American Politics

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2788093]

BTW, who told you the money minted, printed, valued and deemed legal or not by any society is "your" money instead of "our" money to do with whatever the majority decides is best for "us"?[/QUOTE]LOL. Aren't you a landlord? And you do not believe in private property? You just described the USSR. What you meant to say is Democrats like you have private property rights but Republicans should not have them.

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2788093]Or you are welcome to leave the society and start your own somewhere else.[/QUOTE]And you live in Thailand not the USA right when you are posting this?

It is pretty clear you do not know the history of the USA with regards to money. For most of its existence, in the USA, there was no such thing as "our money".

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2788342]And if it's not about race, why is the illiteracy rate in New York state twice that of next door Vermont? NY is richer, and pours vast amounts of money into schools.[/QUOTE]Because that's what Democrats do, throw lots of money around with no accountability. I'm referring to the Democratic politicians and Democratic school boards, not esteemed ISG board members. The Democrats here are responsible [B]when they're spending their own money,[/B] based on their reviews that I've come across.

Seriously, great point. If you sort the table here in reverse order by "foreign populaton %" you'll see four of the five states with the highest % of immigrants, including New York, are all on Spidy's list of the ten most illiterate states:

[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_immigrant_population[/URL]

I suspect what's happening in New York is similar to what's happening where I live. A lot of people don't speak English well.

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2788342]Finally, how long are we going to whine about "muh slavery"? I'm of British origin, and my people were slaves too. First of the Roman Empire and then the Barbary pirates. Gibsmedat reparations, yo![/QUOTE]You might find this enlightening:

[URL]https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/04/09/chapter-1-statistical-portrait-of-the-u-s-black-immigrant-population/[/URL]

Blacks who've immigrated to the USA in recent times are more likely to be married, have a college degree, make more money, and are less likely to live in poverty compared to blacks born in America. In fact, by those criteria, they match up closer to the population as a whole than blacks born in America. Sounding like a broken record, I believe this is more evidence of the legacy of slavery.

That said, this talk about reparations of $200,000 per person is lunacy. Or any reparations for what happened over 100 years ago, unless of course they are paid for by the Democratic National Committee in view of the Democratic Party's role in all this.

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2788342]Anyway, as you can see from the graphs, the correlation is near-perfect. My points are supported by empirical reality as always.[/QUOTE]Well, it's a lot better than Spidy's imaginary correlation.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2788387]he traveled to Colombia with Covid and spread it, he insisted the vaccine was still 95% effective.
[/QUOTE]When it hadn't even been tested for reduction on transmission.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2788387]Just recently he said that I was a buyer of Covid conspiracy theories. Outside of the vaccine containing a computer chip, which I did not believe, can you think of any so called Covid conspiracy theories that were not true? Because I cannot.[/QUOTE]Well let's try to recap what the COVID-denier wackos were saying. COVID wasn't dangerous for the young and healthy, COVID could be tacked by Vit the and Ivermectin. Lockdowns would be ineffective and cause huge social and economic problems down the road, there was no data to support mask wearing, natural immunity was equal or better than vax induced immunity, there is a very real chance that COVID came from a lab, the medical dangers of the vax are being suppressed, Big Pharma was a corrupt industry that was trying to line its pockets at the expense of the people.

Can you add to thiis list of banned topics that have now been obviously proven beyond doubt to be wacko conspiracy ideas?

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2788332]Great! You accept I am correct. No need for the rest of the wrongheaded leftist cope bilge you spewed afterward.[/QUOTE]What you call "bilge" is what Donnie the Dumbass calls "fake news". It is only "bilge" because it goes against your fucked up worldview that all people of color are "bad" and that only "heritage Americans" (I. E. WASPs) ought to live in the USA.

The followinbg tells us everything we need to know: "Asked if there is "a problem with systemic racism in America," nearly every demographic group says yes more often than not: Democrats (by a 63-point margin), Black Americans (by a 61-point margin), adults under 30 (by a 28-point margin), independents (by a 26-point margin) and even white Americans (by a 13-point margin). Overall, far more Americans say yes, the USA Has a problem with systemic racism (54%) than say no, it does not (30%.

[B]The only groups that say no more often than not are on the right: Republicans (by a 15-point margin) and Trump voters (by a 33-point margin).[/B]" [URL]https://news.yahoo.com/new-poll-shows-americans-at-odds-over-black-history-222030915.html[/URL].

Of course, the morons will say "fake news".

George Santos.

Any opinions?

[URL]https://twitter.com/jasonselvig/status/1624086806558900225?s=20&t=8CjOiYmzRQiDD6fTSLHjVw[/URL]

[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Santos[/URL]

Legal issues.

Brazilian check fraud charges.

After obtaining his high school equivalency diploma, Santos spent time in Brazil. In 2008, he forged checks, stolen from a man his mother was caring for, to buy are $1,313 (about US $700) worth of clothing. When writing the checks, Santos presented identification bearing his photo but the check owner's name. The store owner became suspicious when the signatures on two checks did not match. Santos later admitted to the theft in a message to the store clerk on Orkut and confessed to police before he was charged with check fraud in 2010. The case was archived by a Brazilian court in 2013 because authorities there were unable to locate Santos. After the Brazilian charges became widely known in December 2022, Santos said, "I am not a criminal here – not here or in Brazil or any jurisdiction in the world. ".

In January 2023, Rio de Janeiro prosecutors announced that they would revive the fraud charges because Santos's whereabouts had become known.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2788390]LOL. Aren't you a landlord? And you do not believe in private property? You just described the USSR. What you meant to say is Democrats like you have private property rights but Republicans should not have them.

And you live in Thailand not the USA right when you are posting this?

It is pretty clear you do not know the history of the USA with regards to money. For most of its existence, in the USA, there was no such thing as "our money".[/QUOTE]Every society invents and owns its money. Yes, even in Thailand. Individuals do not. Even gold has value solely because certain societies want it to have value. The fact the you really, really want your gold to have value is irrelevant.

At what point in the history of the USA was its currency private property, the "owner" of which could do anything he wanted with it and the government had no say in determining its value, blocking access to it, removal or transferal of it? Enlighten us.

Even holding the deed to land guarantees you nothing if society decides that would be a perfect location for a highway. Then the money they might give you in exchange for that can be rendered worthless with the stroke of society's pen.

Will you be bartering with beaver pelts and corn from now on?

Agreed. You are on target.

[QUOTE=JustTK;2788277]This is a video that is banned in YT. We are still not allowed to question the efficcy of the vaxes, even though the evidence is perfectly clear that they cause more medical issues than they solve:
[URL]https://rumble.com/v28vt2s-uncensored-we-need-to-talk-about-the-covid-vaccine-dr-aseem-malhotra.html[/URL]

Here is a video that demonstrates the efficacy of Vit D to prevent and treat COVID. The owner is not allowed to discuss his thoughts during the video otherwise it will be blocked:
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5MqkbFt2sU[/URL]

This is the world we now live in. A world that is 100% corrupt in the West. We are not allowed to think or hear different thoughts than the narrative that they want to sell us. And I DO mean SELL. That is ALL this is about.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=JustTK;2788436]
Well let's try to recap what the COVID-denier wackos were saying. COVID wasn't dangerous for the young and healthy, COVID could be tacked by Vit the and Ivermectin. Lockdowns would be ineffective and cause huge social and economic problems down the road, there was no data to support mask wearing, natural immunity was equal or better than vax induced immunity, there is a very real chance that COVID came from a lab, the medical dangers of the vax are being suppressed, Big Pharma was a corrupt industry that was trying to line its pockets at the expense of the people.

Can you add to thiis list of banned topics that have now been obviously proven beyond doubt to be wacko conspiracy ideas?[/QUOTE]Social distancing is a noneffective farce. Hand sanitizer does nothing because the virus is airborne. Travel bans are ridiculous, ineffective, and cost countries huge amounts of money. The vaccine causes problems with the cycle of women. Noncompliance was not the reason lockdowns did not work. Having kids learn remotely was going to hurt their education. Ivermectin and hydroxycholoroquine are not dangerous. I am sure there are more I am missing because we were bombarded with bullshit for 2 years.

I understand that government was scared and did not what they were doing, but they acted with such certainty that they did. How long did it take to figure out hand sanitizers and social distancing did not work? 2 years? Really?

I compare it to the NFL that was so much more rational with regards to what they were doing. They kept playing and they kept going. The NFL did not shut down. I trusted their data more than the government's. They were a winner and so were you TK. You did not let Covid ruin your life.

[QUOTE=Vagabundo1;2788592]George Santos.

Any opinions?

[URL]https://twitter.com/jasonselvig/status/1624086806558900225?s=20&t=8CjOiYmzRQiDD6fTSLHjVw[/URL]

[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Santos[/URL]

Legal issues.

Brazilian check fraud charges.

After obtaining his high school equivalency diploma, Santos spent time in Brazil. In 2008, he forged checks, stolen from a man his mother was caring for, to buy are $1,313 (about US $700) worth of clothing. When writing the checks, Santos presented identification bearing his photo but the check owner's name. The store owner became suspicious when the signatures on two checks did not match. Santos later admitted to the theft in a message to the store clerk on Orkut and confessed to police before he was charged with check fraud in 2010. The case was archived by a Brazilian court in 2013 because authorities there were unable to locate Santos. After the Brazilian charges became widely known in December 2022, Santos said, "I am not a criminal here not here or in Brazil or any jurisdiction in the world. ".

In January 2023, Rio de Janeiro prosecutors announced that they would revive the fraud charges because Santos's whereabouts had become known.[/QUOTE]I don't know. Serial small-time thief. Serial big-time liar.

Can this man be trusted to represent his constituents?

[blue][No more comment about racism. Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[QUOTE=JustTK;2788436]Well let's try to recap what the COVID-denier wackos were saying. COVID wasn't dangerous for the young and healthy, COVID could be tacked by Vit the and Ivermectin. Lockdowns would be ineffective and cause huge social and economic problems down the road, there was no data to support mask wearing, natural immunity was equal or better than vax induced immunity, there is a very real chance that COVID came from a lab, the medical dangers of the vax are being suppressed, Big Pharma was a corrupt industry that was trying to line its pockets at the expense of the people.

Can you add to thiis list of banned topics that have now been obviously proven beyond doubt to be wacko conspiracy ideas?[/QUOTE]Not only on covid. Most so-called "conspiracy theories" from the dangers of the covid vax to big tech censorship to the Obama regime spying on Trump's campaign to the Hunter Biden laptop to the rigged election have proven to be true.

Meanwhile the things the fake news were pushing as true, such as the Trump-Russia hoax, the deadliness of the covid virus, the so-called mass killing of peaceful unarmed black men by police, and "climate change" have been shown up as wacko conspiracy theories.

[QUOTE=ChrisP;2788835]Not only on covid. Most so-called "conspiracy theories" from the dangers of the covid vax to big tech censorship to the Obama regime spying on Trump's campaign to the Hunter Biden laptop to the rigged election have proven to be true.

Meanwhile the things the fake news were pushing as true, such as the Trump-Russia hoax, the deadliness of the covid virus, the so-called mass killing of peaceful unarmed black men by police, and "climate change" have been shown up as wacko conspiracy theories.[/QUOTE][B]COVID-19 Vaccines: Myth Versus Fact:[/B]

[URL]https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines-myth-versus-fact[/URL]

Nope. You're wrong.

[B]Ex-Twitter Officials Confirm to Congress: Trump, Not Biden, Has Tried to Censor Tweets[/B]

[URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/ex-twitter-officials-confirm-to-congress-that-trump-not-biden-tried-to-censor-tweets[/URL]

Government censorship efforts on "big tech"? Yep. From the Trump Administration, not the Biden Administration.

[B]Did Obama and Biden spy on the Trump campaign?[/B]

[URL]https://edition.cnn.com/factsfirst/politics/factcheck_95a7597b-6d2f-42f3-b1b8-e0320193f60a[/URL]

[QUOTE]CONCLUSION
This is comprehensively wrong. There is no evidence that Obama or Biden personally directed the FBI to surveil people in the Trump campaign

EVIDENCE
Term-limited President Barack Obama did not run a "campaign" in 2016, when the FBI investigated the Trump campaign's relationship with Russia; nothing related to the Russia investigation comes remotely close to meeting the Constitution's definition of treason.

Also, FBI Director Christopher Wray, who was appointed by Trump, has said he would not use the word "spying" to describe what he called "surveillance activity." But that is more subjective.[/QUOTE][B]Still No Evidence, Mr. President[/B]

[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2017/03/still-no-evidence-mr-president/[/URL]

Nope. You're wrong.

[B]Barr Says No Need For Special Counsel For Hunter Biden Probe, Election Fraud Claims[/B]

[URL]https://www.npr.org/2020/12/21/948787251/barr-says-no-need-for-special-counsel-for-hunter-biden-probe-election-fraud-clai[/URL]

[QUOTE]Some Republicans are pushing for the Justice Department to name a special counsel to handle the probe, which would add an extra layer of protection from potential political influence in a sensitive case involving the president-elect's son. Asked whether he agreed with the idea, Barr said no.

"I think it's being handled responsibly and professionally currently within the department, and to this point I have seen no reason to appoint a special counsel, and I have no plan to do so before I leave," he told reporters.

The U.S. attorney's office in Delaware is leading the investigation.

Barr was also asked whether he saw the need to appoint a special counsel to investigate the president's baseless allegations of widespread voter fraud.

Barr has previously said the department looked into allegations and found no evidence of systemic fraud that would change the election's outcome. On Monday, Barr said he stood by those remarks.[/QUOTE]After looking into it, the most obedient Trump lackey, pro-Repub and anti-Dem Attorney General of all time disagrees with Trump, the GOP and you on both of those counts.

[B]Trumps Russiagate Redemption Fizzles as Durham Probe Limps Toward a Close.
Trump promised the three-year Durham investigation would reveal conspiracy at the FBI. Instead, its slinking toward an end after failing to uncover the crime of the century.[/B]

[URL]https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2022-10-26/trumps-russiagate-redemption-fizzles-as-durham-probe-limps-toward-a-close[/URL]

[QUOTE]The investigation has resulted in only one charge against a government employee, an FBI lawyer who admitted to altering a wiretap application an infraction not uncovered by Durham but by a previous investigation. That lawyer pleaded guilty and received probation in return.

And though Durham was reportedly hunting for evidence of political bias or conspiracy within the FBI, the only other two sets of criminal charges Durham handed down were not against members of the FBI but against FBI sources whom Durhams team argued in court had lied to federal agents officially positioning the FBI not as perpetrators of malfeasance but as the victims.

Durhams team lost both cases in court, the latest coming last week. Now, the grand jury that Durham was using in Northern Virginia is reportedly inactive, and Durham will likely face mounting pressure to finally wind the probe down.

Even candidates running under Trumps banner in the upcoming midterm elections dont mention the probe, deprived of additional campaign-trail fodder against Democrats and the federal government despite routinely railing against the FBI and the treatment of Trump.

The investigation ended not just with a fizzle, but with a complete reversal of what Donald Trump portrayed, says Barbara McQuade, former U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan and current legal analyst and professor at the University of Michigan Law School.[/QUOTE]Nope. You're wrong. Even Trump's own investigation revealed the investigation of Trump's extraordinarily close and devoted ties to Russia and against America was perfectly legitimate, not politically-motivated and not a hoax.

[B]Fatal Police Shootings Of Unarmed Black People Reveal Troubling Patterns[/B]

[URL]https://www.npr.org/2021/01/25/956177021/fatal-police-shootings-of-unarmed-black-people-reveal-troubling-patterns[/URL]

Don't know about your "mass killing" claim. But a troubling pattern does exist and is not made up.

[B]No, Climate Change Isnt Made Up[/B]

[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2019/05/no-climate-change-isnt-made-up/[/URL]

Nope. You're wrong.

Now, on the "deadliness of the covid virus", all of the arguments I have heard on how it really doesn't kill all that many people, that only fat old people or with serious co-factors would get sick enough from it to require hospitalization, that it is the individual's call on whether or not they want to risk death from it, that the Trump-requested closure of businesses and schools was worse for society than Trump's Pandemic virus was, blah blah blah utterly misses the point.

Here is WHY Trump requested closures of schools and businesses was the only way to go, why he was finally cornered into making that request, when the stats and what scientists KNEW about the virus, its rapid spread vs the question of how many private hospital rooms, staff, equipment and facilities were available to treat all the fat old people with co-factors in America all at once months before enough people would have access to and get the vaccines to prevent all of those hospital stays:

[B]With the emergence of the novel coronavirus and the propagation of the infectious disease COVID-19 around the world, everyone is talking about 'flattening the curve.' But what does this mean, and why is it so important?
Preventing a sharp peak of infections, known as flattening the epidemic curve, helps avoid healthcare services being overwhelmed, and also provides more time for a vaccine/treatment to be developed. The same number of infections spread over a longer time frame allows healthcare services to better manage the volume of patients.[/B]

[URL]https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200312/Flattening-the-curve-why-is-it-important-for-coronavirus.aspx[/URL]

[QUOTE]The term 'flattening the curve' comes from a chart depicting two curves that demonstrates the outcome of social distancing. The key message of the chart is that it is essential to delay the spread of the virus from person to person, even if it is an impossible task to halt the spread.

Social distancing is a term applied to specific non-pharmaceutical infection control actions taken by public health officials to stop or slow down the spread of a highly contagious disease.

The objective of social distancing is to reduce the probability of contact between persons carrying an infection, and others who are not infected, to minimize disease transmission, morbidity, and ultimately, mortality.

Experts estimate that anywhere from 20% to 60% of the world's adult population could catch coronavirus disease or COVID-19. This means 40 million cases, at a conservative estimate, in the US alone! Considering that there is no vaccine or specific drugs for this disease, this might make you feel hopeless. However, this is not what healthcare professionals are saying. They want everyone to cooperate in 'flattening the curve.'[/QUOTE]See, if all the fat old people with co-factors in America were to have contracted Trump's Pandemic virus as quickly as scientists KNEW they could based on its KNOWN rapid spread and a sizable, accurately estimated number of them got sick enough from it to require hospitalization long before they could have gotten vaccinated, even otherwise healthy people like Bill Maher would have to lay in a queue at his nearest Emergency Room for hours if not days before they could treat him for, oh, horrible injuries sustained in an auto accident or a heart attack or being impaled by a fence post when he fell off his roof in a drug-induced stupor.

And it is highly likely that would have increased the number of Americans mass murdered by Trump due to his criminal negligence re Covid from 1 million+ to 3 million+, not even counting the number of Trump's Pandemic-related deaths due to hospitals being overwhelmed as in my scenario above.

So, nope, you're wrong about that too.

Damn. That was fun! Thanks.

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2789065][B]COVID-19 Vaccines: Myth Versus Fact:[/B]

[URL]https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines-myth-versus-fact[/URL]

Nope. You're wrong. [/QUOTE]This shit is funny as hell. The very first thing thing your link says is, MYTH: The COVID-19 vaccine can affect women's fertility.

Then you go to this link: [URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/menstruation-changes-covid-vaccines-rcna38348[/URL].

"Before the vaccinations came out, I would say our knowledge on the subject of the connection between immunization and menstrual changes, in general, was nil," said Candace Tingen, a program director with the gynecologic health and disease branch of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

Overall, few studies assess the direct effect of vaccination on the menstrual cycle, and most pharmaceutical trials have not included questions about changes to menstruation.

Tingen views this as a mistake. Perhaps, she said, if Covid-19 vaccine trials had asked about menstruation, people would not have been surprised or frightened by this unexpected side effect.

Now back to your joke of a paper, Tooms, "During the Pfizer vaccine tests, 23 women volunteers involved in the study became pregnant, and the only one who suffered a pregnancy loss had not received the actual vaccine, but a placebo".

So this is the data. You see we have a whole whopping 23 people, and if they did not have an issue, you will not. This is completely shit data. No one would agree that 23 people is enough to screen for a vaccine complication.

Keep in mind the vaccine creates a spike protein. This protein originally was said to be only in the arm. Robert Malone said on Joe Rogan's podcast that it did not stay in the arm as the drug companies said, it hit the ovaries. Of course, Dr. Malone was right, and the drug companies were wrong. Then it was that women's change in meunstral cycles was bullshit. Now, that is accepted as fact.

And this is more bullshit from your article, "Getting COVID-19, on the other hand, can have potentially serious impact on pregnancy and the mother's health". So what? This is more bullshit in that it alludes to the fact that if you get the vaccine, you will not get Covid, and we know that is not true.

And the whole part of the woman's cycle is to get pregnant. If you negatively affect it, IMO it is more likely than not you will see fertility problems, but there is not data to definitively say that is true one way or the other, but these Johns Hopkins blowhard assure women there are no fertility concerns with the vaccine after completely being wrong on meunstration.

It is just another example of these "experts" being blowhards saying something is when no one knows whether it is or not. Democrats or drug companies paying scientists are not scientists. They are politicians and deserve to be treated as such. Real scientists refer to data.

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2789065][B]No, Climate Change Isnt Made Up[/B]

[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2019/05/no-climate-change-isnt-made-up/[/URL][/QUOTE]

Yes, Angelo Fichera, a journalist with no background in science or mathematics other than debunking alleged COVID conspiracies, is the man to go to on this issue. The question isn't whether global warming is made up. It's how do we tackle it in a practical, effective, cost efficient manner. And the Biden administration doesn't have a clue, beyond the standard Democratic "solution", throw money at the problem and hope some of it results in more votes and more campaign contributions for Democrats. Biden's climate plan has succeeded mainly in antagonizing our allies and trading partners in Europe with subsidies that are contrary to WTO rules. And in reducing our long term energy security by highlighting the risk that investments in domestic oil and gas may end up as stranded assets if the Democratic Party gets its way.

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2789065][B]Fatal Police Shootings Of Unarmed Black People Reveal Troubling Patterns[/B]

[URL]https://www.npr.org/2021/01/25/956177021/fatal-police-shootings-of-unarmed-black-people-reveal-troubling-patterns[/URL]

Don't know about your "mass killing" claim. But a troubling pattern does exist and is not made [/QUOTE]Police shoot and kill about 1000 to 1100 people each year. They kill more whites than blacks or Hispanics.

[URL]https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race/[/URL]

This is a problem, yeah, but insignificant compared to deaths from heart disease, cancer, COVID and the flu, homicides, suicides, traffic accidents, etc. The politicians and the media have blown this totally out of proportion, in order to win votes, get contributions, and sell commercials. And in the process they divide us.

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2789065]....it is highly likely [b]that would have increased the number of Americans mass murdered by Trump due to his criminal negligence re Covid from 1 million+ to 3 million+[/b], not even counting the number of Trump's Pandemic-related deaths due to hospitals being overwhelmed as in my scenario above.

So, nope, you're wrong about that too.

Damn. That was fun! Thanks.[/QUOTE]About 65% of COVID deaths so far occurred under Biden's watch. Where were the home test kits when Omicron hit, so people would know if they had COVID and could stay home and not infect others? And how about the N95, KN95 and other quality masks? Yes the Federal government helped a little with masks, but it was too little and too late. And how successful has Biden been in using the bully pulpit to encourage vaccination? Fewer than 40% of adults over 65 have gotten the bivalent booster. Then there's Paxlovid, the best treatment we've got for the disease. Availability of Paxlovid and public education as to the benefits leave much to be desired.

While precautions to deal with COVID are chiefly in the hands of individuals, and secondarily in the hands of state and local government, these are things the federal government could have done that would have prevented deaths and would have cost a piddly amount compared to what we've spent on economic stimulus.

And as to individuals, which country is the most like us, in terms of the culture? Well, it's Canada, of course. And the percentage of the population that has died from COVID in Canada is almost the same as in the USA. I can't see you accusing Trudeau, a left of center politician, of mass murder. And you NEVER criticize Biden. Only the Republicans.

Fascinating show bcos the hosts cover a recent hit piece by the NYT that tries to smear and discredit them and several other podcasts as the biggest sources of misinformation. As you will see, they demonstrate the claims the NYT make as the conspiracy it is. But the whole show is a great example of where we find ourselves in the world of authoritarian lies and censorship of truth.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dG-NEhwaIB8[/URL]

I don't agree with everything these 2 say, especially their opinion pieces, but they deserrve a lot of respect for having their lives ruined by the state bcos they boldly and correctly stood up for science.