Laboratory science versus Real world public health.
[QUOTE=NiteRiderCal;2577928]You can nip it in the butt, if it prevent transmission. It does not, it lower the transmission.[/QUOTE]That's true, I agree. And it's nothing to write off, especially in a worldwide state of emergency.
[QUOTE=NiteRiderCal;2577928]The dots is the vaccine allow vaccinated people to get infected and transmit it to unvaccinated people. Because it does not prevent infection, therefore, antibody is sub optimal. Thus allow for selection in the body. If you still don't get it at this point, I don't know. Go back and take high school biology. Read the section on evolution by natural selection.[/QUOTE]If recommending others to brush up on textbook "high school" science, I implore you to brush up on graduate level Public Health. These comments seem to be written from the view of someone approaching this in theoretical silo rather than actual practice.
Re: Sub-optimal? I'm not even sure what that is supposed to mean at the tangible level. Stopping transmission at the individual level is never the expectation of vaccination programs. It is always evaluated at the population level. Reduction in pathogen transmission is always evaluated with the goal of reaching herd immunity, not with the practically impossible goal of completely stopping transmission from a single person to another. Again, laboratory / academia versus real world practice.
[QUOTE=NiteRiderCal;2577928]Other vaccine prevent transmission. These covid vaccine reduce transmission. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that reduce transmission is all bad. There is a time and place for it. None of the condition have been met to use these vaccine.[/QUOTE]Name one vaccine that stops transmission completely. What conditions? Worldwide state of emergency is not a condition? Again, real world practice was theoretical ideals.
[QUOTE=NiteRiderCal;2577928]This is where I agree with you, there is serious misinformation. If you meet me or any of the virologist that I know, we will tell you that the covid vaccine is great! You should take it. No one dare to say anything different. Privately, everyone is saying that escape of adaptive immunity is a issue. Now what is the consequences, well it is not good. However, is it neutral or a catastrophe, or somewhere in between? This is the part that make me shit in my pant. Humanity already decided to fuck with a system so complex, that a human brain have no way of even guessing what will happen next.
Now, all of this is a moot point because it is too late. Too many people have been vaccinate already. Sooner or later the unvaccinated people will suffer the same consequences as the vaccinated people. I hope the consequence will be neutral.[/QUOTE]Again, real world evaluation in necessary. It is the decision between dealing with the immediate effect of perpetual lockdowns and uncontrolled death versus the possible effect of a future super virus. All of your proposed theories of future variants apply to both natural and artificial selection through vaccines. Artificial selection through vaccination does not stop evolutionary drift of the viral mutation moving towards escaping host defenses. The only difference is that mass vaccination would speed up the selection timeline. We would have to deal with future variants one way or another. With the vaccination, we solve the immediate problem rather than just sitting on our hands and feet while society crumbles.
Half the reason I left research science and moved into clinical medicine was because of mindsets like this. Real world usefulness versus theoretical but effectively, impractical near-term use.