Printable View
[QUOTE=JustTK;2717399]From 1970 to date, real wages have fallen without break.
What caused this change in the 1970's? .....cheap labour flooded in to USA..[/QUOTE]So we agree open borders mass world immigration is bad. Great! No need for all the other guff you wrote.
[QUOTE=Gino02;2717215]Stay on point please. Biden is a useless junk, admit that first. No further explanations or proofs needed.
Your kinds, including Biden, keep blaming others for their failures which is exactly what you just shown us above. Again. LOL.[/QUOTE]Biden has already accomplished more positive results for America (Recovery from Trump's Pandemic, Jobs Created, Historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Legislation, etc) and the rest of the world (Beating The Snot Out Of Putin's and Trump's Goals Of Weakening The Western, Democratic Alliance) than all previous Repubs of the past 100 years combined.
And he proves with every public appearance, press briefing and Question and Answer session the same thing he proved while beating the snot out of Trump at every Presidential Debate including the ones Trump was too cowardly to attend and when he tried but failed to infect Biden with his Trump's Pandemic virus; that he is more lucid, more cognitively capable, better prepared, better informed and more fit for office as POTUS than any Repub so-called potus ever.
We definitely won't be hearing any more "questioning" of his boyfriend / benefactor's motives and methods coming out of Trump's pie hole no matter how mild. LOL.
[B]Russia state TV host suggests Moscow could 'reinstall' Trump as US president[/B]
[URL]https://www.businessinsider.in/politics/world/news/russia-state-tv-hosts-suggests-moscow-could-reinstall-trump-as-us-president/articleshow/92709617.cms[/URL]
[QUOTE]A Russian state TV host said Moscow hasn't decided whether to "reinstall" Trump as president in 2024.
The US intelligence community concluded Russia interfered in 2016 and 2020 to boost Trump's chances of winning.[/QUOTE]I guess our resident Kremlin talking points disseminater missed this report or he surely would have posted it by now.
This is not working out so well for the Repub "Biden's economy is tanking! Crashing!" Crowd.
[B]Payrolls increased 372,000 in June, more than expected, as jobs market defies recession fears[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/08/jobs-report-june-2022-.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Job growth accelerated at a much faster pace than expected in June, indicating that the main pillar of the U.S. economy remains strong despite pockets of weakness.
Nonfarm payrolls increased 372,000 in the month, better than the 250,000 Dow Jones estimate and continuing what has been a strong year for job growth, according to data Friday from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The unemployment rate was 3.6%, unchanged from May and in line with estimates.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Travv;2717431]The prophets have long whispered of the return of MAGA King Trump. In faith, we know that his return is inevitable and that he will soon reclaim the presidency and set right what has gone awry.
Here are the first 12 things Trump will do when he returns to power:
Spray Febreze on the Oval Office curtains to get the old man smell out: Step one to draining the swamp is giving it a flowery scent.
Make Pelosi wear a sweater on the beach: I mean, really.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/07/gallup-public-trust-in-the-presidency-sees-most-significant-drop-under-biden-since-obama/[/URL]
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2717467]It has been several years since I saw the video but I am paraphrasing what she said.
And thankfully the end result is she made sure the "Bad law" was reversed LOL prima facie evidence of what she thought of it LMAO.
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/27/what-ruth-bader-ginsburg-really-said-about-roe-v-wade/[/URL][/QUOTE]The WAPO link says exactly what I said that she said. "Indeed Ginsburg's criticisms of Roe generally had to do with pragmatic and political concerns, rather than saying it was outright wrong. And far from wanting to leave this decision to the states, as Friday's decision does, she repeatedly sided with the idea that abortion was a constitutional right. She had preferred that right to be phased in more gradually and that it rely more on a different part of the Constitution — the right to equal protection rather than the right to privacy, the basis of Roe. " And "Ginsburg's other main problem with Roe was that it was based upon the right to privacy rather than the right to equal protection — she felt the latter would have left it more insulated from challenges. " And ""Roe isn't really about the woman's choice, is it?" Ginsburg said in a 2013 event at the University of Chicago. "It's about the doctor's freedom to practice. . It wasn't woman-centered, it was physician-centered."
But sure, keep on contending that Ginsburg was against Roe v. Wade. That's what you guys do, you take one statement and turn it into something else and think that nobody will notice. But we all aren't as dumb as you are.
[QUOTE=ChrisP;2717568]Speaking of which, Biden's handlers have just signed up to Zelensky's latest demand for $750 billion. That's on top of the $50 billion plus already sent.
Hell, why not make it a cool trillion? We're already $30 trillion in debt, what difference will another one make? It's not as if regular Americans could use the money, is it? Half of it will go back to the Bidens, Clintons, Pelosis, Kerrys, Romneys and the rest of the swamp in kickbacks anyway so you can see why they're so enthusiastic.[/QUOTE]Yep, what a joke. Now Pres. Z. Is unwilling to negotiate. What a mess, I am afraid we have created a monster in Pres. Z, this war will never end.
[QUOTE=PVMonger;2717701]The WAPO link says exactly what I said that she said. "Indeed Ginsburg's criticisms of Roe generally had to do with pragmatic and political concerns, rather than saying it was outright wrong. And far from wanting to leave this decision to the states, as Friday's decision does, she repeatedly sided with the idea that abortion was a constitutional right. She had preferred that right to be phased in more gradually and that it rely more on a different part of the Constitution the right to equal protection rather than the right to privacy, the basis of Roe. " And "Ginsburg's other main problem with Roe was that it was based upon the right to privacy rather than the right to equal protection she felt the latter would have left it more insulated from challenges. " And ""Roe isn't really about the woman's choice, is it?" Ginsburg said in a 2013 event at the University of Chicago. "It's about the doctor's freedom to practice. . It wasn't woman-centered, it was physician-centered."
But sure, keep on contending that Ginsburg was against Roe v. Wade. That's what you guys do, you take one statement and turn it into something else and think that nobody will notice. But we all aren't as dumb as you are.[/QUOTE]If you weren't such a fool you would know that a persons actions speak louder than their words LMAO (thanks so much ruthie you're the best for letting bad orange man reverse the evil known as Roe) she has said that is was a bad ruling for a variety of reasons, even according to your own words dum ass.
"She had preferred that right to be phased in more gradually and that it rely more on a different part of the Constitution the right to equal protection rather than the right to privacy, the basis of Roe. " And "Ginsburg's other main problem with Roe was that it was based upon the right to privacy rather than the right to equal protection she felt the latter would have left it more insulated from challenges. " And ""Roe isn't really about the woman's choice, is it?" Ginsburg said in a 2013 event at the University of Chicago. "It's about the doctor's freedom to practice. . It wasn't woman-centered, it was physician-centered".
Are you brain dead? You just listed reasons why she was against the ruling and then say she wasn't!
[QUOTE=DramaFree11;2717703]Yep, what a joke. Now Pres. Z. Is unwilling to negotiate. What a mess, I am afraid we have created a monster in Pres. Z, this war will never end.[/QUOTE]At least until there is at least one dum ass Ukrainian willing to die so this turd can cash in.
[URL]https://stormer-daily.rw/epic-life-hack-revealed-if-you-dont-want-to-die-dont-join-a-mercenary-army-to-fight-russia/[/URL]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2717591]Biden has already accomplished more positive results for America (Recovery from Trump's Pandemic, Jobs Created, Historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Legislation, etc) and the rest of the world (Beating The Snot Out Of Putin's and Trump's Goals Of Weakening The Western, Democratic Alliance) than all previous Repubs of the past 100 years combined.
And he proves with every public appearance, press briefing and Question and Answer session the same thing he proved while beating the snot out of Trump at every Presidential Debate including the ones Trump was too cowardly to attend and when he tried but failed to infect Biden with his Trump's Pandemic virus; that he is more lucid, more cognitively capable, better prepared, better informed and more fit for office as POTUS than any Repub so-called potus ever.[/QUOTE]This guy is hilarious. He comes out and says with a seemingly straight face things like "Biden is more lucid and cognitively capable than any Republican president", and "Jimmy Carter was a hugely successful president". I don't know whether it's intentional or not, but either way it makes for some wonderful comedy. Keep it up sir.
[QUOTE=ChrisP;2717569]So we agree open borders mass world immigration is bad.[/QUOTE]Not at all. I am all for open borders. I beleive the world could only ever be a socially and economically just place once all borders are removed and people rightfully have the opportunity to improve their lives.
People generally do not want to uproot their lives and move without a strong motive. If other countries are going to sponsor coups, impose and support corrupt corrupt leaders, start wars to steal resources, commit economic sabotage on countries bcos they don't like the way they manage their country, exploit the poor in sweat shop factories, and generally do nothing to promote development in disadvanataged reasons, then those countries reap what they sow. Its called imperialism, exceptionalism, bullying. This is what causes migration. The Dems and Reps are equally guilty in laying the ground for that.
[QUOTE=JustTK;2717748]Not at all. I am all for open borders. I beleive the world could only ever be a socially and economically just place once all borders are removed and people rightfully have the opportunity to improve their lives.
People generally do not want to uproot their lives and move without a strong motive.[/QUOTE]You listed the reasons why real wages in America have been stagnant since the 1970's, which is clearly a bad thing, and correctly put open borders mass turd world immigration on that list. Now you're saying you're in favor of it? That is what we call "cognitive dissonance", often seen among leftists.
Yes, people do not want to uproot their lives and move, particularly when that move is fraught with danger like trekking across cartel-run deserts. That is why the only people who do it are the losers and dregs of the third world.
Despite the image the fake news media would give you, places like Guatemala and El Salvador are functioning countries in which the vast majority of people get along ok. There is no mass famine or war killing hundreds of thousands of people. Only the complete douchebags and criminals at the bottom of society, who are too stupid / lazy and useless to find employment, and where there is little or no welfare state, need to leave. This is so that they can latch onto the generous welfare teat of Uncle Sam, and proceed to spend the rest of their lives increasing the US national debt through the $30 trillion barrier and beyond.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2717741]At least until there is at least one dum ass Ukrainian willing to die so this turd can cash in.
[URL]https://stormer-daily.rw/epic-life-hack-revealed-if-you-dont-want-to-die-dont-join-a-mercenary-army-to-fight-russia/[/URL][/QUOTE]Yeah it's pretty rich to see Blinken the failed rockstar whining about foreign mercenaries fighting in Ukraine not being given Geneva Convention PoW protections when it clearly states these are not extended to mercs. Also the US didn't give PoW status to prisoners in the so-called war on terror.
I hope the war ends quickly but after all the tricks the Washington swamp has pulled in the last 20 years the US doesn't have a leg to stand on with all that "rules-based order" bullshit.
Thanks, Joe, Nancy, Chuck and the Dems.
[B]Number of involuntary part-time workers falls by 707,000, lowest level in 21 years[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/08/involuntary-part-time-worker-numbers-dip-to-lowest-level-in-21-years.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The number of Americans employed part-time for economic reasons fell by 707,000 last month to 3.6 million, according to June jobs report issued Friday by the U.S. Department of Labor.
Thats the lowest level of so-called involuntary part-time workers since August 2001, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. [b]The dynamic suggests workers have ample leverage in the current jobseekers labor market.[/b]
These individuals work part-time involuntarily. They are forced to work part-time because their employer cut their hours or they cant find a full-time gig, according to the Labor Department.[/QUOTE]Repubs hate that result I highlighted in the report. That's what they mean when they say these Great Dem Economic Expansions and Recoveries from Great Repub Economic Disasters like the current one we are experiencing thanks to Biden and the Dems are "Flaming Dumpster Fires" and ignorant crap like that. LOL.
For Repubs, any labor market and economy that favors the workers instead of the CEOs at the great expense of the workers is terrible and must be turned around ASAP!
George W. Bush apparently hated that outcome in the economy he inherited from Clinton 21 years ago the need to "turn it around" might have been another reason he blew off and utterly ignored the alarming Presidential Daily Briefng regarding Osama Bin Laden's plans for the USA he got that month and did absolutely nothing in response to it. That would have been a typical Repub move.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2717739]If you weren't such a fool you would know that a persons actions speak louder than their words LMAO (thanks so much ruthie you're the best for letting bad orange man reverse the evil known as Roe) she has said that is was a bad ruling for a variety of reasons, even according to your own words dum ass.
"She had preferred that right to be phased in more gradually and that it rely more on a different part of the Constitution the right to equal protection rather than the right to privacy, the basis of Roe. " And "Ginsburg's other main problem with Roe was that it was based upon the right to privacy rather than the right to equal protection she felt the latter would have left it more insulated from challenges. " And ""Roe isn't really about the woman's choice, is it?" Ginsburg said in a 2013 event at the University of Chicago. "It's about the doctor's freedom to practice. . It wasn't woman-centered, it was physician-centered".
Are you brain dead? You just listed reasons why she was against the ruling and then say she wasn't![/QUOTE]He's worse than brain dead; he's brainwashed.