Printable View
[QUOTE=Dufey;1748770]If this is what you believe then you must be an avid reader, number 1 fan and president of the fan club of Sirioja's and Francis you's reports.[/QUOTE]Well, somewhat. I read other forums too, and you get the mixed reviews. There are better ones at it than others. Somethings I don't really take it seriously. I don't usually go by reports, or look for girls that are repeatedly reported here. Too much work.
[QUOTE=Jnpr30;1748764]Something Syzy mentioned - Do some guys seriously hide the identity and details of their best girls, and for what purpose? You can't seriously believe that no one else will discover her? She is walking around, stark naked, whispering in guys' ears, and sooner or later, other guys will take her to the room, she provides same or similar service to him that she did to you, and he will look for repeats and may recommend to friends or write on the internet, and that's how it spreads.[/QUOTE]Illogical as you summarise it to be with your pertinent points there are guys that write that do not discuss their best girls. For example, Craivoa cannot even name his favourite club directly and instead diverts attention that the best girls are as written up by Szyzgies.
Then there is the vast majority of readers of ISG who do not write or only write to ask questions who withhold details on their best girls.
So there you are.
[QUOTE=Jnpr30;1748764]Janine and skinny, it is a subjective definition of course. To me, the skinniest girl at sharks recently was Aurelia. Excessively so. Then perhaps Evita. Sure Janine is not super thin, but she looked not any more bulked up than cosmina etc.[/QUOTE]Janine is slim.
Paloma and Aurelia at Sharks are like fucking skinny!!
There is another forum around, and there are more girls talked about. Here, there is like 1 or 2 guys attending the same club recommending the same girls over and over again. Yes, it would be nice if the ones that ask contribute. More contributions, more girls mentioned.
[QUOTE=Dufey;1748772]Illogical as you summarise it to be with your pertinent points there are guys that write that do not discuss their best girls. For example, Craivoa cannot even name his favourite club directly and instead diverts attention that the best girls are as written up by Szyzgies.
Then there is the vast majority of readers of ISG who do not write or only write to ask questions who withhold details on their best girls.
So there you are.[/QUOTE]So some guys hold back intel on the best girls. LOL. Like so what, a girl that is good for one guy can be bad for the next and vice versa. Personally I take little notice of opinions of particular girls as a general rule. I am more interested in overall reports on ISG, something which there should be a lot more of IMHO.
[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1748781]There is another forum around, and there are more girls talked about. Here, there is like 1 or 2 guys attending the same club recommending the same girls over and over again. Yes, it would be nice if the ones that ask contribute. More contributions, more girls mentioned.[/QUOTE]Yes sure, I would like to see lots of guys making their recommendations. Then we could correlate them and see which girls get the most consistent recommendations. Not so much use, if only Sirioja and myself state that Agnes is a fantastic session. For many others she just doesn't appeal. Maybe too old for the age-ists. In another forum, I did not see any review of her whatsoever. I could be wrong.
If I get a good session from a girl, I always report it, omitting sometimes girls I have repeated many times. I hate to read about some guy trying a club for the first time, and picking out some of the worst possible girls, because they simply don't know who to pick. That is why I like to regularly list some well accepted good girls. I also mention which girls I am happy with even if YMMV. It makes sense to also list the no-no girls (generally agreed crap in the room) like Brianna at Oase (however I haven't tested her myself). It also makes sense to suggest avoiding aggressive girls, to my way of thinking they are far more risky, e.g. Stella. I am not going to waste a lot of time criticising girls' looks at length, since guys can decide for themselves.
So which Sharks girls do you recommend, these days? Maybe I recall Yellis? I think she performs pretty good (I only tried once). Not quite as slim as I like, but okay How about Helli? Is she still a priority? Are you really positive about anybody? LOL. I am always happy to state my favourites are Agnes, Kelly, Aurelia, maybe Moira next priority, Paloma, maybe Leya on a good day, maybe Yellis. Aurelia performs clearly weaker but has the looks to sneek into my priorities, and as Dufey says "fucking skinny" but Paloma is even more-so.
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1748799]So which Sharks girls do you recommend, these days? Maybe I recall Yellis? I think she performs pretty good (I only tried once). Not quite as slim as I like, but okay How about Helli? Is she still a priority?[/QUOTE]I like Helli, Larissa, Sandra and Mira at Sharks.
Maybe Cosmina too.
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1748799]Yes sure, I would like to see lots of guys making their recommendations. Then we could correlate them and see which girls get the most consistent recommendations. Not so much use, if only Sirioja and myself state that Agnes is a fantastic session. For many others she just doesn't appeal. Maybe too old for the age-ists. In another forum, I did not see any review of her whatsoever. I could be wrong.
If I get a good session from a girl, I always report it, omitting sometimes girls I have repeated many times. I hate to read about some guy trying a club for the first time, and picking out some of the worst possible girls, because they simply don't know who to pick. That is why I like to regularly list some well accepted good girls. I also mention which girls I am happy with even if YMMV. It makes sense to also list the no-no girls (generally agreed crap in the room) like Brianna at Oase (however I haven't tested her myself). It also makes sense to suggest avoiding aggressive girls, to my way of thinking they are far more risky, e.g. Stella. I am not going to waste a lot of time criticising girls' looks at length, since guys can decide for themselves.
So which Sharks girls do you recommend, these days? Maybe I recall Yellis? I think she performs pretty good (I only tried once). Not quite as slim as I like, but okay How about Helli? Is she still a priority? Are you really positive about anybody? LOL. I am always happy to state my favourites are Agnes, Kelly, Aurelia, maybe Moira next priority, Paloma, maybe Leya on a good day, maybe Yellis. Aurelia performs clearly weaker but has the looks to sneek into my priorities, and as Dufey says "fucking skinny" but Paloma is even more-so.[/QUOTE]I have written about some top girls at various threads if I find her to be highly attractive and performs well. You've probably read my reports on other girls. It maybe negative, neutral or positive. So, not all my reports are negative, but not all positive to give wrong impressions. I don't attend Sharks at a weekly basis, so don't have a list of girls tried. Less trips to Sharks than some other clubs. There are more girls talked about on threads with clubs that I attend more frequently or names I recall. Negative or truthful, matter of perspective.
[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1748781]There is another forum around, and there are more girls talked about. Here, there is like 1 or 2 guys attending the same club recommending the same girls over and over again. Yes, it would be nice if the ones that ask contribute. More contributions, more girls mentioned.[/QUOTE]Yes more girl reports, perhaps not on Oase thread, and they often do one report per girl reviewed. Here we have so many reports that are not a girl session review. The percentage of session reviews is a bit on the low side.
Despite all these things there are heaps of girls at Oase and Sharks that have never been reviewed on the ISG, yet they get sessions. Perhaps they have been reviewed but remain nameless. I sometimes have little clue if they are good performing girls or not. However any newer girl (to me. Without knowing past history) that looks interesting enough, I am game to try her, before any reviews have appeared, e. G. Agnes, Leya, Kelly at Sharks, and Elizabeth (Cze), Lexi, Valentina, Elisa (Gha) at Oase. For girls that are not so outstanding or more borderline, I may meet the girl several times before pulling the trigger, and even seek opinions of others, and would read the reviews.
I sometimes notice that once one guy has been game to post a review, then suddenly others guys will join in re the same girl, that were previously quiet.
BTW, A big thanks to Barry M and J Singapore who really persuaded me to put my body specs aside and try the pretty faced Pamela (Cro). She was super wonderful till she got pulled out of Sharks, possibly for being just too good. Sadly missed now. Incredibly realistic GFE. We are sure she really liked sex a lot. LOL. For me, the best girl of the last year. Like a Jayne Mansfield, more-so than a Pamela Anderson. LOL.
Paloma must not have been in the club on the days I attended, or else I would have noticed.
I liked Aurelia enough to take a session and enjoyed it, but she was a bit too skinny, and I thought other girls had a prettier face, for instance Aylice, and also Evita, etc. That said, Aurelia is definitely quite attractive.
[QUOTE=Dufey;1748773]Janine is slim.
Paloma and Aurelia at Sharks are like fucking skinny!![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Dufey;1748627]No, Janine has other opportunities from Monday to Friday.
If she does work she works maybe Friday, but probably Saturday or Sunday, more probable Saturday unless she has a party with friends to go to.[/QUOTE]Can you please let me know where to find her on Monday or Tuesdays?
[QUOTE=JasonWang;1748896]Can you please let me know where to find her on Monday or Tuesdays?[/QUOTE]I've heard a rumor from two reliable sources that she recently started working at Sharks during the week now. Guess she wanted a fallback in case hooking didn't work out. Now I guess she's all in. Never tried her, but hopefully she will become committed to her new career.
[QUOTE=Jnpr30;1748764]Something Syzy mentioned - Do some guys seriously hide the identity and details of their best girls, and for what purpose? You can't seriously believe that no one else will discover her? She is walking around, stark naked, whispering in guys' ears, and sooner or later, other guys will take her to the room, she provides same or similar service to him that she did to you, and he will look for repeats and may recommend to friends or write on the internet, and that's how it spreads.
But even if you assume somehow you could keep it a secret, that's not great either. If a girl stays too hidden and secret, her beauty and services recognised only by you (how physical beauty is not seen by others is beyond me) she will soon get bored and frustrated at her lack of bookings and move to a different club or quit the biz entirely. Neither is a desirable outcome from your angle.
[/QUOTE]This has been discussed already. Some senior posters have come out and stated that it is never a good idea to be known as an Internet poster (some seem to hint at first hand knowledge of this, some just err on the side of caution). I guess the less you say, the less likely the girl can correlate you Internet handle to your face. Also as Syzygies stated, there will usually be a pile of reviews after a girl has been reviewed a few times. This affords the ISG poster some safe cover, as it has probably been months since he test drove her, and his encounter with said girl was several hundred customers ago.
Syzygies is probably uncharacteristically brave. He has written that he usually gets a first try at every girl that he chooses to go with, despite being known around Oase as the "LU list guy" at Oase.
After the shocking line up in World yesterday (incomparable to Oase and Sharks), today was pretty good in Sharks. Heck, might go back tomorrow.
Maybe the line up is a tad less good then Oase, but I always have the feeling there are far more viable options here (unlike the 20 something in Oase that you can strike of your list immediately).
Today:
Sandra, not the prettiest face, but a nice conversation and allround decent service.
Alice from Romania's next top model: a bit of a shame. The girl has the looks and the skills, but was kind of rushing the whole thing. There was no upsell for time and we didn't discuss anything upfront, so maybe she slows down if you propose a longer stay. A very soft and good kisser, but she is not interested in using that to her advantage. You only get 2 or 3 second kisses and most of the time you literally have to ask her for it. For the record: she claimed it normally isn't part of her service at all and that the girls have to do too much for 50 euro as it is (in a completely non hostile way BTW).
Madalina, the proto type of a "girl next door". Her body feels great and she has a very cute smile (with theeth all over the place, but in a nice way). A lot of fun in the room and afterwards she came by a few times to goof around (and ask for another room off course). Not a girl for siroja LOL.
Mia, who is by far the best service provider I've had these three days in Hessen. What this week is concerned, only second behind the cute teeny in Samya on Thursday.
Tried her today. She's been back for a few days. Skinny tall model body. Small tits. Hair is slightly different now. I liked her BBBJ and lot of energy in the room. She was quite heavily booked.