Angeles City

[QUOTE=GreenBud;1214696]Not quite correct depending on your definition of sex. I like to get BJs from cherry girls.:)[/QUOTE]BJs are not sex. Ask Bill "I-did-not-have-sex-with-that-woman" Clinton.

notwithstanding the fact i agree no means no, your statement: "they do not have to sex you just because you have paid the bar fine" is somewhat sophomoric. what do they think is behind the reason for bfing, discussing field density and it's relationship to gravitational phenomenon?

the other point here, again to protect "us," is to let them know "word gets around."

[quote=frenzy3; 1214258]henryv what do you think happened?

i for one think the bar was not in on it. and why the guy not name the girl or went back to the bar to complain.

i had bar girls tell me they have been abused by guys and all they have done is warn other bar girls so they not get bar fined by the guy. that why when i read here guys getting refused bar fines i repeat that they do not have to sex you just because you have paid the bar fine. they can leave with out having sex and can claim [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord123][CodeWord123][/url] if you force them.[/quote]

Forgot to add, no means no, even if you have paid the bar fine. Just take the girl back to the bar, or go yourself. Hopefully you can say: "either give me my money back or, like Gecko's, this will be all over the internet." That is the real reason we should show some solidarity by telling Gecko's we know what happened!

[QUOTE=Henryv; 1214977]Notwithstanding the fact I agree no means no, your statement: "they do not have to sex you just because you have paid the bar fine" is somewhat sophomoric. What do they think is behind the reason for bfing, discussing field density and it's relationship to gravitational phenomenon?

The other point here, again to protect "us," is to let them know "word gets around."[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Henryv;1214985]Forgot to add, no means no, even if you have paid the bar fine.[/QUOTE]Yes, but how often does this happen that it needs to be discussed ad nauseam? Generally if a girl is not going to fuck you then she will say in advance that she will only go for barhopping.

[QUOTE=Henryv;1214985]Forgot to add, no means no, even if you have paid the bar fine. Just take the girl back to the bar, or go yourself. Hopefully you can say: "either give me my money back or, like Gecko's, this will be all over the internet." That is the real reason we should show some solidarity by telling Gecko's we know what happened![/QUOTE]So how many girls are allowing the guy to barfine only to say no in the room? Is this becoming a new trend in AC.

[QUOTE=Amjeck;1214991]So how many girls are allowing the guy to barfine only to say no in the room? Is this becoming a new trend in AC.[/QUOTE]So far I have never had this problem. But the last time I was in AC was a year ago. Only one time I refused to take the girl to the room after she started coughing and obviously had a bad cold while having dinner. Did not want to catch the cold.

If all girls get the idea that they can refuse sex after barfining it will become a trend leading to demise of AC as a mongering place.

[QUOTE=Sammon;1215154]If all girls get the idea that they can refuse sex after barfining it will become a trend leading to demise of AC as a mongering place.[/QUOTE]Isn't it an ongoing process already? See all this huge bars in Fields with the shows? Nowadays with permission to take photos and videos? Unthinkable of 6 or 8 years ago, those days you shouldn't even think about getting out a camera.

I guess there are lots of girls now, who see themselves more as entertainer or showgirl, not really as bumbum-provider. Sure, nobody can eliminate P4P entirely there, but IMHO the plan is to reduce this more to the smaller bars in Perimeter or so, and make Fields to a cleaner entertainment area, which is then proudly presented to the NGO's or whoever. Of course the Koreans shall continue spending money for company and they will, let them bf 6 girls and no bumbum, maybe for most of them it's just fine? Or HJ is enough?

The typical guy, the Swede or German or Aussie, who spend 2 weeks of annual leave once or twice a year to fuck as many pussy as often as possible is totally uninteresting here.

Just my impression over the last couple of years, maybe beginning around 2007/08.

Enjoy as long as it lasts.

[QUOTE=Ekspat;1215323]Sure, nobody can eliminate P4P entirely there, but IMHO the plan is to reduce this more to the smaller bars in Perimeter[/QUOTE]The pay-to-play scene will never disappear. There's just too much money in it.

In fact, the P4P scene will probably expand dramatically in the years ahead. Clark airport will soon be a hub for AirAsia. Expect heaps of new tourists passing through Angeles City in 2012. There is also talk of transferring some or most of Manila's airport traffic to Clark. Clearly, the outlook for Angeles tourism is very bright.

With an onslaught of tourists, I foresee a widening of a two tier arrangement already in place (Field v Perimeter). In this widening two tier system, the highest quality girls will get to charge ever higher barfines. Barfines of P4000 are probably just around the corner.

Before anyone panics thinking AC will become unaffordable, keep in mind that it's impossible for all girls to charge that much. A vast majority of girls on a given night do not get barfined. There will always be girls for any budget.

I support this system, actually. Very high quality girls should get more. Not only is this fair, but it gives mongers who really want her the ability to have her. If she's forced to charge the standard P1500 barfine (for example) , she'd either be plucked offstage immediately by another patron or she will decline barfines repeatedly to collect more commission on drinks.

Of course, I don't like Koreans outbidding me on talent. But it's fair for someone who pays more to get more.

Been following the threads on the "no sex" bar-fined girls. I have noticed that many guys are now asking upfront (when they first start "talking" with the girls) :

A) Are you on the rag?

B) Are you a cherry girl?

C) Are you a "spot lite" girl (more expensive)

After that, the sex questions emerge. Anal, etc, etc. I guess its just best to ask up front.

I was told that the girls have a small "V" on their cards (in red) which is supposed to tell you they are a "cherry" girl. But for some the V is small to unreadable. Not sure if this is a universal thing, since the different clubs seem to have different color schemes with the girls cards.

So far, the most fun bars this week have been forbidden city (interesting shows, cute dancers) , Lancelot (Good looking waitresses) , International club (hot night crew) , Tropix (fun girls, but many flat chested) , and Dollhouse (decent girls & waitresses). Oh, and we visited a club called Aura. It was off of Fields ave near the Bangkok hotel. There were a few lookers there, and they weren't (for the most part) flat-chested. But I think Lancelot was the best looking girls overall. Going to head back for more tonight.

Bar-fines or EWR or whatever seemed to range between 1600 and 1850 for "non-spot-lite" girls. The spot-lite girls went for 3000.

We did skip Geckos.

Hope this helps. Enjoy!

[QUOTE=FurryFriend;1215364]I support this system, actually. Very high quality girls should get more. Not only is this fair, but it gives mongers who really want her the ability to have her. If she's forced to charge the standard P1500 barfine (for example) , she'd either be plucked offstage immediately by another patron or she will decline barfines repeatedly to collect more commission on drinks.[/QUOTE]And how will it be decided what is "very high quality"?

[QUOTE=Mr Enternational;1215366]And how will it be decided what is "very high quality"?[/QUOTE]

Market forces and consumer choice.

If I were a bar owner, I would group those who get barfined almost every night into a special P3000 catagory. If those girls still get barfined nightly at P3000, they go to P3500 catagory. And if they still get barfined almost nightly at P3500, they go to P4000. This continues until, at a certain price point, she only gets barfined 2-3 times a week.

That means, a bar can have many groups of girls all charging different prices. We have a P1500 pool here dancing on one stage. A P2000 pool on another stage. And a P3000 pool there in the back. Or maybe they get differentiated by the color of their tag.

We already have this system in the mega-bars on Fields. With more tourists flooding in, there will likely be wider price ranges simply because the bars can get away with certain dancers who are insanely in demand.

[QUOTE=FurryFriend;1215364]The pay-to-play scene will never disappear. There's just too much money in it. In fact, the P4P scene will probably expand dramatically in the years ahead.[/quote]FF, I fully agree with you on this. That's why we see the hotels popping up like mushrooms around Fields, investors wouldn't do that without a good reason.

What I meant was the change in habits and mentality of the girls, the change of the purpose of the bar. The brothel-type bar just to present the girls changed into an entertaining bar with fashion shows, body painting and other action to keep customers staying and drinking. And having customers nowadays, who pay for company only, who go with the girls barhopping for hours, who are happy with one bumbum only per night etc, IMHO this change the behavior of the ladies.

[quote]Of course, I don't like Koreans outbidding me on talent. But it's fair for someone who pays more to get more.[/QUOTE]Also fully agreed. Same for mobiles, houses, cars and for every other product on this planet.

Cheers!

The problem with the escalating bar fine structure is the bar business is seasonal and no bar is guaranteed a good night every night during the high season. Pushing girls into higher price brackets and lowering the number of bar fines per girl doesn't make sense when the bar has to pay the girls a salary. Keeping girls in the bar and paying them a base salary is a losing proposition. It would probably result in less girls being hired on for line ups. Then it still doesn't take into consideration the fact that AC's sole attraction is the abundance cheap pussy giving quality GFE not the hotels or anything else. Making Clark an air hub wouldn't necessarily increase the number of mongers especially if prices were to approach Burgos prices. It might actually push mongers into other yet untapped areas of the country. Take away cheap GFE boom boom and concentrated number of bars and the Golden Goose dies.

[QUOTE=Ekspat;1215323]I guess there are lots of girls now, who see themselves more as entertainer or showgirl, not really as bumbum-provider.[/QUOTE]Men are the ones to blame for this. Men reward girls financially for non-sexual services. I've seen many dancers get 500p tips for just dancing on stage.

The only power men have over women is physical and financial. The only power women have over men is pussy power. When men give up their power (s) willingly without sexual reward, women gain the upper hand. This is one of the problems with AC today!

[QUOTE=Chocha Monger;1215387]Pushing girls into higher price brackets and lowering the number of bar fines per girl doesn't make sense[/QUOTE]It's already happening. When I first visited Angeles City in 2007, barfines were pretty much maxed out at around P1500. Now it's P3000.

Let's be honest here. We can say that something "doesn't make sense". But we're not as qualified as bar owners in determining whether a certain policy maximizes revenue. In general, if they're doing something, it's usually because it's in their financial self-interest.

[QUOTE=Chocha Monger;1215387]Keeping girls in the bar and paying them a base salary is a losing proposition.[/QUOTE]Not if they're selling drinks like crazy. If I were a bar owner, I would rather have a girl get 1 barfine a week at P3000 than 2 barfines a week at P1500.

[QUOTE=Chocha Monger;1215387]hen it still doesn't take into consideration the fact that AC's sole attraction is the abundance cheap pussy giving quality GFE[/QUOTE]Do you think Korean guys are in Angeles City to pinch pennies?

Besides, there will ALWAYS be abundance of cheap pussy to attract budget tourists. As I pointed out earlier, most girls don't get barfined on a given night so not all of them can command a P3000 barfine.

I'm only saying that the girls who are most in-demand will get to charge more. It's already happening and it will likely be more extreme in the years ahead.

[QUOTE=Chocha Monger;1215387]Making Clark an air hub wouldn't necessarily increase the number of mongers especially if prices were to approach Burgos prices.[/QUOTE]Anything that makes it easier to go to Angeles City will only attract more visitors.

Right now, Clark receives direct flights from only four international cities: Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore and Bangkok. Once AirAsia is fully operational in Clark, you'll probably increase that to 20 cities. How can that NOT result in more people passing through the area?

Some guy might fly AirAsia from Hong Kong to Davao, with a layover in Clark. Don't you think some of them may want to check out the bars in Angeles City during a layover?