FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

Mc, ex Daria, blond big tits from Atlanta, is at Sharks. Now Leya has a sister for lungs competition and for you, 3 some?

Arabella. Pol is back.

Bad luck, ghost Nick was not arrived yet at 3. 30 pm to see Megan coming to me for her first room of the day, wearing proudly her French stockings. A real pleasure again, for her beauty, her smile, her eyes, today different kisses without piercing and I really enjoy her way for DT, even without piercing. After more than 15 rooms, most for 1 h30 , no reason to stop, I m faithful to girls as long they give me pleasure. Funny when she asks how it is for me with Aliana, she understood since first time we came back from room, today she wanted to have room before her.

Maria is prettier and prettier and if she wants, after our bad start because of a talkative member, we may think about in future.

Many pretty girls on this Wednesday, not so crowded.

Evita is teaching Asian business to Scarlet who was used to Turkish at Samya, nice from Evita, then Scarlet may be busier.

Was said Kelly is back.

[QUOTE=HessenBub;1855366]That's what I meant. I've seen Ramona / Sabina very often, never rocked my boat. I'd rate her optics way below Megan / Francesca.

HB.[/QUOTE]Sabina Scarlet Johanson had really pretty face, prettier than the actress, but couldn't compete with Megan for firm, slim body and for skin quality. I liked Sabina but couldn't compete in room with Megan when she trust you.

[QUOTE=Sirioja;1855189]Exceptional blond Latvian Marina, about 37 or 38, sitting at the bar close to restaurant, even I can t go with her anymore because of what I see in the lounge, but she is just an angel and I like her. A real woman with Russian flavor.[/QUOTE]Why you can't go with? Possible to describe Marina?

Cheers mate.

Thanks Siri for the update and confirmation. So your Sharks fave plans to stop wearing the tongue piercing?

[QUOTE=Ortos;1855396]I have to agree strongly with Craiova, about Megan: Assuming we're talking about the girl used to be called Francesca, who was Sarah at Mainhattan: Last November at Sharks I had a completely lack-lustre session, and like man in above quote, despite trying very hard, I was able to construct virtually no chemistry with this girl, and therefore would not rate the session worth repeating with this girl. Furthermore, she tried to cheat me on the time (I cut the session short at 25 minutes and she tried to pretend it was 32 mintutes), but she backed down from her initial demand of 100 e, when I asked if she would like to move to front desk with me for further disscussion.

I came away thinking: why all the hype about this girl? But here's the beauty of the the situation: I only lost 50 e to test the waters, right? The session could easily, as it so often does, go the other way: off-the-charts positive. It was worth it for me at least to see living vindication of the old axiom: YMMV![/QUOTE]Hello Ortos.

Sarah was one of the best girls I have ever had a session with at Mainhatten. The first few sessions with her were really good, and I still like her personality. However, I noticed during one of my last visits with her at Mainhatten, her service had declined. This is probably not uncommon amongst working girls. Over time, most girls will get tired of the business or be negatively influenced by those around her. This could be a vicious cycle of poor service, leading to fewer clients and then a decline of repeat customers leading to lower earnings.

I guess a change of clubs and several name changes is not enough to restore her good reputation. Bottom line, the girls need to perform. Extraordinary girls are difficult to find, but if you do find them, get them early in their careers. Over time, even the best girls grow tired of the business.

Thanks for the report.

FiddyCent.

Fiddy, could be a different Sarah. Megan started at Mainhattan I believe in Augest 2015. I've heard there was another Sarah before her.

As far as service decline over time, I somewhat agree. It's usually the ones in high demand. They know their self-worth.

Some girls start off with amateurish skills, and hone their skills clocking in a lot, built up experience to switch up their game plan. So overall, I'd agree that they become more formulaic, in either direction. I mainly notice drop, Palace older girls are those experienced types. Artemis has plenty of them. I think it goes, some amateurish girl raise up her skills, popularity rises, and then declines. Other types of girls start up with popularity, but less formulaic, and then she service level drops with becoming formulaic. Compared to high formulaic girls, I rather go with girl with an amateurish girl.

So, one thing to consider is when you have session-ed with a girl, recent or long ago, that matters when people talk about the girl's service.

But, this is a very formulaic way of looking at things.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1855534]Fiddy, could be a different Sarah. Megan started at Mainhattan I believe in Augest 2015. I've heard there was another Sarah before her.

As far as service decline over time, I somewhat agree. It's usually the ones in high demand. They know their self-worth.

Some girls start off with amateurish skills, and hone their skills clocking in a lot, built up experience to switch up their game plan. So overall, I'd agree that they become more formulaic, in either direction. I mainly notice drop, Palace older girls are those experienced types. Artemis has plenty of them. I think it goes, some amateurish girl raise up her skills, popularity rises, and then declines. Other types of girls start up with popularity, but less formulaic, and then she service level drops with becoming formulaic. Compared to high formulaic girls, I rather go with girl with an amateurish girl.[/QUOTE]I trust your report PussyLiccker. I am not up to date with the girls and their movements between clubs. My comment about declining service is just a general comment. There may be external factors, such as a declining customer base, increased demands from a pimp or a boyfriend, and a girl just getting tired of the business. If a woman was a true nymphomaniac, sex to her would be great with or without money as the deciding factor. The trick is to find the girl at the optimal stage of her working career. Couch time is a good way to weed out some of these bad girls, but it is not always the case.

The reasons for declining service are countless. Once it stars though, it is a downward spiral and tough to get out from. Guys can hold a girl to high standards, but eventually the initial spark eventually burns out.

Just my honest opinion.

FiddyCent.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1855534]Fiddy, could be a different Sarah. Megan started at Mainhattan I believe in Augest 2015. I've heard there was another Sarah before her.[/QUOTE]The new Mainhattan Sarah (in Sharks first Francesca now Megan) startet there as PL says in summer 2015. The previous Mainhattan Sarah fineshed at Mainhattan in November 2014, she's was last time at LR. And for me the previous Sarah was even better locking than the new one. And also chemestry and service fits much better than with the new one with me.

[QUOTE=Craiova;1855545]The new Mainhattan Sarah (in Sharks first Francesca now Megan) startet there as PL says in summer 2015. The previous Mainhattan Sarah fineshed at Mainhattan in November 2014, she's was last time at LR. And for me the previous Sarah was even better locking than the new one. And also chemestry and service fits much better than with the new one with me.[/QUOTE]Thank you Craiova for the clarification. As I mentioned before, I am quite removed from the FKK scene, but I am hoping to make a return in the future. It is good that you guys are continuing with these helpful reports.

Hopefully, the scene will still be good for when I do make a return to Frankfurt.

FiddyCent.

[QUOTE=Craiova;1855335]Everything depends on first personal preference for optic, second on personal preference which sex and third at least same important chemestry between client and girl.

Rating optic for me: Beatrice 9,0, Megan 8,5, Julia 8,5 and Alice 8,0. With Alice I,ve never spoken because on her general behavior I've a strong gut feeling that we doesn't fit therefore no reason for me to try her. Funny is her description somewhere as MM look, sorry this I see different. And concerning optic for Megan the 8,5 is of course a high rating when I say "only" 8,5 that is due to this hype about this "Incredible" beauty. Concerning optic Ramona / Sabina from Sharks / Oase was my favorite the last two years a 9,75!

Second rating service for me: Julia 9,25, Beatrice 8,25, Alice don't know and Megan that's difficult to say because our chemestry was close to zero. So third my chemestry level with this girls: Alice only gut feeling that wouldn't work and no room that mean no rating, Julia 9,0, Beatrice 8,5 and Megan to be honest zero.[/QUOTE]Of course, we got mixed opinions on girls, club LU, etc. Also, it's not that many of us that post often enough talking about girls, and given it's a tourist forum, that probably limits the range of girls discussed.

My rating is different from yours. I rate Beatrice on the same level as Megan. I understand they have their differences, type of appearance. Julia less. Julia came off high illusion session wise. I can't say I was a Ramona followers like some others here. Although, I don't visit regularly, I must have seen Ramona at either Sharks or Oase at one point. She actually got pointed out from somebody. I actually had higher expectations since she was repeated mentioned (or as you will say hyped a bit). I like tall girls generally, and she's tall, looks good, but I think your rating is quite high on her. Perhaps, she's your equivalent to Deana (Hun, ex-Oase) that only showed for the weekend for the garden opening party in April, 2012. And of course Cassandra (De, ex-Oase) the short stint fall 2012. Both were stunners in my books.

My memory is a bit fuzzy on Ramona, but I rate her a bit less than Beatrice and Megan. So it appears we all got our differences in taste. It's really difficult to rate the girl's looks. There are different types, it's not so clear cut to say one looks better than the other(besides the obvious ones like comparing to Salvana). Like Lori(dunno if she still at Oase), rates high too, but can't say where she would be. She looked great light brunette, was slimmer, coming out of Samya at Magnum. I would would go further as to say most charm back then.

I understand a bit of hype can lead to some degree of disappointment due to expectation not met.

Sometimes, it's really difficult to separate optiks from service, if you had either peak or very low services. I think the outlook in the girl will have some dependency on what kind of experience you have had with a girl. So, I can see people bluring the lines between looks, interaction (attitude for example), and service. If the experience causes a high emotional response.

DFK seems to be the holy grail of mongers here. Yet, some do fine without and others avoid as the girl might have rimmed the customer before. Yeah, happened to me with a friend I visited the FKK with and I later found out. However, girls working at FKK for years don't get talked about getting loose pussies at all. Surely, there is a difference between a pussy used for long and a relatively newer pussy or ass for that matter. How can fucking the same the girl can bring the same physical enjoyment year after year in a FKK environment? You know that girls don't really have high regards for people who are visiting the club three or two times a week, not really husband or boyfriend material. So, that illusion must be strong enough to overcome a loose pussy.

[QUOTE=McAdonis;1855526]Thanks Siri for the update and confirmation. So your Sharks fave plans to stop wearing the tongue piercing?[/QUOTE]Daria is now Cami at Sharks, still smiling and really friendly, she recognized me before I did, she stays close to the fishes. My room was very correct with her for 1 h at Atlanta, with DFK, even can t compete with Danny or Raïssa. Ro ex Georgina, there.

Megan will get a new, new piercing, next week when she will return from her 3 days off, she is at Sharks until Saturday, maybe still blue like her nails at the moment. Yes, she stays my fav for her beauty even she is too tall, about 1,90 with her high heels, for me, but when she lays on the bed, she is perfect, also for her behavior since August at Mainhattan, just what I call a 20 yo woman, not finished yet for sensuality, but a dreamed girl and I like her chicken skin when I caress her, and her DT BBBJ. Look at her new stockings with feet, next time.

Funny but dangerous game when your 2 girls ask you about the other one, so better to answer to both: but You are my favorite, which is true, Megan for her beauty and smile and Aliana for how she makes me feel.

About Latvian MILF, late 30's, blond Marina, hair to shoulders, white skin, small tits, angel smile, sitting at the bar or in couch close to restaurant, had many exceptional rooms with her, can be high GFE, but also very hot and multi orgasmic, but I let her now with her lover, many other girls to choose at Sharks, too many attractive on this Wednesday, couldn't repeat with lovely, pretty Arabella. Pol, also Maria who was really pretty yesterday, also a real French woman, Stéphanie, with black hair to shoulders, glasses, sitting at the bar on kino side, friendly but not new in FKK business, the new girlfriend of very regular and very friendly German "papy". It was nice to meet Nick who is not a ghost anymore, also it s always a pleasure with my German friend and had a chat at the restaurant with a Moroccan about real Muslims and terrorists.

Not the day I had planned, too far from my white paradise, but a good day at Sharks, among beauties and my 2 girls gave me the will to return to ski, even with pain.

For PL, Sabina Scarlet Johanson had an angel face, but not tall and not so slim at Oase, but what a smile with beautiful teeth, green eyes, just wish her a better life rather than so difficult job for her.

Sandra only returned for a week end, about 2 weeks ago, but doesn't seem to work at Sharks at the moment, but it s not summer yet. Lara works either at Sharks or Paradise Sarrebrucken.

[QUOTE=Linga;1855591]However, girls working at FKK for years don't get talked about getting loose pussies at all. Surely, there is a difference between a pussy used for long and a relatively newer pussy or ass for that matter. How can fucking the same the girl can bring the same physical enjoyment year after year in a FKK environment? .[/QUOTE]Which loose pussy? Where does this myth come from? Exceptions are women who gave birth, that may have an effect. But doesn't have to. There's girls with tight tight pussies I have fucked dozens of time in the last 10 years. No difference. Read the article. Age may affect tightness, birth may, but how often a woman has sex doesn't.

[URL]https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/201109/the-rare-truth-about-tight-and-loose-women[/URL]

HB.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1855566]... Beatrice...Ramona...Megan...[/QUOTE]To me Ramona has been the best among them. BTW, I've heard Yra is back to Sharks from Artemis. Is this true? If so, I'm coming back soon. YY.