Your probably talking about me but.
[QUOTE=PedrosNeeds;1996253]Interesting to note that some members here pass judgment and comment on posts and establishments that have only a handful of posts, presumably meaning they haven't been on her long?
In line with my previous post don't cast aspersions and make matter of fact statements can I suggest, this site has been pretty good of late but at times in the past has been ruined by this sort of thing, to the point I never even boterhs at one point.
If people praise a joint that's there impression, each to their own, conceding also that some punters appear to get to closely involved with ML, not unique I KNOW!
Enjoy.
Pedro.[/QUOTE]You probably are talking about me Pedro. I saw fit to comment about the quality of another person (possibly using multiple accounts?) posts not to be negative on the poster but because it is hard enough finding a decent joint nowadays without hidden agenda's coming into play. I have wasted so much money on dodgey working girls in the past. Trying to pass on some experience to newbies. Not so much the MP scene more from sites like BackPage and Locanto. My suspicion is that this particular poster in q may in fact not even be a happy punter obsessed with the ML. It could be the Owner or ML themselves. So why give them business.
P.S. Whilst I only have a few posts under the belt, I have been lurking around here for years. I actually had another name ages ago but I lost my username details so not a newbie as such. In fact you would have been my first PM back then. I know your favorite ML is Asian with big tits so I was helping you with one I thought you would like.
LE interest in forums such as ISG
[QUOTE=Stykler;1995998] We have a first world police force here (despite what we think sometimes) that know about places well before you and I discover them. If you know where a certain place is, they do as well. Don't let paranoia rule over commonsense.[/QUOTE]Styk, while I have no doubt at all about LE knowing about the presence of, and activities undertaken in establishments frequently reviewed on this and other similar fora, they are definitely interested in collecting data for prosecutions. I have first hand knowledge of a WL who was arrested, charged, brought before a magistrate who found the case proven (but no conviction recorded) and issued a fine. The evidence gathered and presented by the prosecution came from a raft of sources.
When these cases go to court the defence lawyers have access to all of the evidence to be led at the trial. This included complaints from neighbours and other interested parties, newspaper and on-line ads (including when they first appeared and time they ran for), forum reviews, observer reports of punter arrivals, departures, durations and statements of what they had to say when LE chatted to them. The statements were interesting. Several punters were prepared to admit to having received FS yet LE conceded it found no evidence of this taking place and they were not prepared to push it. A possible explanation for this was the offer from LE to let the punters make their statements on the spot or during follow up interviews at their homes. Not too difficult to understand that some took the path of least resistance and simply rolled over and agreed to whatever was suggested to them.
So back to the nub of what I think Pedro and others are on about in the detail they are prepared to openly offer in the forum versus what they may or may not say in response to PM requests, I agree with Pedro's approach.