Printable View
[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2668431]This has to be the dumbest post of them all. The whole point of this forum is to gather information about hookers based on other people's reports. Only this doofus tries to stroke his own ego with this some prideful ego shit.
Another person writes a review, reader takes that information and makes use of it. That's how hooker forums work. Moron.[/QUOTE]I was never a good sheep, I so much prefer to make myself my own way without needing guys like you.
[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2668951]One can't help but think that the conflict in Ukraine would have been quickly squashed l if the NATO Secretary General wasn't a Norwegian who loves getting reach-arounds from Putin from far across the peninsula.[/QUOTE]I heard Schaeffers just came out with a new product now:
Schaeffers Thai Style Caulk.
Please let us know how you would fix those diplomatic holes with your ginormous brain!
But we all know you would only try to fuck up Europe even more by starting a nuclear war.
[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2669042]Omicron's pretty much over. Final surge, unimpressive even with the entire western hemisphere basically wide open through it.
FKK land never saw much of it.
I was right. Sirioja was wrong. Boom. Suck it Baby Trebek.[/QUOTE]I've got omicron as we speak, and to me it sucks even more than delta did, since I got it at a colder month. Delta was just weak. Omicron is just that much more annoying. Only thing that sucked with delta was how it influenced sex and gym afterwards for weeks. Hope omicron doesn't have that.
Today's free geography lesson: Hong Kong is not in the western hemisphere. You are welcome.
As for the "geopolitical" statements, they are just ridiculous.
[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2668951]One can't help but think that the conflict in Ukraine would have been quickly squashed l if the NATO Secretary General wasn't a Norwegian who loves getting reach-arounds from Putin from far across the peninsula.[/QUOTE]I don't think the NATO secretary general has much more than a symbolic role. NATO is 95% USA.
Oh yeah, the Thai Style Caulk from Schaeffers is in case you have only a tiny hole in your deck.
The idiot microbrains who think the war in Ukraine would be over with a much more rough approach towards Moscow have no idea what they are discussing. Financially is the only thing we can do, and some mild equipment deliveries.
Here is the issue:
Russia don't want to annihilate entire populations in Ukraine. But they can if they need to. Their army is essentially an artillery army, and can lay waste to cities in a pile of rubble in an instant if they have to or are forced to. Grozny, the Chechen capital had over 200 k people. After the Russian artillery was done with it, only 10 k was left alive. And since then the Russian artillery capabilities has only improved, with new weapons, new artillery and new systems. Making it even deadlier. They would even have crushed through the US army easily if there ever was a situation where the superior US airforce was not involved, or where US long range tactical cruiser missiles weren't being used.
The problem now is that it seems like people are thinking the Ukrainian defence is working. It is only working against a soft Russian push to avoid civilian casualties. But they have 26 km of artillery and tanks lined up north of Kiev. The Russian army has barely fired it's first shot so far. They only picked on the Ukrainian cities with toothpicks as of yet.
Any smart leader would leave the Russians with a way out of the situation. No matter how miscalculated it was from the Russians to begin with. Something that wouldn't take away all their pride. Because if you surround a bear from all sides armed with the heaviest artillery and nuclear arsenal in the history of the world, the bear attacks. That's a natural law.
When I am reading Zelensky demands Crimea back as a determinant if Russia leaves, I am starting to wonder if he wants to kill millions of his own people. Just like a certain non European Thai person here on the forum. Total stupidity on Putin level!
Here is some of the most recently developed Russian artillery which has been seen en masse in Ukraine on the road. Though not being used at all so far.
The TOS-1 MLRS:
[URL]https://youtu.be/xGYLgQk5xDo[/URL]
[QUOTE=Sirioja;2669339]I was never a good sheep, I so much prefer to make myself my own way without needing guys like you.[/QUOTE]Then why are you on an FKK forum if not to exchange information about women in the clubs?
They know where Z. Is. He posts videos every day at the capital complex and the underground bunker in Kiev. They just need the bunker busting bumbs and to decimate the entire capital neighborhood. After telling all the civilians to get out ASAP. Although President Z. Essentially makes it impossible to kill "civilians" since he gives all civilians Molotov cocktails and government issued fully automatic AK 47's therefore making everyone a combatant. The quicker Z is eliminated the less death and destruction and the safter the world will be from risk of nuclear attacks. Russia needs a buffer zone, just like the Cuban missile crisis, it doesn't want a NATO state on its direct border.
Ukraine has no risk if it disarmed. It is not like Romania or Poland will invade. And a disarmed Ukraine will be a good buffer zone and prevent nuclear war. The "freedom" of people is not important when considering the rest of humanity. They need to stop complaining. Really nobody in the USA is free anyway.
[QUOTE=Pistons;2669510]Oh yeah, the Thai Style Caulk from Schaeffers is in case you have only a tiny hole in your deck.
The idiot microbrains who think the war in Ukraine would be over with a much more rough approach towards Moscow have no idea what they are discussing. Financially is the only thing we can do, and some mild equipment deliveries.
Here is the issue:
Russia don't want to annihilate entire populations in Ukraine. But they can if they need to. Their army is essentially an artillery army, and can lay waste to cities in a pile of rubble in an instant if they have to or are forced to. Grozny, the Chechen capital had over 200 k people. After the Russian artillery was done with it, only 10 k was left alive. And since then the Russian artillery capabilities has only improved, with new weapons, new artillery and new systems. Making it even deadlier. They would even have crushed through the US army easily if there ever was a situation where the superior US airforce was not involved, or where US long range tactical cruiser missiles weren't being used.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PaulInZurich;2669488]I don't think the NATO secretary general has much more than a symbolic role. NATO is 95% USA.[/QUOTE]Agree that USA calls the shots in NATO. Germany and France opposed the Iraq invasion, and ofc that went forward. Merkel also opposed Ukraine and Georgia joining NATO. From 2008 article:
[QUOTE]As Nato prepares to convene for its annual summit in Bucharest on Wednesday, [b]Angela Merkel’s government made clear that it would veto a US drive to allow both former Soviet republics to join[/b] the defence alliance’s membership action plan (Map).
As a result, Nato must now find a formula in its summit communiqué that does not embarrass Georgia and Ukraine but that also avoids angering Russia, which has made clear that it is opposed to Map being offered to the two states.
Ms Merkel had discussed her position with US President George W. Bush, but had not changed her stance in spite of his opposing view. “Mr Bush knows our position,” the spokesman said.
[b]Among the European Union’s larger member states, Germany has been most willing in recent years to take into account Russia’s security worries. German officials were sceptical on Monday about the US view that Nato membership for Georgia and Ukraine would help bring stability and added security to the region.[/b]
https://www.ft.com/content/ab8eb6a6-ff44-11dc-b556-000077b07658..[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2669545]Then why are you on an FKK forum if not to exchange information about women in the clubs?[/QUOTE]Do you think I find my regulars here, or before on Youppie? When so many times I was disappointed by looks when was told about pretty girls and I don't care about not pretty. On last Saturday I met a ex Bruggen NL regular at Sharks visiting for Marta. When I don't plan to return to Sharks on next week end, I will see if his advice is good. At least, we had some same girls. But reading and writing English relax my mind. And I think I give information from real visits.
[QUOTE=Pistons;2669510]Financially is the only thing we can do, and some mild equipment deliveries.[/QUOTE]This unprecedented economic retaliation will hurt Russia and Putin. But the effects of that would be less "immediate". My hope is that this will de-escalate sooner.
[QUOTE=Pistons;2669369]I've got omicron as we speak, and to me it sucks even more than delta did, since I got it at a colder month. Delta was just weak. Omicron is just that much more annoying. Only thing that sucked with delta was how it influenced sex and gym afterwards for weeks. Hope omicron doesn't have that.[/QUOTE]Got the Rona myself recently and it really kicked my ass. But I will be back in fighting shape for FKK land by late spring. The more trip reports from fellow ice bears, the better. Eye on the prize.
[QUOTE=DrPoon;2669643]Russia needs a buffer zone, just like the Cuban missile crisis, it doesn't want a NATO state on its direct border.[/QUOTE]Yeah, poor Russia. Their neighbours always invading them. Lett's see. 1939 when Poland was already defeated by Nazi Germany, Russia invaded Poland, because what? Poland was a threat? Then Finland with all their might was threatening them, so they invaded Finland. Then Russia was under threat from those huge Baltic countries, so they invaded them as well. Then Romania was really threatening Russia, so they invaded half of Moldova. How about crushing Budapest in 1956, crushing Prague in 1968. Were Hungarians and Czechs armies close to Moscow?
[QUOTE=DrPoon;2669643]Ukraine has no risk if it disarmed. It is not like Romania or Poland will invade. [/QUOTE]Disgusting. Of course Romania is not the threat. But Russia invaded them twice since 2014. Ukrainians have every right to defend themselves.
[QUOTE=DrPoon;2669643] The "freedom" of people is not important when considering the rest of humanity. They need to stop complaining. Really nobody in the USA is free anyway.[/QUOTE]How about letting the Ukrainians decide about their future. You have no idea what it means to live in an authoritarian state. What freedom exactly are the people in the US missing?
[QUOTE=DrPoon;2669643]They know where Z. Is. He posts videos every day at the capital complex and the underground bunker in Kiev. They just need the bunker busting bumbs and to decimate the entire capital neighborhood. After telling all the civilians to get out ASAP. Although President Z. Essentially makes it impossible to kill "civilians" since he gives all civilians Molotov cocktails and government issued fully automatic AK 47's therefore making everyone a combatant. The quicker Z is eliminated the less death and destruction and the safter the world will be from risk of nuclear attacks. Russia needs a buffer zone, just like the Cuban missile crisis, it doesn't want a NATO state on its direct border.
Ukraine has no risk if it disarmed. It is not like Romania or Poland will invade. And a disarmed Ukraine will be a good buffer zone and prevent nuclear war. The "freedom" of people is not important when considering the rest of humanity. They need to stop complaining. Really nobody in the USA is free anyway.[/QUOTE]Bad leaders from either side. I can't say I trust Z's motifs the way he argues and make demands. I rather trust the Klitchko brothers. Z really hide in a bunker? I have a female friend in Kiev who isn't even hiding at all. And Z is supposed to be the man? No, it's all propaganda. Vitaly Klitschko and his brother are the real leaders in the conflict.
When that is said, if someone in Moscow managed to take out Putin, that would potentially be even luckier for the rest of us. He is in so much deep shit at the moment due to no one daring to oppose him other than the brain molested Chechen leader, that there is no way of telling what he'll do. And god forbid if he starts to listen even more to that Chechen guy. Then we are all dead. He really want everyone to follow him to hell. And with Putin in such deep shit, he is mentally getting close to that point as well. At least one of those two needs to go. Bad influencer, or the insane leaders.
If this runs for 2 more weeks I bet nukes will be used. And that doesn't even have to land on Ukraine. Could land in USA for that matter.