Thaifriendly limits on content
I have always had a lot of luck with TF. Generally, I start by paying for a month of service. Then, I have contact a girl, and after one or two messages I ask her if she is interested in getting together. Occasionally, I have asked the girl if she is freelance. If the girl is interested, I ask her to send me her LineID or WhatsApp (not many have WhatsApp in Thailand) and when I contact her there, I quickly move onto practical questions such as price, level of service, etc.
Recently, I read here that some people come straight to the point on TF and ask the girl directly if she is a freelancer. On Date in Asia (DIA), this would get one expelled. Indeed, I have been expelled several times from DIA, as well as Tinder (which I cannot get back on without getting a new phone number). It occurred to me that if they really do not expel people from the service, I could cut through a bunch of messages and simply have a profile that says "Looking for hookups" and maybe state "FL / ONS welcome."
Has anyone here ever been expelled from TF for their profiles or directly negotiating a sexual service? If so, were you a paying member? Does anyone know the true boundaries of their moderators?
Yes, it matters to some sex workers
[QUOTE=TimTimms;2763664]Be careful avg age of member here is OLD. Prolly not all that Hansum either. Hahaha.
Hansum vs non Hansum. Does it really Matter to a Sex worker?
Any thoughts. Assumption not outlier customers,. Monkeypox lesions on 500 pound body, etc.[/QUOTE]Some sex workers assume a young and / or handsome man has had sex with many ladies and that many of those ladies agreed to bareback sex with him. Consequently, they might dig in and refuse to go bareback with him for fear of catching an STD. By contrast, they might be fine with going bareback with a fat, ugly old man they assume has not gotten laid in his home country for years and isn't getting bareback sex here either. She might not worry too much about being the "exception" for that dude if the price is right.
Extra advantage to the fat, ugly old man for getting no hassle BBFS+CIP if she thinks he just arrived in town. She might play on the premise that he not only hasn't gotten laid for years back home but that he also hasn't gotten laid on this trip yet either. Then, she calculates, if she rocks his world in bed like he never dreamed would happen to him, this "loser in sex" will want to repeat with her throughout his entire stay and not even try to session with anyone else.
Of course, the Thai hooker has got it all wrong. Most fat, ugly old punters I know are getting more no hassle bareback sex with more different women here than the hookers can imagine. And for the reason cited above. Each hooker calculates (wrongly) that she is the "exception" for him getting BBFS+CIP. LOL.
Yes, the irony is the hookers who think they are playing it safer by going bareback with only fat, ugly old men are in all likelihood actually exposing themselves to more multiple partner bareback STD risk than they would if they did it with young and / or handsome men, most of whom get more resistance to bareback sex for the reason stated above.
Ditto for cum swallowing at the end of a BBBJ+CIM.