American Politics

"Mormons don't pray to Donald Trump. They pray to God and golden plates. And they call the devil "Satan", not "Mitt Romney. ".

But they should, I do and I'm an ardent atheist!

[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/20/donald-trump-promises-the-largest-domestic-deportation-operation-in-american-history/[/URL]

There is but one true god.

Donald J Trump. ".

They are rejecting SATAN after all for the only one TRUE GOD.

Our Lord and Savior.

Donald J Trump.

What next the National Review editorial board LMAOOOOO.

[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/09/yes-joe-biden-is-corrupt/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=third[/URL]

Get on the Trump train already Tiny!

Romney's large team at the equity arm of Bain Capital achieved an average annual return on realized investments of 113% per annum, according to Wikipedia. If he could do that for the average American, who has a net worth of $746,820, that American be worth $63 billion after 15 years!

Romney's showed himself to be an extraordinary executive who produced great economic results, particularly in the private sector but also as a fiscally-responsible governor of Massachusetts who introduced near-universal health care. If our political and bureaucratic class were consistently as able and wise as Romney, then over many years the USA would do very well. If he were a Democrat you'd agree with me.

But how would he raid the SS trustfund and Fort Knox the federal govt and a country of 330 million are not as easily picked on ala the companies that he raped and pillaged whilst at Bain.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmwzGMmGcJw[/URL] 2:36 and 4:03 are gold.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JzvYUYfICM[/URL] 0:50 is gold.

Lastly if you think hes so smart why is he so fucking poor LOL Romney is a 3 time loser lololololol.

Look at other hedge fund mgrs net worth lolololol.

"That has absolutely nothing to do with legislating and stewarding a complex national economy to positive results.

Zero.

If anything, leading a company in ways to make its owners and shareholders wealthier is the exact opposite of what it takes to produce Great Recoveries, Great Economic Expansions and Historic Job Gains in a national economy.

Romney as Job Creator Clashes with Bain Record of Job Cuts.

[URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-07-20/romney-as-job-creator-clashes-with-bain-record-of-job-cuts[/URL]

Perplexing, isn't it? No, not really.

LOL. Yeah, Trump figured out ways to blow all of his daddy's money and flush all the money anyone was stupid enough to entrust with him down the shitter, stiff all of his creditors, contractors and still managed to buy himself a gold toilet. Surely, he could do the same thing for all those dumb Repub hillbillies sending him major chunks of their entitlement checks. LOL. "

Tiny says he created more jobs than he destroyed?

He destroyed many families so Bain could chop up companies, and cannabilize their assets.

So he could get more illegal slaves to work for him.

[URL]https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2012/01/12/mitt-romney-has-15-homes/[/URL]

Many many illegal slave nannies gardners cooks maids et al!!

May he rot in Mormon hell!

[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/21/us/politics/jimmy-carter-hospice.html[/URL]

"That has absolutely nothing to do with legislating and stewarding a complex national economy to positive results.

Zero.

If anything, leading a company in ways to make its owners and shareholders wealthier is the exact opposite of what it takes to produce Great Recoveries, Great Economic Expansions and Historic Job Gains in a national economy.

Romney as Job Creator Clashes with Bain Record of Job Cuts.

[URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-07-20/romney-as-job-creator-clashes-with-bain-record-of-job-cuts[/URL]

Perplexing, isn't it? No, not really.

LOL. Yeah, Trump figured out ways to blow all of his daddy's money and flush all the money anyone was stupid enough to entrust with him down the shitter, stiff all of his creditors, contractors and still managed to buy himself a gold toilet. Surely, he could do the same thing for all those dumb Repub hillbillies sending him major chunks of their entitlement checks. LOL. ".

Tiny says he created more jobs than he destroyed?

He destroyed many families so Bain could chop up companies, and cannabilize their assets.

So he could get more illegal slaves to work for him.

[URL]https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2012/01/12/mitt-romney-has-15-homes/[/URL]

Many many illegal slave nannies gardners cooks maids et al!!

May he rot in Mormon hell!

Maybe Xi can build a compound to protect all the traitors of the US.

The Romneys Flakes Pelosis Bush Bubba Hussein Obama McConnell.

And other scum like Bloomberg Ray Dalio Ken Griffin et al I would say the Bidens.

But several will probably be rotting in Florence soon (if there is any justice in the Universe).

Justice is coming Nov 5 2024.

Inshalla.

[URL]https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?msg=Election%20Countdown&p0=179&ud=2&year=2024&month=11&day=5&hour=0&min=0&sec=0&fromtheme=election[/URL]

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2854722]
Tiny says he created more jobs than he destroyed?

He destroyed many families so Bain could chop up companies, and cannabilize their assets.

So he could get more illegal slaves to work for him.

[URL]https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2012/01/12/mitt-romney-has-15-homes/[/URL]

Many many illegal slave nannies gardners cooks maids et al!!

May he rot in Mormon hell![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2854682]But how would he raid the SS trustfund and Fort Knox the federal govt and a country of 330 million are not as easily picked on ala the companies that he raped and pillaged whilst at Bain.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmwzGMmGcJw[/URL] 2:36 and 4:03 are gold.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JzvYUYfICM[/URL] 0:50 is gold.

Lastly if you think hes so smart why is he so fucking poor LOL Romney is a 3 time loser lololololol.

Look at other hedge fund mgrs net worth lolololol.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2854579]That has absolutely nothing to do with legislating and stewarding a complex national economy to positive results.

Zero.

If anything, leading a company in ways to make its owners and shareholders wealthier is the exact opposite of what it takes to produce Great Recoveries, Great Economic Expansions and Historic Job Gains in a national economy.

[B]Romney as Job Creator Clashes with Bain Record of Job Cuts[/B]

[URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-07-20/romney-as-job-creator-clashes-with-bain-record-of-job-cuts[/URL]

[/QUOTE]Well goodness, I struck quite the chord. My impression from following the forum is that you two legendary mongers met and bonded. And things subsequently unraveled because of your political differences. And now I'm bringing you back together again! I'm happy for you.

The only way you're going to substantially increase GDP and prosperity in the USA is through increases in productivity. In economic terms, productivity is defined as units of output per hour worked. You don't increase productivity the Biden Way, which is also called the French Way, by keeping people in jobs that have become redundant. Or the Trump Way, also called the Biden Way since Biden carried on with his policies, by imposing massive tariffs on toys and textiles and the like in a futile attempt to bring low end manufacturing jobs back to America. You do it the Romney Way, also called the American Way and the Singapore Way, by improving the efficiency and competitiveness of businesses. Yes, this will result overall in people moving from jobs that add less value to jobs that add more value. Fewer people will be employed in low skilled occupations.

An example from years past, it used to take many farmers to supply our country with food. Now far fewer farmers using machinery and technology till much longer plots of land and supply the world with food. And many of the displaced farm workers found better jobs, to replace what they had before. That's the Romney Way!!!

And you're dead wrong about the net jobs. Without Romney, Staples, which employs 75,000 people, probably wouldn't exist. Yes, Bain took over other companies that went bankrupt and companies where it cut jobs. It also took over companies where it added jobs. But they cancel out. Staples added lots more jobs than the puny cuts outlined in your links.

Marquis, I've run out of free National Review articles, so if I don't pick up on something that's why.

Or that's what All Sides ratings of media bias would indicate anyway. A media source that is smack dab in the center would get a "0" rating. The farthest left rating is -6 and the farthest right is +6.

MSNBC gets -5.7. That must be about as biased as you can get. Breitbart gets +5. And Fox gets a fair and balanced 4.

I was kind of surprised with MSNBC this evening. Some guy with a British accent was taking Chris Hays place. He actually spent about 10 minutes truly digging deep into Bob Menendez getting bribed to get Egypt to agree to make his benefactor the sole certifier for meat imports from America . Menendez is a notoriously corrupt Democratic Senator, and he's being prosecuted again.

Of course the other 50 minutes of the show were nonstop anti-Republican propaganda though.

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/msnbc
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/breitbart
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/fox-news-editorial-media-bias

Well goodness, I struck quite the chord. My impression from following the forum is that you two legendary mongers met and bonded. And things subsequently unraveled because of your political differences. And now I'm bringing you back together again! I'm happy for you.

The only way you're going to substantially increase GDP and prosperity in the USA is through increases in productivity. In economic terms, productivity is defined as units of output per hour worked. You don't increase productivity the Biden Way, which is also called the French Way, by keeping people in jobs that have become redundant. Or the Trump Way, also called the Biden Way since Biden carried on with his policies, by imposing massive tariffs on toys and textiles and the like in a futile attempt to bring low end manufacturing jobs back to America. You do it the Romney Way, also called the American Way and the Singapore Way, by improving the efficiency and competitiveness of businesses. Yes, this will result overall in people moving from jobs that add less value to jobs that add more value. Fewer people will be employed in low skilled occupations.

An example from years past, it used to take many farmers to supply our country with food. Now far fewer farmers using machinery and technology till much longer plots of land and supply the world with food. And many of the displaced farm workers found better jobs, to replace what they had before. That's the Romney Way!

And you're dead wrong about the net jobs. Without Romney, Staples, which employs 75,000 people, probably wouldn't exist. Yes, Bain took over other companies that went bankrupt and companies where it cut jobs. It also took over companies where it added jobs. But they cancel out. Staples added lots more jobs than the puny cuts outlined in your links.

Marquis, I've run out of free National Review articles, so if I don't pick up on something that's why.

No unraveling LOL I just love to tease him about his delusional 100% sycophancy towards anything the DNC does.

ET is a good guy, I probably agree with him on more things with him than I disagree.

But since I first met him we strongly disagree on a few things especially my extreme hatred of Bubba and his hideous husband.

I don't give a shit what anyones politics are I could care less I hate the RNC and the DNC.

BTW I must add everything you wrote about the Romney way is morally wrong, and very outdated (aka dead as a doornail).

[URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-geopolitical-investments-economic-shift/[/URL]

"Well goodness, I struck quite the chord. My impression from following the forum is that you two legendary mongers met and bonded. And things subsequently unraveled because of your political differences. And now I'm bringing you back together again! I'm happy for you.

The only way you're going to substantially increase GDP and prosperity in the USA is through increases in productivity. In economic terms, productivity is defined as units of output per hour worked. You don't increase productivity the Biden Way, which is also called the French Way, by keeping people in jobs that have become redundant. Or the Trump Way, also called the Biden Way since Biden carried on with his policies, by imposing massive tariffs on toys and textiles and the like in a futile attempt to bring low end manufacturing jobs back to America. You do it the Romney Way, also called the American Way and the Singapore Way, by improving the efficiency and competitiveness of businesses. Yes, this will result overall in people moving from jobs that add less value to jobs that add more value. Fewer people will be employed in low skilled occupations.

An example from years past, it used to take many farmers to supply our country with food. Now far fewer farmers using machinery and technology till much longer plots of land and supply the world with food. And many of the displaced farm workers found better jobs, to replace what they had before. That's the Romney Way!

And you're dead wrong about the net jobs. Without Romney, Staples, which employs 75,000 people, probably wouldn't exist. Yes, Bain took over other companies that went bankrupt and companies where it cut jobs. It also took over companies where it added jobs. But they cancel out. Staples added lots more jobs than the puny cuts outlined in your links.

Marquis, I've run out of free National Review articles, so if I don't pick up on something that's why. ".

Even the Great State of LDS wants nothing to with him.

They have axed him after 1 term, quite the fall from Mormon grace if you ask me.

Hopefully he will self exile deep into Mexican cartel country like his great grandfathers LMAO.

Breitbart? I'm apolitical I hate both parties and subscribe to NYT.

I would say that Brietbart is more objective than anything else I know of online and I read everything across the spectrum from The Nation to Zero Hedge.

They don't have a political agenda or solid position on the spectrum.

The MSM and the left hate them so much not because they are biased but because they cover stories almost all others bury.

They love to disclose what others won't.

All the news that's fit to print? According to fucking whom? The Sulzbergers?

They want you to think they are the arbiters of what's suitable and appropriate to print.

They are just schills for Wall St, propagandists for the 1%ers.

Trying to dictate the overton window.

They just hate Breitbart because they arent playing by their rules.

Or that's what All Sides ratings of media bias would indicate anyway. A media source that is smack dab in the center would get a "0" rating. The farthest left rating is -6 and the farthest right is +6.

MSNBC gets -5. 7. That must be about as biased as you can get. Breitbart gets +5. And Fox gets a fair and balanced 4.

I was kind of surprised with MSNBC this evening. Some guy with a British accent was taking Chris Hays place. He actually spent about 10 minutes truly digging deep into Bob Menendez getting bribed to get Egypt to agree to make his benefactor the sole certifier for meat imports from America. Menendez is a notoriously corrupt Democratic Senator, and he's being prosecuted again.

Of course the other 50 minutes of the show were nonstop anti-Republican propaganda though.

[URL]https://www.allsides.com/news-source/msnbc[/URL]

[URL]https://www.allsides.com/news-source/breitbart[/URL]

[URL]https://www.allsides.com/news-source/fox-news-editorial-media-bias[/URL]

But not my beloved Breitbart.

Case in point.

[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2023/09/22/nolte-nyts-david-brooks-said-airport-meal-cost-78-restaurant-revealed-humiliating-truth/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Tiny12;2854830]Well goodness, I struck quite the chord. My impression from following the forum is that you two legendary mongers met and bonded. And things subsequently unraveled because of your political differences. And now I'm bringing you back together again! I'm happy for you.

The only way you're going to substantially increase GDP and prosperity in the USA is through increases in productivity. In economic terms, productivity is defined as units of output per hour worked. You don't increase productivity the Biden Way, which is also called the French Way, by keeping people in jobs that have become redundant. Or the Trump Way, also called the Biden Way since Biden carried on with his policies, by imposing massive tariffs on toys and textiles and the like in a futile attempt to bring low end manufacturing jobs back to America. You do it the Romney Way, also called the American Way and the Singapore Way, by improving the efficiency and competitiveness of businesses. Yes, this will result overall in people moving from jobs that add less value to jobs that add more value. Fewer people will be employed in low skilled occupations.

An example from years past, it used to take many farmers to supply our country with food. Now far fewer farmers using machinery and technology till much longer plots of land and supply the world with food. And many of the displaced farm workers found better jobs, to replace what they had before. That's the Romney Way!!!

And you're dead wrong about the net jobs. Without Romney, Staples, which employs 75,000 people, probably wouldn't exist. Yes, Bain took over other companies that went bankrupt and companies where it cut jobs. It also took over companies where it added jobs. But they cancel out. Staples added lots more jobs than the puny cuts outlined in your links.

Marquis, I've run out of free National Review articles, so if I don't pick up on something that's why.[/QUOTE]If any Repub or Coven of Repubs could ever have produced something remotely positive like that in the USA economy instead of every Great Depression / Great Recession and Massive Jobs Destruction in the Millions and none of the historic Recoveries, Expansions, Massive Job Gains and Deficit Reduction in the past 100 years, they should have done it.

But they didn't.

The Dems did though. Many times over. Especially Biden.

[QUOTE=Tiny12;2854836]Or that's what All Sides ratings of media bias would indicate anyway. A media source that is smack dab in the center would get a "0" rating. The farthest left rating is -6 and the farthest right is +6.

MSNBC gets -5.7. That must be about as biased as you can get. Breitbart gets +5. And Fox gets a fair and balanced 4.

I was kind of surprised with MSNBC this evening. Some guy with a British accent was taking Chris Hays place. He actually spent about 10 minutes truly digging deep into Bob Menendez getting bribed to get Egypt to agree to make his benefactor the sole certifier for meat imports from America . Menendez is a notoriously corrupt Democratic Senator, and he's being prosecuted again.

Of course the other 50 minutes of the show were nonstop anti-Republican propaganda though.

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/msnbc
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/breitbart
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/fox-news-editorial-media-bias[/QUOTE]Oh, if MSNBC have a more Left / Liberal Bias and Fux and Breitbart have a more Right / Conservative Bias, then that only confirms the Politico and other site findings that MSNBC is more truthful and legitimately informative than the other two. Probably WAY more truthful, according to your All Sides links.

Makes sense.

This was back in 2017. My God, imagine how much more extreme it has gotten since then:

[B]Facts Have a Well-Known Liberal Bias[/B]

[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/08/opinion/facts-have-a-well-known-liberal-bias.html[/URL]

By Paul Krugman.

Dec. 8, 2017.

[QUOTE]There are two central facts about 21st-century U.S. politics. First, we suffer from asymmetric polarization: the Republican Party has become an extremist institution with little respect for traditional norms of any kind. Second, mainstream media still the source of most political information for the great majority of Americans havent been able to come to grips with this reality. Even in the age of Trump, they try desperately to be balanced, which in practice means bending over backwards to say undeserved nice things about Republicans and take undeserved swipes at Democrats.

This dynamic played a crucial role in last years election; its one of the reasons major news organizations devoted more time to Hillary Clintons emails than to all policy issues combined. But it has been going on for years. Its the whole story of Paul Ryans career: journalists trying to be centrists desperately wanted to show their neutrality by praising a Serious, Honest, Conservative, and promoted Ryan into that role even though it was obvious from the beginning that he was a con man.[/QUOTE]You, Marquis and other NYT subscribers can read the rest in the link.

[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/opinion/us-china-trade.html[/URL]

[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/11/opinion/china-us-relationship.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article[/URL]

[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/06/opinion/pelosi-taiwan-biden-china-policy.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article[/URL]

[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/biggs-migrants-illegal/2023/09/22/id/1135535/[/URL]

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2854871]Oh, if MSNBC have a more Left / Liberal Bias and Fux and Breitbart have a more Right / Conservative Bias, then that only confirms the Politico and other site findings that MSNBC is more truthful and legitimately informative than the other two. Probably WAY more truthful, according to your All Sides links.

Makes sense.

This was back in 2017. My God, imagine how much more extreme it has gotten since then:

[B]Facts Have a Well-Known Liberal Bias[/B]

[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/08/opinion/facts-have-a-well-known-liberal-bias.html[/URL]

By Paul Krugman.

Dec. 8, 2017.

You, Marquis and other NYT subscribers can read the rest in the link.[/QUOTE]Krugman has a well known Democratic Party bias. He's not a liberal. Nor are you or the Marquis, despite his belief that he's less conservative than I am. Classical and economic liberals don't believe in heavy government intervention in the economy. Both of you distrust free markets and want to prevent business owners from cutting jobs or filing for bankruptcy. You want to grow the federal government and the Marquis wants to cut off trade with China. While I'm happy you're not at each others throats again, I'm also happy you're not dictators of the United States of America, because your ideas are a recipe for a moribund economy.

And yes, facts do have a liberal (classical, economic, and social liberal) bias.

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2854923][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/opinion/us-china-trade.html[/URL]

[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/11/opinion/china-us-relationship.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article[/URL]

[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/06/opinion/pelosi-taiwan-biden-china-policy.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article[/URL]

[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/biggs-migrants-illegal/2023/09/22/id/1135535/[/URL][/QUOTE]I just scanned the first couple of sentences but yeah, I think I agree with those NYT and Newsmax articles. Nice catch with the $78 hamburger meal and the alcoholism epidemic among NYT journalists too. You're coming around Marquis!