Printable View
MAGA MIKE running the MAGA HOUSE.
Mitch is a dead turd walking, a MAGA Senate.
A TRUMP supreme court.
And for the pièce de areésistance.
Our Lord and Savior returns to his rightful GLORY in the "WHITE / MAGA HOUSE".
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/10/us/politics/manchin-democrats-senate-map.html[/URL]
ALLAHU AKBAR.
Dirty Joe, all the Biden brothers and the junkie are all going to Florence Co, Inshallah.
"https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2023/11/11/nikki-haley-let-ceos-import-workers-graduates-need/"
Dirty Joe turning America into a dystopian hellhole 1 mile at a time
https://newbostonpost.com/2023/08/28/michelle-wu-says-many-methadone-mile-people-arent-homeless/
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2867584]"Well, 4 out of 4 wrong when you count that Manchin BS. LOL.
North American Free Trade Agreemen.
[URL]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement[/URL]
Uh. Bubba did not become President until a month after the NAFTA Treaty was signed by another president, a Repub, and it was merely sitting in Congress waiting for ratification. Bubba had nothing to do with it.
Uh. Note the date. Actually, Bubba was not keen on the idea and appeared not to be into admitting them. It was another president, a Repub, who "warmed" to the idea almost a year after Bubba left office and voted to admit them.
Uh. Aside from the fact that Glass-Steagall was repealed and replaced by an overwhelming Repub Majority in the House and an equally overwhelming VETO-PROOF Repub Majority in the Senate (roughly 90-95% votes in each house of Repub Majority-Controlled Congress) when Bubba was about as 'lame duck' as a President can be just 1 year before the end of his second term, repealing it had practically nothing to do with Repub GW Bush's Financial Crisis almost EIGHT YEARS after Bubba left office. ".
You're either a pathological liar / want to be obscurantist or really stoopid.
[URL]https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/08/clinton-signs-nafta-into-law-dec-8-1993-1040789[/URL]#text=On%20 this%20 day%20 in%201993,world's%20 largest%20 free%2 Dtrade%20 zone.[/QUOTE]Uh. Clinton signed it simply as a formality to end the Congressional ratification of it. He had no authority to toss it out. It was not a matter subject to a presidential veto.
It was not his treaty. Treaties don't need multiple presidential signatures to become treaties. Bush had already sighed the treaty. Twice, only because Mexico joined the second treaty that he and not Clinton signed.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2867592]Well, 4 out of 4 wrong when you count that Manchin BS. LOL.
Uh. Bubba did not become President until a month after the NAFTA Treaty was signed by another president, a Repub, and it was merely sitting in Congress waiting for ratification. Bubba had nothing to do with it.
Uh. Note the date. Actually, Bubba was not keen on the idea and appeared not to be into admitting them. It was another president, a Repub, who "warmed" to the idea almost a year after Bubba left office and voted to admit them.
Uh. Aside from the fact that Glass-Steagall was repealed and replaced by an overwhelming Repub Majority in the House and an equally overwhelming VETO-PROOF Repub Majority in the Senate (roughly 90-95% votes in each house of Repub Majority-Controlled Congress) when Bubba was about as 'lame duck' as a President can be just 1 year before the end of his second term, repealing it had practically nothing to do with Repub GW Bush's Financial Crisis almost EIGHT YEARS after Bubba left office. ".
[URL]https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/the-legacy-of-the-clinton-bubble/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/the-legacy-of-the-clinton-bubble/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/the-legacy-of-the-clinton-bubble/[/URL][/QUOTE]Dissent Magazine? LOL. That's another impressive accomplishment. How does one cite sources any more ridiculous than Breitbart and Newsmax? Why, cite Dissent Magazine, of course. LOL.
What's next for your learned sources? Fake News For Numbskulls Magazine?
[B]You were just repeating another lie your lord and savior shoveled down your throat. Lol[/B]
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2867584]"Well, 4 out of 4 wrong when you count that Manchin BS. LOL.
North American Free Trade Agreemen.
[URL]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Free_Trade_Agreement[/URL]
Uh. Bubba did not become President until a month after the NAFTA Treaty was signed by another president, a Repub, and it was merely sitting in Congress waiting for ratification. Bubba had nothing to do with it.
Uh. Note the date. Actually, Bubba was not keen on the idea and appeared not to be into admitting them. It was another president, a Repub, who "warmed" to the idea almost a year after Bubba left office and voted to admit them.
Uh. Aside from the fact that Glass-Steagall was repealed and replaced by an overwhelming Repub Majority in the House and an equally overwhelming VETO-PROOF Repub Majority in the Senate (roughly 90-95% votes in each house of Repub Majority-Controlled Congress) when Bubba was about as 'lame duck' as a President can be just 1 year before the end of his second term, repealing it had practically nothing to do with Repub GW Bush's Financial Crisis almost EIGHT YEARS after Bubba left office. ".
You're either a pathological liar / want to be obscurantist or really stoopid.
[URL]https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/08/clinton-signs-nafta-into-law-dec-8-1993-1040789[/URL]#text=On%20 this%20 day%20 in%201993,world's%20 largest%20 free%2 Dtrade%20 zone.[/QUOTE][B]Trump wrong on Bill Clinton and NAFTA[/B]
[URL]https://www.courier-journal.com/story/opinion/readers/2016/09/22/letter-trump-wrong-bill-clinton-and-nafta/90844764/[/URL]#text=The%20 NAFTA%20 Treaty%20 had%20 to, would%20 have%20 overturned%20 his%20 veto.
[QUOTE]The NAFTA Treaty had to be voted on by Congress, which voted to ratify the NAFTA Trade Agreement and was signed into law in December 1993. The agreement, due to the makeup of Congress, was veto-proof, and if President Clinton refused to sign it Congress would have overturned his veto.[/QUOTE]BTW, nothing either Mexico or Canada or Mexico AND Canada have ever done in the entire history of America, including all of the boogeyman Caravans you, Dissent Magazine and Fake News For Numbskulls Magazine can conjure up, has been more damaging and destructive to the National Security, Economy and Jobs Creation of the USA than just the last two Repub so-called presidents of the USA.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2867593]Well, 4 out of 4 wrong when you count that Manchin BS. LOL.
Uh. Bubba did not become President until a month after the NAFTA Treaty was signed by another president, a Repub, and it was merely sitting in Congress waiting for ratification. Bubba had nothing to do with it.
Uh. Note the date. Actually, Bubba was not keen on the idea and appeared not to be into admitting them. It was another president, a Repub, who "warmed" to the idea almost a year after Bubba left office and voted to admit them.
Uh. Aside from the fact that Glass-Steagall was repealed and replaced by an overwhelming Repub Majority in the House and an equally overwhelming VETO-PROOF Repub Majority in the Senate (roughly 90-95% votes in each house of Repub Majority-Controlled Congress) when Bubba was about as 'lame duck' as a President can be just 1 year before the end of his second term, repealing it had practically nothing to do with Repub GW Bush's Financial Crisis almost EIGHT YEARS after Bubba left office. ".
[URL]https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/manchin-offshore-drilling-ban-bbb-saving-us-disaster-experts[/URL][/QUOTE]Oh, boo hoo. The poor widdle Oil and Gas Industry isn't happy about this:
[B]Biden granted more oil and gas drilling permits than Trump in his first 2 years in office.[/B]
[URL]https://news.yahoo.com/biden-granted-more-oil-and-gas-drilling-permits-than-trump-in-his-first-2-years-in-office-190528616.html[/URL]
Meanwhile, Biden's economic policies and stewardship has produced more jobs than the total number of net gained jobs due to the same from every Republican president combined going all the way back to Lincoln. The LOSS of millions upon millions of jobs just under Trump, GW Bush and Herbert Hoover along with the pathetically inferior jobs creation results for Eisenhower, Nixon / Ford, Reagan and GHW Bush made sure of it. Without DINO Joe Manchin struggling to blow a bunch of dumb Repub hillbillies in West Virginia in a vain attempt to save his political ass there, even more jobs would have been created under Biden by now. Hell, you might have finally found one yourself by now befitting your unique qualifications.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2867510][URL]https://headlineusa.com/new-report-flaws-auto-voter-registration/?utm_source=HW_EMAIL_NSP1400&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=HWemail[/URL]
Its the only way a Democrat can win.[/QUOTE]MDS, the 2016 election was rigged by Putin, and 2020 was the most secure in history. Don't you read the NY Times?
Dissent Magazine? LOL. That's another impressive accomplishment. How does one cite sources any more ridiculous than Breitbart and Newsmax? Why, cite Dissent Magazine, of course. LOL.
What's next for your learned sources? Fake News For Numbskulls Magazine?
[URL]https://www.epi.org/publication/issuebriefs_ib137/[/URL]
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States%E2%80%93China_Relations_Act_of_2000[/URL]#text=President%20 Bill%20 Clinton%20 in%202000,of%20 a%20 one%2 Dway%20 street.
President Bill Clinton in 2000 pushed Congress to approve the USA -China trade agreement and China's accession to the WTO, saying that more trade with China would advance America's economic interests: "Economically, this agreement is the equivalent of a one-way street. It requires China to open its markets—with a fifth of the world's population, potentially the biggest markets in the world—to both our products and services in unprecedented new ways," said Clinton. In a speech in 2000, Clinton reiterated his hopes.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2867929]Dissent Magazine? LOL. That's another impressive accomplishment. How does one cite sources any more ridiculous than Breitbart and Newsmax? Why, cite Dissent Magazine, of course. LOL.
What's next for your learned sources? Fake News For Numbskulls Magazine?
[URL]https://www.epi.org/publication/issuebriefs_ib137/[/URL]
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States%E2%80%93China_Relations_Act_of_2000[/URL]#text=President%20 Bill%20 Clinton%20 in%202000,of%20 a%20 one%2 Dway%20 street.
President Bill Clinton in 2000 pushed Congress to approve the USA -China trade agreement and China's accession to the WTO, saying that more trade with China would advance America's economic interests: "Economically, this agreement is the equivalent of a one-way street. It requires China to open its marketswith a fifth of the world's population, potentially the biggest markets in the worldto both our products and services in unprecedented new ways," said Clinton. In a speech in 2000, Clinton reiterated his hopes.[/QUOTE]Thanks. From your link;.
[QUOTE]China became a member of WTO on
[B]December 11, 2001[/b], and its permanent normal trade relations status with the US [b]was made permanent on December 27, 2001[/b].[/QUOTE]Perhaps this is the part of Repub GW Bush's voting to admit China into the WTO that rankles less you the most. Namely, Repub Donald Trump's spectacularly failed stewardship of his China "trade" negotiations:
[B]More pain than gain: How the US-China trade war hurt America.[/B]
[URL]https://www.brookings.edu/articles/more-pain-than-gain-how-the-us-china-trade-war-hurt-america/[/URL]
[B]REALTIME ECONOMICS
China bought none of the extra $200 billion of US exports in Trump's trade deal.[/B]
[URL]https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/china-bought-none-extra-200-billion-us-exports-trumps-trade-deal[/URL]
"MDS, the 2016 election was rigged by Putin, and 2020 was the most secure in history. Don't you read the NY Times?
I really hope it triggers a 2nd Civil War!!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2867924]MDS, the 2016 election was rigged by Putin, and 2020 was the most secure in history. Don't you read the NY Times?[/QUOTE]Did the NYT really report that Putin "rigged" the 2016 election? If so, Putin should sue it for $787 Million. There is precedent.
Well, no, 2016 was greatly influenced by Putin and Team Trump's extraordinarily tight collusion during the campaign. Not exactly "rigged" by him in the way the Electoral College system tries to "rig" it to favor whichever candidate the American electorate would rather not be POTUS. That being the Repub candidate in 7 out of the 8 most recent presidential elections.
Putin does not have to "rig" anything he wants done by any Repub. He just expresses his wishes and they jump. Then they ask "How high" on the way UP.
LOL. Who needed a Russian to "rig" the 2016 election for Trump when we had a Repub Director of the FBI in place to pull a last minute stunt to swing it to him.
But, yes, the 2020 election was historically secure as affirmed by any and every credible news source, something like 60 federal judges, some appointed by Trump himself, virtually everyone in the Trump administration who looked into it and was roundly and accurately reported as such.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2867952]
LOL. Who needed a Russian to "rig" the 2016 election for Trump when we had a Repub Director of the FBI in place to pull a last minute stunt to swing it to him.
But, yes, the 2020 election was historically secure as affirmed by any and every credible news source, something like 60 federal judges, some appointed by Trump himself, virtually everyone in the Trump administration who looked into it and was roundly and accurately reported as such.[/QUOTE]So 2016 election was rigged by the FBI and the 2020 election was the most secure in history? I feel so much better now.
"Did the NYT really report that Putin "rigged" the 2016 election? If so, Putin should sue it for $787 Million. There is precedent.
Well, no, 2016 was greatly influenced by Putin and Team Trump's extraordinarily tight collusion during the campaign. Not exactly "rigged" by him in the way the Electoral College system tries to "rig" it to favor whichever candidate the American electorate would rather not be POTUS. That being the Repub candidate in 7 out of the 8 most recent presidential elections.
Putin does not have to "rig" anything he wants done by any Repub. He just expresses his wishes and they jump. Then they ask "How high" on the way UP.
LOL. Who needed a Russian to "rig" the 2016 election for Trump when we had a Repub Director of the FBI in place to pull a last minute stunt to swing it to him.
But, yes, the 2020 election was historically secure as affirmed by any and every credible news source, something like 60 federal judges, some appointed by Trump himself, virtually everyone in the Trump administration who looked into it and was roundly and accurately reported as such. ".
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0[/URL]
"Did the NYT really report that Putin "rigged" the 2016 election? If so, Putin should sue it for $787 Million. There is precedent.
Well, no, 2016 was greatly influenced by Putin and Team Trump's extraordinarily tight collusion during the campaign. Not exactly "rigged" by him in the way the Electoral College system tries to "rig" it to favor whichever candidate the American electorate would rather not be POTUS. That being the Repub candidate in 7 out of the 8 most recent presidential elections.
Putin does not have to "rig" anything he wants done by any Repub. He just expresses his wishes and they jump. Then they ask "How high" on the way UP.
LOL. Who needed a Russian to "rig" the 2016 election for Trump when we had a Repub Director of the FBI in place to pull a last minute stunt to swing it to him.
But, yes, the 2020 election was historically secure as affirmed by any and every credible news source, something like 60 federal judges, some appointed by Trump himself, virtually everyone in the Trump administration who looked into it and was roundly and accurately reported as such. ".
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0[/URL]
[URL]https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/31/how-the-2020-election-was-rigged/[/URL]
Trump is now in full agreement with fellow wannabe authoritarian dictator Viktor Orban, "the head of Turkey, Hungary" or whatever that President Obama should resign and they should "replace" him with Trump so he can make the world trouble-free and safe again like it was in 2020 when Trump's Pandemic gave all of us the "best economy in history" and apparently bothered no one because, you know, China "feared" him:
[URL]https://youtu.be/2_TUTI4wMvs?si=8KuYbnZ_ub5ALNT9[/URL]
Cue the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media to largely ignore this latest in an almost 9 year endless series of confused, incoherent blathering by Trump demonstrating his dangerously serious cognitive impairment, for which there is no Joe Biden counterpart, none, and continue to mention Biden's age twice as often and they mention Trump's. LOL.