I guess being a junkie pays pretty well these days
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2846750][B]See the mug shots in Trump's Georgia case: Meadows, Giuliani, Powell, Ellis, Chesebro and others.
As Trump and his allies report to the Fulton County Jail for booking in the 2020 election case, the sheriff's office has been releasing mug shots after they surrender. Here is a collection.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/mugshot-rudy-giuliani-jenna-ellis-trump-georgia-surrender-rcna101670[/URL]
If only the world had seen well-earned Mug Shots of Agnew, Nixon, Reagan, Bush2 and Cheney, perhaps your Lord and Savior would not have felt his failing Trump Brand infomercial run as a Repub candidate that blundered into a rigged Electoral College appointment of him as so-called potus meant that, as a Repub, he would get a free pass on whatever crimes he wanted to commit, including the ones that forced the DOJ to indict him and a few of his Repub Crime Enterprise members that led to that historic collection of Mug Shots.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/08/25/report-hunter-biden-downsizes-to-15800-a-month-ocean-view-malibu-home/[/URL]
I predict Joe and Hunter will be sharing a prison cell long before Our Lord and Savior ever sets foot in one.
Fake science, caught red handed abort
Great, you agree with M. Dorstewitz's opinion.
I read the article and listened to the robot summation, and it has nothing to do with what I wrote about science. I'll entertain your tangent, if you listen to article in podcast version on top of the page, its premise is that the top officials from the top down stopped working for the American people.
1. Who are these "top officials"? I love vagueness to keep listener / reader guessing and playing on mythical thinking.
2. "They are lining their own pockets, why are we still employing them, and why are they not in prison?" Actual investigators would look at "targets" financials if there are credible leads. This is simple if there is a paper / digital trail. Then, the investigator would have to get evidence to a prosecutor who would then charge the target, who then becomes a defendant. Presumed innocent with the burden on the prosecutor to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant is guilty to a jury of his / her peers. That's how it works. Lobbing accusations is entertaining, but not reality based analysis of things.
Here's a thing about all this, I really don't care who goes to jail if they've committed crimes. If someone is found guilty in a court of law, then that should be straight forward as to the kind of person he / she is. Are their wrongly convicted people, sure 1% of convictions of white are overturned, while 4-6% of black are overturned. And before you try to play the racism card. I put those figures because I want to illustrate that 99% of white criminals who are convicted are correctly convicted. So if Fauci, being white, committed provable crimes, then the conviction would be deserved.
[URL]https://phys.org/news/2023-08-science-publisher-flawed-climate.html[/URL]
1 photos
Is it part of an Insanity Defense or an I'm Too Stupid defense?
It is such a stupid, prissy and vain thing for Trump to lie about.
Of course, when practically every sentence that comes out of his mouth or written by him is a lie I suppose it just required too much concentration, focus and effort for him to make an exception this one time no matter how much this particular lie out of the dozens of thousands just since 2015 makes him an irresistible object of ridicule.
Or is it another building block of evidence to support an Insanity Defense?
Or it could just be his way of promoting a long time Trump favorite, the "I'm too stupid to commit this crime" defense.
In this instance that defense is supported with, "I'm even too stupid, too cognitively impaired to guess anything close to my own height and weight".
My god. Anyone sitting across the negotiation table from that pathetic fool must have thought he'd just been handed the winning lottery ticket.
[B]From Muhammad Ali to Chris Hemsworth: Celebrities with the same height and weight as Trump, per jail records.[/B]
[URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-booking-height-weight-comparison-b2399801.html[/URL]
Real 3rd world shit holes are laughing
You mean like with Covid and the 3. 4% death rate? Wasn't that "facts and common sense"? See the link: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-s5DYknp9cc[/URL].
Aren't you still drinking the Kool Aid of everyone in the lame stream media who was wrong about that?
I would not pull a banana republic move and investigate a presidential candidate leading in the polls. Of course, I am not a partisan hack like Merrick Garland.
And once again, you assign expert status to someone who does not deserve it. You can go to the 1:39 mark of this video and see Trump was right again, and Biden was lying through his teeth, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ffSyZP8ib4[/URL].
CNN said Biden was incorrect or rather had a blind spot. Then the favorite Dem talking point is that Joe Biden did not have any business dealings with Hunter is blown up, but we now know Joe Biden just used a bunch of psuedonyms to cover up his corrupt family dealings and the final straw was the lame and corrupted attorney investigating Hunter Biden.
What comes next? All sons of the VP should expect to make millions a year in bribes? That is normal, the way it is done in Washington?
You douches keep attaching expert status to all these compromised and corrupt sources. The list is endless now: Page, Strzok, Comey, McCabe, Rosenstein, Schiff, Garland, the 50 intelligence officers who said Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, Fauci, Collins, Biden himself ETC, and I probably missed a few hundred.
There was a meme on twitter of four leaders who prosecuted their political opponents and I think it was Stalin, Mao, and Kim Jong Un. The fourth face on the meme was Biden.
You mean the same crime Hiliary and Biden committed? And taking bribes from China and Ukraine were not crimes?
Xpartan, it just blows me away how wrong you have been about everything and then think you have command of the "facts" and the term "common sense".
Of course, I am not a partisan hack like Merrick Garland.
Garland needs to be impeached with Dirty Joe ASAP.
He can't be allowed to do what hes doing without consequence.
Indict Trump who has been leading opponent for next years election since he stated his bullshit.
But no charges for Dirty Joe and all his corruption, just look at the Junkies laptop.
Tell me you can't get a grand jury to indict on 500 federal charges for Joe and the Junkie.
How about all the documents found unsecured at Dirtys Joes stash house in Delaware.
Or at Penn, why ZERO charges for Dirty Joe?
I say appoint a special counsel for Dirty Joe ASAP, Patrick Fitzgerald!!