General Info

[QUOTE=Optimist;2125001]CK. I read your reference to the article by Ellery in Huffington Post in the context of him being a high profile campaigner for leaving the EU.

He does point up the well established "democratic deficit" in the EU. Other non campaigning authors have suggested that this deficit has been slightly reduced by changes in recent years and may continue to be decreased slowly.

The Council of the EU is made up of national politicians, and it could be argued that this is a significant democratic input. In practice the EU is not mainly a independent entity: the power remains with elected national politicians.

Regardless of all that, UK citizens will probably from 2020 need a visa waiver to enter the EU, which may or may not become more or less democratic. As long as they let me in to visit FKKs I am happy :)

And as long as the pilot and co-pilot don't row and leave the cockpit midflight with the plane flying itself (plane from London on 1 January: discussions on democratic deficit can get heated)[/QUOTE]O, the thing that really got me interested in the EU was a documentary in 2014 called Euromania by a young Dutch fella called Peter Vlemmix long before Brexit was even a word.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO4Ayo4mYZg[/URL]

The bit at 22:00 where the EU attempted to ban porn in all media using a report called "eliminating gender stereotypes" got my attention. When people (well, men) of Europe found out and started emailing the EU to voice their opinions, a filter was added to block any messages containing the word 'porn'.
Shady fuckers.

[QUOTE=TheCane;2124985]And thus Brexit! Where they drive on the wrong side of the road LOL![/QUOTE]This comment about "driving on the wrong side" is historically and demonstrably incorrect. Throughout the history of human travel on road systems the left side was the default side. They drove chariots on left side down roads during the time of Alexander the Great (ca. 350 BC., Hellenistic period) and this continued as the normal direction of travel right through the Roman period, Medieval, etc. This is logical if you think about it because most people are right handed, sword or weapon on the side to best combat on-coming traffic. It was only as late as the late 18th Century that we see right-hand drive introduced by Napoleon (Sirioja's ancestor) for the specific purpose that his army March opposite to the "Anglais" and then, later in history this new direction of travel became more popular and adapted by many other lands, as it is today.

But looking back historically, those countries that still drive on the left (GB, Australia, Cyprus, Japan, etc.) have simply retained the correct/original direction of travel on left side (like marine traffic, I think), whilst all others are actually driving on the "wrong" side, historically thinking. So let's not fall into the trap that what's most popular is correct, but what is used by the minority is "wrong."

This has been an important message from the History Department. And now back to our regular topic of sex and debauchery.

[QUOTE=CitizenKane;2124983]The EU parliament is elected but the EU commission isn't. The commission makes the rules, the parliament only rubber stamps them. It's literally the opposite of how a democracy should work. Normally politicians make the rules and the bureaucrats enact them. The EU has it the other way around.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/matthew-ellery/eu-referendum_b_9514608.html[/QUOTE]This is why political debate has no place on this forum.

[QUOTE=Ortos;2125041]This comment about "driving on the wrong side" is historically and demonstrably incorrect. So let's not fall into the trap that what's most popular is correct, but what is used by the minority is "wrong. "[/QUOTE]My dear lad Ortos. My God it was just a joke! Why must everybody try to take themselves and everything so seriously all of the time? I say "tomayto" but you say "tomahto". As they say, two great nations separated by only a common language! Ha! But we're both fucking the same tutes dude! OK? Now, I like to fuck mine in the center of the bed normally. And you? In the center, on the left, on the right, or at the edge? Or maybe just standing up in the corner! I mean damn! LOLOLOL!

[QUOTE=Ortos;2125041]This comment about "driving on the wrong side" is historically and demonstrably incorrect. Throughout the history of human travel on road systems the left side was the default side. They drove chariots on left side down roads during the time of Alexander the Great (ca. 350 BC., Hellenistic period) and this continued as the normal direction of travel right through the Roman period, Medieval, etc. This is logical if you think about it because most people are right handed, sword or weapon on the side to best combat on-coming traffic. It was only as late as the late 18th Century that we see right-hand drive introduced by Napoleon (Sirioja's ancestor) for the specific purpose that his army March opposite to the "Anglais" and then, later in history this new direction of travel became more popular and adapted by many other lands, as it is today.

But looking back historically, those countries that still drive on the left (GB, Australia, Cyprus, Japan, etc.) have simply retained the correct/original direction of travel on left side (like marine traffic, I think), whilst all others are actually driving on the "wrong" side, historically thinking. So let's not fall into the trap that what's most popular is correct, but what is used by the minority is "wrong. ".

This has been an important message from the History Department. And now back to our regular topic of sex and debauchery.[/QUOTE]Hysterically funny satire, managing to parody overserious political discussion whilst at the same time providing real historical information, and posture puncturing.

Very dry and wicked wit LOL.

Right. Left.

Right. Wrong.

Perhaps that should help explain things. Its a word game gone far.

[URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-05/merkel-s-frenemies-give-stage-to-eu-critic-of-her-refugee-policy[/URL]

[URL]http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42585208[/URL]

Perhaps for some, an eyeopening glimpse inside the mind of a radical feminist who is vehemently against an open attitude towards prostitution: [URL]https://www.rt.com/shows/on-contact/413436-international-movement-legalize-prostitution/[/URL].

P.S. I wonder which "mega brothel" she went to in Munich.

[QUOTE=HornyHarry;2129285]Perhaps for some, an eyeopening glimpse inside the mind of a radical feminist who is vehemently against an open attitude towards prostitution: [URL]https://www.rt.com/shows/on-contact/413436-international-movement-legalize-prostitution/[/URL].

P.S. I wonder which "mega brothel" she went to in Munich.[/QUOTE]Her problem is that she is wrong. And she labels things how she wants to see it.

But one fundamental societal problem we have today is religion. And religious brainwashed people think prostitution is wrong. Because the religion has told them so.

[QUOTE=HornyHarry;2129285]Perhaps for some, an eyeopening glimpse inside the mind of a radical feminist who is vehemently against an open attitude towards prostitution: [URL]https://www.rt.com/shows/on-contact/413436-international-movement-legalize-prostitution/[/URL].

P.S. I wonder which "mega brothel" she went to in Munich.[/QUOTE]Perhaps what the world needs is a new religion: where sex trade is fundamental. And in a world where religious freedom is sought after, who could make it illegal?

[QUOTE=HornyHarry;2129285]Perhaps for some, an eyeopening glimpse inside the mind of a radical feminist who is vehemently against an open attitude towards prostitution: [URL]https://www.rt.com/shows/on-contact/413436-international-movement-legalize-prostitution/[/URL].

P.S. I wonder which "mega brothel" she went to in Munich.[/QUOTE]The funny thing is that that woman is so ugly, she is like the female version of a disabled. And by her own rhetoric she shouldn't be allowed to have sex. But of course she wouldn't like to hear that. Just as much as the Italian dwarves at Wellcum, or the handicapped people in wheelchair at Oceans wouldn't like to hear it.

And the very fact that she is against prostitution clearly leads back to her ugly looks. And how afraid she is of loosing any hope of a man wanting to have sex with her given the options he would have.

[QUOTE=Pistons;2129687]The funny thing is that that woman is so ugly, she is like the female version of a disabled. And by her own rhetoric she shouldn't be allowed to have sex. But of course she wouldn't like to hear that. Just as much as the Italian dwarves at Wellcum, or the handicapped people in wheelchair at Oceans wouldn't like to hear it.

And the very fact that she is against prostitution clearly leads back to her ugly looks. And how afraid she is of loosing any hope of a man wanting to have sex with her given the options he would have.[/QUOTE]Prostitution has a lot of dark sides and strong negative effects for most of the girls on their mental structure, now always the same story are most of the girls prostitutes because they have those disorders or are they getting them because of the fact ot be a prostitutes. I am always surprised when I meet girls outside the club how they have low energy, how for most of them they have low interest in things except their outlook, how most of them even after many years in the P6 have no driving licence, to accept to work in a club and to be fucked so many times every day I believe that you need to have a special mental structure, money is not all it is öostly a excuse. We should never forget that except that in a club the girls lean nothing, they enter with a level and leave after months or years at the same level, most of us we are adding new knowledges every day.

[QUOTE=Pistons;2129687]The funny thing is that that woman is so ugly, she is like the female version of a disabled. And by her own rhetoric she shouldn't be allowed to have sex. But of course she wouldn't like to hear that. Just as much as the Italian dwarves at Wellcum, or the handicapped people in wheelchair at Oceans wouldn't like to hear it.

And the very fact that she is against prostitution clearly leads back to her ugly looks. And how afraid she is of loosing any hope of a man wanting to have sex with her given the options he would have.[/QUOTE]"Women's bodies are mined, for everything. " (27:36 in the video). Oh yeah, it's quite obvious that this woman has some major (psychological?) issues, but the problem is that these extreme left Cultural Marxists ("I'm beyond the left" at 27:34) are given a platform from which they can launch their personal crusades against everything they don't like. She refuses to see that 'there are two sides to each coin' and that there are both positive and negative aspects about prostitution (just like any other job), and with her it's always the male that is at fault. Never once it might occur to her that there are also lots of women who are happy in prostitution, and happy about the (big pile!) of money it provides them every month, happy about being an independent business women in charge of her own body.

The interviewer, Chris Hedges, is absolutely terrible in asking some critical questions, and he even allows her to completely drift off topic and make the link between prostitution and women who are bearing children for other women who are infertile, with her "wombs for rent" comment from 27:35.

What about the men who pick up the garbage for Julie? What about the men repairing her car? What about the men installing her washing machine or moving her furniture? Are they also "abused" by a horrible women in a matriarchal society? "Male muscles for rent?" or "Male engineering for rent?" It's obviously okay for Julie if men do the hard labour and the dirty work in a society, but when a women voluntarily sells her pussy then she portrays every women as a sex slave and every customer as the devil.

It's also very typical of left wing fascists to have very little tolerance for anyone who disagrees with them. At 27:33 she says: "I'm [U]beyond[/U] the left" when she vehemently attacks her left wing critics for not being 'left enough.'

It's typical for this "snowflake" and "millennial" mentality: they refuse to accept that there are things you [I]personally[/I] don't like about society, which leads to censorship, social engineering and totalitarianism.

Anyway, as I said many times before, it's very sad that Cultural Marxists like this are in the driving seat regarding the debate about prostitution, and are allowed to use a few 'one-off' examples to paint an entire part of society with tar, and it's time people here on this board are waking up to see what we're up against.

I see no link to cultural marxism myself. Actually, some of the cultural marxist movements are trying to legalize prostitution worldwide. The idea that it has anything to do with cultural marxism just comes from how people with agendas like to hijack ideas. Happens all the time. These are two totally different subjects.