But they like to project and call the right stoopid LMAO
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2677998]As if we needed more examples of the lunacy of Woke, this little interchange gives us a clear picture of the utter madness of the Woke Marxist movement in America. I don't blame the Ketanji. She is only a pawn in their game.
[URL]https://video.foxnews.com/v/6301590390001[/URL]#sp=show-clips.
So how many of you left wing fascists who continually arguing on this forum can't tell me what a woman is? Or can't tell the difference between a natural born girl from a ladyboy? This ain't rocket science. This is left wing dogma and it is insane.[/QUOTE]Its not dogmatic, its just a result of really low IQs, ala Jackson the mental midget won't show us her LSAT score but wants to sit on the highest court in the land.
Really? Is it damn low? LOL kinda like Barry Husseins college grades intellectually challenged the whole lot of them (and anyone that voted for him).
If you don't know the difference between a boy and a girl you're just brain dead just like these Biden bootlickers in this thread.
Its quite obvious the Democratic Party circa 2022 is using the script of Idiocracy as their platform!
Better Than a Blowjob and 40,000 Dead and MIA Russians For Putin
In addition to Trump blowing Putin and swallowing his load with a smile on the world stage at every opportunity, his blatantly committing Sedition against America, attempting to overthrow American democracy and shitting all over the American Constitution with glee while also managing to mass murder nearly a million Americans and wiping out millions upon millions of USA jobs sure beats the hell out of Putin revealing himself to be the second worst, most incompetent and dumbest head of state in history after Trump, his military machine to be creaking, jammed and falling apart at every level, decimating his country's economy, currency and standing in the world for years to come.
[B]Brooks says Trump asked him to rescind election, remove Biden, call new election[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/23/mo-brooks-says-trump-asked-him-to-rescind-election-remove-biden.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Trump worked so hard to do his part in helping Putin destroy democracies around the world, especially in America, and replace them with authoritarian dictatorships. But Biden's landslide election victory over Trump screwed up their plans to weaken NATO and the Western Alliance of democracies in order to do that the easy way.
Now Trump's fellow America-hating Repubs will carry on their mission at the state and local level in a big hurry before the 2022 midterms.
How much does she love beer?
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2677998]As if we needed more examples of the lunacy of Woke, this little interchange gives us a clear picture of the utter madness of the Woke Marxist movement in America. I don't blame the Ketanji. She is only a pawn in their game.
[URL]https://video.foxnews.com/v/6301590390001[/URL]#sp=show-clips.
So how many of you left wing fascists who continually arguing on this forum can't tell me what a woman is? Or can't tell the difference between a natural born girl from a ladyboy? This ain't rocket science. This is left wing dogma and it is insane.[/QUOTE]When she starts weeping like an infant over how much she has loved beer ever since she was sexually assaulting people as a teenager then I'll start worrying about the mental condition of the faction that supports and defends her appointment to the SCOTUS.
When was the last time a nominee was asked such as silly ass irrelevant question? Was she supposed to say, "A wonan has a pussy"? Then what on Earth would that have to do with transgender rights, discrimination or anything else the SCOTUS might some day rule on?
Waiting for the next Repub to accuse her of causing higher gas prices.
On the positive side, it has been suggested this appointee will rally greater support for Biden and other Dems from the critical, decisive black female demographic.
And on that count, could those idiotic Repubs asking her those ridiculous, condescending questions only to trip off on their Party's sucker social issues and lunatic QAnon conspiracy theory rants have possibly promoted and encouraged that result any more? LOL.
Brilliant chairing by Dem Durbin for letting the Repubs just blather on and on with that nonsense with very little interruption. LOL.
The Resignation Clarified Along With A Tip For Other Career Criminals
The tip? Never leave a paper trail.
Trump was obviously the worst so-called potus of all time with the worst across the board results, one of the worst "businessmen" of all time losing historic record amounts of other people's money, those foolish enough to invest in his various cons, the worst "salesman" for America and democracy of all time in that nobody made both look worse and the dumbest fucking moron who was ever allowed to walk into the Oval Office in his total ignorance of history and contempt for the USA Constitution.
But as Head of the Trump Crime Family, he sure knew how best to dodge well deserved criminal indictment for the crimes he committed requiring tangible proof of "intent. "
Oh, it wasn't possible for him to erase the overwhelming and repeated evidence of his crimes. They happened.
But if he never allowed written notes, emails or recordings of his directives, he knew it would be very difficult to prove he "intended" to commit all those crimes. That way, other people, his lackies, would take the fall and do the time for him. Just like those suckers who lost serious money on his investment frauds cons and, of course, the American people.
[B]"Donald Trump Guilty of 'Numerous Felonies,' Former New York Prosecutor Says"[/B] [URL]https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-guilty-numerous-felonies-former-new-york-prosecutor-says-1691245?amp=1[/URL].
[QUOTE]The criminal probe has already resulted in felony tax evasion charges against the Trump Organization and its former chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg. There is also an active parallel civil investigation into the Trump Organization and the former president by New York Attorney General Letitia James.[/QUOTE]
Republicans are doing a great job of making themselves look like fools
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2678066]When she starts weeping like an infant over how much she has loved beer ever since she was sexually assaulting people as a teenager then I'll start worrying about the mental condition of the faction that supports and defends her appointment to the SCOTUS.
When was the last time a nominee was asked such as silly ass irrelevant question? Was she supposed to say, "A wonan has a pussy"? Then what on Earth would that have to do with transgender rights, discrimination or anything else the SCOTUS might some day rule on?
Waiting for the next Repub to accuse her of causing higher gas prices.
On the positive side, it has been suggested this appointee will rally greater support for Biden and other Dems from the critical, decisive black female demographic..[/QUOTE]Republicans politicians are doing a great job of making themselves look like the morons they are while questioning the Supreme Court nominee. Especially by focusing on child-porn sentencing. It is a well-known fact that about 2/3 of child porn sentences are below the sentencing guidelines. Even judges appointed by the great and powerful wizard of lies (the one-term, twice-impeached, fake-POTUS former guy) and done it and done it often.
But I won't bother to provide a link to that fact because the wingers on this board will just call it "fake newZ". But, they'll just call this post "fake news" anyway because, well, they're all expurts in federal sentencing guidelines and because winger media tells them what to think.
But their other hero, Sen. Ted Cruz is the one who really takes the cake.
While grilling Jackson on critical race theory Tuesday, Sen. Ted Cruz described a children's book called "Antiracist Baby. " he turned his steely gaze to Jackson and asked the Harvard-educated veteran jurist if she believes "that babies are racist. "
Some viewers wondered why a man who looks like he rubbed honey on his face then rolled on the floor of a barbershop would pose such a question. In fact, the collective eye roll was so intense the Earth briefly tilted off its axis.
But I stood and cheered the bold senator from Texas / Cancun. He was speaking truth to power and addressing an issue few Americans have ever been willing to face: Babies are incredibly racist. I don't mean just a little racist. I'm talking full-on, fontanel-having, seething bundles of hatred and racial animus. Swaddled little monsters is what they are.
I can already hear the cries of the baby apologists.
"Oh, that's ridiculous. They're so cute!
"Not possible, they've only been alive a few months!
Let me ask you this. When is the last time you heard a baby denounce racism? Hmmm?
Never. They're silent on the issue. If babies aren't racist, and if a clearly intelligent and serious USA Senator is out there floating a possible epidemic of infant racism, don't you think babies themselves would stand up, immediately fall down and then assure everyone they don't have a racist bone in their soft and pliable bodies?
That's Crisis Management 101, folks.
No, these suckers are coming out of the womb hating everyone who doesn't look like them.
Think about it. You often find them wrapped in white sheets. (Coo Cluck Klan?) And if you introduce a white baby to a person of color and then that person leaves the room, the baby acts as though that person no longer exists. Same happens if it's a Black baby meeting a white person. Some say: "Well, that's called object permanence, or the idea that people continue to exist when you don't see or hear them. Babies don't develop that until they're around eight months old. "
To which I say: "That's called a lame attempt to use science to excuse blatant baby racism, and you should be ashamed of your adult self. "
The undeniable reality of widespread, virulent racism among recently born humans is why it was so important that Cruz took precious moments of his and our lives and devoted that time – time none of us will ever get back – to ask a brilliant and widely respected judge about a 24-page, brightly colored children's book. The existence of a book called "Antiracist Baby" suggests it's possible for a baby to not be racist. But as I've proved so eloquently here, all babies are definitely racist. So how can we allow someone on the Supreme Court if she doesn't recognize "Antiracist Baby" as insidious baby-washing propaganda?
As this confirmation hearing continues, I hope Cruz and other sharp Republican senators will continue this important line of questioning. Are babies also racist against Whos, and does the book "Horton Hears a Who!" attempt to gloss over hostile infant Who hatred? Is "The Very Hungry Caterpillar" an allegory for the supremacy of one particular race over all others?
Yes on both counts, probably.
It's high time someone in this country had the courage to call out the vile, Machiavellian babies who have transformed our day cares into playpens of hate.
Before Judge Jackson is confirmed, she must meet what I'll call "the Cruz requirement. " She must stand up, face the American people and honestly declare: "Yes! All babies are racist! Thank you for asking such an important question. Did you all arrive in the same clown car or drive separately?
