2 photos
Good Deal? NZ Truth 19/6/08
Here are two photos from this week's truth.
The first looks to be good value for money.
The other is the dreadful "BamBam" with her fake photo.
Good thoughts again Flinthef
[QUOTE=Flinthef]Hi Softcock, what you probably realised was that the insights were largely based on personal experience. I am a soldier and paying for sex is the soldier's way. There are very few soldiers who I know who get much joy from hanging about singles' bars down at the Viaduct trying to get some woman to put out. That's for salesmen, accountants, lawyers and others for whom I have no time. Too much sales patter.
Women in those situations are always looking for a BBD (Bigger Better Deal). They are looking for a knight in pinstripe armour to save them from their boring lives. They want bullshit and will lay the best bullshitter. After 22 years of kicking the shit out of bullshitters I don't play those mind games. Even for a bit of nookie. Especially not for nookie.
The best part of being with a SW is that there is no emotional connection.
There is only the commercial relationship and that's what's so true about LAB's comments. He is right when he says that an affair can break up an otherwise good marriage. If he had gone into an affair he would have had to say words like "I love you" to someone he just wanted to have sex with. Far better, and more honest, to just Pay for Play.
I can't comment on Richard's idea of how good it is to have a steady SW because I have only been back to the same one once in my life and the second visit was a disappointment. I guess that its what's right for the individual. Mongering is, after all is said and done, about adult male entertainment.
There is no obligation. You do it when there is spare cash or when there is stress or just whenever you want to. And if you never go back, there are no tears or messy recriminations. Bloody brilliant.
As for the religion-based baggage. Well, after having seen virtually every atrocity possible and seen the worst people in the world having a fantastic time at others expense, I gave up on believing in divine retribution. We are animals. We have binocular vision. This means that none of us are prey. Binocular vision divides us simply into predators and scavengers. We may even, like the lions and hyenas of Africa, be both at different times of our lives; as needs dictate.
The only time that humans become prey is when someone has put weakness into their minds. When religion has told them some lie such as "The meek shall inherit the earth". Yeah right!
A SW may look at you as prey, just as you may look at her in the same way, during the same encounter; but each of you look at each other with complete honesty.
And that by the way was behind my choice of name. FlintHef is a tribute to Larry Flint and Hugh Hefner. Guys who did their best to get rid of sexual guilt and who, as a teenager, gave me hours of entertainment every month.
All I can say is: Get out there and enjoy whatever makes YOU feel good and to hell with guilt![/QUOTE]
I agree with your thoughts Flinthef re: punters and SW's.
If you take as a typical example: A man meets a woman, either socially or through work. He invites her for an evening out, which may include, say a show, film, then dinner or the other way round, which he pays for. At the end of the evening when he drops her home, it is usually implied, he will expect payment sexually for the money he has spent, perhaps not the first time, but if they go out again several times. Visiting a SW seems much more straightforward and less hypocritical.
Also, there are many double standards regarding sex. I remember I was at my local Erox store looking through their products. The local council wanted the shop closed because "it lowered the tone of the neighbourhood and property values". I had a chat to the owner and he told me, the same men who sat on the council and wanted his shop closed were the very men who also visited his shop at times - hypocritical double standards.
Further, something I have noticed over the years in New Zealand, re relations between the sexes. The woman sees giving her sexual favours as a reward if the man "has been a good boy." There doesn't seem to be much consensus. The "reward" is withheld if he "plays up" or misbehaves.
Re. Post - Needy women - correction
[QUOTE=Randy Man]My guess is the girl doing $60 blowjobs as well as the $230 jobs is a very needy woman (read "P addict"). And certainly internationally there are plenty of megarich guys who pay big bucks for the same service we get for much less - but I guess the extra not only buys a classy woman ( ridiculously expensive, but nice) but also absolute discretion for the well known?[/QUOTE]Correction: In my previous post I said that Spitzer had paid US$15, 000 for a punt. Not true, he allegedly paid $4, 000 a time. Where he got into trouble was with the IRS and that was for unexplained routing of funds to hide where he spent the money. The figure in the investigation to date has totalled more than $15K. I guess that he had been Paying for Play more than once. Sorry for the inaccuracy.
Whichever way you look at it, he wasn't just paying for sex, but for something else that came with the package (discretion, thrill of breaking the law or some other "benefit" that Miss Dupré had to offer.).
