Printable View
[QUOTE=PVMonger;2786033] The simple facts are that the availability of firearms is the culprit.[/QUOTE]Haha! When you take a wrong turn in Chicago and get blasted by Shontavious for your Air Jordans, the gun is to blame, nobody else! Got that, bigot?
[QUOTE=PVMonger;2786036]Actually, all Dems know that there is a difference between men and women.[/QUOTE]Really? Then why can't you define them?
[QUOTE=PVMonger;2786036]What we also know is that some males are born into female bodies and some females are born into male bodies. [/QUOTE]Haha! This guy actually believes the crap he reads in those woke leftist blogs like Salon.
You are your body. How is it possible that your entire DNA is male, from your feet to your cock to your eyeballs, but somehow a small part of your brain is "female"? Why can these supposedly "female brains" in male bodies not be distinguished from male brains in any way?
Trannies are mentally ill and / or autogynephiles (men who get turned on thinking of themselves as a woman) with a dash of attention-seeking thrown in.
No doubt the ubiquity of porn available to children is a factor, as is the targeting of kids for grooming by homosexual and trannies, which has always been a thing but has gone into overdrive recently with drag queen kid-touching shows and faggot books pushed on elementary kids by blue-haired leftist SSRI-guzzling single teachers. If they can get them early they can fuck them up for life.
[QUOTE=PVMonger;2786036]They will also deny that homosexuality (male and female) is victimless and that it doesn't harm anybody.[/QUOTE]Except the kids they groom. And the taxpayers who end up footing the bill for their many STDs, rectal fissures, etc.
[QUOTE=JustTK;2786080]One good thing that may well come from all this is. It has really shone a bright light on some huge failures of modern society:
- how corrupt the government is. In this case, in league w Big Pharma (but usually its defence / banks / finance etc).
- how the government should never be allowed to censor free speech, nor use big tech to influence / censor people that think differently to them.
- how the majority of normal people can be lead off the cliff edge (once again) by psychological manipulation for the cause of a Big Lie.[/QUOTE]Good post.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2786144]But really, what are the Repubs blablabla[/QUOTE]As we've established, most Repubs support the Second Amendment.
Why do the dems, fake news, hollyweird and deep state, who are opposed to gun ownership, not focus their considerable efforts on the areas where the vast majority of gun crime exists: urban ghettos and handguns?
Why do they ignore the vast majority of gun crime (committed by, shall we say, democrat voters in urban democrat areas) to endlessly attack (via legislative efforts, hollyweird movies and shows, fake news reports and more) comparatively law-abiding people in suburbs and rural areas who own rifles and commit a tiny fraction of the total gun crime?
This is the 5th time I've asked, so let's see if you answer the question this time.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2786145]Your delusions are indeed very comical, to the point where is just one big blurring rant. And where you are now self congratulating yourself...kkkk!
Could be considered very narcissistic indeed? Take care now![/QUOTE]You're spending a lot of time thinking about me, attempting to psychoanalyze me, wondering what I'm doing / thinking / wearing.
I don't think about you at all.
I'd just like you to answer a simple yes or no question: Do you deny that black people, particularly black males aged 15 to 35, commit vastly more violent crime than other groups?
[QUOTE=JustTK;2786173]No of course you can't. I no longer expect anything else from you.[/QUOTE]It's best to expect nothing but comedy from Eihtooms. That way, he rarely fails to deliver.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2786337]Yes, Democrats are much more likely to appoint people based on their sex, race or sexual preferences, instead of their abilities. That's not to say I wouldn't love to see a Nikki Haley / Tim Scott presidential ticket in 2024. Not only are they much more competent than Biden and Harris, they'd win. Nikki's a bit of a neocon, but it would still be worth it to see them wipe the floor with the tears of Democrats.[/QUOTE]Don't injure your back twisting like that.
The realities of the day were that Hillary Clinton was the most qualified person to be POTUS in 2016. I'll even say that was true in 2008. Her gender was not a disqualifier for the nomination or the job.
The realities of the day were that Barack Obama was clearly the best choice for POTUS among all the other party nominees in 2008 and 2012. His skin color was not a disqyalifier for the nomination or the job.
Maybe someday the Repub Party will break with modern historical precedent and nominate someone qualified for the job of POTUS. Although it strains plausibility that such a person would run as a Repub instead of a Dem, particularly if they happened to be female and / or have black skin, not to mention win the Repub nomination in the first place even if by some bizarre fluke such a person did run as a Repub.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2786181]
What, are you crazy? That's not the way I roll. What woman is going to want to bang Darth Vader? I'll be the guy with the surgical grade N95 mask, the aviator goggles, Bermuda shorts, and wife beater (sleeveless) T-shirt. Here in God's country, Texas, I'd typically have a semiautomatic weapon slung over my shoulder too. This is called peacocking -- appealing to the opposite sex. Women can't resist a man with aviator goggles and an AR-15. And the aviator goggles, like the N95 mask help prevent transmission of COVID![/QUOTE]Have to disagree with you on masks, my friend. Attractive women do indeed love a man with aviators and an AR-15, but nothing dries their pussies faster than a guy who has submitted to wearing the face diaper (other than perhaps admitting he votes democrat).
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2786351]Like I said, policing is done at the local level. All the state police do in my state is hand out parking tickets.[/QUOTE]Excellent point. Democrat blue city mayors and prosecutors who defund the police and refuse to prosecute criminals for political reasons have far more influence over their cities than state governors do. Which is why they remain violent shitholes full of crime.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2786351]Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire are all gun friendly states that have low firearm homicide rates.
As to places like Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana, I attribute the problem to over 100 years of Democratic Party misrule prior to 1965. [/QUOTE]I daresay the ethnic demographics of the states mentioned above is the best way to explain their varying rates of gun crime.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2786351]Like I said, policing is done at the local level. All the state police do in my state is hand out parking tickets.
Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire are all gun friendly states that have low firearm homicide rates.
As to places like Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana, I attribute the problem to over 100 years of Democratic Party misrule prior to 1965. I'm not going to get into that though as the last time you and I did, our posts were deleted, with good reason. In any event, the blue counties in those states, like the USA in general, have the highest homicide rates.
As Chris and I have pointed out to you and Spidy repeatedly, the problem is the handguns. Chris would probably disagree, but in my view, if the powers that be want to ban handguns, they can have at it. Just don't take my long guns.[/QUOTE][URL]https://nypost.com/2023/02/03/video-shows-moment-california-doctor-hit-by-car-stabbed/[/URL]
Cmon you psychotic antiwhite anti american leftists, lets hear your true colors, ala loud keyboard cheering.
Too bad this cyclist didn't have a gun!!
He was probably anti gun, what a shame he would still be alive.
George Santos, steps down from Committees and says, "...nobody tell me to do anything, I made the decision on my own."
MTG, describes the George Santos, situation as "...he just felt like there was just [b]too much drama[/b], while we want to focus on removing Ilhan Omar."
Who knew there would be [b]"drama"[/b] from a Republican Brazilian drag queen? (....kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2786351]As Chris and I have pointed out to you and Spidy repeatedly, the problem is the handguns. Chris would probably disagree, but in my view, if the powers that be want to ban handguns, they can have at it. Just don't take my long guns.[/QUOTE]Your entitled to your opinion, but [b]PVMonger is absolutely correct[/b] with his assessment of the problem, that "The simple facts are that the availability of firearms is the culprit".
The only other thing I would add, is the presence, of stronger gun control laws and penalties. Funny how it seems to work in most other G7 countries in the world.
[QUOTE=PVMonger;2786033]Of course, people of a Repub bent will call the above analysis bogus but how else can one explain it? The simple facts are that the availability of firearms is the culprit. Where do the firearms come from? They come from straw buyers, from gun shows, from being stolen and they come from outside the state where gun laws are more lax (assuming the state in question has tougher gun laws that neighboring states). Evidently Repub governors, who have the power to convince their Repub-controlled legislatures to enact tougher legislation re: the issues raised above, think the situation in their states is just fine. But if a "Saturday night special" that costs $50 on the street of any large city anywhere now starts costing $1000 because they have become impossible to get, it becomes a loosing proposition to buy a $1000 handgun to stick up a bodega to get $100.[/QUOTE]Outstanding analysis and questions!
Questions, to which they don't want to own, because it would mean, going after their gun base. But doing something that's [B]right[/B] for the greater good for the majority of Americans, is never something the Repubs, have been any good at. You have to realize, [b]"at the fringes" [/b] of American society is where they like to play.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2786351]Like I said, policing is done at the local level. All the state police do in my state is hand out parking tickets.
Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, Maine, Vermont and New Hampshire are all gun friendly states that have low firearm homicide rates.
As to places like Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana, I attribute the problem to over 100 years of Democratic Party misrule prior to 1965. I'm not going to get into that though as the last time you and I did, our posts were deleted, with good reason. In any event, the blue counties in those states, like the USA in general, have the highest homicide rates.
As Chris and I have pointed out to you and Spidy repeatedly, the problem is the handguns. Chris would probably disagree, but in my view, if the powers that be want to ban handguns, they can have at it. Just don't take my long guns.[/QUOTE]If the powers that be want to ban handguns, they can have at it. Just don't take my long guns.
As soon as the population would hand over the handguns, a millisecond later they would be taking the rifles in the same truckload.
They just want to take our guns so that we will feel completely powerless to resist their oppression and scumbag Democrats like this POS.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/02/03/video-shows-moment-california-doctor-hit-by-car-stabbed/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/charlton-hestons-cold-dead-hands-speech-fired-up-nra-2000-1209349/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2786505]Your entitled to your opinion, but PVMonger is absolutely correct with his assessment of the problem, that "The simple facts are that the availability of firearms is the culprit".[/QUOTE]When Saint George Floyd invaded that pregnant woman's home and threatened her with his gun to her belly, the gun was the real culprit. Poor George was just as much a victim as the woman into whose belly the gun was forcing him to push it while he and his homies robbed her house, if not more so.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2786505]The only other thing I would add, is the presence, of stronger gun control laws and penalties. Funny how it seems to work in most other G7 countries in the world.[/QUOTE]Like Switzerland, where every adult citizen has a rifle by law. No, wait.