Printable View
[QUOTE=CaliGuy;2668667][B]Democrate government?[/B]
From democrat government?[/QUOTE]So Cali Guy:
Do you think when the Bureau of Land Management reports shows oil companies have nearly 10,000 approved, but unused, permits.
That is fake news?
What more reliable source do you have?
[QUOTE=EatALotOpus;2668821]Behold the Great Leader!
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EztVHjghJg[/URL]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wHpuGx9gfk[/QUOTE]The second link didn't work for me. But if the dingbat fake news anchor in the first link tilting her head like a confused basset hound and rolling her eyes over every provably accurate statement Biden made in that interview had the data to refute what he was saying, why didn't she stop looking and sounding like an ignorant numbskull and cite it?
I'll answer that; because she couldn't.
The only thing she got right but still offered no specifics on was that "inflation is at a 40 year high".
Sure enough, inflation was higher during Reagan's second year in office than it is today. She got one right.
But she neglected to mention the Unemployment Rate also started at 8. 6% that year, much higher than the downward trending rate Reagan inherited from Carter a year earlier and skyrocketed into 4 consecutive months higher than 10% by the end of the year! To 10.8%!
Today's Unemployment Rate is 4%. And wages rose faster and higher last year than Reagan's presidency ever saw, certainly not in 1982. Both of which makes the sting of inflation today, lower than it was under Reagan, even less painful than it was under Reagan.
Otherwise, here is some data she neither mentioned nor could she refute except by tilting her empty head and rolling her eyes. Which is apparently enough to convince even more ignorant numbskulls than she is.
[B]"President Biden's Economic Performance Has Proved Unbeatable [/B]- Bloomberg" [URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-12-20/president-biden-s-economic-performance-has-proved-unbeatable[/URL].
As great as the numbers were at the end of Biden's first year in office, the numbers got even better as more data came in last month to revise them upward.
[B]"Bidens Economy Strengthens Upon Further Review[/B]
[URL]https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2022-02-04/bidens-economy-strengthens-upon-further-review?context=amp[/URL]
[B]"Murder Rose by Almost 30% in 2020. Its Rising at a Slower Rate in 2021. [/B]- The New York Times"[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/22/upshot/murder-rise-2020.html[/URL].
No Repub can or ever has matched Biden's economic results. Not even Reagan. And he is in fact "the best" the Repub Party has to point back to over many, many decades. Still not as good as Biden's results though.
And if Trump passed one bipartisan or, hell, even one partisan Infrastructure legislation during his four year self-enriching golf tournament, I would love to know when that happened. Much less a long, long over due $1. 9 Trillion bipartisan one.
[QUOTE=Gino02;2668835]Biden Approval Rating Falls to Record Low 37%: Post-ABC Poll ([URL]https://www.bloombergquint.com/onweb/biden-approval-rating-falls-to-record-low-37-post-abc-poll[/URL]).
But but, I'm pretty sure some experts here will still argue that this "damp sock puppet in human form" is better than Trump, even though most Americans seems to be waking up.
Here's another poll that MSM is suppressing:
62 percent of voters say Putin wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if Trump were president: poll ([URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump[/URL]).[/QUOTE]Hey, what a coincidence!
I just posted a couple of links for something that happened while Biden was president for just one year that didn't happen while Trump was president for four years too!
I'm repeating them here along with some others.
No need to ask anyone in a poll if they "think" these things would have happened under Trump or not. It is 100% certain they didn't:
[B]"President Biden's Economic Performance Has Proved Unbeatable[/B] - Bloomberg" [URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ar...ved-unbeatable.[/URL].
As great as the numbers were at the end of Biden's first year in office, the numbers got even better as more data came in last month to revise them upward.
[B]"Bidens Economy Strengthens Upon Further Review[/B][URL]https://www.usnews.com/news/politics...ew?context=amp[/URL].
[B]"Biden signs bipartisan infrastructure bill into law : NPR"[/B] [URL]https://www.npr.org/2021/11/15/1055841358/biden-signs-1t-bipartisan-infrastructure-bill-into-law[/URL].
[B]"Data continues to show downward trend in COVID deaths, hospitalizations"[/B] [URL]https://thenationaldesk.com/amp/news/health/data-continues-to-show-downward-trend-in-covid-deaths-hospitalizations-coronavirus-omicron-delta-cdc-vaccine-vaccines-hospital-pandemic-endemic-mask-guidance[/URL].
[QUOTE=Gino02;2668835]Biden Approval Rating Falls to Record Low 37%: Post-ABC Poll ([URL]https://www.bloombergquint.com/onweb/biden-approval-rating-falls-to-record-low-37-post-abc-poll[/URL]).
But but, I'm pretty sure some experts here will still argue that this "damp sock puppet in human form" is better than Trump, even though most Americans seems to be waking up.
Here's another poll that MSM is suppressing:
62 percent of voters say Putin wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if Trump were president: poll ([URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/595919-62-percent-of-voters-say-putin-wouldnt-have-invaded-ukraine-if-trump[/URL]).[/QUOTE]BTW, the "62%" poll you linked to and were so excited about is another one of those "online, vote as many times as you have email addresses from your mom's basement" polls.
Which are so unreliable and not to be taken seriously, they can't even claim any known +/-Margin of Error.
From your link:
[QUOTE]The survey is an online sample drawn from the Harris Panel and weighted to reflect known demographics. As a representative online sample, it does not report a probability confidence interval.[/QUOTE]Uh. Maybe that's wht MSM aren't exactly doing the same Olympic sized backflips over it that you are.
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2668676]It's easy to understand. Saker is an unapologetically pro-Russian blog. No one needs to "tell you that" when they themselves tell you that. Yes they also incorporate some unsubstantiated, tired global conspiracy theories with anti-Jew angles which are Golfinho's favorite flavor. So given the present world circumstances it makes for a nice change of the channel, relief from the awful cardigan sweater, beady eyes, and pointy nose of the bigot E. Michael Jones (look him up), but all are barking up the same tree.
Saker though is essentially Russian state media with some other twists added to the stew to attract pseudo-intellectuals like Golfinho. But in the end he is giving comfort to our enemies in a time of war. Don't waste much time with him as he is of little significance. Long Live Ukraine.[/QUOTE]Oh, I know about Saker. I've just wondered if Putin is the only world tyrant our Golfinho is enamored with, or if he's drooling over others as well. I mean if Blood Orange admitted being in love with Kim, perhaps Golfinho's not far behind either? Like I said, just curious.
And yes, I'm stunned by the good fight the Ukrainians have put up so far. But then I remembered reading how Ukrainian partisans were fighting Stalin for 10 years after the WW2, completely isolated and outgunned, so that probably shouldn't be a surprise.
[QUOTE=ScatManDoo;2668843]So Cali Guy:
Do you think when the Bureau of Land Management reports shows oil companies have nearly 10,000 approved, but unused, permits.
That is fake news?
What more reliable source do you have?[/QUOTE]LOL, the problem with crackpots is twofold.
1. There is no data that would support their idiotic notions.
2. Even if there were, they are astonishingly lazy. Even a simple 5-minute google search makes them dizzy. It's so much easier to just parrot their party lines over and over again ad nauseum.
Putin and Russia have never been so isolated, abandoned and screwed:
[B]"Putins Bloody Folly in Ukraine[/B]
The New Yorker" [URL]https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/03/07/putins-bloody-folly-in-ukraine/amp[/URL].
[QUOTE]The Russian leaders assault on a sovereign state has not only helped to unify the West against him; it has helped to unify Ukraine itself.[/QUOTE]
[B]"As Russias isolation grows, China hints at limits of friendship[/B]
[URL]https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/economy/2022/2/28/as-russias-isolation-grows-china-hints-at-limits-of-friendship[/URL].
[QUOTE]Chinese state-owned financial institutions have been quietly distancing themselves from Russias beleaguered economy.[/QUOTE]
[B]"Neutral Swiss join EU sanctions against Russia in break with past[/B] [URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/neutral-swiss-adopt-sanctions-against-russia-2022-02-28/[/URL].
[B]Russians turn on Putin: Massive anti-war protests break out in Moscow and St Petersburg for fourth day in a row - as Kremlin threatens to jail 'traitors' who offer to help Ukraine[/B]
[URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10557215/amp/Ukraine-war-Russians-turn-Putin-Kremlin-threatens-jail-traitors-try-help-Ukraine.html[/URL].
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2668896]Hey, what a coincidence!
I just posted a couple of links for something that happened while Biden was president for just one year that didn't happen while Trump was president for four years too!
I'm repeating them here along with some others.
No need to ask anyone in a poll if they "think" these things would have happened under Trump or not. It is 100% certain they didn't:
[B]"President Biden's Economic Performance Has Proved Unbeatable[/B] - Bloomberg" [URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ar...ved-unbeatable.[/URL].
As great as the numbers were at the end of Biden's first year in office, the numbers got even better as more data came in last month to revise them upward.
[B]"Bidens Economy Strengthens Upon Further Review[/B][URL]https://www.usnews.com/news/politics...ew?context=amp[/URL].
[B]"Biden signs bipartisan infrastructure bill into law : NPR"[/B] [URL]https://www.npr.org/2021/11/15/1055841358/biden-signs-1t-bipartisan-infrastructure-bill-into-law[/URL]..[/QUOTE]LOL I'm sure you know that those articles that you referred to are also opinion pieces by MSM. Sad is that few people like yourself are still supporting this "damp sock puppet in human form", rest with even minimal brain moved on.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2668907]LOL, the problem with crackpots is twofold.
1. There is no data that would support their idiotic notions.
2. Even if there were, they are astonishingly lazy. Even a simple 5-minute google search makes them dizzy. It's so much easier to just parrot their party lines over and over again ad nauseum.[/QUOTE]That's why it is so easy to support the one-term, twice-impeached, fake-POTUS former guy.
1. Everything is "fake news" that doesn't come from either the Orange Fruitcake himself or one of the many ultra-stupid winger propaganda sites. Government sources? Fake news. Foreign sources? Fake news. Truth? Fake news? Lies? The truth.
2. All fact-check sites are also "fake news" for the reasons stated above.
3. They have no idea how to think for themselves so, yes, they parrot the party line ad nauseum.
4. Breathing one's own exhaust is considered a good thing.
So, they are forever caught in the 4-instruction-loop above.
[QUOTE=Golfinho;2667198]Well, well, the people behind Senile POTUS succeeded in starting their war on Russia's border. After Trump managed to keep the lid on it for four years, the Democrat Party warmongers in total recklessness just went right ahead and fcuked everybody.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=EatALotOpus;2667215]Bradon's deterrence and fourty+ years of diplomatic know-how worked out well for Ukraine Eh? And he did that all by himself! Stand by! With the impotence of this POTUS China is acting next
We got long black winter ahead of us and it'll last for three more years.
Let's go Brandon![/QUOTE][QUOTE=EihTooms;2667254]I have still yet to read a coherent explanation for how a spectacularly stupid move by Putin has anything whatsoever to do with Biden?
"Biden is weak"?
I notice Putin didn't blunder into an invasion of the USA. Why Not?
I also notice Putin didn't bunder into invading a NATO country where "weak" Biden would be bound by Treaty to respond militarily. Why not?
I also notice Putin has just bought himself god knows how many years of the most unified crippling sanctions ever imposed on a needy, pathetically deficient national economy.
Unified or rather Re-unified thanks to "weak" Biden unifying civilized nations like never before after Trump spent 4 years trying to make Putin's dream of a dismantled Western Alliance come true.
And unless Trump or another Repub weasels into the White House to secretly violate those sanctions against Putin as dutiful Putin Puppet Trump did until he was busted by the Dems in Congress and forced to abide by the agreement, Russia is going to be forehead deep in shit until Putin squeals like a stuck pig.[/QUOTE]Yes, EihTooms nailed it. Four days after the invasion, the ruble collapsed today.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2668908]Putin and Russia have never been so isolated, abandoned and screwed:
[B]"Putins Bloody Folly in Ukraine[/B]
The New Yorker" [URL]https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/03/07/putins-bloody-folly-in-ukraine/amp[/URL].
[B]"As Russias isolation grows, China hints at limits of friendship[/B]
[URL]https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/economy/2022/2/28/as-russias-isolation-grows-china-hints-at-limits-of-friendship[/URL].
[B]"Neutral Swiss join EU sanctions against Russia in break with past[/B] [URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/neutral-swiss-adopt-sanctions-against-russia-2022-02-28/[/URL]..[/QUOTE]What does that mean approx 90% of the electorate don't want him as prez LOL.
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/mclaughlin-biden-democrats/2022/02/28/id/1058907/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.rt.com/news/550837-democratic-socialists-nato-expansion-ukraine/[/URL]
Yes sir.
[QUOTE=Gino02;2668911]LOL I'm sure you know that those articles that you referred to are also opinion pieces by MSM. Sad is that few people like yourself are still supporting this "damp sock puppet in human form", rest with even minimal brain moved on.[/QUOTE]Is it your contention that the only things that [B]aren't[/B] opinion pieces are propaganda articles from ultra-stupid wingnut sites.
Thanks for clearing that up.
EihTooms.
Yep, this never would have happened While Trump was so-called president.
Putin and Russia have never been so isolated, abandoned and screwed:
Congratulations Eih. You finally told the truth in a post. You are right the Ukraine invasion would not have happened under Trump.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2668906]Oh, I know about Saker. I've just wondered if Putin is the only world tyrant our Golfinho is enamored with, or if he's drooling over others as well. I mean if Blood Orange admitted being in love with Kim, perhaps Golfinho's not far behind either? Like I said, just curious.
And yes, I'm stunned by the good fight the Ukrainians have put up so far. But then I remembered reading how Ukrainian partisans were fighting Stalin for 10 years after the WW2, completely isolated and outgunned, so that probably shouldn't be a surprise.[/QUOTE]Since you request links from others, will you supply us with links with respect to "Ukrainian partisans were fighting Stalin for 10 years after the WW2"? My point is maybe you need to do a better job to see who were those 'partisans' especially from the point of view of your heritage.
[QUOTE=ScatManDoo;2668843]So Cali Guy:
Do you think when the Bureau of Land Management reports shows oil companies have nearly 10,000 approved, but unused, permits.
That is fake news?
What more reliable source do you have?[/QUOTE]I went to Bureau of Land Management Site and it does not show that anywhere on that site. I googled it and it came up as an opinion on a liberal site. Please show me the BLM posting of this information or admit you just took it from fake news.