Printable View
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2669437]So, neither you nor the poster you think "nailed it" can produce a single credible source of data to substantiate even one of those thoroughly debunked claims?.[/QUOTE]If you want a credible source come to USA and drive by a gas station or go into a grocery store to see what Biden has accomplished. Hiding in a apartment in a foreign country reading fake news qualifies you for nothing.
[QUOTE=Canada;2669617]If you want a credible source come to USA and drive by a gas station or go into a grocery store to see what Biden has accomplished. Hiding in a apartment in a foreign country reading fake news qualifies you for nothing.[/QUOTE]You've still got nothing?
Case closed.
[QUOTE=Vagabundo1;2669555]Putin.
My admiration for Putin is based on his choice of mistress alone. Haha.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/joan-rivers-calls-president-obama-716738/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Gino02;2669478]Worst since 1979, according to even your biased MSM opinion column:
"Biden's -20 point net approval rating on the economy is the worst for any president since at least 1978 at the time of their first State of the Union."
"Since Gallup started asking that question in 1979, there has never been a president giving their first State of the Union when a lower percentage of Americans were satisfied with how the country was going."
Reference: [URL]https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/01/politics/approval-rating-biden-sotu-analysis/index.html[/URL].[/QUOTE]Don't wingers consider CNN "fake news"? So how can a poll conducted by CNN or referenced in any CNN article be true. After all, isn't it "fake news"?
[QUOTE=Canada;2669617]If you want a credible source come to USA and drive by a gas station or go into a grocery store to see what Biden has accomplished. Hiding in a apartment in a foreign country reading fake news qualifies you for nothing.[/QUOTE]He asked for a "credible source." Kinda like you asked for re" the Bureau of Land Management website. But sure, deflect 'cause that's what you do best.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2669388]I really am beginning to wonder if you wingers think the purpose of the presidency or any other elected office is to get high poll numbers regardless of actual, verifiable economic or national security results.[/QUOTE]BB, that was a video of what Biden accomplished, and the best answer was "he is not a Republican."
Ask me that of Trump, and I would say: stable economy, no wars, secure border, energy independence, and rational leadership.
As for polls, Trump was hammered every day for 4 years in the media. Trump jokes about injecting bleach and he is such an idiot. We just saw Biden make a huge gaffe with Iranians and Ukrainians and it is "Oh, that is okay, we know what you meant."
I do not give a damn about polls. Were Americans better off under Biden or Trump? It is Trump, and it is not even close. Not only do we have sky high inflation, we have to worry about their being WW3.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2669454]Our resident crackpots are so hyper today. Is it the moon, I wonder?[/QUOTE]You are the crackpot who was doling out inappropriate medical advice.
Here is one for you: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k6xroHtn-8[/URL].
$50 to anyone who pick out Xpartan at the table.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2669524]He confirms every truth well informed people have been saying about Trump and Biden and destroys every lie ill-informed loons have been saying about them.
Sure enough, Trump was a do nothing, know nothing moron who spent 4 years kissing Putin's ass and the only reason Putin waited until now to invade Ukraine was because he wasn't sure his military was ready.
In other words, if the Republican Party's surgical removal of anti-Putin invasion military support for Ukraine from their 2016 platform on Putin / Trump's demand along with Trump delaying and denying military aid to Ukraine until Dems in Congress busted him and forced him to give the damn money and support to Ukraine, you prick, and if Trump's "perfect phone call" had all worked out as Putin, Trump and the Republican Party had planned, Putin's military most certainly would have been ready sooner and in a stronger position relative to a weaker Ukraine's military than it is today since Biden took office.
[B]"John Bolton: Not accurate to say 'Trump's behavior somehow deterred the Russians'[/B]
TheHill" [URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/596338-john-bolton-not-accurate-to-say-trumps-behavior-somehow-deterred-the?amp[/URL].[/QUOTE]LOL, talk about yet another right-wing-nut hack who got got expecting a totally different answer. Learn how to vet your guests, idiots. And yes, absolutely, whatever sanctions had been put against Putin, were implemented AGAINST Trump's wishes when he would've been outvetoed if he tried to prevent them.
Here is the no-one's-tougher-on-Russia-than-me Blood Orange being tough with the war criminal Lavrov. Boy, did he show him!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2669524]He confirms every truth well informed people have been saying about Trump and Biden and destroys every lie ill-informed loons have been saying about them.
Sure enough, Trump was a do nothing, know nothing moron who spent 4 years kissing Putin's ass and the only reason Putin waited until now to invade Ukraine was because he wasn't sure his military was ready.
In other words, if the Republican Party's surgical removal of anti-Putin invasion military support for Ukraine from their 2016 platform on Putin / Trump's demand along with Trump delaying and denying military aid to Ukraine until Dems in Congress busted him and forced him to give the damn money and support to Ukraine, you prick, and if Trump's "perfect phone call" had all worked out as Putin, Trump and the Republican Party had planned, Putin's military most certainly would have been ready sooner and in a stronger position relative to a weaker Ukraine's military than it is today since Biden took office..[/QUOTE]Yawn. Bolton was fired by Trump. Bolton never met a war he did not like. He wanted a more aggressive approach in Venezuela, Afghanistan, and North Korea. Take Nordstrom 2. Trump fought it with all he could. Biden was like, "Eh, it is fine."
Bolton's critique of Trump was filed with gotcha type "I am smarter than you" points like Trump did not know where Ukraine was or Finland was part of Russia. Whatever.
Truth is Bolden's sorry ass was fired because he wanted to go to war with everyone. Trump did arm the Ukrainians but with a guy like Bolton that was not enough. Bolton is the kind that thinks Ukraine should have been allowed to enter NATO and be given nukes. He is bought and paid for by the defense industry and advocated for the stupid Iraq war. Bolton being critical of Trump is as certain as the sun rising tomorrow.
[QUOTE=Canada;2669617]If you want a credible source come to USA and drive by a gas station or go into a grocery store to see what Biden has accomplished. Hiding in a apartment in a foreign country reading fake news qualifies you for nothing.[/QUOTE]Like I've already said before, there are two problems with right-wing nuts.
1. They're willing and ready to lie whenever it suits their agenda.
2. They are too lazy to lie convincingly.
I don't live in a foreign country. I live in NYC, the second most expensive market in the USA I don't see huge issues at grocery stores. I see some moderate increases with some foodstaffs. Cream cheese is about 20% more expensive than it used to be and it's rarely on sale lately. As to gas, I have paid more.
Now, [blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue] who for 4 years sucked off the worst tyrant on the planet, who tirelessly worked on destroying our democratic institutions and who almost managed to sever our ties with the rest of the civilized world.
And they also insist that all our problems, mind you, have nothing to do with the pandemic that kept the world economy shut down for 2 years or the raging war in Europe brought on by the moron's own BFF, but president Biden, who's already done more for the working man than all repub presidents in the last 70 years combined.
Well, keep lying. It's just that your lies are so flat and dumb, I wish you put a little effort in it. At least your former Liar-in-Chief was somewhat entertaining. You are not.
Below I have quoted verbatim today's editorial from the Wall Street Journal's Editorial Board. It is a honest analysis of last night's State of the Union Address where the President of the United States could of made a mid-course correction and helped his failing presidency, the country, and the world. But in typical Brandon fashion, the Wizard of OZ missed the opportunity. He probably was not even aware he had one. Truth be told: Joe, I like vanilla ice cream before my afternoon nap, Biden is no Bill Clinton and Biden is just not up to the job.
Here is the editorial:
"Biden had supportive words for Ukraine against Russia, but he offered no domestic or defense policy reset. Biden is no Olaf Scholz. The new Chancellor upended decades of center-left German defense and energy policy this week after Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, and Mr. Biden had a similar opportunity in his State of the Union address Tuesday. He missed the moment. The President remained on the same policy course of his first year, albeit dressed up in new anti-inflation packaging.
More defense spending to meet the threats from autocrats? No. A new appreciation for the contribution of fossil fuels to American and European security? Not a word. A note that government spending contributed to the highest inflation in 40 years? Nope. A word of praise for the private Pharma innovation that developed Covid therapies and vaccines? He proposed government price controls instead.
Mr. Biden did offer stirring support for Ukraine and its fight for freedom, which received bipartisan applause. His Administration deserves credit for helping to rally Europe and other nations to impose sanctions and provide more military aid. He was properly condemning of Mr. Putin.
But his self-congratulation ignored the failure to deter the Russian autocrat. "We were ready" if Mr. Putin invaded, Mr. Biden said. But if the USA Had been ready, Mr. Putin wouldn't have invaded. The Russian invaded because he thought the West would do little. And Mr. Putin finds himself in a struggle now because of the bravery of 41 million Ukrainians, not the strength of Europe or the United States.
What we also didn't hear was a vow that Russia will not be allowed to conquer and hold Ukraine. There was no warning to Mr. Putin not to launch missiles into residential neighborhoods or surround and starve cities into submission like a medieval siege. This was not Harry Truman at the dawn of the Cold War calling the world to meet a new danger.
On his domestic agenda, Mr. Biden acknowledged inflation, as he had to given the polls. But he blamed rising prices on the pandemic and greedy businesses, and his solutions are to unleash prosecutors and antitrust cops, and to spend even more money on social welfare and entitlements. His most other-worldly line was that his program would "cut energy costs for families an average of $500 a year by combating climate change."
The entire point of his climate agenda is to raise the price of energy for Americans by reducing the supply and increasing the cost of coal, oil and natural gas. His regulators are working to do that every day in every way. It was as if the horror of the last week, which exposed the folly of Europe's dependence on Russian oil and gas, had never happened. The climate left still has a choke hold on this Presidency.
An anxious world is looking for American leadership in a dangerous new era. Instead Mr. Biden offered a rehash of his first-year domestic agenda that has brought him to his low political ebb. It's dispiriting that a White House facing so many daunting challenges could come up with so little. The President really does need to fire some people and get better advice."
So it looks like we will have 3 more years of the same same declining leadership. Oh fuck! The only good news is Wokeism is dead. Thank you, Mr. President. Let's go Brandon. Buy Gold!
[QUOTE=Canada;2669365]Stop with the fake news. Show me the facts on the Bureau of Land Management site. That will be the truth. Why do you always avoid the truth?[/QUOTE]Since the Bureau of Land Management is part of the Department of the Interior (you probably didn't know that), I found the data that you were looking for. The data all comes from the BLM site. You, of course, will say that this, too, is "fake news" or you'll say something equally as nonsensical. But here's the link: [URL]https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/report-on-the-federal-oil-and-gas-leasing-program-doi-eo-14008.pdf[/URL].
I will warn you in advance that the report contains lots of bigly words. Undoubtedly too bigly for most supporters of the one-term, twice-impeached, fake-POTUS former guy. But you've got to take the good with the bad!
Please read the last paragraph on page 4 and the first paragraph of page 5. Reread them enough times that the data penetrates. Since you won't read them, I am including them here to let you know that [B]I[/B] have read them. FYI, the [BI]bold and italics[/BI] are mine: "Federal onshore oil and gas production accounts for approximately seven percent of domestically produced oil and eight percent of domestically produced natural gas. The BLM currently manages 37,496 Federal oil and gas leases covering 26.6 million acres with nearly 96,100 wells. Of the more than 26 million onshore acres under lease today to the oil and gas industry,[BI]nearly13.9 million (or 53 percent) of those acres are non-producing[/BI]. The oil and gas industry has a substantial number of unused permits to drill onshore. As of September 30,2021, the [be]oil and gas industry holds more than 9,600 approved permits that are available to drill[ / bi]."
The majority of page 5 deals with 'offshore' production. At the end of page 5, the report says: "[bi]The 55 percent of the leased acreage that is non-producing[ / bi] may be in an.
Earlier stage of the development process, or being held for speculative reasons, indicating a sufficient inventory of leased acreage to sustain development for years to come.
By the way, [be]non producing[ / be] means, as it says above, [be]being held for speculative reasons[ / be]. In other words, [be]stockpiled[ / be].
So, this government report says [be]the exact same thing as the OP said[ / be]. It also says [be]exactly the same thing[ / be] as the links I provided that you called "fake news."
So, as it turns out, you are the one spreading misinformation.
But we all know that misinformation is the hallmark of supporters of the one-term, twice-impeached, fake-POTUS former guy. It is all you have. If Donnie didn't say it, it isn't real! If I didn't hear it from some winger source like Tucker "Nobody in their right mind should believe anything I say" Carlson, it isn't real! If it didn't come from Newsmax or Infowars or OANN or some other abysmally stupid source, it isn't real!
"Fake news", "fake news", "fake news". Hogwash!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2669690]Yawn. Bolton was fired by Trump. Bolton never met a war he did not like. He wanted a more aggressive approach in Venezuela, Afghanistan, and North Korea. Take Nordstrom 2. Trump fought it with all he could. Biden was like, "Eh, it is fine."
Bolton's critique of Trump was filed with gotcha type "I am smarter than you" points like Trump did not know where Ukraine was or Finland was part of Russia. Whatever.
Truth is Bolden's sorry ass was fired because he wanted to go to war with everyone. Trump did arm the Ukrainians but with a guy like Bolton that was not enough. Bolton is the kind that thinks Ukraine should have been allowed to enter NATO and be given nukes. He is bought and paid for by the defense industry and advocated for the stupid Iraq war. Bolton being critical of Trump is as certain as the sun rising tomorrow.[/QUOTE]He's a "never was" bitter loser, he could not even be confirmed by Congress so he was a recess appt for W the turd.
He's bitter cause Trump gave him a job and didn't hand over to him the ability to make the foreign policy decisions the W crowd, like Dickhead Cheney would prefer.
Then to add insult to insult he fired him! LOL.
I'm guessing he'll never work in DC again, ok maybe just for the Rachel Maddow show or CNN LMAO.
[QUOTE=Vagabundo1;2669555]Putin.
My admiration for Putin is based on his choice of mistress alone. Haha.[/QUOTE]As soon as Russia gets regime-changed, and American globohomo culture reaches St. Petersburg (and Moscow), we can look forward to Russian women becoming just like their American sisters. Won't that be nice.
[QUOTE=PVMonger;2669712]So, this government report says [be]the exact same thing as the OP said[/be]. It also says [be]exactly the same thing[/be] as the links I provided that you called "fake news."
So, as it turns out, you are the one spreading misinformation.
But we all know that misinformation is the hallmark of supporters of the one-term, twice-impeached, fake-POTUS former guy. It is all you have. If Donnie didn't say it, it isn't real! If I didn't hear it from some winger source like Tucker "Nobody in their right mind should believe anything I say" Carlson, it isn't real! If it didn't come from Newsmax or Infowars or OANN or some other abysmally stupid source, it isn't real!
"Fake news", "fake news", "fake news".[/QUOTE]I picture in my head CaliGuy / Canada stomping his feet and banging his fists as he shouts this at the top of his lungs.