Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!

[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2578941]So far 4 million dead by "Covid" (including the many 'deaths' by falsified statistics), which on a worldwide population of 7,8 billion is a total joke. No significant difference between North Dakota (strict DNC lockdown) and South Dakota (much more liberal).

No mass deaths in Nicaragua (no lockdown), Florida, Texas, or Sweden (very soft and un-intrusive measures) as 'predicted' by all the fearmongers.[/QUOTE]Here's an example of massive misrepresentation of data.

Claim: no lockdown in Nicaragua and no massive deaths.

Reality: Nicaragua does not actively test for covid. However excess death remains high and undercount ratio is 2nd only Tak It's actually ranked 2nd in the world only to Tajikistan, wherever that is. Nicaragua undercounts somewhere in the 50 x vicinity.

[URL]https://elifesciences.org/download/aHR0cHM6Ly9jZG4uZWxpZmVzY2llbmNlcy5vcmcvYXJ0aWNsZXMvNjkzMzYvZWxpZmUtNjkzMzYtdjIucGRmP2Nhbm9uaWNhbFVyaT1odHRwczovL2VsaWZlc2NpZW5jZXMub3JnL2FydGljbGVzLzY5MzM2/elife-69336-v2.pdf?_hash=Y7t7DrsfdIrmm%2BIFMaGJg%2Bm1L7xZXlt2UqJcQB2KOYY%3D[/URL]

[URL]https://havanatimes.org/features/nicaragua-underreports-covid-19-deaths-by-90/[/URL]

As for North Dakota and South Dakota, more false scapegoating. North Dakota's restrictions were governor mandates, a republican. Furthermore, at the time of restriction mandates, both States had some of the highest rates in the nation. However North Dakota declined much faster, starting higher and ended lower in a quicker time span. Not like the restrictions were much of anything anyway.

[URL]https://www.postbulletin.com/newsmd/coronavirus/6824462-North-Dakota-got-a-mask-mandate-South-Dakota-didnt.-COVID-19-cases-have-plummeted-in-both[/URL]

No idea where these people get the no mass casualties in Texas claim. They're just randomly making up shit and seeing what they want to see.

More politically bias bullshit. An insult to data representation.

[QUOTE=Sirioja;2578743]You asked, I just answered. Same than at LR when you came and needed to tell me your so pathetic story, or did I come to you and tell you about my girls? I will have to waste my time, drive more than 1200 kms and take risk in dangerous Switzerland for you, so don't forget Sambrancher croosroads on 2 October and if you forget, at least let me know here, not to make me going for nothing, when Verbier is not on my climbing tour, when I didn't even take risk to go to ski on April. Ego is good engine for life.[/QUOTE]Awaiting wager. Don't see it.

[QUOTE=HammerTime96;2579383]Remember: it's the lockdowns, the masks, the vaccine madness that kept FKKs closed! In short: it's because of CCP crypto-fascists like you who follow the Chinese Model of Social Credit, lockdowns, fascist state monitoring of it's citizens and experimental vaccines.[/QUOTE]Pretty sure it was the massive amounts of people dying that kept clubs closed. Would have been much more if your kind had their way. FKKs would have been closed maybe forever if your people had won out. Good thing they lost.

[QUOTE=NiteRiderCal;2579534]At Murse,

It is not in the interest of company to public result saying their drug is toxic. Most, if not all of moderna partner for gene therapy was pulling back funding because it fail. Don't get me wrong, mRNA / LNP is a great technology. Let just say I have an interest in finding a company with the formulation that is safe and hopefully specific. Point me to one company and I will treat you to a whole day at a FKK.

Do you know what is the FLCCC recommendation? 0. 2 MG / kg for prevention. 0. 2 to 0. 4 MG / kg for outpatient. 0. 4 to 0. 6 MG / kg for the sickest hospitalized patient. Per your links of publication, well below 2 MG / kg, even 2 MG / kg was still found to be safe. But no one are saying to take that high of a dose.

Have you read the JAMA publication that you posted the link? I look into it. One interpretation is Covid is not more than a flu to people under 65 and no comorbidity. These patient was so healthy that the researchers committed one of clinical trial red flag, changing the primary outcome in the middle of a trial. The original design for primary outcome was time to worsen. In the middle of the trial, they change it to time to resolution. Secondly, the adverse event is the same for both Ivermectin and placebo. I don't know, but it look like the placebo group got ivermectin to me.[/QUOTE]At the very least all those on the Ivermectin plan will be free of lice, crabs, and skin mites.

[QUOTE=PaulInZurich;2579640]Wouldn't it be nice if people would educate themselves before coming with strong opinions. Please quote a single source that says that vaccinated people are being infected in large numbers. Oh, I forget you only trust what you can see with your own eyes. Well, did you see with your own eyes the virus jumping from a vaccinated person to another person? Or you trust French doctors? How come Macron makes vaccination of all health care personnel mandatory? Does he listen to French doctors or not?[/QUOTE]I believe that it's been made clear that the uptick in UK cases has been largely associated with the young and / or unvaccinated. Same here in the United States in a handful of the most unvaccinated states. These new cases are disproportionately skewed to milder symptoms because they are seen in the relatively young. Hospitalizations have been trending up but less so than during the Christmas wave. But more importantly, as expected, deaths have not correlated to the same degree as the previous waves. My hospital went from 0 ICU cases to 3 in the past week. All 3 are in their 50's and were unvaccinated. Only one required intubation.

[QUOTE=Canary;2577132].[QUOTE=Perfectionist;2576793]Unfortunately this is the case. Is there any way that we can limit the quantity of posts by 'S'.

I have no intention of causing bad feeling. For those who take this forum as a useful informative tool you will understand where I am coming from.

Even prior to Covid the excessive posts of non informative drivel by 'S' has completely dominated the forum.

I for one would like to see a return to regular updates on daily visits to Sharks and reading about the Good and Bad experiences had.[/QUOTE]I have to agree with your sentiments.

Although this site continues to add informative posts which help us all in our hobby I do find there are more totally irrelevant posts than before, thus diluting the quality of information that we all use and value. Well I do![/QUOTE]I agree with you. I wish we could see more informative posts instead of posts by 'S'.

[QUOTE=Pistons;2579650]Let's not forget that the vaccine was purposefully released onto the population. We know this from the Chinese covered it up. And also from certain amino acids on the crown which enhances mutation rates. As well as a vaccine patent in China against the virus even before it had been released.[/QUOTE]And by that I meant covid-19 was purposefully released onto the public. Which is not to also say that my initial post here is actually kinda funny given that error.

[QUOTE=BigBuddy69;2579440]And it's because of the no lockdowns no mask no nothing policy that the death rates in India and Brazil are skyrocketing.[/QUOTE]That's simply not true. Both countries had lockdowns and restrictions, you really should educate yourself better before you decide to spread fake news. Try Google.

It's also interesting to see how there are other countries with more deaths per capita which you choose to ignore. There are also countries with less restrictions than India and Brazil which fared better. You're nothing but an uneducated demagogue.

You're brainwashed by the media, that's what you're talking about India and Brazil even though more people died per capita in Peru and Hungary.

[QUOTE=PaulInZurich;2579640]Wouldn't it be nice if people would educate themselves before coming with strong opinions. Please quote a single source that says that vaccinated people are being infected in large numbers. Oh, I forget you only trust what you can see with your own eyes. Well, did you see with your own eyes the virus jumping from a vaccinated person to another person? Or you trust French doctors? How come Macron makes vaccination of all health care personnel mandatory? Does he listen to French doctors or not?[/QUOTE]It's a well established fact that many, many fully vaccinated did in fact get infected with COVID-19. But please do show a source which says that fully vaccinated can't get infected.

[QUOTE=Mursenary;2579674]Pretty sure it was the massive amounts of people dying that kept clubs closed. Would have been much more if your kind had their way. FKKs would have been closed maybe forever if your people had won out. Good thing they lost.[/QUOTE]Haha, nope. You're wrong. Stop it with your lies and uneducated guesses.

[QUOTE=Ararat;2579257]Bror, re-invent yourself. That stuff is just boring, just like you. If you want to be a troll you at least need to try to be funny.[/QUOTE]I'm not surprised to see that you're trying to gaslight serious posters as myself. Stop trying to ruin this forum with your BS trolling. You're not being funny, you're just a sad little weirdo.

[QUOTE=Mursenary;2579211]The Tourette's bot is back.[/QUOTE]It's kinda sad that you don't realize how weird people think you're. You're the type of loser that women have to file a restraining order against. LMFAO! Get a life, a job and some friends.

[URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/israel-50-of-delta-variant-cases-vaccinated-severe-2021-6%3Famp[/URL]

[QUOTE=PaulInZurich;2579640]Wouldn't it be nice if people would educate themselves before coming with strong opinions. Please quote a single source that says that vaccinated people are being infected in large numbers. Oh, I forget you only trust what you can see with your own eyes. Well, did you see with your own eyes the virus jumping from a vaccinated person to another person? Or you trust French doctors? How come Macron makes vaccination of all health care personnel mandatory? Does he listen to French doctors or not?[/QUOTE]Because they are vaccinated, many are not careful, knowing they are quite protected, but they give to others. Would you let enter a vaccinated who is positive? What about both papy at Globe, Sofia won't have anymore geriatric business as past nurse, or at Sharks, then who will win for chess? And many fat? When delta fourth wave is arriving in EU, much faster spreading, Macron tries to protect weakest, when I never wrote not to vaccine, you can read all as you do, but I say this is not enough for covid playfield brothels and I don't say this being scared when I don't care for me, but if cluster, then closed for a while. About French forum you repeat bullshits without even knowing, you can read a claimed Globe specialist telling Megan started at Globe under covid, when she arrived on April 2017 and she wish to return to GT Bruggen when will reopen, but problem is she never worked at Bruggen and don't even know this club. FKK land of bullshits. For sure, not Megan. I would say Melissa ex Tara ex Ashley, long time German prostitute who finished at Globe on Summer 2020 , like whale on the beach. He even hallucinated seeing Linda ex YY NL. Maybe she put silicon to become Sofia ex Artemis?

At Murse,

I will assume that you have not read the the JAMA publication that you posted a link to. If have, then you are a lab technician who never design an experiment involving statistics in your life. Technician tend to just read the conclusion due to the lack of understand of the scientific process.

Experimental design 101. A study can only test what it was design to test. To do anything different, you are committing a sin of data mining. While data mining is useful (and I encourage people to do it), however, a conclusion / hypothesis from data mining must be tested again with a new experiment. That new experiment must be powered and designed to test your new hypothesis coming from data mining.

I should get pay for teaching you this shit.

Now, on to the JAMA paper and I will connect the dot for you. The author designed an experiment to test ivermectin vs placebo with primary outcome as time to deterioration. Let look at the result.

Deterioration, 1. 8% in ivermectin, 3. 5% in the placebo.

Deaths, No one die in ivermectin, 1 person die in placebo.

The author incorrectly design the study with the assumption, covid will lead to deterioration in this population. The reality is COVID is just a flu or common cold in this population. It might be deathly in other population. But that is not what they are looking at. Understand.

The author decided that the above data is meaningless. Therefore, they decided to change the primary outcome to time to resolution. Red flag.

Time to resolution, 10 days for ivermectin vs 12 days for placebo.

Once again the above data is meaningless because this population is too healthy. They need to powered it correct with a new study. The rule of thumb is you need a large (N) If you have a healthy population.

In addition, the author made an error and rightfully accounted for that. However, I'm a little surprise that the adverse event is the same for both ivermectin and placebo. Suggesting other error which was not caught. Ivermectin is safe, but even an baby aspirin will have some detectable adverse event. Anyway, I'm less concern about this and more concern about the poor experimental design.

Take away, Covid is a common cold in this population of people under 65, with no comorbidities, living in this geographical area. Other population, covid might be deathly, I don't know. OK.