General Info

Time for this topic to be moved to the right Forum. Asians and tourist in general are more generous then say the local expats. I don't recall any of my BGs telling me they're more generous and I go for what the Asians go for. A small percentage do get the best but most Asians take the mid tier women like everybody else. Plenty of nice cute 6's to be enjoyed and Asians know this.

The Asians are generally less wild and easier in this regard for BGs to handle. Western males are more inclined to take them and party hard. So one night it's the wild westerner the next the more sedate Asian. Some BGs cannot take this roller coaster ride week after week so they stick w one type. We've all heard about the "3 3 3 which translates to 3 minutes, 3 inches, 3 K. That's what the sharp BGs are after, an easy night. One look at me and they know I'm going to pound them good so some very hot BGs say no, preferably from the stage.

Asians IMO had the inside tract (in AC) a few years ago and since then they've been less of a concern for me. I think the women just got tired of them and also if a BG wants to get fucked good they know where that action is. That's what a few BGs have told me about the difference between Asians and westerners, we fuck better. And in my experience (and that's a lot) pinays are the more hornier of their Asian cousins. They love western dick.

Anyhow, pretty good list Blanq. I just added to it. Only newbies do not know these basics.

This is a really interesting interpretation of the "consenting and payment" transaction between guys and gals.

I am not a lawyer but if I was one of the guys who regularly tries to short-change a women (I'm not) or even "get it for free" it would worry me a bit, especially if there was an understanding that a payment was expected. In a society where the sex industry is legalised (like in Brisbane), then there is a legal pathway.
I guess it is much more murky for a filipina to pursue through any legal means a guy who short-changes her.

Of course, there is always the well-known ploy of calling in the reinforcements (like brothers, parents, boy friends, benefactors etc) and dealing with it extra-judicially.

[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/oct/13/it-absolutely-should-be-seen-as-when-sex-workers-are-conned?CMP=soc_567&fbclid=IwAR3zZqFi9Bsp93CZez1qYudA2BvW8HCPsysm8skxgfJpO2d43Tt4eTNz6jM[/URL]

[QUOTE=RedKilt;2235732]
I guess it is much more murky for a filipina to pursue through any legal means a guy who short-changes her.

Of course, there is always the well-known ploy of calling in the reinforcements (like brothers, parents, boy friends, benefactors etc) and dealing with it extra-judicially[/QUOTE]I'm not saying it never happens but I've never known repeat offenders to be directly confronted by angry boyfriends etc. However, I know of several times that said guys mysteriously get caught up in minor drug busts, motorbike hit and runs etc.

Remember, Karma is a Bit*h in Asia!!

[QUOTE=RedKilt;2235732]This is a really interesting interpretation of the "consenting and payment" transaction between guys and gals.[/QUOTE]This is fucking ridiculous. But in no way can this be considered raepe. All it is is theft of services. The other charge indicates forcibly having sex with someone against their will, which was not the case. But for not receiving payment, she would have had no problem with the action of sex with the male. Same as when you walk into a store, the owner does not care what you walk out with, as long as the money for it is left at the register. Puting a charge of sex assault on someone when this happens misconstrues and dilutes the definition of sex assault, which has nothing to do with an exchange of money.

The charge has to be in the action of money not exchanging hands (ie. fraud that it was), not in the deed of having sex with someone. This is a slippery slope, because if this created a precedent, likewise promising to take a chick to a concert if she fucks you could also result in the same charge if you end up not taking her to that concert.

And since this is transactional based, are those same people aruging for legal action to be taken when a sex worker promises something but does not come through? They should also receive the same charge, which most people would consider ridiculous. In that case they would argue that it was caveat emptor, or buyer beware, just like buying a used car in many places. They are not sending a chick to jail because she refused to do doggy style after promising it and being paid for it. Men watch out. The war on masculinity is real.

[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2235934]This is fucking ridiculous. But in no way can this be considered raepe. All it is is theft of services. The other charge indicates forcibly having sex with someone against their will, which was not the case. But for not receiving payment, she would have had no problem with the action of sex with the male. Same as when you walk into a store, the owner does not care what you walk out with, as long as the money for it is left at the register. Puting a charge of sex assault on someone when this happens misconstrues and dilutes the definition of sex assault, which has nothing to do with an exchange of money.

The charge has to be in the action of money not exchanging hands (ie. fraud that it was), not in the deed of having sex with someone. This is a slippery slope, because if this created a precedent, likewise promising to take a chick to a concert if she fucks you could also result in the same charge if you end up not taking her to that concert.

And since this is transactional based, are those same people aruging for legal action to be taken when a sex worker promises something but does not come through? They should also receive the same charge, which most people would consider ridiculous. In that case they would argue that it was caveat emptor, or buyer beware, just like buying a used car in many places. They are not sending a chick to jail because she refused to do doggy style after promising it and being paid for it. Men watch out. The war on masculinity is real.[/QUOTE]Will they apply the same law to women who fraudulently obtain male consent? Many women lie about being on birth control to get men to nut in them raw and then put them on child support payments. When women do this, they steal half of the male victim's DNA and 20 to 33 percent of his gross income. As one man put it, "Women kill your dreams!" The same harsh punishments should apply to women who contract marriage under false pretense to snatch assets from gullible male partners in a subsequent divorce.

Is there any recourse for men tricked into paying for expensive surf and turf dinners at chic restaurants by a serial female mooch promising sex but never delivering after the meal? At the very least, it is grounds for a charge of theft by deception.

Hi,

Any suggestion for Cebu? I am going next week, so any tips or guides would be nice. I have read the forum by yay not the most popular place in PH for a single guy.

[QUOTE=MarlboroRed;2237851]Hi,

Any suggestion for Cebu? I am going next week, so any tips or guides would be nice. I have read the forum by yay not the most popular place in PH for a single guy.[/QUOTE]There is a separate Philippines Cebu forum. Why don't you review that thread?!

[QUOTE=Firebird;2237852]There is a separate Philippines Cebu forum. Why don't you review that thread?![/QUOTE]Yes, but its really hard to find. First you scroll down to near the bottom of the Phils forums, under User Blogs, to find it. Then you click the Cebu link, only to be taken to another page with another link. Here it is:

[URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/forumdisplay.php?773-The-Philippines-Cebu[/URL]

[QUOTE=WestCoast1;2237854]Yes, but its really hard to find. First you scroll down to near the bottom of the Phils forums, under User Blogs, to find it. Then you click the Cebu link, only to be taken to another page with another link. Here it is:

[URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/forumdisplay.php?773-The-Philippines-Cebu[/URL][/QUOTE]Not as hard as that Westie! Is easy to find and convenient IMHO. Just look at Asia and you it there rather than scroll down / If you do it that way easy to see but the other yes can be more time consuming. But some people don't even try to find which is the main issue.

I'm no geography expert, but if Cebu is part of the Phillipines, why have "Phillpines-Cebu" as a virtual separate country listing?

[QUOTE=AussieGaigin;2238163]I'm no geography expert, but if Cebu is part of the Phillipines, why have "Phillpines-Cebu" as a virtual separate country listing?[/QUOTE]True! I always was very surprised not to find a Cebu forum under the Philippines one, and discovered it only few days ago, thanks to the later posts!

[QUOTE=AussieGaigin;2238163]I'm no geography expert, but if Cebu is part of the Phillipines, why have "Phillpines-Cebu" as a virtual separate country listing?[/QUOTE]Good question my non-geography expert.

[QUOTE=WickedRoger;2238068]Not as hard as that Westie! Is easy to find and convenient IMHO. Just look at Asia and you it there rather than scroll down / If you do it that way easy to see but the other yes can be more time consuming. But some people don't even try to find which is the main issue.[/QUOTE]When I log in, the last pic is the page that I see. On the left I have to click 'Philippines', which brings up the next page that I see (pic #2). Must scroll all the way down to the bottom section to find and click the Link to Cebu Forum thread (pic #1). Hassle.

[QUOTE=WestCoast1;2238289]Good question my non-geography expert.

When I log in, the last pic is the page that I see. On the left I have to click 'Philippines', which brings up the next page that I see (pic #2). Must scroll all the way down to the bottom section to find and click the Link to Cebu Forum thread (pic #1). Hassle.[/QUOTE]I click on 'Asia' then scroll down you see Cebu under the main Philippines thread. Much easier to do and much easier to find also IMHO.

[QUOTE=WickedRoger;2238736]I click on 'Asia' then scroll down you see Cebu under the main Philippines thread. Much easier to do and much easier to find also IMHO.[/QUOTE]When you click on 'Asia', can you post a screen shot of that? When I log in, I see what is in this pic. There is a link for Philippines, but not for Asia.

[QUOTE=WestCoast1;2238981]When you click on 'Asia', can you post a screen shot of that? When I log in, I see what is in this pic. There is a link for Philippines, but not for Asia.[/QUOTE]Westie, you are correct. You cannot go from the log on page displayed direct to the Asia nor Philippines _ Cebu Forum.

The path is:

Front Page (your screen shot) upon log in or the blue tab at the top of any page.

Forums tab at the top of the page.

Open Asia forum, past Canada, Mexico etc. (Note Cebu is not listed under Asia here either. Dooh!

Open The Philippines_Cebu, past Afganistan, Bangladesh,. . . The Philippines.

Sorry no screen shots as my mobile destroys the page justification.

I agree it is as simple as Chinese algebra. That's why I have been guilty of deferring to the Philippines Forums if my post straddles other area. Eg. My post about first using PinaLove in Cebu was posted under Penpals rather than Cebu.