Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!

[QUOTE=ShooBree;2579799]It's kinda sad that you don't realize how weird people think you're. You're the type of loser that women have to file a restraining order against. LMFAO! Get a life, a job and some friends.[/QUOTE]I got you covered dude:

[QUOTE=ShooBree;2579797]I'm not surprised to see that you're trying to gaslight serious posters as myself. Stop trying to ruin this forum with your BS trolling. You're not being funny, you're just a sad little weirdo.[/QUOTE]Back to trolling all of us?

Or having another psychotic episode?

[QUOTE=NiteRiderCal;2579851]At Murse,

I will assume that you have not read the the JAMA publication that you posted a link to. If have, then you are a lab technician who never design an experiment involving statistics in your life. Technician tend to just read the conclusion due to the lack of understand of the scientific process.

Experimental design 101. A study can only test what it was design to test. To do anything different, you are committing a sin of data mining. While data mining is useful (and I encourage people to do it), however, a conclusion / hypothesis from data mining must be tested again with a new experiment. That new experiment must be powered and designed to test your new hypothesis coming from data mining.

I should get pay for teaching you this shit.

Now, on to the JAMA paper and I will connect the dot for you. The author designed an experiment to test ivermectin vs placebo with primary outcome as time to deterioration. Let look at the result.

Deterioration, 1. 8% in ivermectin, 3. 5% in the placebo.

Deaths, No one die in ivermectin, 1 person die in placebo.

The author incorrectly design the study with the assumption, covid will lead to deterioration in this population. The reality is COVID is just a flu or common cold in this population. It might be deathly in other population. But that is not what they are looking at. Understand.

The author decided that the above data is meaningless. Therefore, they decided to change the primary outcome to time to resolution. Red flag..[/QUOTE]And you're a low integrity "researcher" who uses red herrings and misdirection ignoring things to which you have no rebuttal who doesn't know the difference between a milligram and a microgram.

Anyway, Quite a reach of a conclusion with lots of little borderline grab-out-of-your-ass particulars for the cited JAMA study when the FLCCC's main cited study of focus (Egypt) compared Ivermectin to HCQ (suspect?) while all other studies they cited had sample sizes in the teens. It goes both ways.

One thing is clear, the NIH article from the Journal of Pharmacology indisputably showed that just in LAB studies showed that in pure tissue (the molecular level), Ivermectin required much higher doses in order to produce anti-viral effects against SARS-COV-2. And that's without being filtered by the liver or attached to binding proteins in the body, Bioavailability. Do you even understand pharmacodynamics? Apparently not.

[QUOTE=Mursenary;2579860]Back to trolling all of us?

Or having another psychotic episode?[/QUOTE]Dude,

You live on this site. Do you understand how pathetic that is? It's obvious that you're the one having serious mental problems. Please keep trolling so I can laugh at you and thank God that I'm not you.

[QUOTE=Sirioja;2579831]Because they are vaccinated, many are not careful, knowing they are quite protected.[/QUOTE]Please explain how you are more careful in a brothel, with or without a vaccine. The rest of the post is just meaningless gibberish which has nothing to do with the subject.

[QUOTE=ShooBree;2579801][URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/israel-50-of-delta-variant-cases-vaccinated-severe-2021-6%3Famp[/URL][/QUOTE]Next time maybe read more than just the title. Here is the key point: "An analysis by UK health officials found that two doses of Pfizer's vaccine were 88% effective against Delta while a single shot was 33% effective. That's compared with 95% efficacy against the original strain, or 52% after one shot. "

[QUOTE=ShooBree;2579971]Dude,

You live on this site. Do you understand how pathetic that is? It's obvious that you're the one having serious mental problems. Please keep trolling so I can laugh at you and thank God that I'm not you.[/QUOTE]Yawn. Basic trolling. Try harder.

[QUOTE=PaulInZurich;2579986]Next time maybe read more than just the title. Here is the key point: "An analysis by UK health officials found that two doses of Pfizer's vaccine were 88% effective against Delta while a single shot was 33% effective. That's compared with 95% efficacy against the original strain, or 52% after one shot. "[/QUOTE]Are you really this stupid or are you just pretending because I squashed your argument into a million pieces? And don't try to change the subject, let me remind you of your own words:

"Please quote a single source that says that vaccinated people are being infected in large numbers".

I'm amazed by how stupid people on this forum are. I feel sorry for your coworkers, or in Nurse case; his mother.

[QUOTE=ShooBree;2580052]Are you really this stupid or are you just pretending because I squashed your argument into a million pieces? And don't try to change the subject, let me remind you of your own words:

"Please quote a single source that says that vaccinated people are being infected in large numbers".

I'm amazed by how stupid people on this forum are. I feel sorry for your coworkers, or in Nurse case; his mother.[/QUOTE]"New daily cases reported in Israel have jumped to over 100", out of that maybe half on vaccinated people, with no number how many of those were actually fully vaccinated. So less than 50 is a large number for you?

You can't even troll properly, you have to try harder to make it interesting, this is too easy. You are just as easy to make a fool of like S.

[QUOTE=ShooBree;2580052]I'm amazed by how stupid people on this forum are. I feel sorry for your coworkers, or in Nurse case; his mother.[/QUOTE]When one has to insult another person by labeling them some profession with derogatory intent, it shows that they have no content in their words. It's a reflection that even they have no faith on the merit of their own argument.

Arguments made with ill-faith same to be prevalent from the same cast of characters.

Anyway, fully vaccinated makes up 8% of June's Delta cases in the UK:

[URL]https://www.bbc.com/news/health-57610998.amp[/URL]

The line up at Sharks must be fantastic if people are spending more time talking about salmon than about sexy WGs. LOL!

[QUOTE=ShooBree;2580052]Are you really this stupid or are you just pretending because I squashed your argument into a million pieces? And don't try to change the subject, let me remind you of your own words:

"Please quote a single source that says that vaccinated people are being infected in large numbers".

I'm amazed by how stupid people on this forum are. I feel sorry for your coworkers, or in Nurse case; his mother.[/QUOTE]Yes, ignorance and stupidity are bliss.

Funny how the narrative changed: first the vaccine was "the only way end the pandemic," but now it has been twisted into "you'll still get infected, but it won't be as bad. " Hahahaha!

In the EUSSR only 50% of people have received their second vaccine shot, but the Pharma Fascists are already talking about a third "booster shot!" That's how well the vaccine 'protects' you from SARS-CoV-2! / sarc.

In the meantime, "thousands of unvaccinated people are getting infected with the Delta Plus Variant" all over Europe, but hospitals are empty! That's how "dangerous" it is!

Guess what: I'll stick to my natural immune system instead of chemical shit from Big Pharma, as 99,85% of people under 70 have no problemo whatsoever with Covid19! If I get a cold or a flu, I'll sick it out! Fuck Big Pharma, fuck the politicians, fuck the Snowflake Crybabies, fuck Klaus Schwab, fuck the Goebbels Mainstream Media, and fuck the CCP!

At Murse.

I have to work and don't have time to write a book on every point you bring up.

Once again, when you post a link, did you even read it?

[QUOTE]Subjects (n = 68) were assigned to one of four panels (3:1, ivermectin/placebo): 30 or 60 mg (three times a week) or 90 or 120 mg (single dose). The 30 mg panel (range: 34 7-594 microg/kg) also received a single dose with food after a 1-week washout. Safety assessments addressed both known ivermectin CNS effects and general toxicity[/QUOTE][QUOTE]Ivermectin was generally well tolerated, with no indication of associated CNS toxicity for doses up to 10 times the highest FDA-approved dose of 200 microg/kg[/QUOTE]Up to 10 x the highest dose of. That is 200 micrg / kg X 10 equal to 2 MG / kg. Unless my English is wrong here? As I said, no one is recommending this high of a dose, even if your link said that it is safe.

Dude, your just a technician who think you can go from lab bench to bed side. WTF. You can't even go from animal to the bed. That is sooo amateurish.

There are many, many publication supporting ivermectin. Each by itself does not mean shit and I can sit here and rip it apart all day. However, taking together and with metastudy done by FLCCC as well as other, it is a powerful evident. Not gold standard but powerful evident in my book. In addition, doctor all over the world, claiming they see their patient get better the next day. Once again anecdote does mean shit. But taking all together. I will be taking ivermectin if I even get a sneeze.

I trust the FLCCC doctor. I don't trust our scientific bureaucrat. I see to many amateurish technician go in to bureaucrat.

[QUOTE=PaulInZurich;2580115]"New daily cases reported in Israel have jumped to over 100", out of that maybe half on vaccinated people, with no number how many of those were actually fully vaccinated. So less than 50 is a large number for you?

You can't even troll properly, you have to try harder to make it interesting, this is too easy. You are just as easy to make a fool of like S.[/QUOTE]So 50 % is not much, it's hilarious how you try to change the narrative time after time.

And then the Dunning-Kruger effect kicks in, you're simply too stupid to realize that you're the stupid one.

You can gaslight and troll all you want, in the end of the day you're still wrong.

[QUOTE=Mursenary;2580127]When one has to insult another person by labeling them some profession with derogatory intent, it shows that they have no content in their words. It's a reflection that even they have no faith on the merit of their own argument.

Arguments made with ill-faith same to be prevalent from the same cast of characters.

Anyway, fully vaccinated makes up 8% of June's Delta cases in the UK:

[URL]https://www.bbc.com/news/health-57610998.amp[/URL][/QUOTE]This is hilarious, you must be schizophrenic considering how you just the other day called me a troll and psychopathic. Or how you called me a "school shooter".

Yeah, you got some serious mental problems, that's probably why you don't have any job, friends or life. You're a sad little weirdo who spends all his time writing BS on ISG from his mother's basement. You have to understand that you're a loser, get back to me when you have a life.

Thank you for proving my point, 8% is very much a significant number.

The indisputable fact is that vaccinated people are still getting infected with COVID.