General Info

And interestingly enough I think the powers that be, might also want prostitution. So they are not against brothels at all. Thus we have nothing to worry about. Just take one of their instruments such as Amnesty International as an example. They are fighting to legalize prostitution everywhere. And they will win. It doesn't matter how many old / fat women are against it because in this respect, it does indeed bring about divorces and a lower fertility rate. The feminists thought they had a backing, but this is purely a case by case situation, and they are getting fucked in the cornhole in this regard. Sucks to be them!

But the by far biggest instrument to lower population growth is the banking system. Everything else pales in comparison.

[QUOTE=HornyHarry;2097313]When girls start to realise that getting registered at the tax office means 'sharing' 20-40% (it's not just income tax but also paying high social premiums) of their income with Puff Mutti Merkel, many girls will either want to leave or go underground. The smart ones are the ones that realise that now, and want to leave early in order to beat the crowd rushing for the exit.

Suppose that by July 2018 things turn out to be [u]not[/u] as bad as expected with the taxes, then a successful girl can (if she wishes) always easily come back since she had a regular client base and word will quickly spread (through ISG and other forums) that she has returned to Germany. On the other hand, if things turn out to be disastrous for the remaining girls, then the girls who have left got themselves a 6-12 month head start before the competition finally wakes up and also wants to leave Germany and move to Austria, Switzerland or god knows where. The 'early adopters' will have established a new customer base and the 'not-so-smart' girls who stayed behind in Germany will have to fight an uphill battle to get some of that market share in Austria or Switzerland.

For successful and good-looking girls it makes a lot of business sense to try something new before the 1st of January 2018. They are smart and realistic, as the new requirement to get registered at the tax office (and thus pay German taxes + social premiums) will not magically disappear. The socialist Utopia will always need more and more and more money, that's a fact. [/QUOTE]Rumour has it that Trinity (Estonia) has left GT and is relocating to Switzerland. Does trinity read ISG, or is Trinity perhaps a smart girl with a good service who doesn't like to wait like a deer caught in the headlights for the German tax Office to run her over?

Keep on closing your eyes that this world is rapidly changing (look up "Normalcy Bias" keep on ignoring the facts, keep on shooting the messenger, and keep op reporting me to the moderators.

Last one out, please turn of the light of your FKK club.

[QUOTE=Pistons;2100512]But the by far biggest instrument to lower population growth is the banking system. Everything else pales in comparison.[/QUOTE]Na Uzo Billah, sad day! How so?

[QUOTE=Polyamorist;2100894]Na Uzo Billah, sad day! How so?[/QUOTE]Because of how money (or at least official currency) is created through debt, and how there are always more debt in existence than there are money (or official currency). This makes sure that some people will always fail and go bankrupt. It is thus built into the system that the economy is a system of musical chairs where one chair is removed at each song.

[QUOTE=Pistons;2101112]Because of how money (or at least official currency) is created through debt, and how there are always more debt in existence than there are money (or official currency). This makes sure that some people will always fail and go bankrupt. It is thus built into the system that the economy is a system of musical chairs where one chair is removed at each song.[/QUOTE]Well, if the banking system is impoverishing us then it is encouraging population growth not curbing it. There is a negative correlation between income and fertility.

"And if ye are in doubt. Then produce a surah of the like thereof. " (Quran 2:23).

[QUOTE=Polyamorist;2101469]Well, if the banking system is impoverishing us then it is encouraging population growth not curbing it. There is a negative correlation between income and fertility.

"And if ye are in doubt. Then produce a surah of the like thereof. " (Quran 2:23).[/QUOTE]I am not sure the negative correlation has to be purely about wealth. I know that is the general idea these days, but it could be that it is more about knowledge. Then you also have the middle income trap. And we know security such as health and state benefits also helps (France). The negative correlation might only be where they either don't know better (how to manage wealth, and how to not have kids), or where the child is basically used as an economic safety net once you get older, because the society allows them to make enough money to care for their parents. But that is when they are so poor that they basically don't spend money on anything other than food. Once they get told to buy other stuff, they end up in the middle income trap, and that's where the fertility rate is the lowest.

Concerning the fear that bjs have changed these days and that BBBJ is no longer the norm: well, I have found, to my delight, things to be unchanged and everything is as it has always been. BBBJ still seems to be the default mode, at least this is my experience at Sharks and Oase during recent visits.

For example, over the past 3 days, I've had six 1-hour sessions with different girls: 4 at Sharks (3 with known regulars of mine and one with a new girl) add 2 at Oase (both with new girls, including one with a very hot 19-year old Brand new to the business). In each case, without any prior discussion or negotiation, the girls self-initiated BBBJ as normal.

Why were there weeks and weeks of speculatory (bullshit) doom and gloom posts about the disappearance of this beloved service?

In my last Phg visit, one girl tried to sell it to me as an extra. I heard that in samya covered in the norm so we have to stay firm if we want to keep the BBBJ standard.

[QUOTE=Ortos;2102018]
Why were there weeks and weeks of speculatory (bullshit) doom and gloom posts about the disappearance of this beloved service?[/QUOTE]Two clubs isn't a huge sample size. And it's still too early to declare victory I'd say.

If WGs realize that they can maintain their income levels without providing this beloved service (or only provide this beloved service to their best paying customers), than that it is exactly what they will do.

[QUOTE=HornyHarry;2097313]When girls start to realise that getting registered at the tax office means 'sharing' 20-40% (it's not just income tax but also paying high social premiums) of their income with Puff Mutti Merkel, many girls will either want to leave or go underground. [/QUOTE]How are the girls avoiding paying taxes now? What do they do with the cash? How do they deposit this cash into bank accounts without raising flags?

[QUOTE=Ortos;2102018]Concerning the fear that bjs have changed these days and that BBBJ is no longer the norm: well, I have found, to my delight, things to be unchanged and everything is as it has always been. BBBJ still seems to be the default mode, at least this is my experience at Sharks and Oase during recent visits.

For example, over the past 3 days, I've had six 1-hour sessions with different girls: 4 at Sharks (3 with known regulars of mine and one with a new girl) add 2 at Oase (both with new girls, including one with a very hot 19-year old Brand new to the business). In each case, without any prior discussion or negotiation, the girls self-initiated BBBJ as normal.

Why were there weeks and weeks of speculatory (bullshit) doom and gloom posts about the disappearance of this beloved service?[/QUOTE]Agree completely. Well, this was true for me at Sharks where with the exception of one single girl every session contained a BBBJ. Some with regulars, some with new girls to me, some with girls new at any FKK.

In July, we went through endless series of discussions and arguments to the effect that even an oblique reference to BBBJ in these threads on ISG could do irreversible damage to BBBJ forever. People who dared to argue against such blanket bans on free speech were called idiots, renegades and traitors to the rights of male species.

Now I see guys openly writing reports about obtaining BBBJ in clubs, naming names. When I wrote a report, I actually respected the opinion of those self appointed regulators and cut out reference to BBBJ and merely said blow job; but other men are writing very clearly "xyz girl gave me BBBJ or even (in the Dietz thread) fucked me bareback”. And as far as we can tell no repercussions occurred, whatsoever. In some clubs some girls are not giving BBBJ and in some other clubs many girls do give BBBJ, but after 4 months *no link* has been established between the writings here on ISG and happenings in the clubs.

I will be soon be visiting Berlin and plan to visit FKK clubs.

I have heard that in some of them Asians are not welcome. Can you please advise the ones which I should target.

[QUOTE=Ortos;2102018]Why were there weeks and weeks of speculatory (bullshit) doom and gloom posts about the disappearance of this beloved service?[/QUOTE]Because they ignored my posts to the contrary.

The lack of BBBJs is a red herring compared to the risk of girls no coming back next year.