Printable View
"Potential side benefit: If you're into anal stimulation, and I'm not, this would be the mother of all prostrate massages. ".
I've had 3 in the last 15 yrs and I'm 55 yrs old.
I know a guy that died because he didn't get one.
He died with the doctors order in his wallet, he was a very very smart guy, but he would tell you.
He fucked up this one.
"Your hero Trump is one of those partisan fools who disagrees with you and agrees with me about a heads up from the Pandemic Prevention and Response teams of just 2-3 months being enough to have easily prevented all of the death and economic mess that Trump's decisions in 2018 and 2019 created, in defiance of all expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid.
His admission is on audio recording as well:
[URL]https://news.yahoo.com/bob-woodward-stunned-trump-told-091902598.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL3MyBR_rYrzTmh_f1UGFaVRI-cExPvIvcggnY2xdATx2cGUWicgKYhtvqTCoxtjyDyFoR351PVDIFKPkI4Vy0zg1GLHAnRspSly8lYJ4h-Jt-Ur6nzWNqIMNUakkIkKwZWLdoNL7H1T5ehHalQp5Dzm6SxwMKBaEvSqCX5GQcgc[/URL]
The only extra spin on it being everyone knew China was not going to be honest about such a thing and give us that heads up.
So that is why we embedded our respresntatives to do it.
Those were the experts Trump defunded and removed, the final and most important ones being removed 5 months before the first cases emerged. Whereupon, sure enough, as far more intelligent and comperent Economic and National Security stewards than Trump predicted, for the first time in many years China had the unmonitored freedom to lie about it while a likely manageable endemic developed into a much less manageable Pandemic.
Oh, and this part is extremely important and is directly related to the "Flatten The Curve" concept understood and promoted by scientists and experts like Dr. Fauci; the earlier heads up alerts are not expected to stop a stubborn viral spread from eventually ccurring anyway every time. It is meant to take measures as early as possible to contain, quarantine, isolate and SLOW DOWN the potential spread long enough to prevent hospitals, staff, equipment, supplies and facilities from being overwhelmed all at once and in order to do exactly what you have suggested over and over again would have been the better approach with regard to an UNRUSHED creation, testing and administration of a more effective vaccine for it.
You know, to avoid having to mandate worldwide closures, severe travel restrictions, mask wearing, social distancing and so on.
You must agree with me and Trump that would have produced about 1000% better outcome, right?
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/13/us/politics/cornel-west-campaign-manager-peter-daou-green-party-democrats.html[/URL]
He Was a Hillary Clinton Cheerleader. Now he Calls Democrats a Threat.
Peter Daou, a former Democratic activist, is running Cornel West's third-party campaign. He talked to The New York Times about how he came to view the two-party system as a bigger problem than Donald J. Trump.
Share full article.
Peter Daou.
Peter Daou, seen here in 2016, when he was a combative defender of Hillary Clinton. Now he manages Cornel West's campaign for president on the Green Party ticket. Credit. Todd Heisler / The New York Times.
Charles Homans.
By Charles Homans.
Sept. 13,2023, 12:06 pm ET.
On Monday, Cornel West, a left-wing scholar and third-party presidential candidate, announced that he had hired Peter Daou as his campaign manager. The choice adds a new twist to one of the most unusual career trajectories in political consulting.
A Lebanese American jazz keyboardist and dance music producer — one of his early club remixes was declared "smokin'" by Billboard in 1991 — Mr. Daou, 58, found his way into politics in the mid-2000's. He started as a liberal blogger and then became a digital adviser for John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign and Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign.
In 2016, he achieved prominence as the chief executive of Shareblue, a pro-Clinton megaphone that cultivated online outrage against Donald J. Trump, the political media and Bernie Sanders, Mrs. Clinton's primary rival. (Mr. Daou was not affiliated with the 2016 Clinton campaign, but he did get a shout out in Mrs. Clinton's subsequent book, "What Happened. ") At the time, a Sanders strategist called Mr. Daou the "pond scum of American politics" — so it was a surprise when, four years later, Mr. Daou transformed from Clinton superfan to an equally loud supporter of Mr. Sanders, the Vermont socialist.
It was the first of a series of record-scratch shifts in Mr. Daou's politics. He has since quit the Democratic Party, called on President Biden to resign over campaign-trail allegations of groping, and worked briefly for Marianne Williamson's campaign before signing onto Dr. West's Green Party candidacy.
ADVERTISEMENT.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
In 2017, Mr. Daou started a short-lived online platform, endorsed by Mrs. Clinton, that aimed to fight "a proliferation of confusing, chaotic misinformation" with verified, Clinton-affirming facts. He denounced "Russia's successful hacking of our election using cyberespionage, online intimidation, and disinformation. " he now mocks the "liberal speak" of Democrats: "January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, January 6, Orange man bad, Orange man bad, Orange man bad, Orange man bad, Putin, Putin, Putin, Putin, Putin, Putin," he posted this month on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.
"My evolution, philosophically and politically, I've been exceptionally transparent about it," Mr. Daou said in a phone conversation with The New York Times, shortly after the West campaign's announcement. The interview has been edited and condensed.
How would you define success for the Cornel West campaign? What are you trying to do here?
The first definition of success, to me, is a President Cornel West. But there are many, many ways of thinking about what this campaign can achieve. One would be to finally break the grip of the duopoly, you know, the monopoly of the two parties where you really just get two choices.
You'll hear Democrats saying, "We're saving democracy, we're protecting democracy. " Well, you don't protect democracy by trying to kick Greens off the ballot, and you don't protect democracy by telling people, "You're a spoiler. " You can't kill democracy to save it.
Editors' Picks.
Sharks on a Golf Course Made a Watery Grave Unlike Any Other.
Aubrey Plaza Has Found Her Scene Partner.
What Can Turmeric Actually Do for Your Health?
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
Image.
Delivering a speech, Cornel West holds a microphone in one hand and points upward with his other.
Cornel West is running for president as a third-party candidate. Credit. Damian Dovarganes / Associated Press.
During the 2020 primary, you wrote an essay in The Nation warning that fighting among the various factions of the American left, "at a time when they need to marshal every asset to defeat Trump and his G. O. P. Cronies," would be "an epic act of self-destruction. " Jaime Harrison, the Democratic National Committee chairman, has made more or less the same argument about Dr. West's candidacy, saying, "This is not the time to play around on the margins. ".
ADVERTISEMENT.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
Somebody quoted William Blake, in "The Marriage of Heaven and Hell," on Twitter: "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. " Yes, in 2020, I was buying into these spoiler arguments. I was going after the progressives and the leftists and the Green Party members who I have now come to see as my family. And it was a mistake. I was wrong. You know, it's OK to be wrong.
In 2016, you worked for Shareblue, which a lot of people would credit with stoking the my-party-right-or-wrong strain of Democratic social media posting that you now decry. Do you feel like you had a hand in creating this thing that you're fighting?
I think I played a part, yes. Because look, when you're in that partisan war, you're in the trenches and you're fighting and you're throwing punches. You get caught up in the moment, you believe your side is right, and you fight. I'm one human being, but I take responsibility for that. I apologize for that. The way I see it, what I can do right now, especially with Dr. West, is break out of it.
You've recently made fun of what you call the "orange man bad" school of liberal discourse.
My former liberal Democratic political friends say, "Oh, you just love Trump, you're a Trump supporter. " No, I oppose Trump more than you do. The problem is painting Donald Trump as some singularly dangerous figure, because it takes attention away from all the other problems. That's propaganda. That's intentional. And it also raises a lot of money for the Democratic Party.
ADVERTISEMENT.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
You wrote a book in 2019 arguing that "nothing in American life is more of a threat to our democracy than the Republican Party's lurch to the far right. " You're now arguing that the Democratic Party "is itself a threat to democracy. " Are these threats comparable, to your mind?
I consider myself an independent leftist. I haven't always been in that place. For a long time, I worked within the Democratic Party, and slowly moved toward the left, to the point where I quit the party in 2020. And, having done that, I look much more objectively at these arguments that Republicans are far, far worse and far, far more dangerous than Democrats, and if Trump gets elected again, it's the end of the world, it's the end of the country.
When we say we're protecting democracy, there's an assumption there that there is a democracy. You only are given two choices. And both parties are responsible for that. It's certainly a threat to democracy to take Joe Biden, who 67 percent of Democratic voters in a recent CNN poll do not want to be the Democratic nominee.
If that's the case, why not challenge him in the primary? Why run as a third-party challenger?
I think what we've seen this cycle, and the last couple of cycles with Bernie Sanders, is the Democratic Party will not give the opportunity for somebody like Dr. West to actually engage in a fair primary process. So I think this is the right way to go. The Green Party will get on the ballot, or we're working to get on it, in all 50 states. We are going to make sure this is a fair process because it's not going to be a fair process within the Democratic Party.
Ron Klain, who until recently was Mr. Biden's chief of staff, wrote a blurb for your 2019 book. When was the last time you talked to anybody in Bidenworld?
ADVERTISEMENT.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
I have not been in contact with any of my establishment colleagues for many years. I'm sure they don't have very high opinions of me. But it really doesn't matter to me, because this is not about my personal connections.
You recently addressed the young Biden-supporting TikTok influencer Harry Sisson, comparing his enthusiasm for Mr. Biden to yours for Mrs. Clinton in 2016, and warning him: "Trust me, you'll regret it later. " For a long time, even after you embraced Bernie Sanders, you seemed to stand by your years as a Clinton die-hard. Are looking back differently at that now?
I thought I was doing the right thing at the time. Looking back now, I was just enabling and supporting a system that is oppressing people. So for a younger person getting involved, I say, look at the system itself. Look at the suffering created by the system and fight the system. Don't get attached to one politician or one party. I find the idea of anarchist philosophy, along the lines of David Graeber, quite intriguing: You know, no power dynamics, no coercion, a structure in which in which we all cooperate, and there's true equality, right?
In the end, what Dr. West is doing, this is the way you do it: You go at the system directly. And that's what we're going to be doing to the very last day. He will be on the ballot. And this is not going to be some sort of process in which, you know, "Down the line, well, maybe not, if this is going to bring on a Republican. ".
We are working to get on the ballot. In the general election, there are going to be at least three choices, and he will be one of them.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2852038]
I've had 3 in the last 15 yrs and I'm 55 yrs old.
I know a guy that died because he didn't get one.
He died with the doctors order in his wallet, he was a very very smart guy, but he would tell you.
He fucked up this one.[/QUOTE]One of my best friends died of colon cancer when he was about 45. He was a walking poster boy for everything you can do that causes cancer. He worked for a fuel distribution company delivering gasoline, drank a lot, smoked a lot, consumed various and sundry illegal substances, and would run around in his boat all day in the summer and get burnt to a crisp. If he'd started getting colonoscopies at 40 like you, he'd probably still be alive. Well, unless something like lung cancer, liver cancer or melanoma got him by now.
A couple of aunts and uncles, on both sides of my family, never got colonoscopies and died of colon cancer as well.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2851964]This just came out in the literature. And again, I warn you about percent reduction bullshit. This was from JAMA: [URL]https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2808648?guestAccessKey=517677e9-c937-4996-9c4a-f734f09de19e&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=082823[/URL].[/QUOTE]Elvis, please note from my reply to the Marquis above that I have a particular interest in colon cancer. So I looked at your link a little closer, with that in mind. While the authors promote their paper as some kind of meta study, they only looked at one colonoscopy study, this one, by Bretthauer et al:
[URL]https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2208375[/URL]
And Bretthauer et al weren't looking at how effective colonoscopies were at reducing incidence of colon cancer and deaths from colon cancer. They were looking at the effectiveness of inviting people to get colonoscopies! Only 42% of the invitees actually got colonoscopies. I bet people like me, with a history of colon cancer in my family, were more likely to take them up on their kind offer to shove a massive coil of tubing up their asses than others.
And certain of the findings of the study would support colonoscopies for screening. See.
[URL]https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/10/13/1128531054/colonoscopies-save-lives-doctors-push-back-against-european-study-that-casts-dou[/URL]
This is an excerpt from a political thread on another hooker board by a poster who goes by the handle Manslut. Manslut is a Democrat, responding to criticism of Joe Biden.
[B]A President has absolutely no control over the Economy, get that through your damn heads people.
Look at all the people we have with Economics degrees, and they cant control it. Oh they can tell us what its not doing or doing, in other words read & analyze stats, but they cant fix anything with itWe have a Federal Reserve Chairman, an economic expert, a banking and finance expert and he cant control inflation.
Fuck that bullshit a POTUS can control the EconomyLMAO
A POTUS cant control the price of a carton of eggs, much less a taco at Jack-in-the-Crack, and you think he can control or influence the price of a barrel oil, or the GDPLMAO II[/B]
Food for thought Tooms. Food for thought. I freely admit that Biden's policies currently have nothing to do with inflation in the price of eggs. Although they did in 2021.
Mitt is history.
Mitch is next.
Nutty Nancy and Dirty Joe will take up the rear.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/13/scarborough-every-democrat-i-speak-to-off-air-says-biden-is-too-old-to-run/[/URL]
Its time to MAGA AGAIN!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2852306]This is an excerpt from a political thread on another hooker board by a poster who goes by the handle Manslut. Manslut is a Democrat, responding to criticism of Joe Biden.
[B]A President has absolutely no control over the Economy, get that through your damn heads people.
Look at all the people we have with Economics degrees, and they cant control it. Oh they can tell us what its not doing or doing, in other words read & analyze stats, but they cant fix anything with itWe have a Federal Reserve Chairman, an economic expert, a banking and finance expert and he cant control inflation.
Fuck that bullshit a POTUS can control the EconomyLMAO
A POTUS cant control the price of a carton of eggs, much less a taco at Jack-in-the-Crack, and you think he can control or influence the price of a barrel oil, or the GDPLMAO II[/B]
Food for thought Tooms. Food for thought. I freely admit that Biden's policies currently have nothing to do with inflation in the price of eggs. Although they did in 2021.[/QUOTE]Nothing to say about Manslut's conclusions other than that is clearly, utterly and inarguably wrong.
Does a POTUS candidate run and campaign on a set of ecomomic proposals and objectives?
Does that winning POTUS then propose corresponding ecomomic legislation and / or request it be placed right in the budget and / or the tax code?
Can a POTUS veto or change in many ways before signing any legislation that has not locked in a veto-proof Senate majority?
Is a POTUS expected to notice, assess and at least respond in some way to storm clouds on the horizon heading our way?
To mention just a few obvious questions.
Oh, and the POTUS is the one who interviews, vets and nominates for approval the Fed Chairman, right?
To suggest that a person who weilds more stewardship control over economic legislation and response to whatever tweaks and turns might be necessary to avert or diminish disaster than any other person on the Planet is not "responsible" for much of the outcomes and results, barring total stupidity like the Repub Grinbitches and McQarthys stumbling into one idiotic Government Shutdown after another or threat of one in order to crash the USA economy regardless of the positive trajectory, is no different than arguing that economic agendas, legislation, budgets and tax rates don't matter, response to dire trends and storm clouds or doing nothing at all don't matter and that "shit just happens", good or bad in the economy and it is out of mere mortals' control to change it. Well, might as well not bother to vote then.
So Manslut is a stealth Repub or an unknowing one.
LOL. Let me guess; he also attributes the uninterrupted pattern of the last 100 years or so of historic jobs creation and no Great Recessions under Dem POTUS stewardship after they propose and pass their favorite Dem Party economic agenda legislation vs every Great Recession and massive jobs destruction and none of the historic jobs creation in almost those same 100 years under Repub so-called potuses after they propose and pass their favorite Repub Party economic agenda legislation as merely a "wild coincidence", right? Lolol.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2852308]Mitt is history.
Mitch is next.
Nutty Nancy and Dirty Joe will take up the rear.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/13/scarborough-every-democrat-i-speak-to-off-air-says-biden-is-too-old-to-run/[/URL]
Its time to MAGA AGAIN![/QUOTE]I did a Google Search for "Betting odds for the 2024 Presidential election" and could not find a current one that did not place Joe Biden as the clear favorite to win. Can you?
I stopped looking after the first 6 results.
[URL]https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2024/winner[/URL]
[URL]https://www.empirestakes.com/ny-sports-betting/presidential-election-odds[/URL]
[URL]https://www.thelines.com/odds/election/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.vegasinsider.com/odds/us-presidential-election/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.actionnetwork.com/politics/presidential-election-odds-2024[/URL]
[URL]https://www.covers.com/politics/us-election-betting-odds[/URL]
My favorite age-related quote lately is, "When Joe was a Senior, Donnie was a Freshman. " LOL.
"Nothing to say about Manslut's conclusions other than that is clearly, utterly and inarguably wrong.
Does a POTUS candidate run and campaign on a set of economic proposals and objectives?
Does that winning POTUS then propose corresponding economic legislation and / or request it be placed right in the budget and / or the tax code?
Can a POTUS veto or change in many ways before signing any legislation that has not locked in a veto-proof Senate majority?
Is a POTUS expected to notice, assess and at least respond in some way to storm clouds on the horizon heading our way?
To mention just a few obvious questions.
Oh, and the POTUS is the one who interviews, vets and nominates for approval the Fed Chairman, right?
To suggest that a person who weilds more stewardship control over economic legislation and response to whatever tweaks and turns might be necessary to avert or diminish disaster than any other person on the Planet is not "responsible" for much of the outcomes and results, barring total stupidity like the Repub Grinbitches and McQarthys stumbling into one idiotic Government Shutdown after another or threat of one in order to crash the USA economy regardless of the positive trajectory, is no different than arguing that economic agendas, legislation, budgets and tax rates don't matter, response to dire trends and storm clouds or doing nothing at all don't matter and that "shit just happens", good or bad in the economy and it is out of mere mortals' control to change it. Well, might as well not bother to vote then.
So Manslut is a stealth Repub or an unknowing one.
LOL. Let me guess; he also attributes the uninterrupted pattern of the last 100 years or so of historic jobs creation and no Great Recessions under Dem POTUS stewardship after they propose and pass their favorite Dem Party economic agenda legislation vs every Great Recession and massive jobs destruction and none of the historic jobs creation in almost those same 100 years under Repub so-called potuses after they propose and pass their favorite Repub Party economic agenda legislation as merely a "wild coincidence", right? Lolol."
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2023/09/13/carney-on-kudlow-a-uaw-strike-will-be-bidens-fault-because-his-policies-have-destroyed-autoworkers-wages/[/URL]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2851815]So the permanent rates in that monstrosity might only add $1. 5 Trillion to the deficit in the first 10 years of their existence. Then what happens? Does the Earth evaporate and we no longer keep count of how much it continues to add to the deficit while adding zero net gain to GDP and fewer jobs with it than without it?
Unless "permanent" means something other than "permanent", it will continue to add at least $1. 5 Trillion to the deficit with nothing to show for it every 10 years. Goodie. I have obviously been too generous and forgiving of that monstrosity by only attributing $2. 5 Trillion to its net cost to America. I could have accurately characterized it as flushing $100 Trillion down the shitter if it takes long enough to repeal it.
As a purported USA National Economy "stimulous" and "jobs creator", it surpasses the definition of "flushing money down the shitter. ".
Now, if they had sold it as and named it "The Great Trump / Repub Jobs Losing, Deficit Skyrocketing Gift To Corporate CEOs and the Super Wealthy To Be Paid For By Everyone Else Act", then I would really have nothing to criticize about it in terms of a piece of legislation accomplishing its stated goals.[/QUOTE]This is proof that even the brightest among us are sucked in by MSNBC and Progressive demagoguery. Blame it on the corporations and the wealthy, who don't pay their fair share. Right.
There were three main provisions of the Republican's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
1. Temporary cuts in personal income tax rates, which made our income tax system more progressive, by lowering the % of income middle income Americans pay in income tax by more than higher-income Americans. Democrats could have chosen to accelerate the sunset of these cuts in 2021 and 2022 but chose not to.
2. A permanent cut in the corporate income tax rate, so that our total (federal + state) corporate rate went from the highest in the developed world to the middle of the pack. This was coupled with the GILTI tax on American companies' income from foreign subsidiaries, and legislation that encouraged American companies to bring cash from overseas back home. No Democrats want to go back to what we have before. The moderates and Biden don't want to raise the federal corporate rate all the way back to 35%. And the Progressives like Sanders and Warren don't want to do away with the GILTI tax. Democrats could have chosen to modify these changes in the corporate tax regime in 2021 and 2022 but wisely chose not to.
3. A temporary implementation of a 20% deduction for pass-through income for small companies, and for companies with high labor and depreciation expense as a % of revenue. This is the so called Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction. I don't believe that government should play favorites. Taxpayers should be treated the same. As such I believe that Democrats should have done away with the QBI deduction in 2021 and 2022. But they chose not to.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2852353]Oh, and the POTUS is the one who interviews, vets and nominates for approval the Fed Chairman, right?[/QUOTE]The Fed has two mandates, to control inflation and to support high employment. Yes, under G. William Miller and Paul Volcker, inflation and unemployment soared. Both were appointed to the Fed Board of Governors and the Fed Chair by Jimmy Carter, a Democrat.
Jerome Powell was appointed to the Fed Board of Governors by Barrack Obama, a Democrat. He was initially appointed Chair of the Fed by Donald Trump, a Republican, and later re-appointed Chair by Joe Biden, a Democrat. Unemployment and inflation also soared under Powell.
HOWEVER, most Fed governors voted along with the Chairs during the Carter, Reagan, Trump and Biden administrations. And Manslut's excellent pronouncement applies to Fed Chairs, just like presidents. So I don't fault Democratic presidents for their appointments.
I did a Google Search for "Betting odds for the 2024 Presidential election" and could not find a current one that did not place Joe Biden as the clear favorite to win. Can you?
I stopped looking after the first 6 results.
[URL]https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2024/winner[/URL]
[URL]https://www.empirestakes.com/ny-sports-betting/presidential-election-odds[/URL]
[URL]https://www.thelines.com/odds/election/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.vegasinsider.com/odds/us-presidential-election/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.actionnetwork.com/politics/presidential-election-odds-20[/URL]
[URL]https://www.covers.com/politics/us-election-betting-odds[/URL]
My favorite age-related quote lately is, "When Joe was a Senior, Donnie was a Freshman. ".
Well that's ODD?
My guess is the smart money that runs these gambling operations doesn't always pick the likeliest winner per se.
But they like to cover their asses before anything else.
Did the oligarchs cheat and rig 2020 only to have our Lord and Savior walk right back in? Doubtful.
They will probably double down.
Thats why they are going so hard on the J6 protesters.
They want to try to discourage the sequel if they cheat again.
Hopefully it will just escalate to full scale Civil War 2. 0 if necessary.
Dirty Joe and his corrupt DOJ are doing their part.
Next the corrupt CDC may be screaming lockdowns and we need mail in ballots again.
Be ready for all kinds of BULLSHIT ala 2020.
I hope the true PATRIOTS of this country show them a REAL insurrection if they cheat again!
A really Bloody Blood bath in DC 1812 style!
We have all the guns and ammo its time to put them to good use.
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/06/19/there-are-more-guns-than-people-in-the-united-states-according-to-a-new-study-of-global-firearm-ownership/[/URL]
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2852308]Mitt is history.
Mitch is next.
Nutty Nancy and Dirty Joe will take up the rear.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/13/scarborough-every-democrat-i-speak-to-off-air-says-biden-is-too-old-to-run/[/URL]
Its time to MAGA AGAIN![/QUOTE]I like Mitt and Mitch. True, they sometimes supported the growth of our inefficient and wasteful Federal government. But they were on the side of fiscal sanity more than the majority of the Washington political class.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2852457]
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2023/09/13/carney-on-kudlow-a-uaw-strike-will-be-bidens-fault-because-his-policies-have-destroyed-autoworkers-wages/[/URL][/QUOTE]This may hurt Biden. He shouts his support for the workingman and Big Labor from the rooftops. Michigan may just follow in the footsteps of West Virginia, which votes for Republicans by huge margins, in large part because Democrats took their green agenda too far, and jobs were lost.
"I like Mitt and Mitch. True, they sometimes supported the growth of our inefficient and wasteful Federal government. But they were on the side of fiscal sanity more than the majority of the Washington political class.
This may hurt Biden. He shouts his support for the workingman and Big Labor from the rooftops. Michigan may just follow in the footsteps of West Virginia, which votes for Republicans by huge margins, in large part because Democrats took their green agenda too far, and jobs were lost. ".
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/12/exclusive-cliff-sims-trumps-populism-is-the-true-heir-to-reagans-blue-collar-conservatism-not-pences-globalism/[/URL]
[URL]https://nationalinterest.org/feature/trump-doctrine-peace-through-unrestrained-strength-206386[/URL]
[URL]https://amgreatness.com/2023/09/13/revenge-of-the-bums/[/URL]
[URL]https://dailystormer.in/singer-who-said-mutilating-children-is-bad-set-to-get-best-sales-in-her-career-on-new-album/[/URL]
"I like Mitt and Mitch. True, they sometimes supported the growth of our inefficient and wasteful Federal government. But they were on the side of fiscal sanity more than the majority of the Washington political class.
This may hurt Biden. He shouts his support for the workingman and Big Labor from the rooftops. Michigan may just follow in the footsteps of West Virginia, which votes for Republicans by huge margins, in large part because Democrats took their green agenda too far, and jobs were lost. ".
I'm guessing he was going to lose reelection that's why hes quitting.
How many that voted to impeach Our Lord and Savior are still around? LMAO.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/12/mitt-romney-backs-joe-biden-impeachment-inquiry/[/URL]
Mitt has been very bad for Mormons.
If you didn't hate Mormons before you sure do now, Thanks Mittens LMAO.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2852414]I did a Google Search for "Betting odds for the 2024 Presidential election" and could not find a current one that did not place Joe Biden as the clear favorite to win. Can you?
I stopped looking after the first 6 results.
[URL]https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2024/winner[/URL]
[URL]https://www.empirestakes.com/ny-sports-betting/presidential-election-odds[/URL]
[URL]https://www.thelines.com/odds/election/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.vegasinsider.com/odds/us-presidential-election/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.actionnetwork.com/politics/presidential-election-odds-2024[/URL]
[URL]https://www.covers.com/politics/us-election-betting-odds[/URL]
My favorite age-related quote lately is, "When Joe was a Senior, Donnie was a Freshman. " LOL.[/QUOTE]The easiest to understand is predictit.org. You can more or less assume the numbers quoted there correlate with probabilities. It's legal for USA Residents to bet on predictit.org, as it's run by a nonprofit for research purposes. The downside is you're limited on your bets. The maximum punt is something like $1000.
Some people get Alzheimer's in their 50's and others stay sharp as a tack into their 90's. That's not to say that either of our leading presidential candidates is sharp as a tack. Neither is.