FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

[QUOTE=Pistons;1917615]I would have put her performance at a 9. Top 3 performance girl for me on my last trip. But perhaps the fact that Takedown didn't come might have lowerred his score. And it could be a ymmv as well as something she did extra with me. I don't know. And also for looks she gets an overall 9- from me. 9 for body. 8+ for face. She was the top sharks girl for me now in july, and I didnt see anyone better in looks either. Although Marlyn and Janine had their draws too. Alexia is more my type in femininity perhaps...[/QUOTE]I am used to very high standards. Maybe that is why I think very good but less. Her looks are good but I would not put her in the top three for performance in Sharks.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1917619]Victorias secret should mean super models, gorgeous.

Playboy in contrast may be more blonde bimbo types probably with sillies.

Most of us can imagine difference in quality.[/QUOTE]I'd say victoria secrets = tall almost annorexic.

Playboy = curved fit shaped bodies. Either with help of surgery or not.

There are tall girls at Oase too (Anja got to be over 1. 80, but she is not annorexic)), and fit curved ones at sharks (Janine etc). But as a whole I agree with Takedown.

[QUOTE=DerAuslander;1917620]I am used to very high standards. Maybe that is why.[/QUOTE]I call bullshit.

[QUOTE=Pistons;1917622]I call bullshit.[/QUOTE]I think my point is reasonable. We can all differ in opinion. She is ok. I probably won't repeat. Good for her that you like her so much! :)

[QUOTE=Sirioja;1917299]Megan on holidays and she should try other life.[/QUOTE]You should give up writing shit like this like all men are arseholes, the job is a horror, and you are the shining knight. I get sick of reading about your behavior, if I can be bothered reading any more than a list of names, instead of the girls behavior or response.

Girls are not always telling me how horrific is the job, so what is it with you, that this topic dominates your thoughts? I don't see others stuck on this topic.

You do write very disrespectfully about girls, repeatedly dumping shit on girls not your preference, even if you never tried them.

It seems to be a mental problem if you want to fuck girls but want them to stop fucking other guys. This is not a way to show any respect for the girls, to always say they should not do this job, yet happy to be the customer. I do not use girls that make it obvious they hate the job. I at least prefer to spend time with girls who maybe can have a bit of fun in their work.

I never tell girls to quit. Its not my business nor is who they want to fuck or their choice of employment.

Even you mention girl's names all the time, does not mean they are in attendance nor they even work at Sharks. Confusion reigns.

Mainly useful info about Sharks' girls would be a big improvement. Separate ideas need separate sentences.

[QUOTE=DerAuslander;1917624]I think my point is reasonable. We can all differ in opinion. She is ok. I probably won't repeat. Good for her that you like her so much! :)[/QUOTE]I think it is pretty clear that she loves me more than she loves you! LOL!

Nice girl Megan. Very optically pleasing and probably one of the better looking girls in FKK Sharks but perhaps not the best performer in the zimmer.

I would not be too sorry for her. I watched her earn 2 or 3 thousand euros over this weekend.

[QUOTE=Pistons;1917629]I think it is pretty clear that she loves me more than she loves you! LOL![/QUOTE]No I was with her for several hours and she wanted my money again! Its just that for me there are better girls. Hey Takedown gives her a 8 for performance. You would give her a 9 and [b]Der Auslander[/b] would give her a 7. We are all agreed she is a good looking girl. Hardly a matter for all this disagreement and carry on unless you are getting a cut from her earnings! :)

[QUOTE=Pistons;1917629]I think it is pretty clear that she loves me more than she loves you! LOL![/QUOTE]And you call bullshit! LOL. I think you have to take into account there are pessimists and optimists when it comes to rating girls. Also customers can be Tigers or pussycats.

Of course demanding pessimists can have worse chemistry with the girl too.

I am afraid to tell you that you are even more of an Optimist than me, relating to beauty and could be for performance as well. However I prefer optimists.

Some of the so called Sharks beauties are not even on my list to try. Plenty just look ordinary to me. My spec is often different to the norm.

I will check Alexia looks soon.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1917634]And you call bullshit! LOL. I think you have to take into account there are pessimists and optimists when it comes to rating girls. Also customers can be Tigers or pussycats.

Of course demanding pessimists can have worse chemistry with the girl too.

I am afraid to tell you that you are even more of an Optimist than me, relating to beauty and could be for performance as well. However I prefer optimists.[/QUOTE]I did write 'LOL' for a reason. But yes, chemistry and optimism / negativism is a good factor in this. Not to mention the mood you are in when entering the room. Thats probably part of why I rated Dea (Magnum) so low while others rated her much higher as well.

But that mood doesnt just affect your take on the girl, it can affect her performance too. Impulses goes both ways...

In regards to the topic in the Oase thread, this is a very good reason why cold girls get less business than smiling girls...

[QUOTE=Pistons;1917635]I did write 'LOL' for a reason. But yes, chemistry and optimism / negativism is a good factor in this. Not to mention the mood you are in when entering the room. Thats probably part of why I rated Dea (Magnum) so low while others rated her much higher as well.

But that mood doesnt just affect your take on the girl, it can affect her performance too. Impulses goes both ways...[/QUOTE]I am almost always in a good mood when entering the room until the girl really makes an effort to spoil it, especially with too many rules or too many questions.

I prefer to cancel before entering the room if any signs that chemistry is poor. Sometimes cannot tell though that girl is an upsell specialist or dick scared. Fortunately Sharks is low for upsell.

[QUOTE=Takedown;1917443]Alexia. 28 yo Ro / Moldovian Blond currently with green streaks. 167 cm. B / C cups. Roman nose. Very tanned from the solarium. Former Globe? Or Goldentime, Vienna, I forget.

She is a very nice girl and also a true professional, not a little girl like most. She is sweet in the room and just wants to do her job. If she doesn't want to do something, she will tell you why. She has no fat but is not skinny, just athletic, petite muscle.

She was a true professional and can easily become a favorite on repeat sessions.[/QUOTE]After repeated bookings I can confirm. Very nice woman. Quite good service, but altogether it felt a bit sterile too. IMO, her service somehow lacks juice, I would say. Not so much DFK. She offers anal too, I didn't try.

[QUOTE=NickTheG;1917641]After repeated bookings I can confirm. Very nice woman. Quite good service, but altogether it felt a bit sterile too. IMO, her service somehow lacks juice, I would say. Not so much DFK. She offers anal too, I didn't try.[/QUOTE]Yes I would have to agree with your summary. Nevertheless a very good looking girl who tries more than some in the room. She will earn lots of money!

[QUOTE=Pistons;1917621]I'd say victoria secrets = tall almost annorexic.

Playboy = curved fit shaped bodies. Either with help of surgery or not.

There are tall girls at Oase too (Anja got to be over 1. 80, but she is not annorexic)), and fit curved ones at sharks (Janine etc). But as a whole I agree with Takedown.[/QUOTE]Yes, that is about right.

Sharks: Victoria Secret. Tall skinny, less augmentation.

Oase: Playboy. Voluptuous often with augmentation.

Obviously, you see more than those types but my top tier girls at each club fall into those categories respectively.

By party, I mean that Oase at night, the girls can be seen having fun dancing in the dark room by the kino. I have never been to Sharks where many girls are dancing like at Oase. Often, the girls at Sharks are sitting all over the main couch area not seeming to be having a good time. I still like Sharks better because the girls I've been with seem more authentic in the rooms, but the club can use a bolt of energy, especially at night. That is something that I notice the Turkish customers were able to provide on previous trips. I did not see many of them on this last trip.

Pistons, I gave Alexia an 8 for performance not because she was bad (I think an 8 is a very good score.). Just that she was very professional and tame. She is not a porn star performer so without the authentic girlfriend vibe, I could not give her more than an 8. We had not built that chemistry yet prior to our session but our time talking at the end of the session will endure at least a 9 session when I repeat.

VS does not equal annorexic. VS models are tall, fit, and have good curves.

Sharks is VS? Really? If I went to Sharks based on that being said, I'the be disappointed. Not that the LU is bad, but it's over the top to generalize to that degree.

Yes, Janine has curves. Megan's body type is different being thin in comparison, not anorexic, but skinny. Alice's body I would consider, no curves. I would consider on the extreme.