Printable View
[QUOTE=Sirioja;2016791]You mean bad casting on a Friday early evening? Maybe beauties are in room?[/QUOTE]Yup, casting quality was really really poor even though quantity was usual high. I left home, again, without any session after watching about 6 hours.
[QUOTE=Gino02;2017128]Yup, casting quality was really really poor even though quantity was usual high. I left home, again, without any session after watching about 6 hours.[/QUOTE]In which case, may I suggest the high quality visually appealing stunners you're perhaps looking for are not available in this type of establishment at €50.00 a pop.
[QUOTE=Gino02;2017128]Yup, casting quality was really really poor even though quantity was usual high. I left home, again, without any session after watching about 6 hours.[/QUOTE]At what time, looks unusual that on a Friday evening the LU is poor, there are so many girls all can t be not at your taste.
[QUOTE=Pentire;2017253]In which case, may I suggest the high quality visually appealing stunners you're perhaps looking for are not available in this type of establishment at 50.00 a pop.[/QUOTE]Yeah, maybe you are right. But 2015 or 2016 were way better casting. Looks like the club is now focusing on quick bucks by allowing any girl for 100 euros entry fee, without any basic quality control, which they seem to used to do.
I dunno if 2015 or 16 had way better casting. There is still the same core girls that's been working there. Maybe the newly rotations aren't interesting enough as when those core group of girls new for you at the time.
I've had too many visits that I don't come out so satisfied with the level of optics(well, at least not as much as the hype going for it). Sharks LU, besides the notable girls, I don't go around thinking, oh boy look at those numbers of hotties. It's usually, I spend lots of time looking, and just end up taking whoever. If the LU isn't full of hotties, I expect some service, lack of upsells, and if that is not the case, where is the value?
It's just a hyped up version of what World's LU was back in the days with many avg looking girls. Anyway, LUs these days, I'm not compelled by optics, I'll be more pleased by services. If the services was strong, I will be more compelled that's for sure. I don't find much value either way so, I don't visit that much.
I do have an element of sympathy with Gino's remarks, although as I say again, for a €50.00 fuck; you're most certainly not going to get Miss World. In any event, I've more or less given up on the very popular, shall we say more visually appealing types whom sit around thinking their shit doesn't stink, hardly ever are they able to satisfy my bedroom requirements when the chips are down.
At the other end of the scale Gino, yes there are a few right ole munters in Sharks whom in my opinion should not be allowed entry even though they've paid their door fee. There's the fat Filipina whom would keep bugging me asking if I'd like a massage, then you have a more than slightly rotund blonde wearing glasses who's naked appearance is quite grotesque, but then again I witnessed her snogging the face off an old fella in the lounge area near the sauna, WTF.
[QUOTE=Gino02;2016771]Some of you may have seen the Deja Vu Showgirls strip club's slogan "1000's of beautiful girls and 3 ugly ones! Now Sharks can put a slogan "1000's of ugly girls and 3 beautiful ones!" LOL.[/QUOTE]Hey Gino,
Who are the 3 beautiful ones at Sharks?
Howie.
[QUOTE=PussyLiccker;2017316]
I've had too many visits that I don't come out so satisfied with the level of optics(well, at least not as much as the hype going for it). Sharks LU, besides the notable girls, I don't go around thinking, oh boy look at those numbers of hotties. It's usually, I spend lots of time looking, and just end up taking whoever. If the LU isn't full of hotties, I expect some service, lack of upsells, and if that is not the case, where is the value?
[/QUOTE]In general, Hessen girls are better at cultivating relationships and creating chemistry with the customer. Some mongers here are transparent about their preferences and how much they spend. Having relationships with the WG outside the club. Doing five-hour rooms. Drinking alcohol in the lounge for three hours. Visiting them in Romania. Some even hint at AO. At the 50 EUR price point, NRW girls are much better value, but at the higher price points maybe not. I just don't think NRW clientele demand these luxury services, so the NRW WGs do not have the skills, experience, or comfort level to deliver them.
I prefer NRW for sure. But it's not for everyone. It has its negatives. Long room waits and smaller LUs mean I have to waste more money on entries and waste more time driving around. Girls are not naked. GT also has older WGs.
[QUOTE=Gino02;2017278]Yeah, maybe you are right. But 2015 or 2016 were way better casting. Looks like the club is now focusing on quick bucks by allowing any girl for 100 euros entry fee, without any basic quality control, which they seem to used to do.[/QUOTE]I can only be agree, I wrote so many times after my few visits since September, casting is not what it was until Summer 2016 , even certainly biggest German casting. Even I never experienced, maybe also many girls upsell now for kissing or DATY. Becoming a tourists to fuck GND factory.
I agree with Syzy on one point: In a club, I don't care about how many girls, because I won't fuck 100 girls, I'm just interested by the few prettiest, but now I don't find at Sharks beauties who attract me, with GFE woman behavior. Mandy. De has the behavior, Sandra. De also, but many others left.
Nevertheless, if too many GND now, I won't write many are ugly. Sylvana is now at Samya, where casting is now higher for my eyes, no Kleopatra, nor Katea. Ru, nor Francesca, nor Tina, at Sharks, or Oase.
For well known examples, Evita face never attracted me, Janine. De face is quite average for me, Branda / Brandy / Leya or Alice Marilyn face are not attractive for me, but I won't say they are ugly, just lack of lightning face for my tastes, but they are the running after stars at Sharks.
Maybe a few more quite pretty faces at Oase, but lack of women's behavior and sensuality.
So I moved to other places, with less girls, but higher level for me. I remember History Liestal on 17 December. Only 17 girls, but Mady now touring at Globe, Andrea and Amelia who seemed left, and the exceptional GF Lorena, also Ada. A small club where I couldn t have the 4 attractive girls for me, had only Mady and Andrea, I regret I missed Amelia and had many times with Lorena after, last was on Friday when I couldn't ski on water snow, becoming too dangerous.
For my last visits at Sharks, I never regret I missed a girl.
Still few high level services girls: Marina. Lat, Blond now silicon Patricia, Mandy and Sandra, Agnes. Pol if still working at Sharks. Had so many great times with top girls at Sharks, club really improved for services, so I just can wish a new dreamed girl in future, just one is enough and easier for me.
But I confirm quantity never made quality. I will keep my 20 € voucher, each time I went on Monday for Karolina. Pol or Alice, I paid 45 + voucher and they gave me back a new voucher, I don't know if they also give back on Tuesday.
[QUOTE=McAdonis;2017426]In general, Hessen girls are better at cultivating relationships and creating chemistry with the customer. Some mongers here are transparent about their preferences and how much they spend. Having relationships with the WG outside the club. Doing five-hour rooms. Drinking alcohol in the lounge for three hours. Visiting them in Romania. Some even hint at AO. At the 50 EUR price point, NRW girls are much better value, but at the higher price points maybe not. I just don't think NRW clientele demand these luxury services, so the NRW WGs do not have the skills, experience, or comfort level to deliver them.
I prefer NRW for sure. But it's not for everyone. It has its negatives. Long room waits and smaller LUs mean I have to waste more money on entries and waste more time driving around. Girls are not naked. GT also has older WGs.[/QUOTE]Maybe true for Evita business, I don't say for AO, but at the moment, since last Summer, much higher level in NRW for skill, at LR, or at least Madeleine at GT, Kate for very friendly and top sexy girl, Katea. Ru.
[QUOTE=Gino02;2017278]Yeah, maybe you are right. But 2015 or 2016 were way better casting. Looks like the club is now focusing on quick bucks by allowing any girl for 100 euros entry fee, without any basic quality control, which they seem to used to do.[/QUOTE]2015 was way better than now.
Summer 2016 it started, the girl's amount began to raise upto 200 or more.
Then the top girls starting to leave the club, because they don't make enough money.
Last Tuesday was like 90 girls and Wednesday over 100, and weekend over 100.
But much less men than before, because the most knows, Sharks is changing, and there is hardly top girls left.
And then new 100€ deal, with DFK and so on. Only make it worse.
Bye bye Sharks!
I visited Sharks and Oase on their dessous days. That is 2 out of 5 days wasted. I fucked up my schedule trying to synch with the availability of my special gal, and that's how it came about. Anyway, if I needed confirmation, dessous is not even interesting as a novelty. I could look at bikini girls all day for free on a beach less than 50 miles away. Sharks is glorious with a hundred+ bare naked ladies strutting pussies and tits; dessous can't hold a candle. For that alone, I would skip a club or a spa where the chicks are not naked. On the first day I can fuck any moving piece of flesh (just kidding, I am a bit more discriminating than that) but on the fifth day of clubbing, it is seeing those beautiful naked sights which brings my little man back to life.
And I think people are too harsh in their assessments. I thought there are at least a couple of dozen girls hot enough to fuck for any demanding customer at Sharks and Oase. Slim bodies, nice tits, young and firm tone. Yes, not everyone has the face of a young Cameron Diaz, but it is crazy to think you can fuck such girls for 50 or even 500. Perhaps some times you get lucky and such girls are there in the clubs, but in general you are getting your money's worth with the quality of girls in these clubs, as long as they don't scam.
[QUOTE=Jnpr30;2017504]
And I think people are too harsh in their assessments. I thought there are at least a couple of dozen girls hot enough to fuck for any demanding customer at Sharks and Oase. Slim bodies, nice tits, young and firm tone. Yes, not everyone has the face of a young Cameron Diaz, but it is crazy to think you can fuck such girls for 50 or even 500. Perhaps some times you get lucky and such girls are there in the clubs, but in general you are getting your money's worth with the quality of girls in these clubs, as long as they don't scam.[/QUOTE]Words more true are seldom, if ever, posted here. Bravo to you, Sir, for your reports and acute observations.
If you go into any club like Oase, Sharks, or even MH or Palace, with large extensive line-ups, and IF you go with the right (positive and experimental) attitude, you should be able to find above-average sexual experiences (whatever that means to you personally), if you are willing to "work the line-up."
These days what I look for in a mainstream club LU are many different things. Sure, like all of us, I first look for stop-me-in-my-tracks optics. But, there are lot of things beyond that (for me) too: chemistry high on the list. Different guys got different criteria and different (individual) ways of acquiring and / or picking up on chemistry. [For example, take a guy like The Cane, who gave us a fantastic series of posts a few weeks ago: we all know what kind of characteristics and "backward chemistry" he's looking for, right? LOL]
We all look for different micro-things in a girl when we chat / interact / interview / encounter during the course of the day / night / early morning of being in the club, whatever club you're in.
I guess I better make a point here, otherwise be accused of endless rambling: yeah, but at least it's understandable and not repeated ad-nauseum (because once is enough, right?).
My point: Out of a LU of 60 to 100+ girls: if you can't find somebody to click with in the Zimmer, well, maybe the problem is internal, not external. Or maybe you just don't "need it" enough on that day.
[QUOTE=Ortos;2017527]My point: Out of a LU of 60 to 100+ girls: if you can't find somebody to click with in the Zimmer, well, maybe the problem is internal, not external.[/QUOTE]Why is there a need really for it to all be about a "problem" with somebody or some thing? I went to Sharks twice during my trip and did not go with anybody to the room. I said then and I'll say it again now. It's not that there was something intrinsically wrong with Sharks. Nor was there some problem with me. Hey, the place just did not work for me. OK? I don't know why. I can't explain it. It just didn't. I was there for hours and hours on end each time and just did not see anybody I liked. Spoke to some. Was approached by some. No deals were struck! And that's just the way the cookie crumbled. This has happened to me so many times at Mainhattan that I do not plan to return there again anytime soon.
[QUOTE=Jnpr30;2017504]. Yes, not everyone has the face of a young Cameron Diaz, but it is crazy to think you can fuck such girls for 50 or even 500. [/QUOTE]I never opted to fuck Cameron Diaz (tall Oase Adelle) even for 50 e. Good thing we are all different in our opinnions. For 500 e I would expect 2 x Pamela Anderson at her heights, or CJ Miles or Jesse Jane. Or both or all three at once. Damn you americans are used to overpaying. Let loose and don't assume your religious extremist views are or should be the norm. Anthropology from the animal world says that all women want to sell sex for money. Now the price is only determant on supply and demand...