FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

See here:

[URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?3225-FKK-Sharks-Darmstadt&p=1880801&viewfull=1[/URL]#post1880801.

HB.

Hello everyone!

I was at Sharks last September 2 times on layovers. I have zero complaints! I had a great time! This forum helped a lot.

I have another layover in July this year - 11 hours.

Here's my question for regulars. If I wanted to increase the amount of different women with whom I've sessioned with, does the scenery change significantly in 10 months? (Influx of new girls). Or, should I go to Atlanta?

I really liked how I didn't feel as though the women were shark up sellers at Sharks. I've read the reports about Mainhattan and Palace. I don't think they would be to my liking. Atlanta appears calm like Sharks - "calm" a relative word.

In short, what's the turnover rate at Sharks? Will there be new women on a Sunday in July?

Thanks!

Having visited Sharks 4 times in the last 10 days and having had sessions with 11 of the girls, I thought that I should update my ratings list. I have down-rated most of the scores since my original list with hindsight appears overly generous because I used NotSavvy's list as a basis. This updated list is more in accordance with my own assessment of body/face/service. I have dropped those girls that I sessioned with more than 9 months ago as their ratings might no longer be current; and added 4 girls whom I have tried for the first time over the last week: Annabelle, Sasha, Megan and new girl slim Romanian Sorina.

Evita 8/8/8: 8.
Mia 8/6/9: 7,7.
MaiLing 7/7/9: 7,7.
Janine 9/9/5: 7,7.
Dina 7/8/7: 7,3.
Ada 7/6/8: 7.
Annabelle. 8/8/5: 7.
Aurelia 8/8/5: 7.
Raissa 7/6/8: 7.
Elliss 7/5/8: 6,7.
Hanna 8/7/5: 6,7.
Yeliz 8/6/6: 6,7.
Sasha 7/7/6: 6,7.
Megan 8/6/6: 6,7.
Sorina 8/7/5: 6,7.
Paloma 6/5/8: 6,3.
Lara 7/6/5: 6.
Ariana 6/6/6: 6.
Sandra 6/4/8: 6.
Arabella 6/6/6: 6.
Cosmina 7/6/5: 6.
Tamaris 5/7/5: 5,7.
Cathy 6/5/6: 5,7.
Nicoletta 4/6/4: 4,7
Lorina 7/5/1: 4.

[QUOTE=TankTank123;1882670]Having visited Sharks 4 times in the last 10 days and having had sessions with 11 of the girls, I thought that I should update my ratings list.

Evita 8/8/8: 8.
Mia 8/6/9: 7,7.
MaiLing 7/7/9: 7,7.
Janine 9/9/5: 7,7.
Dina 7/8/7: 7,3.
Ada 7/6/8: 7.

...

Cathy 6/5/6: 5,7.
Nicoletta 4/6/4: 4,7
Lorina 7/5/1: 4.[/QUOTE]Thanks for this quite interesting approach to listing girls and their attributes, both physical and performance. Fascinating to see how many low scores you list for performance: Lorina got a "1" you say? And girls like Nicoletta, if the body / face is so low, why on earth did you even go to the room with them in the first place with so many other (more attractive) options available?

Also interesting to see a couple of girls at the top of your list score "9" for performance, and "old stars" like Sandra and Paloma (ex-"Skinny Karina" of World) score a consistent high peformance level.

Rating the body and face, however, as we would all naturally agree, is very personal and thus subjective. For example, many would rate Ada's face not so low as "6" or Paloma's face as low as "5" unless they've deteriorated in looks very recently. I must say, however, that, although I only went to room with her once, I agree on your assessment of Megan, since I too experienced a rather lack-lustre performance at variance with all the hype.

One factor I would think might influence the performance rating (at least in some cases) is: how many times you've been with a particular girl previously. Girls who might consider you a "Stammgast" or Regular customer, might well up-their performance standard, don't you think? It cetainly helps, esp the perception of good service level, when there is already a strong chemistry established.

Thanks again for this interesting post.

Here's my list. It's not so straightforward to quantify this stuff, but perhaps it gives a relative idea of each individual experiences. Added Illusion element which I find could be important info other than general services. A girl can provide decent services, but illusion low that leaves a bad impression.

Most of the aspects are pretty straight forward except acting skillz. Would score low if there is something that breaks it. It's a complex aspect as it's a mix of things that has elements of trust, trying to pull something over or bullshit I can detect (poor acting. LOL). I find this to be an important factor for repeatability. After all, WGs at FKKs are distinct from other venues due to the illusion aspect that comes into it.

Body / Face / Service / Attitude / acting skillz (illusion).

Sharks.

Evita 7/8/6/9/8.

Janine 8/7,5/3/7/4.

Lavinia 7/7,5/6/9/7.

Jellis 6/7/7,5/9/8.

Megan 7,5/8,5/7,5/9/7,5.

Cindy 6/7/5,5/8/7.

Jana (absent, long ago) 6/7/8,5/9/8,5.

Beatrice (ex-Oase) 8/8,5/5,5/7/2.

Helli 7,5/7/6,5/7/6


Oase.

Laura 6/7,5/6/7/3.

Adele (ex-Angie) 7,5/8,5/8/9/8.

Lexi 7,5/8,5/5/7/5.

Francesca (blond, ex-Sharks) 7/7,5/8,5/8/8.

Francesca (ex-World, maybe absent) 6,5/7,5/6/7/6.

Julia (blond, now at Palace?) 7/7,5/8/9/9.

Elizabeth (Hun) 7,5(the tittens)/7,5/5,5/6/2


World.

Isa 7/8/8/9/8 (cuteness factor due to her voice, 10. Hehe).


Palace

Vanessa (Ro) 7,5/8,25/8/8/7

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1882776]World.

Isa 7/8/8/9/8 (cuteness factor due to her voice, 10. Hehe).[/QUOTE]Yep World Isa a very nice girl and with very good room performance. But last time I saw her her body totally out of shape with at least 10 kg more so a 7 for body very flattering.

I don't think my body scores are that precise(overall I can't say the scores in general are really that precise), but I'm probably basing her body score of my impression of when I first met her. But, I've heard her body is different now.

The illusion that she's enjoying it? Idk guess only jedi masters can use the "mind trick" after all, LOL.

Like I've stated, Illusion is a mix of stuff. If I get a sense that a girl is really trying to give a good time, I'd give her brownie points. It's also has to due with how I perceive her as trust-able or not. Based on actin skills, but it's not only about actin to put it more precisely. If it seems that she is having a good time(or at least no signs of dull time), I also enjoy, and that aspect would bump it up. If she's not, that's fine, but would score low of course.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1882798]Like I've stated, Illusion is a mix of stuff. If I get a sense that a girl is really trying to give a good time, I'd give her brownie points. It's also has to due with how I perceive her as trust-able or not. Based on actin skills, but it's not only about actin to put it more precisely. If it seems that she is having a good time, I also enjoy, and that aspect would bump it up. If she's not, that's fine, but would score low of course.[/QUOTE]Much to learn this padawan still do Master PussyLiccker, hehe.

Guess its illusion if a girl you have been with is willing to DFK on the couch to get you in the room again.

[QUOTE=Exodus8;1882802]Guess its illusion if a girl you have been with is willing to DFK on the couch to get you in the room again.[/QUOTE]No, nothing of that sort for the most recent LU of girls. As far as I'm concerned those times are pretty much gone. If I were to do a rating of back in the days, with that factor there, perhaps most of the girls that type of pre-zimmer the rating would go up since that type of interaction lead to better than avg time in the room (no unexpected occurrences, or not as talked about services).

Don't want to come off as a really demanding guy as I'm really not, but the score is just a relative to my experiences, nothing more. Doesn't mean there aren't other factors that would draw me to like the girl that may rate lower on certain aspects. It's complex. It's not as simple as some numbers on a sheet.

Even without that sort of interaction outside the room, there are magic girls, and it's just about how it turns out during the session. Good surprises.

I call it illusion because simply it's paid sex. Some girls may have easier time providing better services, and others maybe more YMMV due to various factors. One of the strongest of that aspect is trust-ability. An attractive girl that is trust-able has good repeat-ability. Even with top optiks, very low illusion will not work out.

[QUOTE=Ortos;1882680]One factor I would think might influence the performance rating (at least in some cases) is: how many times you've been with a particular girl previously. Girls who might consider you a "Stammgast" or Regular customer, might well up-their performance standard, don't you think? It cetainly helps, esp the perception of good service level, when there is already a strong chemistry established.
[/QUOTE]Perhaps with some girls, but based on my experience clubbing around various spots, I don't find that stamgast really have much to do with services in the room (perhaps depends on the club). Perhaps more time pre-zimmer or whatnot given by a girl known well for a regular punter. What my experience is a girl may give top service in the start to get me interested in her, and may not be same level of service consequtively. The top sessions I've had probably had to do with girl's mood if I compare with repeated sessions it makes most sense. This is probably why guys state that girls that do lots of rooms, likely wouldn't be performing at a good level. I can't say I really follow when guys say, repeat her and she gets better and the the better service being linked to repeated sessions. You'd see a pattern if you regularly take her on a more frequent basis like weekly, but if you take her much less frequently like a tourist, you may make a correlation that it's the repeated session that changed her services. It's quite possible due to long time since sesssioning with her, that she up'ed her game.

All I can say is that some girls are more consistent over others when repeated. You may also get a real strong session the first time around, and degrade as time goes on. Some girls changes up the game generally for worse over time. This has to do with demand, and what they find to work best based on their experiences in a calculative way.

I think depends on the person or the girl in how it works out. Girls may need some repeated sessions to get to know the punter, may get more comfortable. But, conversely how often do punters repeat a girl that the service wasn't up to par? A high optiks girl maybe.

Pre-zimmer interaction can be a test how loose the punter is with their wallet. Suggesting 1hr for kissing or dishing out pricing to see if the punter is familiar with pricing. Same goes for punters I'm sure, there are some methods used to feel the vibes of girls.

[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;1883014]Perhaps with some girls, but based on my experience clubbing around various spots, I don't find that stamgast really have much to do with services in the room (perhaps depends on the club). Perhaps more time pre-zimmer or whatnot given by a girl known well for a regular punter. What my experience is a girl may give top service in the start to get me interested in her, and may not be same level of service consequtively. The top sessions I've had probably had to do with girl's mood if I compare with repeated sessions it makes most sense. This is probably why guys state that girls that do lots of rooms, likely wouldn't be performing at a good level. I can't say I really follow when guys say, repeat her and she gets better and the the better service being linked to repeated sessions. You'd see a pattern if you regularly take her on a more frequent basis like weekly, but if you take her much less frequently like a tourist, you may make a correlation that it's the repeated session that changed her services. It's quite possible due to long time since sesssioning with her, that she up'ed her game.

All I can say is that some girls are more consistent over others when repeated. You may also get a real strong session the first time around, and degrade as time goes on. Some girls changes up the game generally for worse over time. This has to do with demand, and what they find to work best based on their experiences in a calculative way.

I think depends on the person or the girl in how it works out. Girls may need some repeated sessions to get to know the punter, may get more comfortable.[/QUOTE]Is all this not to be human, the girl are not machines, every day is different for them like for us. I respect each girl I sessioned and never complain about there performance.

If the session is not good I just consider that I was not able to give her fun to be with me, I never transfer my responsibility to others.

My 2 cents on PL's list:

Body / Face / Service / acting skills (illusion).

Took out attitude, wasn't quite sure what it means.

Evita 8/9/3/3 (session was in her first days / week at Sharks).

Janine 9/7 never been with her, not attracted at all.

Lavinia 9/5 never been with her, don't like her face.

Jellis 6/6 never been with her, hips too wide, don't like her face.

Megan 9/8/7/7.

Cindy who's Cindy?

Beatrice (ex-Oase) 8/6 never been with her, don't like her face.

Helli 8/9/8/8.

HB.

I too took Evita when she first started. Same for Helli as well. It was at Oase though.