Since when is child support not intended to support the child?
[B]Are you really going to make the intellectually dishonest argument that if a man is sending money to the mother of his child (without court order) that it is not child support?[/B]
Stealing is Stealing. You are not going to get any argument with me over that.
My point is that some (and you can include yourself in this statement if you want but it is not directed at you) from the Western world hold others to standards that are not met in their own country. In my country of origin there is not requirement that court ordered child support is spend on a child. Are you going to make the argument that because individual amounts are not dictated by the court that the court does not intend for the fund to be used in their entirety for the benefit of the child?
A Mother is held to the same standards as trustee. If your are the court ordered guardian of a child you have a fiduciary responsibility to use the funds designated for that child in that manner or face legal repercussions. Child support (court ordered or not) is not held to the same standards.
It is the principle of the matter and you are playing your usual semantic games that you play in your replies to my posts. Different is I'll point them out when you reply to me directly.
[B]Checkmate[/B]
[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2867877]But we are not talking about child care payments. My friend supports his child without any court order and even lets the child's mother live in his condo. He had these particular funds marked for a specific thing.
It is like you signing your kid up for baseball and you sending the money to the mom to buy his top of the line new equipment. She takes some of that money for herself and buys him equipment from the thrift store. Stealing is stealing. Even worse when you steal from your own kid.[/QUOTE]
1 photos
Always read the warning label
Always read the warning label.
Raj Raj be raw dogging up in here!
[QUOTE=RajPatela;2867878]What you should be worried about is high rate of STDs in Pattaya.[/QUOTE]Why exactly should people be worried about that [B]Raj Raj?[/B].
You suggesting that everyone does like you and [U]raw dog[/U] in Bangkok but not Pattaya. Or do you [U]raw dog in both places?[/U] I would have thought you have no worries since you pay more for your "attractive" prostitutes. You mean you are saying that you can pay the money that you do and still get "burnt while you are up in it"?