Rebuttal too requires a rationale.
[QUOTE=StealthBoy;2555100]Do you have any proof for what you just said? What do you mean by 'chances are low'. Don't spread false information.[/QUOTE]Stealth'Boy', 'LonelyMonger' has got his facts straight, albeit with caveat emptor! That being of gross oversight pertaining to vaginal micro-environment homeostasis, presuming that it's in sync and physiological harmony; which tbh, in a harlot's lifestyle and routine is most likely altered. So let's cut him some slack, not lambast and chastise for redeeming fundamental right of expressing his two cents on what is nonetheless a split-second lapse in judgement which could potentially cost OP his peace of mind and health for years to follow. Immature move OP, even a remote possibility of an iota of lethal outcome is best circumvented.
Although a Board-certified and licensed Medical Practitioner, I will make an educated attempt to justify my above stand and not ask you to blindly take my "expert" opinion at face value. A woman's Gynaecologic establishment is thoroughly evolved in the pursuit of innate hygiene, immunity, complex via epithelial defense against virulent invasion via pathogens and surprisingly efficient in self-cleansing. The vaginal microbiota is comprised primarily of Lactobacilli which maintains an acidic pH (natural spermicidal-paradox for propagation BTW), thereby biochemically inhibiting proliferation of varios other flora and micro-organisms by default, HIV expression within intriotus including. Now this phenomenon gets disrupted through unsanitary practises leading to bacterial vaginosis, Candidiasis, Trichomoniasis and the likes. Which is quite likely the case if you're going bareback on paisa-worth cum dumpsters who couldn't give two shits about ever suctioning and fumigating them privates. Hence in a nutshell, the flesh sell-out isn't the ideal candidate whom your willy ought to penetrate nilly as that would be utterly silly. Oh, the defence goes both ways. Women have mega levels of resistance against permitting live HIV to diffuse through into circulation and induce pathogenic response. The HIV epidemic of Africa was narrowed down to episodes of coitus sans barrier methods of protection. Not the odd one or two. Once them women went black, they couldn't go back. As for men, no such defence mechanisms in place and guess what! Semen is the dearest companion for HIV to habitat and sustain in due to nutritious nature of ejaculate. Even with negligible viral loads in blood, HIV has been detected exponentially on semen analysis in men. Cheers.
Who is this Albert Einstein? LOL
[QUOTE=LonelyMonger30;2555039]Do not worry about HIV / AIDS. The chance of HIV spreading from a woman to a man via unprotected sex is very low (although it can happen), it mostly transmits easier from a man to a woman via vaginal and mostly anal intercourse. In your case you are more at risk from Syphilis, Herpes; Gonorrhea, Hepatitis etc. I would suggest you wait for a month from your date of unprotected sex and then get a complete STD panel test after consulting your physician & then repeat once again after 3 months from you date of exposure. For your test results to be valid and conclusive its important you not engage in further unprotected sex (both vaginal & oral) and always be honest with your doctor. Good luck![/QUOTE]Reply:
Buddy sorry to say but your logic towards HIVs cannot get transmitted via vaginal penetration from a HIV infected female to a male are baseless.
I should not reveal few things socially but being a professional hazard for me to counsel others and taken an oath to save others beyond myself.
I would like to correct you that HIV transmission has no barrier of human race, color, gender, etc etc.
Rather as others are pointing out, best advice is to take STDs inspection and monitor after 6 months again.
I hope others also in this group are more sensible towards the fatalities of mongering so at least be very stern on using 'C' and avoiding DATY as much as possible unless you are very sure the girl and you both are HIV negative.
Speed reading hack isn't working out for you mate.
[QUOTE=SBlack0070;2555244]Reply:
Buddy sorry to say but your logic towards HIVs cannot get transmitted via vaginal penetration from a HIV infected female to a male are baseless.
I should not reveal few things socially but being a professional hazard for me to counsel others and taken an oath to save others beyond myself.
I would like to correct you that HIV transmission has no barrier of human race, color, gender, etc etc.
Rather as others are pointing out, best advice is to take STDs inspection and monitor after 6 months again.
I hope others also in this group are more sensible towards the fatalities of mongering so at least be very stern on using 'C' and avoiding DATY as much as possible unless you are very sure the girl and you both are HIV negative.[/QUOTE]I pity our erudite friend who is on the receiving end of rebuke by ignorant folks laying claim to knowing it all. He doesn't state that it absolutely "cannot" spread but explicitly mentions rather of slim chances due to the odd foolish encounter or two. Guess what, he is logically sound! Albert Einstein was a renowned Theoretical Physicist and Mathematician BTW, not a VDRL emeritus. I wish you'd taken a moment to peruse through my trailing post to understand the biochemical intricacies behind why possibly the lowest risk for HIV transmission is through heterosexual vaginal intercourse.
Nobody here knows better than decades worth of tireless research and statistical analysis so going by established facts, high-risk groups for HIV spread comprises of the 4-Hs-homosexuality (anal sex-no vaginal epithelial and mucosal defence barrier at play plus due to it being highly vascular past dentate line), heroin abusers (shared needles), Haiti (African flesh traders) and haemophiliacs. Homosexuals contributed to the AIDS endemic of 80's in Miami (USA). Has it's origin in 1920's when DRC cannibals butchered and consumed raw meat of primates infected with SIV.
Now I'm not endorsing bareback acts with a sex worker in a country where HIV is prevalent as it's still very much possible to contract HIV via unprotected coitus (30% risk still isn't a valid excuse), hence I back Psybram that OP initially get screened via ELISA / Western Blot (gold standard due to high sensitivity) and only get PEP (Truvada+lopinavir+lamivudine) within 72 hours from contact if tests return positive. Presuming that she ought be HIV negative since she is just 22 isn't wise. Women hit menarche from 13 on average and data has proven that low socio-economic class of society is exponentially more sexually active, be it for money or child-bearing in the younger years. Lack of knowledge into STDs and raging carnal appetite is a recipe for health disaster. I speak from a Professional background in Medicine, FYKI. Oh and thanks 'InterCourser', for the kind acknowledgement. Be well and cover up. Not worth it, condom-less sex is overrated.
1 photos
Well said although one in a million claim is tad too liberal and bit exaggerated.
[QUOTE=BadMan;2555306]Am not a professional. But there was a time when the condom broke in one of my encounters way back in 2012.
And I was shit scared. Did lot of R&D at that time.
Keypoints.
The probability of getting HIV from one act of unprotected sex with an HIV positive female is one in a million. Provided there are no exposed cuts and bruises. However if the number of sexual partners and encounters of unprotected sex are more the probability increases exponentially.
Unprotected Anal Sex is very very dangerous. And to be avoided at any cost.
Regards,
Badman.[/QUOTE]Uncircumcised bareback adventures poses a greater risk than one would imagine as well. Yes, multiple mistakes of same nature ends up costing dearly. All said and done, covering up cuts out 99% chances of transmission of whatever risk (3 in 10 daring acts of unprotected sex tends to transmits HIV), so best to rubber up nonetheless.
Have you guys not learned anything?
About 22 years ago, a Master Monger known as Surfer turned me on to so much wisdom, not the least of which was that I could buy 15 minute oral HIV tests from a clinic in Patpong for $10 a shot. These tests made by Abbott Labs are better than 99%.
Accurate for positive. It changed my travel world. I'm not a cheap fuck (like so many) so I stocked up on them and tested every ho I banged (yes, bareback) throughout SEA (that would be in the hundreds). You can buy these.
Kits anywhere now so what is the excuse?
When I read these forums, it's like you guys are clueless.
