Printable View
At Art, most girls are in the bar area where it's dark. In sharks bar area, its well lit.
Palace and GT are dark clubs also. I really don't like it when it gets dim because the vision get's blurred and you cannot see detailed optics of the girls. That means girls will look better than well lit rooms.
This is the reason why I'm in favor of Sharks, Mainhattan, and ACA when it comes to being well lit. Girls cannot hide their ugliness like in dark clubs.
[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1507986]This is the reason why I'm in favor of Sharks and Mainhattan clubs when it comes to being well lit. Girls cannot hide their ugliness like in dark clubs.[/QUOTE]Maybe the monger can hide his hehehe!
[QUOTE=Bearsk;1507778]The bar is the only place to get a drink and the showers near reception the only place to shower.[/QUOTE]There are showers on the far right of upstairs near the right Jacuzi. Sometimes towels are available near the pool, but most of the time I took a towel with me.
By the time I reached that point, I needed oxygen after the climb and did not want to go back to the reception. Thanks for the info.
[QUOTE=Forcharles;1508063]There are showers on the far right of upstairs near the right Jacuzi. Sometimes towels are available near the pool, but most of the time I took a towel with me.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Bearsk;1507778]My impression of Sharks was that the line up had more variety than Mainhattan but less than Artemis. Compared to Mainhattan the quality at Sharks was perhaps a little lower but with some quite remarkable gals. The whole place is a bit dark. A little more light would help with seeing girls on offer. I will repeat if have the opportunity.[/QUOTE]Commander, you have performed well, even in such darkness, and everyone in Ho'dquarters appreciates your carrying out the mission. However, it seems you had enough fun that this cannot really be described at taking one for the troops.
[QUOTE=Bearsk; 1507968]Maybe just me but I found Sharks dark. Palace is very dark. Mainhattan was dark in the wellness area. The main area around the bar with Football on, not so dark.
Its just everyones impression but basically I do like a decent look (and chat etc) before I walk.[/QUOTE]I remember one time at Palace that the full lighting was (I guess) accidentally switched on on a Saturday night for a few minutes. By full lighting I mean the lighting that I assume they only use for cleaning the joint. Holy fuck! Some of the girls were not best pleased!
[QUOTE=Solo Traveler;1507955]By the way, when I ordered the cold non-alcoholic beverage (coke or water) from the bar, the glasses the staff gave me is extremely thin and small.[/QUOTE]So what? At World they give you these tiny plastic Pepsi cups. At GT the have these tiny Coke glasses. At Sharks just ask for 2 drinks or a bigger glas, which they have.
HB
[QUOTE=Forcharles;1508063]There are showers on the far right of upstairs near the right Jacuzi. Sometimes towels are available near the pool, but most of the time I took a towel with me.[/QUOTE]I didn't know that either, thank you. I've always used the spacious ones next to the saunas.
[QUOTE=PussyLiccker; 1507986]At Art, most girls are in the bar area where it's dark. In sharks bar area, its well lit.
Palace and GT are dark clubs also. I really don't like it when it gets dim because the vision get's blurred and you cannot see detailed optics of the girls. That means girls will look better than well lit rooms.
This is the reason why I'm in favor of Sharks, Mainhattan, and ACA when it comes to being well lit. Girls cannot hide their ugliness like in dark clubs.[/QUOTE]Get your eyesight checked and eat more carrots.
Sharks is the most well-lighted club among big 5. World has been getting a bit darker recently, Mainhattan too. Palace and Oase are like haunted house, LOL. Accidentally, the order of brightness is just same as my recent taste of the clubs.
I'm sure you guys had this happen to you.
You find a nice looking cuttie from a distance. So you get up close to talk to her, and you find out she looks like a dog or has herpes on her lips.
I don't like dimly lit clubs because you are forced to approach them in order to have an idea of how they look. I bet the lighting is done on purpose to make the girl's make-up cover up their ugliness.
You guys are so cynical. The dim lighting is not to hide anything, it's the clubs doing their part to conserve energy and save the planet. LOL
Anyone who knows the name of this girl in the picture below and her attitude in room?
Many thanks in advance.
[QUOTE=UniversoFkk; 1508242]Anyone who knows the name of this girl in the picture below and her attitude in room?
Many thanks in advance.[/QUOTE]I'd like to know this also. I remember her from my last visit there, and she was the one that stood out to be highest priority for me to do when I saw her from a distance.
She was sitting at the bar and she is a type that just sits there until someone approaches. I approached and talked to her briefly. She comes off as typical cold Hessen professional. Not that she was rude of anything. I just got bad vibes and facially she a bit older than from a distance. She looks older than this photo shows. But, then again, I am a bit anal with looks. If she was that good looking, I would have just taken her to the room no matter the vibe, but her looks didn't hit the spot for me to do so. I would say she's one the best looker I've witnessed at Sharks when I was there. The other looker, I didn't get a good vibe either as I've witnessed her approaches were shark like.
And that's the porn star look I'm talking about, PL. LOL.
Personally I have zero interest in girls who look like this.