Super delegates for me but not for thee
"And this starts at the primary level. One of the great untold political stories is how Hiliary rigged the 2016 primaries against Bernie. She then tried to do the same thing in 2016 with Trump and lost.
I was talking to someone about why the swamp likes Dems more, and the answer was not Dems are more in line with the views of the CIA and FBI. It is just that the Democratic primaries are easier to rig than Republican ones.
There was this great book by John Grisham called the Brethren. It was a light and fun read. Here is the description:
The "Brethren" are three former judges who are incarcerated at a fictional federal minimum security prison. The trio embark on a scam to deceive and exploit wealthy closeted gay men. None of them are gay, but they write convincingly as two young vulnerable gay men, developing friendships and then asking for financial help. In some cases, they also try blackmail.
Meanwhile, Teddy Maynard, the ruthless and soon-to-retire director of the CIA, is orchestrating a scheme to tip the United States presidential election in the favor of Aaron Lake, a hawkish congressman supported by arms manufacturers. However, Lake, who is closeted, is hooked by the unwitting Brethren in their scam.
End of link.
Grisham is a popular author, and it was never mentioned or controversial that the CIA was busy picking presidents, and you wonder how many times they have.
That is the thing the Dems here do not get. Why do people love Trump so much? Well maybe because we know that it is obvious the CIA did not pick him. We did.
Hell, Chuck "seven ways to Sunday" Schumer even admitted the CIA controls most the pols. ".
It all started with Bubba in 1992 they handed him the election to get NAFTA the CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass Steagal.
Bubbas "third way" set the table for all this bullshit, it even cost Bubba a third term in 2008 when they rigged it against him for the muslim dood.
Remember Bubba got more delegates in the final count and they still threw it to muslim dood.
The deep state fully controls the DNC.
Most Dem voters could care less or even have a clue.
As long as someone gives them more food stamps and gives them a new Obama fone, they will vote straight DNC like ET (aka Whoopi Behar) suggests.
The 3 worst presidents ever
"And this starts at the primary level. One of the great untold political stories is how Hiliary rigged the 2016 primaries against Bernie. She then tried to do the same thing in 2016 with Trump and lost.
I was talking to someone about why the swamp likes Dems more, and the answer was not Dems are more in line with the views of the CIA and FBI. It is just that the Democratic primaries are easier to rig than Republican ones.
There was this great book by John Grisham called the Brethren. It was a light and fun read. Here is the description:
The "Brethren" are three former judges who are incarcerated at a fictional federal minimum security prison. The trio embark on a scam to deceive and exploit wealthy closeted gay men. None of them are gay, but they write convincingly as two young vulnerable gay men, developing friendships and then asking for financial help. In some cases, they also try blackmail.
Meanwhile, Teddy Maynard, the ruthless and soon-to-retire director of the CIA, is orchestrating a scheme to tip the United States presidential election in the favor of Aaron Lake, a hawkish congressman supported by arms manufacturers. However, Lake, who is closeted, is hooked by the unwitting Brethren in their scam.
End of link.
Grisham is a popular author, and it was never mentioned or controversial that the CIA was busy picking presidents, and you wonder how many times they have.
That is the thing the Dems here do not get. Why do people love Trump so much? Well maybe because we know that it is obvious the CIA did not pick him. We did.
Hell, Chuck "seven ways to Sunday" Schumer even admitted the CIA controls most the pols. ".
2 out of three were illegitimate.
All three belong in prison.
Bubba.
Barry the foreign born muslim.
Biden.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/watch-blinken-dies-inside-while-biden-blunders-through-major-geopolitical-moment[/URL]
Who runs this mutha...girls?
With Beyoncé, Taylor Swift and Barbenheimer (Barbie and Oppenheimer movies), adding $8.5 billion to the US economy, has definitely showed us, that women and women's movements have been quite the tour de force in Q3.
Perhaps as a cautionary tale, Republicans should stop trying to control, [b]"box up/box-in"[/b] and/or ban women's rights to abortion and instead realized and focus on women's freedoms that are a [b]"box office"[/b] boom to the US economy and overall welfare of the country.
[i]"Run the World" ...Girls![/i] (...kkkk!) It would seem, Beyoncé has a point!!! Well, at least for Q3, 2023, anyway.
[b]Beyoncé, Taylor Swift, Barbenheimer To Add $8.5 Billion to US Economy[/b]
[URL]https://www.investopedia.com/beyonce-taylor-swift-barbenheimer-boosted-summer-spending-7964698[/URL]
But there are those that are still saying (since Biden took office ) that, [u]winter is coming[/u]?
[b]The $8.5 billion Barbenheimer, Beyoncé, and Taylor Swift bonanza is fading, ... giving way to a winter ...[/b]
[URL]https://fortune.com/2023/08/31/recession-summer-spending-pop-culture-barbenheimer-beyonce-taylor-swift/[/URL]
Wow. I knew you could do it. And you did! LOL
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2869340]"And this starts at the primary level. One of the great untold political stories is how Hiliary rigged the 2016 primaries against Bernie. She then tried to do the same thing in 2016 with Trump and lost.
I was talking to someone about why the swamp likes Dems more, and the answer was not Dems are more in line with the views of the CIA and FBI. It is just that the Democratic primaries are easier to rig than Republican ones.
There was this great book by John Grisham called the Brethren. It was a light and fun read. Here is the description:
The "Brethren" are three former judges who are incarcerated at a fictional federal minimum security prison. The trio embark on a scam to deceive and exploit wealthy closeted gay men. None of them are gay, but they write convincingly as two young vulnerable gay men, developing friendships and then asking for financial help. In some cases, they also try blackmail.
Meanwhile, Teddy Maynard, the ruthless and soon-to-retire director of the CIA, is orchestrating a scheme to tip the United States presidential election in the favor of Aaron Lake, a hawkish congressman supported by arms manufacturers. However, Lake, who is closeted, is hooked by the unwitting Brethren in their scam.
End of link.
Grisham is a popular author, and it was never mentioned or controversial that the CIA was busy picking presidents, and you wonder how many times they have.
That is the thing the Dems here do not get. Why do people love Trump so much? Well maybe because we know that it is obvious the CIA did not pick him. We did.
Hell, Chuck "seven ways to Sunday" Schumer even admitted the CIA controls most the pols. ".
It all started with Bubba in 1992 they handed him the election to get NAFTA the CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass Steagal.
Bubbas "third way" set the table for all this bullshit, it even cost Bubba a third term in 2008 when they rigged it against him for the muslim dood.
Remember Bubba got more delegates in the final count and they still threw it to muslim dood.
The deep state fully controls the DNC.
Most Dem voters could care less or even have a clue.
As long as someone gives them more food stamps and gives them a new Obama fone, they will vote straight DNC like ET (aka Whoopi Behar) suggests.[/QUOTE]In addition to you being proven wrong in every way about the origins, time-lines and ultimate resposibility for NAFTA, CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which was practically and provably irrelevant to Repub G. W. Bush's Great Repub Recession, Great Repub Financial Crisis and Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction, now you are proveably wrong about another utterly debunked Repub Party fabrication; the so-called "Obamaphone', a program that also started under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents and doesn't have anything to do with Obama anyway:
[B]The Obama Phone?
Oct. 9, 2009[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?
A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it
......
The SafeLink program has actually been offering cell phones to low-income households in some states [b]since 2008[/b], not beginning "earlier this year," as the e-mail claims.[/QUOTE]You're on a roll with getting everything wrong. We'll, that is nothing new, of course.
Got anymore? LOL.
Whoopi you're as silly as it gets
In addition to you being proven wrong in every way about the origins, time-lines and ultimate resposibility for NAFTA, CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which was practically and provably irrelevant to Repub G. W. Bush's Great Repub Recession, Great Repub Financial Crisis and Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction, now you are proveably wrong about another utterly debunked Repub Party fabrication; the so-called "Obamaphone', a program that also started under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents and doesn't have anything to do with Obama anyway:
You're on a roll with getting everything wrong. We'll, that is nothing new, of course.
Got anymore? LOL.
I need to stop replying to your nonsense, "One does not bother debating anything with someone that won't concede even when they blatantly lose", I proved.
With every single issue you're clearly full of lies and full of Whoopi Goldberg diarrhea of the mouth with my links, and what do you do?
Of course, say I'm still wrong, you're a pathological liar, that should not be debated.
This is some weird ass game to you where you to try to Gaslight the fuck out of people, one cannot have a sane conversation with you.
Please, Bill, may we have more of your election predictions?
While Bill Maher continues his years long weekly Republican Party Campaign Rallies and calculates which third candidate on a future ballot to endorse in order to ensure a Republican candidate win, it might be useful to recap a few recent Bill Maher Republican Party Campaign Rally expert analysis and predictions vs real world outcomes:
[B]Bill Maher predicts GOP will win big in midterms because of 'woke culture' and says America is now the 'Titanic right after the iceberg hit': Compares democracy to a McRib - 'it's here now... so enjoy it while you can'
Nov. 5, 2022[/B]
[URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11393401/Bill-Maher-predicts-GOP-win-big-midterms-woke-culture.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]The Real Time host, 66, didn't seem too positive about the 2022 Midterm Elections on Tuesday, and says 'woke culture is just one reason why the Republicans are going to do so well in this election.'
....
He went on to say that the 'left has gone super crazy with lots of s**t that the average American just never voted for,' such as gender identity and homelessness.
....
is predicted that the Republican Party will rule the Senate and the House after Tuesday's election.
'Things are going to change fundamentally in this country after this election,' Maher said on Thursday. 'Theyre definitely going to win.'
....
The self-proclaimed 'traditional liberal' channeled the same energy on his Friday night show on HBO, where he again declared that 'democracy will lose' and Trump's 'election-deniers' will prevail on Tuesday.
He said on his show that the former president's election deniers will carve out seats for themselves and Americans 'won't even care after it happens.'[/QUOTE]Vs:
[B]How Democrats won the midterms.
Dec. 12, 2022[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/3766063-how-democrats-won-the-midterms/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Democrats defied expectations up and down the ballot in 2022 despite facing historic headwinds and other challenges going into the midterms.
However, Democrats were able to grow their majority in the Senate, retain and win a number of gubernatorial and state-level races, and temper their losses in the House.[/QUOTE]Oh, and there is this, Bill:
[B]The Democrats Lost the House by Just 6,675 Votes. What Went Wrong?
At first glance, Democratic performance in last years House races was great. But a close look under the hood reveals that, with a few smarter moves and a little more luck, wed have Speaker Jeffries.
Feb. 9, 2923[/B]
[URL]https://newrepublic.com/article/170248/democrats-lost-house-2022-midterm-election-mistakes[/URL]#text=Even%20 by%20 the%20 standards%20 of, changed%20 that%20 number%20 to%206%2 C675).
[QUOTE]Although almost no one realized it at the time, the 2022 elections for the House were the Capitol Hill version of George W. Bush versus Al Gore. Even by the standards of close elections, 2022 was off the charts. An analysis by Jacob Rubashkin in early December for the political tip sheet Inside Elections found that [b]just 6,670 votes spread over five House districts would have kept the Democrats in the majority. (Final counts have changed that number to 6,675). For math mavens, that works out to be 0.006 percent of the more than 107 million votes cast in House races. [/b]According to Rubashkins tally, 22,378 of these votes in the right places would have prevented the Republicans from picking up a single seat in the House. So we are not talking about a normal electionthis was the Democrats losing on a wild pitch in the tenth inning of the seventh game of the World Series.[/QUOTE]Mind you, that would include Mini Trump George Santos' "win" in New York based on what is turning out to be 100% lies about everything and at least a couple of over-creatively magic-marker Repub Governor-"redrawn" districts similar to the ones for which those so-called Governors have been spanked by Federal Judges.
But it didn't stop there:
[B]Democrats have been winning big in special elections.
That could bode well for them in the 2024 election.
Sept. 20, 2023[/B]
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/538/democrats-winning-big-special-elections/story?id=103315703[/URL]
[QUOTE]How the final vote-share margins in congressional and state legislative special elections in 2023 compare with the seats base partisanship, as of Sept. 20, 2023
(See Chart)
[/QUOTE]And let's not forget this:
[B]Democrats are celebrating major victories in Tuesday's elections.
Nov. 8, 2023[/B]
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2023/11/08/1211459885/democrats-are-celebrating-major-victories-in-tuesdays-elections[/URL]
You know, I'm beginning to suspect Bill Maher's pro Repub Bothsiderism election analysis and predictions are quite full of shit, especially with regard to his continually campaigning for Repubs on their idiotic "War on Woke" nothingness for lack of anything else to run on that they have ever accomplished for the American people over the past 100 years or so.
Another great post by the King
"I said Republican primaries are less rigged not that they were totally pure. The media has been rigging them for years when they do this front runner bullshit. Jeb Bush as front runner in 2016? Somehow the media had a comeback in 2020 when they pushed the corpse of Joe Biden to be president and with a little help from the AA communities, he "won".
Actually, Trump completely hoodwinked the media in 2016 to cover him. He got more free media coverage than anyone and instead of the media, which rigs elections, making him look foolish, Trump made the media look dumb. The media were all crying in their La Croix water when Trump got elected and said, "Why did we give this guy so much coverage?
Even now, you have many people running in the more fair Republican primaries and viable challengers like RFK JR (guess he too is not a Democrat like Bernie) bailing ship and running as independent. The Democratic primaries are so rigged the majority of Democratic voters don't want Biden as president but they have no choice but to accept him. Hel, you even have Bill Maher begging Biden not to run.
We are running out of ingredients Mr. Pretzel. Salt, nacho cheese are gone. All that is left is a side of mustard. Man, I get it. It is hard being a Democrat these days. Things were so much easier when Black Jesus was around. ".
There are reasons women have jobs, wall street wants to drive up GDP, how? By making both husband and wife work, you can pay the man less, because now they have 2 incomes to get by, but need 2 cars now and clothes for work etc but they can drive up the GDP.
And there is what's called ADULT DAY CARE.
I go into the Chase Tower in downtown Chicago regularly and see lots of ADULT DAY CARE.
You will go by an office with several 20 something women sitting in there playing with their fones and hair etc.
I guess they are having a MEETING LMAO.
Travel around most of the world and you will see most of these women selling pussy.
But in the west they don't want men getting easy pussy.
They want men to have to fight over crumbs and work your ass off for a beach with a horrible entitled attitude.
Travel around Asia or Latin America or Eastern Europe and see what kind of ADULT DAY CARE is available? NONE.
The wall street dirtbags and The WEF crowd want females working 9 to 5 for them.
Even if its just ADULT DAY CARE.
I hope next time one of these ISG losers have cancer or need brain surgery they make sure to goto a female physician LMAO.
[URL]https://www.amazon.com/-/he/Martin-L-Gross/dp/0380973197[/URL]
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/media/passport-bro-growing-number-men-ditching-american-women-overseas[/URL]
Just look around America? How many street hookers do you see? Not many they rather be working at Chase for ADULT DAY CARE.
Just look and see how many men are homeless including veterans? How many women are homeless??
Its because of dirtbags with the same attitude as spidy.
Be nice to the pigs, lick their dirty buttholes, maybe theyll give you sum pussy!
