Stupid shit in Medellin

[QUOTE=BlueTouch;2563511]He is an adamant supporter of white nationalism and various conspiracy theories. And he is always surrounded by similar "friends." If you challenge, or worse- successfully and efficiently disprove, rightwing notions. Your post is removed and you are on his black list.[/QUOTE]I have no clue what the politics is of the owners, admins of this site, but they let it flow on the off topic threads, far right, far left and everything in between is published. A brief look at the American Politics thread in the Opinions section proves that. You are simply talking out of your ass, which as you just proved, is also allowed on off topic threads. Lolol.

[QUOTE=PolloNegro;2558686]I would call the guy that I would like to be a dumbass and incoherent, you have not been to Medellin, you don't know anything of Medellin and you enjoy trolling others simply because that disability check and SSI doesn't provide you the opportunity to travel like you dream of daily. Good luck though, maybe you'll get some action in yourself and stop verbally wrestling with other BMs who actually travel and who actually have a presence in Medellin. Pollo Negro is Out![/QUOTE]LOL this clown got his panties in a bunch because I said I overpaid for a tinder prepago. He's deathly afraid that I'm going to price him out of the market and he'll no longer have his only source for pussy that he can afford with his social security checks. He spends all day bashing other board members, jealousy / hate is very apparent.

We recently had this angry lonely old man shoot and kill 8 of his coworkers in San Jose, CA. His coworkers / neighbors said he was an angry loner, this guy fits the mold jajajaja.

[QUOTE=JjBee62;2564266]I thought you didn't like outliers? Now you're basing your claims on finding one hooker, one place in the world, who varies her rates?

Why is it that whenever I set up another monger with a girl in Medellin she sets her rate before knowing anything about the guy? Why is it that the casas and strip clubs have an established rate? Why do photoprepagos why mileroticos girls quote prices over WhatsApp? Why is it that one girl, charged the same price for 5 different guys over a period of several weeks, guys ranging from under 30 to over 60, from fit to fat?

What's this silliness about doing better than most? They're prostitutes. They sell sex for money. There's no better or worse. You pay, you get laid. As long as you bathe regularly and know how to use a toothbrush, you'll have no difficulty, regardless of what you look like. They don't base whether or not they're taking customers on how attractive they think the guy is. They base it on how much they need the money.

If you had ever been to a mongering destination you would know this. I've hung out with guys in Medellin who are still in their 20's and guys in their 70's. I've met up with guys who could barely climb a flight of stairs and guys who run marathons. I've seen guys who looked like models, and guys with faces even their mother has a tough time loving. They're all getting laid and mostly they're all paying about the same.

There's a simple way to solve this. I'll be in Medellin June 16-25. Just show up and hit me up. I'll call up a girl to meet you. You can prove that she'll charge you much less than her normal price.[/QUOTE]Mileroticos LOL, I don't do fixed pricing LOL that's for chumps.

Escorts are bullshit, I set the rules of engagement, not some pimp.

Its my money I'm no fool, escorts are bullshit, in every single country in the world.

There are guys that understand this and are willing to learn ways around it.

They are cool.

Then you have dirtbags like.

"I'll pay what I want for pussy and could careless if broke asses whine about it; call it gentrification".

And they don't care if they burn it all down (if they can't have it, they don't want you having it) LOL.

There's a simple way to solve this. I'll be in Medellin June 16-25. Just show up and hit me up. I'll call up a girl to meet you. You can prove that she'll charge you much less than her normal price.

That's not a random sample.

Sounds more like a rigged outcome.

I avoid sharks that like to sodomize beta mongers.

I don't want them for free.

Here's a better example meet me in say bkk.

Nana plaza, we walk into a bar, I don't even sit down, I don't drink so I never buy drinks.

I do a lap in the place, pick out at minimum an above avg girl.

And pay her much less than anyone else does in the whole nana plaza that night.

And tell her before I barfine, there will be no condoms!!

The odds of me getting a no, are almost 0%.

And nana is a condom kinda place.

I'll be 54 soon, Ill pick the cutest one closest to 18 yo. No tattoos, no implants or babies.

I typically don't aim for the stone face "prettiest" puta shark sitting in the corner with her fone stuck in her face.

You know the one in most places, waiting for a chump like dark thought to walk in to pay her 10 x the going rate.

Meanwhile I paid less for a PSE experience and she's going to demand 3 condoms for triple protection before she even touches him.

[QUOTE=JjBee62;2564266]I thought you didn't like outliers? Now you're basing your claims on finding one hooker, one place in the world, who varies her rates?

Why is it that whenever I set up another monger with a girl in Medellin she sets her rate before knowing anything about the guy? Why is it that the casas and strip clubs have an established rate? Why do photoprepagos why mileroticos girls quote prices over WhatsApp? Why is it that one girl, charged the same price for 5 different guys over a period of several weeks, guys ranging from under 30 to over 60, from fit to fat?

What's this silliness about doing better than most? They're prostitutes. They sell sex for money. There's no better or worse. You pay, you get laid. As long as you bathe regularly and know how to use a toothbrush, you'll have no difficulty, regardless of what you look like. They don't base whether or not they're taking customers on how attractive they think the guy is..[/QUOTE]If you had ever been to a mongering destination you would know this. I've hung out with guys in Medellin who are still in their 20's and guys in their 70's. I've met up with guys who could barely climb a flight of stairs and guys who run marathons. I've seen guys who looked like models, and guys with faces even their mother has a tough time loving. They're all getting laid and mostly they're all paying about the same.

No offense, but they sound like naive rookies, the price of pussy is negotiable in most places, and if you want to show me a place it isn't, then guess what, you literally couldn't pay me to go in there.

I don't pay sucker price.

What is that axiom? All men are created equal, some are just more equal than others LOL.

I'm not trying to be arrogant, but I don't like certain attitudes, I understand some have inferiority complexes.

But maybe some public shaming would help, instead of being complicit in their bullshit by providing / co-signing excuses for their deliberately destruction mongering ways.

This post is quintessential hubris.

I'll pay what I want for pussy and could careless if broke asses whine about it; call it gentrification.

If I owned this site, a post like this would be just cause for permanent banning including the IP address.

But like Kazeu suggests just don't engage them, that's a start.

Not co-signing their bullshit is another.

[QUOTE=BlackThought;2564563]Don't fall for it jjbee! Nana plaza is where all the ladyboy bars are, I knew this guy was sus! Soi cowboy is where the hottest ones work.

A visit to a ladyboy bar is on a lot of tourists to do list when they travel to Bangkok Thailand. Nana Plaza and Patpong have the most ladyboy bars
https://www.barnewsbangkok.com/m.ladyboy-bars.html[/QUOTE]Fall for it? He's a blowhard posting from his mommy's basement. He throws out BKK because it's not open for tourism and likely won't be for awhile. It's his way of doing a victory dance, without ever having to ask his mommy's permission to go outside.

Meanwhile, while he's blustering about, telling everyone how great he is, I'll be in Colombia doing what I enjoy.

[QUOTE=JjBee62;2564590]Fall for it? He's a blowhard posting from his mommy's basement. He throws out BKK because it's not open for tourism and likely won't be for awhile. It's his way of doing a victory dance, without ever having to ask his mommy's permission to go outside.

Meanwhile, while he's blustering about, telling everyone how great he is, I'll be in Colombia doing what I enjoy.[/QUOTE]LOL yea, only a loser would brag about scoring with a hooker like he does.

[QUOTE=FunLuvr;2564565]As for getting the vaccine after you have had Covid, many doctors advise against that. They say the antibodies your body produces are more powerful than the vaccine.[/QUOTE]This is a nonsense.

[QUOTE=FunLuvr;2564565]Y

As for getting the vaccine after you have had Covid, many doctors advise against that. They say the antibodies your body produces are more powerful than the vaccine.[/QUOTE]No competent immunologist is saying any thing like this. All the competent doctors are saying the opposite, It is everyone's choice what they should do but they should be acting on the best knowledge available, not from some quack doctor who is spouting off their opinion but from the best doctors in the country.

They are saying that " If you were treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma, wait 90 days before getting a COVID-19 vaccine. ".

[URL]https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-vaccine/art-20484859[/URL]#had-covid.

All the top medical advisors are saying that even if you had Covid already that there is no guarantee that you developed enough natural antibodies to be immune.

[URL]https://www.health.harvard.edu/covid-19/covid-19-vaccines[/URL]

[URL]https://www.uchicagomedicine.org/forefront/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/do-i-need-a-vaccine-if-i-had-covid[/URL]

[URL]https://health.clevelandclinic.org/when-should-you-get-vaccinated-if-youve-had-covid-19/[/URL]

[URL]https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/faq.html[/URL]

[URL]https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccine/for-patients.html[/URL]#text=People%20 who%20 have%20 gotten%20 sick, sick%20 with%20 COVID%2 D19%20 before.

[QUOTE=MojoBandit;2564771]No competent immunologist is saying any thing like this. All the competent doctors are saying the opposite, It is everyone's choice what they should do but they should be acting on the best knowledge available, not from some quack doctor who is spouting off their opinion but from the best doctors in the country.[/QUOTE]Any other government sponsored program you want to shill for: social distancing, hand washing, travel bans ETC? All recommendations for "competent" professionals? Colombia listened to all your "competent" advice and where are they right now?

The data on whether to vaccinate people who have had Covid 19 is not in, and the benefits of their getting vaccinated are tiny and the risks of increasing their load of antibodies is huge. Maybe you do not or rather ignore people who have had side effects from the vaccine but I have not.

And by all means, tune out DR Rand Paul. He is not reputable because he is a Republican. Right, you Democratic douche?

Yes, the recommendation is for previously infected people to have the vaccine, but it is not based on data. Studies were not done on people who had prior Covid 19, and it is not known what to do with said people. Yes, Fauci, an ever loving vaccinologist who owns an unknown amount of Moderna shares and whose feet you Democratic douches worship at, has recommended it and those who are paid off via grants by him parrot him.

However, given he and you Democrats, aligned yourself with China to downplay the origins of the Covid virus, your credibility is at an all time low. It was bad enough that you all had to dismiss the lab leak theory but to censor anyone who mentioned it? That was pathetic, and all because Trump said it may have come from a lab. You guys not only mocked him, and you called anyone who mentioned the lab leak theory stupid.

And now it is the same with Dr. Rand Paul. Whatever he says, you and Paulie are against.

And Paulie, Mr. New York, New York, said Cuomo did a bang up job treating people with a virus. Why are you two are still doling out advice after being wrong about everything?

I arrived at the playground today, aka ground zero around 10 AM and ran into the Chica I had met yesterday that I told I wanted to have a session with today and we had a "failed negotiation". I asked her what I would be getting for 30 K and when I asked about the unconvered blow job she looked at me funny. So I asked her if it was included and the answer was "will see" and "maybe", so I again asked if it was included and didn't get a positive answer meaning yes or no so I politely said I'm going for a walk and left. I typically get everything I want agreed to beforehand and wasn't going to accept a "maybe, or will see". So I took some laps and after about 15 minutes she sees me, comes up to me, and say's, ok no problem with the BBBJ, at which point I had already moved on. If a girl is reluctant to give BBBJ's and / or hesitant about it, it's usually best to pass on them. So after about another 1/2 hour, one of my BJ queens shows up and I immediately retained her services. I then left El Centro around 1 PM, went to Bellen, and there was a thunderstorm and they shut the pool down so I came back to ground zero around 2 PM at which time it stopped raining. A lot of times I stand against the wall opposite the glass covered walkway in front of the Veracruz Church courtyard and I had some issues there today.

The first one was I had a bunch of coins in my pocket and I was sorting thru them in my hand, and all of a sudden people started coming up to me asking for "monedas", total rookie mistake. Then a very old and grotesque / fat hooker came up to me and instead of politely telling her no thanks, I walked away without saying a word to her, and she had a shit fit, walked out onto the glass part of the walkway, spit on it, then rubbed her shoe in it, yelled at me and called me a fag and departed. I didn't say a single word to her and probably should of politely said I wasn't interested.

After this I took some more laps, interviewed some new girls which I passed on, and then one of my favorite spinners appeared who hasn't been around for a long time and upstairs we went. This one is smaller than my new spinner, and she was totally in heat. I think I over dosed on viagra, I took a quarter pill, and an hour and a half later took another quarter and was so hard it took me like 45 minutes to finish. And she pounded me so hard while on top I had to have her turn it down. I met her a few years ago and she is typically there to bullshit with friends and drink some beers. I told her she was like a dog totally in heat and she said she hadn't been fucked in several weeks but of course I didn't believe her, but what a blowout session.

Just another day at the playground.

The little wing nut baby is having another Covid-19 meltdown on the stupid shit thread. Deja Vu. LOL.

You yourself are in here making medical assertions with no "data" or source citations while whining about Cuomo like he has anything to do with the price of rice in China, other than to attack a guy based on his home state. As it stands now the CDC and the consensus of contagious disease specialists who have spoken out recommend vaccination for those who have had Covid. Those are facts. There's also been a study done that indicates that those who have had Covid likely will do well enough with a single shot. That link which alludes to "data" was already posted in the regular thread a few days ago. Do your blood pressure a favor and do some research next time rather than believing everything Rand Paul, Fox, and whatever wingnut blog tells you, along with what you want to embellish along the way. That's asking a lot I know. As to the shots, of course everyone is free to do as they wish, as they've been doing all along anyway.

[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/mishagajewski/2021/03/10/people-who-already-had-covid-19-might-not-need-the-second-dose-of-vaccine-study-finds/?sh=43d6cd515f85[/URL]

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2564869]Any other government sponsored program you want to shill for: social distancing, hand washing, travel bans ETC? All recommendations for "competent" professionals? Colombia listened to all your "competent" advice and where are they right now?

The data on whether to vaccinate people who have had Covid 19 is not in, and the benefits of their getting vaccinated are tiny and the risks of increasing their load of antibodies is huge. Maybe you do not or rather ignore people who have had side effects from the vaccine but I have not.

And by all means, tune out DR Rand Paul. He is not reputable because he is a Republican. Right, you Democratic douche?

Yes, the recommendation is for previously infected people to have the vaccine, but it is not based on data. Studies were not done on people who had prior Covid 19, and it is not known what to do with said people. Yes, Fauci, an ever loving vaccinologist who owns an unknown amount of Moderna shares and whose feet you Democratic douches worship at, has recommended it and those who are paid off via grants by him parrot him.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BlackThought;2564656]LOL yea, only a loser would brag about scoring with a hooker like he does.[/QUOTE]But in any case look in the mirror I know its tough, but you need to stop projecting.

Because I'm not the one that gets overcharged by putas (even the 3rd world ones) jajajaja.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2564869]Any other government sponsored program you want to shill for: social distancing, hand washing, travel bans ETC? All recommendations for "competent" professionals? Colombia listened to all your "competent" advice and where are they right now?

The data on whether to vaccinate people who have had Covid 19 is not in, and the benefits of their getting vaccinated are tiny and the risks of increasing their load of antibodies is huge. Maybe you do not or rather ignore people who have had side effects from the vaccine but I have not.

And by all means, tune out DR Rand Paul. He is not reputable because he is a Republican. Right, you Democratic douche?

Yes, the recommendation is for previously infected people to have the vaccine, but it is not based on data. Studies were not done on people who had prior Covid 19, and it is not known what to do with said people. Yes, Fauci, an ever loving vaccinologist who owns an unknown amount of Moderna shares and whose feet you Democratic douches worship at, has recommended it and those who are paid off via grants by him parrot him.

However, given he and you Democrats, aligned yourself with China to downplay the origins of the Covid virus, your credibility is at an all time low. It was bad enough that you all had to dismiss the lab leak theory but to censor anyone who mentioned it? That was pathetic, and all because Trump said it may have come from a lab. You guys not only mocked him, and you called anyone who mentioned the lab leak theory stupid.

And now it is the same with Dr. Rand Paul. Whatever he says, you and Paulie are against.

And Paulie, Mr. New York, New York, said Cuomo did a bang up job treating people with a virus. Why are you two are still doling out advice after being wrong about everything?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/31/opinion/media-lab-leak-theory.html[/URL]

When I mentioned the blog Zero Hedge, the Democratic douches do as they always do: attack the source. If Fox News says 2 + 2 =4, the Democratic douches would say something to the effect that "Fox News would say something like that. "

What kind of conspiracy theorist type reads an "economical blog" like Zero Hedge?

Well, it turns out no mask, one mask, two mask Anthony Fauci does: [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/fauci-emails-reveal-damage-control-scramble-after-zerohedge-spotlights-man-made-covid-19[/URL].

And yes Fauci saying that the Corona virus was man made was "really outlandish". Ha!

And now the Washington Post is walking things back "The Post becomes the latest in a growing list of media outlets and 'fact checkers' that have been forced to walk back their insistence that the lab leak theory was an impossibility. " [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/washington-post-becomes-latest-media-outlet-walk-back-debunked-conspiracy-theory-wuhan[/URL].

Yep, nothing like another main stream paper of record showing it is full of shit. What is a Democratic douche to do?

Now the USA is having 1/3 the cases that Colombia has, do you think that maybe somebody ought to tell the Colombians that the social distancing, hand sanitizers, wearing masks outside, Covid tests upon entering the country do not work? Now all we need is Paulie saying Duque showed "real leadership" in this crisis and maybe JJBee can repeat his "jobs come back but lives do not. "

Yeah, all this Democratic douche, "scientific" leadership did was kill people and cost people their jobs while covering up the origins of the virus. The lab leak theory was racist doncha know? Gee, who know that fucking around with deadly viruses could kill millions? Not Fauci. No, fucking around with viruses was worth the benefit per Fauci. He testified to this before Congress in 2012, and he started the gain of function research on his own after Obama shut it down. Yep, the mastermind of gain of function with viruses was Fauci and he hides behind racism and his "scientific" co-conspirators.

Now we can hear about how no one predicted this 2 year lag in supply chains. That was "nonessential" work right? Shiiit!

Shaking my fucking head. Can you believe all the stupid shit that was done in the name of fighting Covid? And that Colombia is still doing it?

Cue the Democratic douche line, "Nobody knew. "

Hey Mojo, let me hear it. How "reputable" is Fauci now? Let me guess. You are still quoting the reputable Washington Post.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2564869]Any other government sponsored program you want to shill for: social distancing, hand washing, travel bans ETC? All recommendations for "competent" professionals? Colombia listened to all your "competent" advice and where are they right now?

The data on whether to vaccinate people who have had Covid 19 is not in, and the benefits of their getting vaccinated are tiny and the risks of increasing their load of antibodies is huge. Maybe you do not or rather ignore people who have had side effects from the vaccine but I have not.

[b]And by all means, tune out DR Rand Paul. He is not reputable because he is a Republican.[/b]Right, you Democratic douche?

Yes, the recommendation is for previously infected people to have the vaccine, but it is not based on data. Studies were not done on people who had prior Covid 19, and it is not known what to do with said people. Yes, Fauci, an ever loving vaccinologist who owns an unknown amount of Moderna shares and whose feet you Democratic douches worship at, has recommended it and those who are paid off via grants by him parrot him.

However, given he and you Democrats, aligned yourself with China to downplay the origins of the Covid virus, your credibility is at an all time low. It was bad enough that you all had to dismiss the lab leak theory but to censor anyone who mentioned it? That was pathetic, and all because Trump said it may have come from a lab. You guys not only mocked him, and you called anyone who mentioned the lab leak theory stupid.

And now it is the same with Dr. Rand Paul. Whatever he says, you and Paulie are against.

And Paulie, Mr. New York, New York, said Cuomo did a bang up job treating people with a virus. Why are you two are still doling out advice after being wrong about everything?[/QUOTE]I tune out Rand Paul because he isn't an immunologist or a virologist. Just as I tuned out trump's advice on disinfectant and light bulbs.