girls that they should do more 30 minute sessions. It doesn't make massive sense to me since no girl ever tried to stop me from taking a 1 hour session.

However, suppose it came to the attention of management that certain girls were refusing to take customers who wanted only 30 minute sessions, allegedly. It would make sense then to have a chat to these girls and suggest that they should be taking customers, without demanding at least a 100 per session. Indeed plenty of forum writers complain about girls not wanting to do 50 Euro sessions.

Obviously any girl willing to do 30 minute sessions, will end up doing a fair number of 30 minute sessions, no matter how good she is. 30 minutes is long enough for plenty of guys! The message surely would be: "We expect to see girls doing 30 minute sessions, not just long sessions ONLY!".

It would be easy for this management message to be distorted by girls, into something where they must try to do more short sessions. If the girl was willing to do 30 minute sessions, she could easily say fine, to the management and just continue on as normal. I don't see other girls at Sharks having a problem. I don't know if any are refusing 30 minute bookings, I certainly suspect it, but a girl can refuse a customer without giving any reasons. She just doesn't like him.

I can understand it is possible that customers could complain about extreme difficulty to get to certain popular girls being hogged by customers who want to book for several hours. However that is the way it goes. I can always understand if a girl says she cannot go with me as she has a 5 hour booking.

Years ago there was a girl who told me not to come to see her any more on a Saturday. Pick another day, since she had a guy who wanted to book her 8 hours every Saturday, for just a little bit of sex, and mostly chat, sleeping, mucking around, etc. The money was too good to pass up, even if the whole thing was a little boring for her.

At Sharks, MWTF is a well known customer who wants a hell of a lot in a 30 minute session. He will take maybe 6 or more 30 minute sessions in the day. I see that a good percentage of girls refuse him. They know he wants a hell of a lot in a fast paced 30 minutes for just 50.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1748677]For me, her body was not so perfect, that I simply had to do her. However definitely one of the very good looking girls. I remember we had Janine mania on the forum for a while.[/QUOTE]There was a reason for the Janine mania on the forum and that Janine did stand out as a very beautiful girl that seem unattainable to the humble club goer unless he was an older local man and preferably with no hair since she seems to be monopolised by either of the two baldy guys or the hermaphrodite sprawling all over taking her sofa space.

[QUOTE=Craiova;1748654]Hmm sorry but the best and only real expert about really good sex is the honourable user "Syzygies" he can tell you better than me evan which girl you should book for really good sex. And also important for this is the waist to hip ratio or something similar. LOL.[/QUOTE]What? I ask you a specific question, related to a post YOU just made about YOUR regular club where one can find "really good sex" and you avoid answering the question entirely by changing the subject and passing the issue over to Syzygies and his choice of girls? LOL Okay, if you don't want to cite your club, fair enough, but, with all due respect to the great Szy: I think I'll not rely on other guys' choices and criteria for which girls I sesssion with but instead go with my own instincts and assessments, which, based on recent track record, seems to produce positive results.

[QUOTE=Ortos;1748706] Okay, if you don't want to cite your club, fair enough, [/QUOTE]Mainhattan. LOL.

Sharks management dictating girls to do 30 min sessions only is the same quality conspiracy theory as chemtrails.

HB.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1748680]Wait, so there can't be opinions on the forum? Only positive information? I've been with her and expressing my impressions, no more or less.
[/QUOTE]Sure and I am a merely criticising your post and apparent attitude. It's reads like a habitual negative attitude of another well known poster.

You can do what you want, I would like to hear some more positive reviews though. My impression is that you prefer to write negative comments. There are hundreds of girls we could spend a lot of time knocking, if we wanted to. However we all have different taste.

I don't see much point in concentrating on that, unless reviewing a session that went badly, or warning why to avoid some girl.

Some posters want to keep their good girls secret, and spend more time "shit dumping", not referring to you, just a general comment.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1748730]Sure and I am a merely criticising your post and attitude. It's reads like a habitual negative attitude of another well known poster.

You can do what you want, I would like to hear some more positive reviews though. My impression is that you prefer to write negative comments. There are hundreds of girls we could spend a lot of time knocking, if we wanted to. However we all have different taste.

I don't see much point in concentrating on that, unless reviewing a session that went badly, or warning why to avoid some girl.

Some posters want to keep their good girls secret, and spend more time "shit dumping", not referring to you, just a general comment.[/QUOTE]I personally think negative reports are important to provide perspective on things. I know not to take some negative reports serious. Even positives for that matter. Especially if I see it has being overly hyped. When I read reports, I use my best judgement to gauge if the person writing is merely hyping up or it sounds neutral. Ideally, I find negative reports as useful as positive reports. So we have different opinions on this. I've seen some of the girls as described, and that reveal whether to take anything that's overly emphasized to be warranted. I consider people's opinions on matters negative or not. If negative, and I agree, then I would take those posts more serious. If only positve, and don't agree, then will not take them seriously. Some of the negative reports I find them to reveal more and are truthful than reports that are missing some info. We all have reasons for posting in the way we do.

I understand it that there is a reason why you are limited to how you post.

Brunette Evita. Ro is at Sharks this Sunday with a lot of make up.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1748734]
I understand it that there is a reason why you are limited to how you post.[/QUOTE]I don't have such a negative outlook, in any case. However if a girl performs really badly I can say why I found it that way.

If I search very hard, I might find your positive posts. LOL Do you actually enjoy FKK visits? Always seem a bit grumpy or pessimistic.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1748740]I don't have such a negative outlook, in any case. However if a girl performs really badly I can say why I found it that way.

If I search very hard, I might find your positive posts. LOL Do you actually enjoy FKK visits? Always seem a bit grumpy or pessimistic.[/QUOTE]LOL. If I didn't enjoy FKK visits, I wouldn't be visiting. I have good experiences, but I don't post it all the time. What I post is not accounting for all that happens on my trip. I personally don't write every detail of what happened. There are reports of tops girls or gems that I find throughout various visits if you search around. Usually if I recall the names the reports are in more details. May not be on this thread that you often look at, but in other threads in this forum. Lots of my posts are just what I observe and what I hear, and some conclusions based on that. Just providing my perspective based on my visits. No way are people's visits to be assumed based on mere posts here. I censor somewhat on some stories I tell to not reveal too much, but other than that just bits of my experiences of trips that I've had.

My opinion is that negative or bad experiences and positive experiences that are posted provides better perspective. For example, lets says somebody writes about an experience with a girl and it's negative. Somebody else writes something positive. It provides a better balance of things. I do appreciate people writing their bad experiences as I find them to be revealing and truthful.

Something Syzy mentioned - Do some guys seriously hide the identity and details of their best girls, and for what purpose? You can't seriously believe that no one else will discover her? She is walking around, stark naked, whispering in guys' ears, and sooner or later, other guys will take her to the room, she provides same or similar service to him that she did to you, and he will look for repeats and may recommend to friends or write on the internet, and that's how it spreads.

But even if you assume somehow you could keep it a secret, that's not great either. If a girl stays too hidden and secret, her beauty and services recognised only by you (how physical beauty is not seen by others is beyond me) she will soon get bored and frustrated at her lack of bookings and move to a different club or quit the biz entirely. Neither is a desirable outcome from your angle.

I was a Roxana devotee for a while, then wrote a few reports what can be described as "shit dump" stuff on her and Larissa. Those were my honest and first hand experiences. Same on Ramona. Now, I have been a recent convert to the religion of Aylice. Hope she lasts, she stays in the club, and that she is nice to me and stays beautiful. Why not? These are such beautiful experiences, which we get for 50. When I see a pretty girl at the mall, or the store or some other place, I am a lot more content now. I have always the memory and confidence I have had better, or as good.

W.r.t. Janine and skinny, it is a subjective definition of course. To me, the skinniest girl at sharks recently was Aurelia. Excessively so. Then perhaps Evita. Sure Janine is not super thin, but she looked not any more bulked up than cosmina etc. I did not try her however, on my recent trip, as so much of my interest and dollars went to Aylice.

[QUOTE=Jnpr30;1748764]Something Syzy mentioned - Do some guys seriously hide the identity and details of their best girls, and for what purpose? You can't seriously believe that no one else will discover her? She is walking around, stark naked, whispering in guys' ears, and sooner or later, other guys will take her to the room, she provides same or similar service to him that she did to you, and he will look for repeats and may recommend to friends or write on the internet, and that's how it spreads.

But even if you assume somehow you could keep it a secret, that's not great either. If a girl stays too hidden and secret, her beauty and services recognised only by you (how physical beauty is not seen by others is beyond me) she will soon get bored and frustrated at her lack of bookings and move to a different club or quit the biz if a total failure. Neither is a desirable outcome from your angle.

I was a Roxana devotee for a while, then wrote a few reports what can be described as "shit dump" stuff on her and Larissa. Those were my honest and first hand experiences. Same on Ramona. Now, I have been a recent convert to the religion of Aylice. Hope she lasts, she stays in the club, and that she is nice to me and stays beautiful. Why not? These are such beautiful experiences, which we get for 50. When I see a pretty girl at the mall, or the store, are some other place, I am a lot more content now. I have always the memory and confidence I have had better, or as good.

W. are. T Janine and skinny, it is a subjective definition of course. To me, the skinniest girl at sharks recently was Aurelia. Excessively so. Then perhaps Evita. Sure Janine is not super thin, but she looked not any more bulked up than cosmina etc. I did not try her however, on my recent trip, as so much if my interest and dollars went to Aylice.[/QUOTE]I dunno if guys hide girl's names for that reason, but there are those that do not want to be revealed talking about a specific girl especially on threads that are known to be frequently read by girls. I give out names if I recall them as it's no big deal as the girls will be discovered one way or another especially if they are a great performer. I posts gems at times, and at times write about sessions that weren't up to par although not in details. I find Evita being skinny too which was my qualms about her body style. I did not try Cosmia either, was not my spec as Syz would say. LOL. She seemed skinny to me, maybe the small tits. Dunno. She looked petite than I imagined.

Your reports on what has happens with your regulars were unique, and informative.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1748746]My opinion is that negative or bad experiences and positive experiences that are posted provides better perspective. For example, lets says somebody writes about an experience with a girl and it's negative. Somebody else writes something positive. It provides a better balance of things. I do appreciate people writing their bad experiences as I find them to be revealing and truthful.[/QUOTE]If this is what you believe then you must be an avid reader, number 1 fan and president of the fan club of Sirioja's and Francis you's reports.