FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

I am going to be in Frankfurt on February 16 and 17. I was planning on doing Oase on both days. But reading the comments here is making me second guess my choice. I have been to sharks probably 7 or 8 times over the past two years. But on my last trip, I went back to Oase and remembered why I had such fond memories. I tend to go in the afternoon rather than at night--just when I am more active. But I could change my timing to include early evening if you were to highly recommend that I do so.

So what is you guys recommendation for a Tuesday and Wednesday--Sharks or Oase?

Thanks!

Liz / Anita, I guess she changed her name to Carla now, was a very pretty girl for me as well. Fun girl, but can be moody, and definitely opinionated. I am happy she is back. Something to look forward to.

I thought Francesca was pretty but did not get a chance to session with her. Evita is definitely very pretty. I find Aylice most attractive for me, but Syz would accuse me of not being able to separate service from looks, lol. I am one of the few fans of Janine around here, and Aurelia is quite pretty even if her service sucked. I think Milana is quite good looking, as is Anita/Liz since she is back now; Roxana would be pretty if she did not have those enhancements. Coco is pretty. Never met Karin. Cindy is not bad either, and Esther was also pretty.

[QUOTE=VitoCorleone;1828096]Yes. Same girl.[/QUOTE]

I was at Sharks today from 4 pm til 9 pm. I wasn't quite feeling it today, so left earlier than planned. I was a little underwhelmed with the lineup; probably the worst that I've experienced in my limited visits. Sessions with Jessica and Louisa as I didn't find anyone new to try.

As I was leaving I briefly chatted with a mid-brown haired, Romanian, with pronounced incisors (vampire teeth). No tattoos. Very sexy look, for me. I think she said her name was Madelina, but I am not sure. Does that sound right? If so, has anyone any comments on her service levels? Tempted to try her out tomorrow.

Good to see the extension to the glass dining room, although I was the only one in there!

Tried the kamasutra room for the first time. A good room.

I take it that you live in Germany Syzygies, The cost of entry into an FKK club in €65 to €75 even at €45 discount it's still not cheaper than a hotel. Besides the girls will.

Not give you the chance to catch some sleep if you choose to make the club your lounge. I'm one of those that prefer to catch my flight from the club but that's only.

Because I rather be in the presence of pretty girls than watch boring channel of which I only happens to understand the language on CNN and Ajazeera.

Some hotels will offer you unlimited coffee and snacks if that's your thing for less than the FKK entry price.

The Only problem I have when I get into the clubs is that I don't remember some of the names given to me on the forum also if I do how do I go about locating the girls.

As she may get angry that I'm gathering information from some source about her, with some many girls it does get blurry.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1827895]Yeh, some guys are going to clubs for wellness, meet the buddies, annoy the buddies, to dine on a lot of free food and drink a lot of free coffee, somewhere to sleep instead of booking a Hotel, some are going to several clubs in a day because of the tremendous fear there might be something better elsewhere, some are "clubbing" (whatever that is), some are going to be the experts who must know everything, and lastly, the biggest reason is it's an addiction. LOL.

However, for me, the reason is I want to see naked girls, want to fuck, and specially want to fuck my favorite girls (and am addicted). In between fucks, it's nice to rest, sleep, do something else.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Jnpr30;1828335]I am one of the few fans of Janine around here[/QUOTE]I also think Janine is attractive with a nice bod. Service is crap but its not like I was expecting her to be out of this world in bed.

[QUOTE=Frozty;1828353]I was a little underwhelmed with the lineup; probably the worst that I've experienced in my limited visits. [/QUOTE]I found the lineup to be really good this Wednesday! Most of the girls are now back from holidays in Romania or elsewhere. So you were lucky not to be there one week earlier!

[QUOTE=Frozty;1828353]As I was leaving I briefly chatted with a mid-brown haired, Romanian, with pronounced incisors (vampire teeth). No tattoos. Very sexy look, for me. I think she said her name was Madelina, but I am not sure. Does that sound right? If so, has anyone any comments on her service levels? Tempted to try her out tomorrow.[/QUOTE]Madalina is her name, still 21 years old. Very nice and friendly, smiling and in good mood. Acts sometimes like a schoolgirl / teenie in the room. Best for GFE. Blowjob imo not that spectacular. Other things she does better!

[QUOTE=Jnpr30;1828335]I find Aylice most attractive for me, but Syz would accuse me of not being able to separate service from looks, lol. [/QUOTE]Yes, service and looks are different aspects. Same goes for attractiveness as well. A girl may look good, but I may not be attracted to her. Her demeanor, attitude, interaction, personality, communication, and similar counts when it comes to attraction. I may session a girl out of looks because she's a high opti, but I wouldn't think about going with her again if there is something that cut off the attraction. A girl a punter repeats heavily due to service, and then something happens that cuts off from further business would be one example. Something that creates a bad outlook on the girl, and prettiness and attraction become blurred. Somebody may stop seeing her as being pretty, but in reality attraction is lost. Although prettiness is subjective, it's still something that is stuck to a girl than an outlook on a girl, which is attraction.

When you first spot a hottie that stands out, that's when you see her on the shell (superficially) without anything attached. A bad interaction or service would change that initial outlook from the superficial.

[QUOTE=MrHo;1828021]As for service standard, of course it is depend on which girls, but I felt service standard at sharks are generally higher than any other FKK I have been to. This is the feeling I got during my visit.

I think each FKK has its service level regardless of what club promised. I think palace is like worst and they leave it totally up to girls, and I felt sharks is like other end meaning service club promises to clients are more or less what clients get from girls, I felt like this at sharks, I hope I am making some sense here.[/QUOTE]You come from Artemis, no? Mind you I don't do so many trips there, but based on my sporadic visits, I sense a decline. That's just me. As a whole I see a decline with the popular clubs. I postulate even before my time, it was even better. Lot more clubs around for punters to move, more Romanians. Central Europeans, and Baltics on the older side and scarce. Changes.

Are yall guys from Artemis looking at other pastures migrating Hessen now? If you are coming from Artemis, you'd see differences. Also, I'd think Sharks are getting more international clientele, and it will increase over time. Asians are comin! Haha.

Based on what I see of different club, it not so clear what the answers are to your question. I think most Germans migrated to Sharks. But, also I'm sure there are those folks that go to other clubs like service-RTC(and other non-mainstream venues) now that there are more of them around. Lots of club options keeps people from the few clubs. More clubs, tourists, keeps the high populations of Romies coming and working at various clubs.

No clear answer why clubs are the way they are. Clientele is clearly one. I know Palace front desk is more on the girl's side. I would think the same for Artemis. I think the better service clubs are more experienced clientele, likely more demanding in services, higher standards, and club taking the complaints most seriously.

Sharks, Oase, Mainhattan, and World has young Romies. Palace has mixed, but older type pros mostly. With all this, something can be said?

[QUOTE=NickTheG;1828381]I found the lineup to be really good this Wednesday! Most of the girls are now back from holidays in Romania or elsewhere. So you were lucky not to be there one week earlier!

Madalina is her name, still 21 years old. Very nice and friendly, smiling and in good mood. Acts sometimes like a schoolgirl / teenie in the room. Best for GFE. Blowjob imo not that spectacular. Other things she does better![/QUOTE]Thanks Nick, that's helpful.

Maybe my view on the lineup reflected my mood. I'll see how I get on today!

Jnp,

Aylice always has face hidden behind hair, WG may be shy, not the only one. But when You put her hair different, when she smiles with her beautiful teeth and good breathe, when she looks at You with her shinning black eyes, she has prettier face than Janine with long nose and who doesn't look so clever, or not shining Evita face. Francesca has shining face. Aylice is only a small body, Bulgarian, black hair, girl, but she is well known at Sharks now, and can be in room for hours with some regulars.

Discount Wednesday is a good day for casting at Sharks, Tuesday may be quiet, many days off.

Sharks' main room is not dark. If you can't see a girl properly you should have your eyes examined. Same for the guys complaining about poor line up, what are you expecting? 100 top models, working for 50€/30 min?

HB.

[QUOTE=HessenBub;1828492]Sharks' main room is not dark. If you can't see a girl properly you should have your eyes examined. Same for the guys complaining about poor line up, what are you expecting? 100 top models, working for 50/30 min?

HB.[/QUOTE]If You see some real fashion top models without make up, with no tits, but body with bones, may be You don t pay 50 . Not many Doetzen Kroes. Look at Heidi Klum without make up, I prefer small Arabella at Sharks.

[QUOTE=HessenBub;1828492]Same for the guys complaining about poor line up, what are you expecting? 100 top models, working for 50/30 min?

HB.[/QUOTE]Yes I want victoria secret angels, LOL.

BTW I think Francesca resembles Kendall Jenner abit.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1828446]You come from Artemis, no? Mind you I don't do so many trips there, but based on my sporadic visits, I sense a decline. That's just me. As a whole I see a decline with the popular clubs. I postulate even before my time, it was even better. Lot more clubs around for punters to move, more Romanians. Central Europeans, and Baltics on the older side and scarce. Changes.

Are yall guys from Artemis looking at other pastures migrating Hessen now? If you are coming from Artemis, you'd see differences. Also, I'd think Sharks are getting more international clientele, and it will increase over time. Asians are comin! Haha.

Based on what I see of different club, it not so clear what the answers are to your question. I think most Germans migrated to Sharks. But, also I'm sure there are those folks that go to other clubs like service-RTC(and other non-mainstream venues) now that there are more of them around. Lots of club options keeps people from the few clubs. More clubs, tourists, keeps the high populations of Romies coming and working at various clubs.

No clear answer why clubs are the way they are. Clientele is clearly one. I know Palace front desk is more on the girl's side. I would think the same for Artemis. I think the better service clubs are more experienced clientele, likely more demanding in services, higher standards, and club taking the complaints most seriously.

Sharks, Oase, Mainhattan, and World has young Romies. Palace has mixed, but older type pros mostly. With all this, something can be said?[/QUOTE]Yeah, I have been to Artemis since 2010 ish and I began trying Hessen area last summer properly (I went to palace very briefly once before, but last summer was the time I began hitting Hessen FKK on daily basis for straight 11 days).

I do see the decline at Artemis LU, before there were more younger girls and occasionally stunner walking in. It still is most diversify LU, but I really do not see girls, especially teeny German girls. And rarely see stunner. And LU is getting more older and it is becoming bit like Palace. You know more pro working girl looking LU.

However, I think Sharks has its own charm and I did noticed the service level to be more higher than other FKK I have been to and LU are more natural girls both looks and characters. As a guy who has been battling for better service etc in Artemis for years, it was nice to be in atmosphere of sharks where things were more smooth and girls are more natural. I did not like it when I was there though, I just began realizing it lately.

I did see cute girls, but no stunner in FKK sharks though. I mean I wonder if there are ever any, but it seemed with only one whole day visit, I think FKK shark is not for stunner, but it is for finding cute girls. , so I think it will serve me for that area of purpose that I need, you know it is nice for one or two days. Also not many spenders in sharks? I say this because when I took one girl for 1.5 hours, and I offered her to tip her just 20 euro more if she perform good, her service was one of the best I ever had in any FKK. So I wondered.

Anyways I now realize I like sharks for certain purpose, but not for seeking stunner (correct me if I am wrong on not finding stunner).

Also I did not see German girls at all in Sharks. Am I accurate on this? I looked for them, but I only found one girl who is German blonde. There are no German table in FKK sharks?

Lighting in FKK sharks is like other FKK club, it is just that there are NO area where you have clear light on LU except outside, like in Artemis, you got stairs, in palace you got bar by the changing room where you have clear light on girls, but in FKK sharks. Just outside and if it is closed in winter time. No area where you can see girl on more clear light. I am not fan of main bar disco type light because you can see, but not clearly, and once you are in the room with her then you realized you messed up LOL I always like clear light spot in FKK and that is where I hunt, in sharks. None. Beside outside.