Stupid shit in Medellin

[QUOTE=MiamiBoy1;2827336]Do you know how to use google search? There is plenty of information about the 1-10 scale online, including comparison photos, descriptions of each category of attractiveness, etc. You can even find studies on the distribution of women according to the 1-10 attractiveness scale. But you won't understand shit, because you live in a primitive black and white binary world. A stray dog is probably more selective when choosing a sex partner than you are.[/QUOTE]I was teaching people to use Google before there was Google. WAIS, Gopher and Spider among others. So I searched. What did I find?

1. A list of descriptions of categories, subjective descriptions of categories.

2. I found subjective discussions about the scale and places where others could subjectively rate pictures. Those have been around for years.

What I didn't find was any method to objectively measure beauty to assign an objective rating on a 1-10 scale.

[QUOTE]Speaking of the juice, if you are allergic that is your problem, not mine. Your allergy doesn't make the juice worse in any way. If you have erectile dysfunction and can't fuck a woman, or you are gay, that is your problem as well, it won't affect any woman's attractiveness.[/QUOTE]I'm guessing you're the guy sitting for 5 minutes at the 4 way stop because he can't grasp binary.

If I'm allergic, or if a girl has a visible trait which I consider a defect, then that girl, or juice has lower attractiveness to me. We would each rate her, or it different.

Objective: Something which can be measured and the result is independent of the person performing the measurement. Example:

I'm 76 inches tall. No matter who measures me, the result is the same.

Subjective: Something which can be measured, although the results are totally dependent on the opinion of the person doing the measuring. Example:

The temperature drops to 62 F in Phoenix, in December. A native of Phoenix says it's cold. A visitor from Michigan says it's warm. The actual temperature is objective. How people feel about it is subjective.

When it comes to a 1-10 scale for attractiveness it's ridiculously, even stupidly easy to determine whether or not it's subjective. Ask. Or, just read the board.

If you want to continue to claim it's objective, all you need to do is prove it.

1. List all the things which are being measured, height, weight, bust, hip, waist, cheekbone height, shoe size ratios of leg vs body length, eye and hair color, hair length, spacing between eyes, length of fingers, etc. That's enough to get you started. All you have to do I'd list what the proper value is for each one for each 1-10 category.

2. Explain how you obtain all those measurements.

It's easy to show how selective each of us is. I've already posted pics in the past of women I've actually been with, while you only posted pics of women who wouldn't talk to you. Here's one from a few years ago. I tired of her quickly, because her conversation was lacking. It's a crappy screen grab.

As the title of this section sez Stupid Shit in Medellin. To throw my 2 cents in on this subject. In Cali theres a bar called Son Sonero. Yes its a lower end of chicas, but I find the chicas attractive there. To me theres a lot of attractive ones that hang out in the bar that I have dated and taken upstairs. But other guys have said these are a bunch of ugly dogs there. Don't look good at all.

Well everybody has got their own opinion of what's good looking chicas. To each their own subjective opinion.

[QUOTE=JjBee62;2828039]I was teaching people to use Google before there was Google. WAIS, Gopher and Spider among others. So I searched. What did I find?

1. A list of descriptions of categories, subjective descriptions of categories.

2. I found subjective discussions about the scale and places where others could subjectively rate pictures. Those have been around for years.

What I didn't find was any method to objectively measure beauty to assign an objective rating on a 1-10 scale.


It's easy to show how selective each of us is. I've already posted pics in the past of women I've actually been with, while you only posted pics of women who wouldn't talk to you. Here's one from a few years ago. I tired of her quickly, because her conversation was lacking. It's a crappy screen grab.[/QUOTE]I would rate that girl a solid 8. Are we close in rating. Face has proportionate features pleasing to human eye. Large doe eyes. Nice button nose. Pretty eyebrows. I love natural girls so real non painted or filled in eyebrows is a plus. No lip fillers and not overdone in makeup. Love skinny chicks too and seems like she fits the bill. Spinner type young and glowing. She could either have a real nice big goofy fun smile it seems which is nice or too much gum would be the only negative I could see.

Mad props good on you. She looks like a fun one.

[QUOTE=CasaNoVa;2828111]I would rate that girl a solid 8. Are we close in rating. Face has proportionate features pleasing to human eye. Large doe eyes. Nice button nose. Pretty eyebrows. I love natural girls so real non painted or filled in eyebrows is a plus. No lip fillers and not overdone in makeup. Love skinny chicks too and seems like she fits the bill. Spinner type young and glowing. She could either have a real nice big goofy fun smile it seems which is nice or too much gum would be the only negative I could see.

Mad props good on you. She looks like a fun one.[/QUOTE]Well, he doesn't use 1 to 10, so his rating would be 1 on the 0-1 scale.

I don't know why he posted her photo, maybe just to brag, or maybe he wanted us to rate her, even though our ratings won't matter to him.

But I do agree with you, she is pretty, 7. 5/10 on my scale, if she straightens her teeth she could go even higher.

But my point is rating girls is not a rocket science if you know how to use the scale and be fair in your judging. You don't have run around with a measuring tape figuring out her proportions, sizes, etc. Our brain is capable of assessing women's beauty in just a few seconds. He is saying nobody uses the 1. 10 scale, but I do read posts / reports almost every single day, where guys talk about ratings, he got to be fucking blind not to notice that. What I haven't seen yet is another person using the binary scale.

[QUOTE=CasaNoVa;2828111]I would rate that girl a solid 8. Are we close in rating. Face has proportionate features pleasing to human eye. Large doe eyes. Nice button nose. Pretty eyebrows. I love natural girls so real non painted or filled in eyebrows is a plus. No lip fillers and not overdone in makeup. Love skinny chicks too and seems like she fits the bill. Spinner type young and glowing. She could either have a real nice big goofy fun smile it seems which is nice or too much gum would be the only negative I could see.[/QUOTE]When I saw it this is the first thing that popped into my mind and I can not unsee it that way.

[QUOTE=MiamiBoy1;2828203]...

I don't know why he posted her photo, maybe just to brag, or maybe he wanted us to rate her, even though our ratings won't matter to him...[/QUOTE]I think this is the reason.

[QUOTE=JjBee62;2828039]...I've already posted pics in the past of women I've actually been with, while you only posted pics of women who wouldn't talk to you. ....[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MiamiBoy1;2828203].... What I haven't seen yet is another person using the binary scale.[/QUOTE]I have no problem with 1-10 scale but to me I probably can't really tell the difference between 7 to <10. If you list one girl for 7,8,9 each, I probably can rank them in the order of 1,2,3 but not be able to assign them a 1-10 scale.

10 probably means flawless so obviously that is easier to identify.

I use a physical scale. If I can have physical reaction, then it is yes/1, otherwise it is no/0. LOL.

[QUOTE=BayBoy;2828106]As the title of this section sez Stupid Shit in Medellin. To throw my 2 cents in on this subject. In Cali theres a bar called Son Sonero. Yes its a lower end of chicas, but I find the chicas attractive there. To me theres a lot of attractive ones that hang out in the bar that I have dated and taken upstairs. But other guys have said these are a bunch of ugly dogs there. Don't look good at all.

Well everybody has got their own opinion of what's good looking chicas. To each their own subjective opinion.[/QUOTE]That's it exactly!

You find what you enjoy. You enjoy it. You don't need to worry that someone is enjoying something different.

[QUOTE=CasaNoVa;2828111]I would rate that girl a solid 8. Are we close in rating. Face has proportionate features pleasing to human eye. Large doe eyes. Nice button nose. Pretty eyebrows. I love natural girls so real non painted or filled in eyebrows is a plus. No lip fillers and not overdone in makeup. Love skinny chicks too and seems like she fits the bill. Spinner type young and glowing. She could either have a real nice big goofy fun smile it seems which is nice or too much gum would be the only negative I could see.

Mad props good on you. She looks like a fun one.[/QUOTE]She was all natural, only 2 small, unnoticeable tattoos she hot when she was 12, was 18 with 1 kid, flaca body and a sweet voice. She was also a complete innocent at the time.

However, she quickly learned the ropes, found someone to buy her some silicone boobs and by that time I was done. I'd already found my current girl, who brings more to the table.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2826872]Anyway, at the 4 minute mark, you will see a perfect representation of this clown Subcmdr.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2826837]Are you fucking kidding me? If you have to ask that question above, then you are stupid, and that is not up for debate.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2826464]You are a bullshit artist and I cut through your bullshit. You made a stupid post where you said women are all the same (pussy is pussy) and men are different.
And your second point is that hookers care about more than money. They care if men are clean, smooth, fit, do not smell bad. I agree. But you think men do not think the same of women? And THAT is why your point is stupid.
I am attacking your argument not you, and your argument makes no sense and is stupid. IMO you are lying to yourself and justifying being stingy with women.
Your being stupid does not mean I am smart.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2826614]Miss Cartagena was not the only beauty queen I dated, and I had all these assholes pipe in that she was not a beauty queen as if they knew better based on one photo. After her, I was not going to talk about the others. Now I don't care.

One was in Bogota. She competed in the Miss Venezuela pageant. She won in a medium size city and did not make the cut to go to nationals. How do I know she was not lying? First, this woman could wear a potato sack and make it look classy. She was always dressed perfectly. Second, her talent was dancing. She was as flexible as a Chinese acrobat and literally could do any dance to perfection. You name it. To this day, she had the tightest snatch of anyone I have ever been with.

You hear this, "all the women are only interested in money", and it is not always true, but I never met a beauty queen where it wasn't. I said before when you have a 10 at a bar, it is a privilege for you to buy a drink. With beauty queens, their attitude is that it is a privilege for you to spend hundreds at the mall. Maybe some guys think that is worth it, but I am not one of them.[/QUOTE]As a man who dates multiple beauty queens you seem to be very angry and uptight. You have a let a single individual (me) cause you to have apoplectic fits and show your use of the English language is not as strong as it needs to be.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2827674]Good point and good summary. Yeah, we got a newbie here who is arguing just to argue. There is no point to any of it outside of his trying to show how "brilliant he is.[/QUOTE]All anyone has to do is review your responses to me. Your vocabulary is limited to the following words: "bullshit", "moron", "clown", "stupid". All I need is five words for you to think I am "brilliant". I know you read my posts in order to learn. You are welcome.

I would like to see if you have the testicular fortitude to call me names to my face. In Medellin. If not then you are just a keyboard warrior typing until your fingers seize up because my post trigger you.

I am still waiting to read a post from you that contains information about having sex with girls. Not just bragging about what you have done or what you won't do. What you need to is get your beauty queens to suck your dick more. And chill out cause you are clearly one uptight individual.

[B]How you like me now?[/B]

[QUOTE=MiamiBoy1;2828203]Well, he doesn't use 1 to 10, so his rating would be 1 on the 0-1 scale.

I don't know why he posted her photo, maybe just to brag, or maybe he wanted us to rate her, even though our ratings won't matter to him.

But I do agree with you, she is pretty, 7. 5/10 on my scale, if she straightens her teeth she could go even higher.

But my point is rating girls is not a rocket science if you know how to use the scale and be fair in your judging. You don't have run around with a measuring tape figuring out her proportions, sizes, etc. Our brain is capable of assessing women's beauty in just a few seconds. He is saying nobody uses the 1. 10 scale, but I do read posts / reports almost every single day, where guys talk about ratings, he got to be fucking blind not to notice that. What I haven't seen yet is another person using the binary scale.[/QUOTE]Here's why I posted her photo:

[QUOTE]It's easy to show how selective each of us is. I've already posted pics in the past of women I've actually been with, while you only posted pics of women who wouldn't talk to you.[/QUOTE]It's not rocket science. You keep talking about it like it's some perfect, shining beacon of truth and enlightenment, when it's just an opinion, often inflated.

What I've been saying is that everyone uses their own version of the 1-10 scale. Your 8 might be another's 5, his 8 might be a 4 to you. And that's just scratching the surface. The 5 or 6 you did might become a 7 when telling your friends. The 9 you thought you found might drop to a 6 when your buddies prove they each raw dogged her for 50 k.

After that it gets confusing. You declare my standards are probably 5 or below. When I post a picture, you immediately find a flaw that doesn't exist and downgrade it. If someone who strokes your ego posted the same picture you would have upgraded it. Elvis did the same thing awhile back when he declared you had found a 9, without any idea what the girl looked like. You do it all the time claiming guys you don't know are seeking out 4's and 5's, when you know nothing about who they are seeing.

I do the exact same as everyone else. I look at a woman and decide if I want to fuck her. If I do, I decide how much effort or money she's worth to me. When I'm done I decide whether or not she was worth it.

I just don't mess around trying to convince everyone the women I've fucked were anything special. If you're drinking a beer with me, I'll show you a photo, or video, if I have one. It's much easier and more reliable than trying to decide what number on the 1-10 scale to keep her in the range between impressive and believable.

[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2828319]I am still waiting to read a post from you that contains information about having sex with girls.[/QUOTE]You just quoted one. LOL.

[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2828319]You have a let a single individual (me) cause you to have apoplectic fits and show your use of the English language is not as strong as it needs to be..[/QUOTE]You are not relevant. You are like a fly buzzing around people's heads annoying them.

[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2828319]All anyone has to do is review your responses to me. Your vocabulary is limited to the following words: "bullshit", "moron", "clown", "stupid".[/QUOTE]Yeah, and I regret none of them. Instead of complaining about the name calling, up your game. Maybe tell about your experiences instead of how great you think you are.

[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2828319]I would like to see if you have the testicular fortitude to call me names to my face.[/QUOTE]And why would I want ever want to meet you?

I was not even going to say this, but in your desire to be relevant, you and Mr. E had a discussion. Mr. E thinks his way is the right way. He gets average looking women to fall for him and says he has real relationships while other guys pay for sex. When others pay or up their game to get the most in demand women, IMO I think he is jealous. Still, I have no problem accepting his POV because even though it is different than mine, it is logical. In fact, it is to my advantage that he and others like him like average looking women.

With you, you come along with this pussy is pussy argument and argue that you should be paying for it. Those two statements show you to be a loser that Mr. E has not just beaten but beaten to a pulp. Still, you are so busy arguing to argue, you don't even see how dumb you are being.

Now you will write a novel that basically will be "I am not dumb". Maybe you can list more of your credentials on a hooker board.

[QUOTE=JjBee62;2828325]

After that it gets confusing. You declare my standards are probably 5 or below. When I post a picture, you immediately find a flaw that doesn't exist and downgrade it. If someone who strokes your ego posted the same picture you would have upgraded it. Elvis did the same thing awhile back when he declared you had found a 9, without any idea what the girl looked like. You do it all the time claiming guys you don't know are seeking out 4's and 5's, when you know nothing about who they are seeing.

I do the exact same as everyone else. I look at a woman and decide if I want to fuck her. If I do, I decide how much effort or money she's worth to me. When I'm done I decide whether or not she was worth it.

I just don't mess around trying to convince everyone the women I've fucked were anything special. If you're drinking a beer with me, I'll show you a photo, or video, if I have one. It's much easier and more reliable than trying to decide what number on the 1-10 scale to keep her in the range between impressive and believable.[/QUOTE]I rated her solely based on the photo you posted, and this has nothing to do with whether I like you personally or not. I rated her fairly, and as you already know, she meets my minimum standards and therefore is doable. And my rating corresponds with yours, since she is 1/1, or doable as well for you. The flaw that I found is not a major one and can definitely be fixed, just like the boobs. If anyone else posted the exact same photo, I would rated her the same.

As for the girls that I have fucked, I never share their photos on the public forum for various reasons, period. The photos that I had posted earlier, were the examples of the girls that I found attractive, I can't recall that I ever tried to contact them with p4 p proposals, but I were to contact them, most would never respond, simply because my messages would be lost in their inbox, girls that are in high demand are not easy to get their attention, especially on IG.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2828351]Instead of complaining about the name calling, up your game. Maybe tell about your experiences instead of how great you think you are[/QUOTE]I have posted about my experiences. Sorry, I cannot out do you. As you are the Prostitution El Jefe of Medellin.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2828351]And why would I want ever want to meet you?[/QUOTE]You just proved my point. Unable to exercise any command of the English language you continue to focus on your insults with laser focus. As if you think it bothers me at all.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2828351]I was not even going to say this, but in your desire to be relevant, you and Mr. E had a discussion. Mr. E thinks his way is the right way. He gets average looking women to fall for him and says he has real relationships while other guys pay for sex. When others pay or up their game to get the most in demand women, IMO I think he is jealous. Still, I have no problem accepting his POV because even though it is different than mine, it is logical. In fact, it is to my advantage that he and others like him like average looking women.[/QUOTE]You see everything as competition. You are actually nobody. Because it is not an achievement of anytype to get an attractive girl to go with you for money. Unless, you are saying the real achievement is in earning that money in the first place. You see it is the sharing of information here that is important. The the bragging type of posts you are so enamored with. Along with arguing to make yourself feel better.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2828351]With you, you come along with this pussy is pussy argument and argue that you should be paying for it. Those two statements show you to be a loser that Mr. E has not just beaten but beaten to a pulp. Still, you are so busy arguing to argue, you don't even see how dumb you are being.[/QUOTE]Now I have no problem saying this: E Boy he is a punk ass female dog that has been trolling me for close to 10 years. I understand that you did not know that. When you don't know then you should ask somebody. Rest assured I have no better thoughts of you.

If you are going quote me, you should at lease quote me accurately. I'm glad you enjoy riding E Boys dick so much. He seems to have an amazing affect on individuals as yourself and the girls he claims to be fucking for free. Because money is never involved in real relationships. The fact that you buy into that line of reasoning is enough for me to understand that you are just another one of my many critics. And you don't count. Because I am a "man in the arena".

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2828351]Now you will write a novel that basically will be "I am not dumb". Maybe you can list more of your credentials on a hooker board.[/QUOTE]You are misinformed about the nature of this forum. [B]The purpose of this Forum is to facilitate the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women.[/B].

The reason I have no names for you is because the intellectual bankruptcy you display says it all. I will not be meeting you in court.

Pussy is indeed pussy. And when it comes to hiring prostitutes I remember that and stay focused on the deal not the girl. I don't care what you think of me or my ideas. Just keep calling names. Shows how immature you are. Now shouldn't you be getting one of your Beauty Queen that you pay to suck you dick? With all the girls your have available to you, I am surprised you even have time to respond to my posts with the calling of names. I am flattered. Please continue.

[I]How you like me now?[/I]

[QUOTE=JjBee62;2828325]I do the exact same as everyone else. I look at a woman and decide if I want to fuck her. If I do, I decide how much effort or money she's worth to me. When I'm done I decide whether or not she was worth it.

I just don't mess around trying to convince everyone the women I've fucked were anything special. If you're drinking a beer with me, I'll show you a photo, or video, if I have one. It's much easier and more reliable than trying to decide what number on the 1-10 scale to keep her in the range between impressive and believable.[/QUOTE]Drop the bat and stare, straight walk off home run brother. An excellent position to take. When it comes to the actual fuck, pussy is pussy. The reality is (at least for me and the only thing that matters is my dick) beauty queen or 1 the busting of a nut when you have the desire to bust a nut is one of the highest rated experiences in my life. LOL! The numeric rating of a girl, her demand, the amount you pay has nothing, I repeat nothing to do with the quality of the nut you bust in the moment.

How many of us have fucked the exact same girl and compared notes? I have done this with many of my friends. Because when I roll with my boys, if I fuck, we all going to fuck! And more than once we describe completely different experiences with the exact same girl. I think that is all we have to say about that. Beauty all across the world falls on the Standard Deviation curve. There are 195 countries on this earth. I have only visited 17.4% of them. But that is the conclusion I have draw up to this point.

If you are the type that needs the ego gratification that comes from seeking out the highest in demand girls so you can pay them to fuck you, so be it. IMO individuals that do that are deeply wounded and because of that they have a flawed personality. They call names and are proud of it. [B]Elvis 2008[/B] comes to mind.

[QUOTE=MiamiBoy1;2828370]The photos that I had posted earlier, were the examples of the girls that I found attractive, I can't recall that I ever tried to contact them with p4 p proposals, but I were to contact them, most would never respond, simply because my messages would be lost in their inbox, girls that are in high demand are not easy to get their attention, especially on IG.[/QUOTE]How do you know what they are if you can not contact them or they will not respond to your messages? For all you know they could just be married or even gay and just seeking online attention. Just because you are unable to communicate with them does not mean they are in high demand. I would assert that just about any woman with a pussy is in high demand.