[QUOTE=Gentleman17]Cunnilingus is very unlikely to transmit anything in either direction (except when there are open sores, e.g. syphilis or herpes, but half of us have herpes anyway).[/QUOTE]
Genital herpes is a life-long, often debilitating, infection that really shouldn't be treated so lightly. And it can be transmitted even where there are no visible symptoms. [url]http://www.herpesonline.org/hsv1vs2.html[/url]
[QUOTE]I used to think it was a bad thing for sex workers to give BBBJ (uncovered fellatio). Now I conclude that it is not so bad for the sex workers, given that the main risk is a treatable bacterial infection (gonorrhea or syphilis) as long as they get tested regularly and treated when infected.[/QUOTE]
Sounds fair in theory, but it doesn't work that way in practice.
a) Overuse of antibiotics leads to drug-resistance. Drug treatment should always be viewed as an undesirable consequence, never a frontline defence.
b) Regular testing, while certainly important, is a case of closing the gate once the horse has bolted. The idea of sex workers being 'medically monitored' gives clients a false sense of security, but in reality it is completely useless in terms of risk prevention within the sex industry. Even if a sex worker was tested EVERY DAY: when you factor in STI gestation periods, waiting times for results and the number of clients she sees per day, it becomes glaringly obvious that a 'clean' medical certificate is not worth the paper it's printed on. As for regular testing being instrumental in sex worker health, it really only limits the potential for long-term effects of STIs (such as infertility, PID, etc). The simple fact is...for BBBJ to be free of risk for female sex workers, it's the CLIENTS who need to be tested regularly, not the hookers!
c) Sex workers, by definition, earn their living from sex. When a person is told they have an STI, they will be asked to abstain from sex until the infection is cleared, but you simply can't do that if sex is your livelihood. Taking time off to heal is a luxury that most sex workers cannot afford. It's not like they get sick pay or worker's compensation! While many sex workers will choose to provide safe alternative services during treatment (eg. hand relief), many others are not in a position to do so - which can lead to a never-ending cycle of transmission and re-infection. People are always quick to condemn sex workers who work while infected, and most countries have laws criminalising that behaviour, but nobody seems to realise that this is their JOB and without it, their bills don't get paid. I'm sure most sex workers don't want to intentionally hurt anyone, but when it comes to the crunch, what do you think is most important to the average hooker...protecting their clients or feeding their children? "Getting tested and treated" may sound like an easy and painless solution for sex workers, but I can assure you, it's not.
Sorry if this sounds like I'm attacking your post. That wasn't my intention. I just wanted to give you a sex worker perspective. Good on you for caring enough to do the research and post it here for the benefit of your fellow mongers.
