Printable View
Often, many slim, natural without silicon, fresh look, girls, like Ada, Diana, Maria, Francesca, Karolina. Pol, Rena. Some classy, pretty like Karin, Arabella ex Mainhattan, Agnes. For my tastes for look, Sharks is now number 1 in Frankfurt and Aca is in NRW with plenty of fresh Romanian beauties. But 1 dreamed Romanian classy beauty found at GT.
She made me remember coitus with my girlfriend of the days of University. Very GFE. One must meet her before she becomes a professional.
I'm glad I saw BM again.
Hello all,
I will be arriving in Frankfurt on St. Patrick's day March 17. I am wondering if there is special party going on St. Patrick's day in FKK Sharks?
Or is it bad idea to go to Oase on St. Patrick's day? I could wait until the next day if the number of girl selection is better.
Also, what is the cheapest and safest way to go to FKK Shark from Frankfurt Central Station?
Thank for all your help.
[QUOTE=Sirioja;1827033]Often, many slim, natural without silicon, fresh look, girls, like Ada, Diana, Maria, Francesca, Karolina. Pol, Rena. Some classy, pretty like Karin, Arabella ex Mainhattan, Agnes. For my tastes for look, Sharks is now number 1 in Frankfurt and Aca is in NRW with plenty of fresh Romanian beauties. But 1 dreamed Romanian classy beauty found at GT.[/QUOTE]Yes I began noticing the same when I was thinking about my all different FKK I visited last year.
Each FKK has different appeals and now that I come to think about it, with my one time visit in summer to sharks, I did notice many fresh girl just joined FKK type of girls at FKK sharks. I feel there is casting for fresh girls at FKK sharks. In palace and Artemis, they expect some experience in FKK before girls work in club and I know this via girls, but I think FKK sharks has casting policy that new girls to industry can begin in sharks?? I felt something like this considering the looks of girls and I do like non tattoo teen type, so I think FKK Sharks are the place for this? I may give another shot at Sharks to taste girls.
[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1826464]
Cheyenne (Oase) was former Globe, but many guys say she don't DFK, but does that mean she DFK'd at Globe?[/QUOTE]Maybe she did, or she didn't last that long at Globe. Some girls have been at Globe for a day and had to leave as they didn't adapt to the standard service level.
HB.
[QUOTE=MrHo;1826620]
Even I was disappointed with sharks last summer as there was hype on forum about LU and LU was that good, I do love younger less pro looking girls so I may give another try to FKK sharks in my next visit at Frankfurt. I did not see stunner there though, but around 7's, but less pro looking, which I begin to realize that I want to go to room with, maybe sharks has LU casting that require girls to be new FKK industry comers? Where as palace and Artemis require girls to be experienced in FKK industry.[/QUOTE]Could have been a bit overly hyped at times.
There were not that many really pretty faces, however IMHO the line up improved a lot after the summer. During the summer I preferred Oase, with a set up more suited to the summer weather. Every club has its ups and downs for line up quality. You should not judge too much based on just one visit, especially if it was not a Friday or Saturday.
Palace has some pretty girls, but rather too much silicone and aggression last time I visited. Was hard to feel comfortable there, despite being a regular there in the past. My success rates for getting a GFE were not that good. Only found one girl worth repeating. Next visit or two she was not there. Bummer.
[QUOTE=Tedesco;1826454]Sometimes it's better to check a place and the girls out yourself instead of relying other punters. The board is important and gives us all the chance to share information, but in the end expectations on girls, their behavior, service festures and "what" to pay for may be often very different.[/QUOTE]Its ALWAYS better to decide what girls appeal to you first, before considering likely risk based on reviews and on other punters that have tried the girl. Also you have to know which persons have reliable opinions likely to be in tune with your own.
Sometimes however a girl that is not quite your spec can be highly recommended. In the end I had to take notice of recommendations for Pamela in the past, despite her legs being a bit thick for me (face still gorgeous). My buddies were right. She quickly became a favorite. I also eventually took notice of recommendations for Moira. I always liked her body. Again I was well rewarded. She is one of the very best. She has a dick squeezing pussy talent too. Wonderful GFE.
So recommendations are really useful for girls in the borderline choice category, where an extra push is needed to get you to pull the trigger. However I am not interested in recommendations for girls that I have never so much as noticed.
If a girl is sufficiently hot / pretty, I try her regardless of other opinions.
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1827166]Could have been a bit overly hyped at times.
There were not that many really pretty faces, however IMHO the line up improved a lot after the summer. During the summer I preferred Oase, with a set up more suited to the summer weather. Every club has its ups and downs for line up quality. You should not judge too much based on just one visit, especially if it was not a Friday or Saturday.
Palace has some pretty girls, but rather too much silicone and aggression last time I visited. Was hard to feel comfortable there, despite being a regular there in the past. My success rates for getting a GFE were not that good. Only found one girl worth repeating. Next visit or two she was not there. Bummer.[/QUOTE]Palace we all got to negotiate hard to get good service. Girls at palace are pro, same goes to Artemis, but palace is first in line for pro girls and upsell. Artemis is second. Oase I like the set up and surprisingly, food, I liked pizza and pasta there with good coffee comparison to other FKK, you know Italian touch there, but girls at Oase can be sharky too. In Artemis and palace sometimes, real sometimes, you find real stunners, but got to negotiate hard for good service most of times, especially at palace.
But sharks was more laid back girls who are still girls just tend to be in FKK club, I got this feeling, you get that too? I mean this is appealing to me and I did not see stunners on that day, but let say we can expect some next door teen girl kinda girls to be found at FKK sharks, you know cute and bit beautiful, but not stunners. So for this use, I may hit FKK sharks again.
Each FKK has different use for mongers, how about that?
I visited Sharks again last weekend and the lineup had improved immensely after my first visit just after New Year's day. I also found that the service was better although I had lously service from one Romanian girls, she is relatively tall at 1. 7 with short black hair. She cheated for time, 10 minutes to go, just before I was about to come and said I needed to extend even though I pointed out that we had 10 minutes left. Then I told her to get lost and paid her the 50 Euros. I think her came was Chrissi.
But one Romanian girl, red head, over 30 buts looks 22, was great, Ester was her name.
Although the absolutely fabulous Serbian Milana was there and I had four sessions with her over two days. Her service rivals that of any girl at the Globe, but in general service wise you are way better of in the Globe, but is it worth 2. 5 xs the cost, that is another issue.
Her Bosnian friend Imina, is very good service wise and will take it anywhere with great intensity.
Now, truth be told the last time I was in the Globe was mid 2014, at that time the lineup was far better than I had seen anywhere else, however I have heard but not seen that it has gone down. Sharks was okay, but compared to what I had seen at other Swiss clubs and the Globe, the swiss clubs have better lineups.
But Sharks did not disappoint and I concede is more cost effective.
I heard that at Oase a lot of girls cheat non regulars and it is better to agree the price beforehand even for standard sessions, is that right, so do you have to clarify that you will pay only 50 for BBBJ, DATY and CFS? I know the girls especially try to cheat East Asians, but if she says 200 Euros after a standard session, could you say "no the actual price is 50" and would the front desk back you up, or is it better to clarify things beforehand?
If you do have to clarify, I would say Sharks is a much better choice.
Romanian Kriss is short blond hair with tattoos, often pole dances.
Crissy, blond, silicon, with tattoos, is Bulgarian, ex GT.
Romanian Ester, 1,65 , long dark blond, reddish hair, is not 30 yo, but about 22.
[QUOTE=Sirioja;1827409]Romanian Kriss is short blond hair with tattoos, often pole dances.
Crissy, blond, silicon, with tattoos, is Bulgarian, ex GT.
Romanian Ester, 1,65 , long dark blond, reddish hair, is not 30 yo, but about 22.[/QUOTE]It was Kriss who provided the horrible service. I have heard from someone there that he first saw Ester more than 10 years ago in a club around Leipzig.
[QUOTE=DeltaIndigo;1827439]It was Kriss who provided the horrible service. I have heard from someone there that he first saw Ester more than 10 years ago in a club around Leipzig.[/QUOTE]Maybe he was speaking about Sylvana, when she worked in Roma for Julius Ceasar. It was before the danish master was born. Ester worked in east, before, but not 10 years ago.
Kriss is 1,60 without heels, pretty face, beautiful eyes, super sexy even too many tattoos and piercings, amazing ass for doggy, even limited for size. Last time I saw her on beginning of this year, she was not brunette, but fake blond since she arrived at Sharks.
I was at Sharks Monday 18.
It started quite but improved after 8.
Many good looking girls. Didn't met with Moira or Ira though I have visited Sharks many times in 2015 and now 2016.
I have sessioned with.
1) Andrea. Nice Romanian girl. She has big boobs and small ass, her body is great but her service are standard (wasted talent) I guess if she would improve her behavior ((she sits all time on sofa and don't walk around or approach) and services she will be super busy, did 50 E /30 m because not worth 1 hour, although I would repeat just for 30 min again.
2) Merilla. I know her from previous visit- she is nice and her services are top. 100 E /60 min.
I have seen 4 girls at least I wanted to session with but didn't, I will come back Wednesday.
OK. I have seen something.
Today there was Asian man sitting on Sofa with 2 girls (1 petite blonde + 1 petite redhead) he have a good taste (I like petite too) both girls were hot, he was with the 2 girls from the minute I entered the club (about 5 PM) until 3 AM. I think he have booked them all day(good for the girls. Not fair for guys LOL) I bet he paid lots of money, which is a waste IMO (maybe he had only 1 or 2 session with them).
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1827166]Could have been a bit overly hyped at times.
There were not that many really pretty faces, however IMHO the line up improved a lot after the summer. During the summer I preferred Oase, with a set up more suited to the summer weather. Every club has its ups and downs for line up quality. You should not judge too much based on just one visit, especially if it was not a Friday or Saturday.
Palace has some pretty girls, but rather too much silicone and aggression last time I visited. Was hard to feel comfortable there, despite being a regular there in the past. My success rates for getting a GFE were not that good. Only found one girl worth repeating. Next visit or two she was not there. Bummer.[/QUOTE]I'm a face guy too. Looking back, most of my Sharks visits were not that high on the echelon (or that memorable). Like MrHo says, no stunners, but stunners are rare anyhow. Bodies probably, and for those that like thin girls or teeny types. The avg age is definitely favorable at Sharks, and of course the LU is of the better out there. Majority of Sharks visits, I often don't have the urge of I must take this girl feeling. Lots of girls, low sharkiness and upselling are positives.
All clubs have their merits and drawbacks for various reasons.
Also, Mr. Ho, I can't say I agree if you say you see stunners at Palace. Not to my eyes anyway. Stella has a pretty face, but that's a bout it with crappy service.
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1827169]Its ALWAYS better to decide what girls appeal to you first, before considering likely risk based on reviews and on other punters that have tried the girl. Also you have to know which persons have reliable opinions likely to be in tune with your own.
Sometimes however a girl that is not quite your spec can be highly recommended. In the end I had to take notice of recommendations for Pamela in the past, despite her legs being a bit thick for me (face still gorgeous). My buddies were right. She quickly became a favorite. I also eventually took notice of recommendations for Moira. I always liked her body. Again I was well rewarded. She is one of the very best. She has a dick squeezing pussy talent too. Wonderful GFE.
So recommendations are really useful for girls in the borderline choice category, where an extra push is needed to get you to pull the trigger. However I am not interested in recommendations for girls that I have never so much as noticed.
If a girl is sufficiently hot / pretty, I try her regardless of other opinions.[/QUOTE]I'm different, I can't go with a girl unless I'm attracted to her. If some guy points out some girl that's been much talked about here, and I have not noticed her, I will likely not take her. Logically, I wasn't attracted to her to notice her. Same goes for other guys at the clubs, I'd recommend a girl if I have a good session, but they might be reluctant due to not being attracted to her. I've made so many trips to Sharks, and I still don't know who Moira is. Possible I may have not seen her on every visit.
Most often, I will run into some girls, and it will match up with some guy's taste. We would mutually take each other's picks more seriously. I think that's how it goes with lots of folks here. Same goes for choice in clubs.
I am the same, I'm clubbing so I can find hot/pretty girls. I'm paying, so I will be looking for the hotties.
My experiences tells me that what's read here doesn't align with what I'm looking for. I've ran into Francesca (a highlight of a trip) at Mainhattan, but that club is not much talked about.
[QUOTE=DeltaIndigo;1827395]I heard that at Oase a lot of girls cheat non regulars and it is better to agree the price beforehand even for standard sessions, is that right, so do you have to clarify that you will pay only 50 for BBBJ, DATY and CFS? I know the girls especially try to cheat East Asians, but if she says 200 Euros after a standard session, could you say "no the actual price is 50" and would the front desk back you up, or is it better to clarify things beforehand?
[/QUOTE]No, you are reading too much into it. Better to agree means, what she will provide in the session. If DFK is high on the services for you, get a confirmation from the girl before hand so you don't get surprised that she doesn't. Same goes for Anal if that's important. All the extras in Hessen are double what you get at the NRW. 50 for CIM, 100 for Anal. There could be some scammer girls that will try to cheat a clueless monger that don't know pricing, but likely not will happen. Just know the pricing. You seem like you track of time.
Not likely she will try to charge you 200 for a standard session. It's going to be pretty much same as sharks. What may happen is the girl may push you to agree to 1 HR if you want kissing or whatever. This is bogus, the rate is 50 per half, and no reason why you'd agree to this since you'd have to gauge if she is worth extending to an hour. Remember, CIM and Anal are offical extras. Kissing, DATY, fingering are not extras. Some girls may refuse one or more of those, so talking to the girl about her services assures what she provides in the room.
Front desk will back you up.