American Politics

"You had great timing Spidy. You posted this the day one of my manosphere heroes, Aaron Clarey published his book, "A world without men". [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm5foiiRrv8.[/URL].

I will save you the $15 and tell you that around 75% of our food and 80% of our "stuff" comes from men. You need a HR position filled then you get a woman. You need a car fixed or wiring in a home and you HAVE to get a man. In the 1950's there were no HR employees but there were mechanics and electricians. It is funny how that works. It is almost like jobs had to be made up for women.

And you are a traitor to your sex, Spidy? A soy boy? LOL. Well, you better be a thin one because that soy you are consuming was produced by men.

Man, I wish you libtards had to stay and live in the shitholes you created. Tooms the pretzel would have had to stay in California. PVmonger could not hightail it down to Mexico, and you would have your passport revoked. "I am sorry sir you can only have sex with women in blue states. " MLK had a dream, and that is mine. ".

WOMEN CAN DO ANYTHING MEN CAN DO.

JUST NOT VERY GOOD.

"And this starts at the primary level. One of the great untold political stories is how Hiliary rigged the 2016 primaries against Bernie. She then tried to do the same thing in 2016 with Trump and lost.

I was talking to someone about why the swamp likes Dems more, and the answer was not Dems are more in line with the views of the CIA and FBI. It is just that the Democratic primaries are easier to rig than Republican ones.

There was this great book by John Grisham called the Brethren. It was a light and fun read. Here is the description:

The "Brethren" are three former judges who are incarcerated at a fictional federal minimum security prison. The trio embark on a scam to deceive and exploit wealthy closeted gay men. None of them are gay, but they write convincingly as two young vulnerable gay men, developing friendships and then asking for financial help. In some cases, they also try blackmail.

Meanwhile, Teddy Maynard, the ruthless and soon-to-retire director of the CIA, is orchestrating a scheme to tip the United States presidential election in the favor of Aaron Lake, a hawkish congressman supported by arms manufacturers. However, Lake, who is closeted, is hooked by the unwitting Brethren in their scam.

End of link.

Grisham is a popular author, and it was never mentioned or controversial that the CIA was busy picking presidents, and you wonder how many times they have.

That is the thing the Dems here do not get. Why do people love Trump so much? Well maybe because we know that it is obvious the CIA did not pick him. We did.

Hell, Chuck "seven ways to Sunday" Schumer even admitted the CIA controls most the pols. ".

2 out of three were illegitimate.

All three belong in prison.

Bubba.

Barry the foreign born muslim.

Biden.

[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/watch-blinken-dies-inside-while-biden-blunders-through-major-geopolitical-moment[/URL]

That helped destroy America, Bush 43.

"And this starts at the primary level. One of the great untold political stories is how Hiliary rigged the 2016 primaries against Bernie. She then tried to do the same thing in 2016 with Trump and lost.

I was talking to someone about why the swamp likes Dems more, and the answer was not Dems are more in line with the views of the CIA and FBI. It is just that the Democratic primaries are easier to rig than Republican ones.

There was this great book by John Grisham called the Brethren. It was a light and fun read. Here is the description:

The "Brethren" are three former judges who are incarcerated at a fictional federal minimum security prison. The trio embark on a scam to deceive and exploit wealthy closeted gay men. None of them are gay, but they write convincingly as two young vulnerable gay men, developing friendships and then asking for financial help. In some cases, they also try blackmail.

Meanwhile, Teddy Maynard, the ruthless and soon-to-retire director of the CIA, is orchestrating a scheme to tip the United States presidential election in the favor of Aaron Lake, a hawkish congressman supported by arms manufacturers. However, Lake, who is closeted, is hooked by the unwitting Brethren in their scam.

End of link.

Grisham is a popular author, and it was never mentioned or controversial that the CIA was busy picking presidents, and you wonder how many times they have.

That is the thing the Dems here do not get. Why do people love Trump so much? Well maybe because we know that it is obvious the CIA did not pick him. We did.

Hell, Chuck "seven ways to Sunday" Schumer even admitted the CIA controls most the pols. ".

2 out of three were illegitimate.

All three belong in prison.

Bubba.

Barry the foreign born muslim.

Biden.

[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/watch-blinken-dies-inside-while-biden-blunders-through-major-geopolitical-moment[/URL]

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2869685]In addition to you being proven wrong in every way about the origins, time-lines and ultimate resposibility for NAFTA, CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which was practically and provably irrelevant to Repub G. W. Bush's Great Repub Recession, Great Repub Financial Crisis and Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction, now you are proveably wrong about another utterly debunked Repub Party fabrication; the so-called "Obamaphone', a program that also started under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents and doesn't have anything to do with Obama anyway:

You're on a roll with getting everything wrong. We'll, that is nothing new, of course.

Got anymore? LOL.

I need to stop replying to your nonsense, "One does not bother debating anything with someone that won't concede even when they blatantly lose", I proved.

With every single issue you're clearly full of lies and full of Whoopi Goldberg diarrhea of the mouth with my links, and what do you do?

Of course, say I'm still wrong, you're a pathological liar, that should not be debated.

This is some weird ass game to you where you to try to Gaslight the fuck out of people, one cannot have a sane conversation with you.[/QUOTE]Sure sure sure. Whatever you say.

So my actual link proving that your Repub Party talking point about the so-called 'Obamaphone', which was roundly and famously debunked since they first pitched that lie, had nothing to do with Obama and even began in 2008 under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents the year before Obama became President and launched into producing one of the most successful Great Dem Recoveries of all time from one of the most disastrous Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction of all time was somehow miraculously refuted by your absolute zero link supporting no contention whatsoever other than that you were obviously either just making up shit on your own or left it up to your beloved Repub Party to provide all the shit you are delighted to carry for them?

Oh yes, of course. Even the casual reader can see that.

Lolol.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2869666]You had great timing Spidy. You posted this the day one of my manosphere heroes, Aaron Clarey published his book, "A world without men". [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm5foiiRrv8[/URL].

I will save you the $15 and tell you that around 75% of our food and 80% of our "stuff" comes from men. You need a HR position filled then you get a woman. You need a car fixed or wiring in a home and you HAVE to get a man. In the 1950's there were no HR employees but there were mechanics and electricians. It is funny how that works. It is almost like jobs had to be made up for women.

And you are a traitor to your sex, Spidy? A soy boy? LOL. Well, you better be a thin one because that soy you are consuming was produced by men.

Man, I wish you libtards had to stay and live in the shitholes you created. Tooms the pretzel would have had to stay in California. PVmonger could not hightail it down to Mexico, and you would have your passport revoked. "I am sorry sir you can only have sex with women in blue states. " MLK had a dream, and that is mine.[/QUOTE][B]Earliest known meeting of the Manosphere Founding Fathers:[/B]

[URL]https://youtu.be/0OTYdizres8?si=fDTtDHt7PmEkMihU[/URL]

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2869738]"In addition to you being proven wrong in every way about the origins, time-lines and ultimate resposibility for NAFTA, CCP in the WTO and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which was practically and provably irrelevant to Repub G. W. Bush's Great Repub Recession, Great Repub Financial Crisis and Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction, now you are proveably wrong about another utterly debunked Repub Party fabrication; the so-called "Obamaphone', a program that also started under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents and doesn't have anything to do with Obama anyway:

[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-phone/[/URL]

You're on a roll with getting everything wrong. We'll, that is nothing new, of course.

Got anymore? LOL.

I don't know who started the program nor do I care, did I say who started it, slow down the keyboard diarrhea and learn how to read.

While I'm sure Barry added a few trillion to the program, if you live in the USA you might know what you're talking about but you want to debate American politics.

From 10000 miles away and you haven't even stepped foot on American soil in at least 12 yrs.

If you lived here you would know what they call Obama fones in the ghetto, they are called "Obama fones" dum dum.

Just like they still call food stamps "Obama bucks".

Ask blacks why they loved barry or if they still do, and they will tell you because he gave us new Obama fones and bumped up our food stamps therefore.

In gratitude theyve permanently named them "Obama bucks".

I see you didn't have any trouble finding the term Obama fones.[/QUOTE]Yes, no problem at all finding utter Repub BS being debunked over and over again. And you still don't have any substantiation for any of your silliness. LOL. Do you call your Out-of-Order for 5 years smartphone an "Obamaphone" out of a sense of affection for him as well? The phone you had that stopped working years ago and apparently cannot be repaired had as much to do with Barack Obama as all of your other beloved Repub Party BS had to do with Bill Clinton and Reagan / GHW Bush's NAFTA, Bill Clinton and GW Bush's voting CCP into the WTO, Bill Clinton and GW Bush's Great Repub Financial Crisis 8 years after Clinton left office and handed that incoming Repub better economic conditions than any outgoing Repub ever handed an incoming Dem. As did Jimmy Carter. And Barack Obama. And every other Dem going back to at least FDR.

"Sure sure sure. Whatever you say.

So my actual link proving that your Repub Party talking point about the so-called 'Obamaphone', which was roundly and famously debunked since they first pitched that lie, had nothing to do with Obama and even began in 2008 under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents the year before Obama became President and launched into producing one of the most successful Great Dem Recoveries of all time from one of the most disastrous Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction of all time was somehow miraculously refuted by your absolute zero link supporting no contention whatsoever other than that you were obviously either just making up shit on your own or left it up to your beloved Repub Party to provide all the shit you are delighted to carry for them?

Oh yes, of course. Even the casual reader can see that.

Lolol. ".

[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/mobile/these-states-depend-obama-phone-most-n378741[/URL]

Nbc calls them Obama fones dum dum jajajajajajajaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

I believe it was Reagan that started the subsidy program.

But Barry expanded it to include free fones, that's why they call them Obama FONES.

I know you're old, but maybe go back to school and learn to read.

Oh wait you can't you're in the 3rd world jajajaja and can't go back to California they kicked you out and their shitty public schools are the reason you can't comprehend anything you read in the first place.

Sure sure sure. Whatever you say.

So my actual link proving that your Repub Party talking point about the so-called 'Obamaphone', which was roundly and famously debunked since they first pitched that lie, had nothing to do with Obama and even began in 2008 under one of your beloved Repub so-called presidents the year before Obama became President and launched into producing one of the most successful Great Dem Recoveries of all time from one of the most disastrous Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction of all time was somehow miraculously refuted by your absolute zero link supporting no contention whatsoever other than that you were obviously either just making up shit on your own or left it up to your beloved Repub Party to provide all the shit you are delighted to carry for them?

Oh yes, of course. Even the casual reader can see that.

Lolol.

The Obama administration, well into the internet and wireless age, agreed that broadband and cellular services are essential. So, yes, citizens of various federal programs could qualify for a cellphone — a basic one, not the latest iPhone or Galaxy — with a plan they receive under Lifeline.

[URL]https://federalnewsnetwork.com/tom-temin-commentary/2017/07/a-short-history-of-the-obamaphone/[/URL]

The Obama administration, well into the internet and wireless age, agreed that broadband and cellular services are essential. So, yes, citizens of various federal programs could qualify for a cellphone — a basic one, not the latest iPhone or Galaxy — with a plan they receive under Lifeline.

The Obama administration, well into the internet and wireless age, agreed that broadband and cellular services are essential. So, yes, citizens of various federal programs could qualify for a cellphone — a basic one, not the latest iPhone or Galaxy — with a plan they receive under Lifeline.

The Obama administration, well into the internet and wireless age, agreed that broadband and cellular services are essential. So, yes, citizens of various federal programs could qualify for a cellphone — a basic one, not the latest iPhone or Galaxy — with a plan they receive under Lifeline.

The Obama administration, well into the internet and wireless age, agreed that broadband and cellular services are essential. So, yes, citizens of various federal programs could qualify for a cellphone — a basic one, not the latest iPhone or Galaxy — with a plan they receive under Lifeline.

The Obama administration, well into the internet and wireless age, agreed that broadband and cellular services are essential. So, yes, citizens of various federal programs could qualify for a cellphone — a basic one, not the latest iPhone or Galaxy — with a plan they receive under Lifeline.

The Obama administration, well into the internet and wireless age, agreed that broadband and cellular services are essential. So, yes, citizens of various federal programs could qualify for a cellphone — a basic one, not the latest iPhone or Galaxy — with a plan they receive under Lifeline.

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2869742]

There are reasons women have jobs, wall street wants to drive up GDP, how? By making both husband and wife work, you can pay the man less, because now they have 2 incomes to get by, but need 2 cars now and clothes for work etc but they can drive up the GDP.

And there is what's called ADULT DAY CARE.

I go into the Chase Tower in downtown Chicago regularly and see lots of ADULT DAY CARE.

You will go by an office with several 20 something women sitting in there playing with their fones and hair etc.

I guess they are having a MEETING LMAO.

Travel around most of the world and you will see most of these women selling pussy.

But in the west they don't want men getting easy pussy.

They want men to have to fight over crumbs and work your ass off for a beach with a horrible entitled attitude.

Travel around Asia or Latin America or Eastern Europe and see what kind of ADULT DAY CARE is available? NONE.

The wall street dirtbags and The WEF crowd want females working 9 to 5 for them.

Even if its just ADULT DAY CARE.

I hope next time one of these ISG losers have cancer or need brain surgery they make sure to goto a female physician LMAO.

[URL]https://www.amazon.com/-/he/Martin-L-Gross/dp/0380973197[/URL]

[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/media/passport-bro-growing-number-men-ditching-american-women-overseas[/URL]

Just look around America? How many street hookers do you see? Not many they rather be working at Chase for ADULT DAY CARE.

Just look and see how many men are homeless including veterans? How many women are homeless??

Its because of dirtbags with the same attitude as spidy.

Be nice to the pigs, lick their dirty buttholes, maybe theyll give you sum pussy![/QUOTE]And the soy boys Tooms and Spidy convince themselves they are the sides of women, not the women who respect and co-exist with men, but the women who HATE them. They are so delusional that they do not even see the train wreck they are creating. Well, they are the Demolition Democrats after all.

Clarey actually makes the case, a case I agree with, that what drives society is male sex drive. In other words, men busting their asses to impress women is what pushes society forward and now that these same men are getting their teeth kicked in, insulted, told women have choice while killing their kids but no choice when it comes to child support, and how fucking great women are when they produce most of the important things in society, they are checking out. They are rejecting the lard asses, the women with tattoos everywhere, the women with other men's children, and the women sucking down a smorgasbord of pills for mental illness. Hell, this site is a testament to men saying fuck it when it comes to American women.

What Clarey predicts, and what I have seen in my own life, is men particularly younger men shacking up with their folks, living in one bedroom with a huge TV content to live with video games and porn and never date. Last I checked a webcam gal couldn't falsely claim rape or sexual harassment. Yes, one way to not be accused of victimizing a woman is to never speak to one.

(Having a Colombian gal, I will say that they are similar to their American counterparts but there is one huge difference. There is not this constant playing the victim in Colombia. My gal's daughter tried doing that, and my gal ripped her a new one verbally.).

The typical soy boy / feminazi reaction to the men checking out is to rag on such men as if this is their problem and not a huge issue for society, and it is one. If you got men content to live on $25,000 a year and not wanting to procreate, society will literally collapse.

Yet the Demolition Democratic douches are content to do to society what they have done to our finest cities.

Men suck. Go women! / sarc. What a bunch of sexist punks.

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2869849][b]In the great tradition of Alfalfa, I nominate Elvis![/b]

[B]Earliest known meeting of the Manosphere Founding Fathers:[/B]

[URL]https://youtu.be/0OTYdizres8?si=fDTtDHt7PmEkMihU[/URL][/QUOTE]
Just frickin' hilarious and very apt for Elvis 2008 (methinks)!

BTW, does that make MDS1...Spanky? (...kkkk!)

[QUOTE=Spidy;2870033]Just frickin' hilarious and very apt for Elvis 2008 (methinks)!

BTW, does that make MDS1...Spanky? (...kkkk!)[/QUOTE]Buckwheat says [B]otay[/B]! LMFAO!

[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2869666] You had great timing Spidy. You posted this the day one of my manosphere heroes, Aaron Clarey published his book, "A world without men". [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm5foiiRrv8.[/URL]

...

And you are a traitor to your sex, Spidy? A soy boy? LOL. Well, you better be a thin one because that soy you are consuming was produced by men... [/QUOTE] (...kkkk!) Elvis 2008, can't you strive to be anything better than a hackneyed QAnon/MAGA clich?

[b]Why the alt-right movement is using the term soy boy to insult its enemies online[/b]
[URL]https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/social/why-the-altright-movement-is-using-the-term-soy-boy-to-insult-its-enemies-online/news-story/109652bcecb348d7bc733ec9a09a8a6a[/URL]

I mean really, isn't [b]"soy boy"[/b] so 2017? Making it alt-right wing [i]"tired old-man speak?"[/i] May I suggest, you check-back-in, with your fellow toadies at your next, [i][b]Incels'[/b] group meeting[/i] for more updated woke, "anti-he-man" insults (...kkkk!).

[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2869666]Man, I wish you libtards had to stay and live in the shitholes you created. Tooms the pretzel would have had to stay in California. PVmonger could not hightail it down to Mexico, and you would have your passport revoked. "I am sorry sir you can only have sex with women in blue states. " MLK had a dream, and that is mine.[/QUOTE]That's funny, because I could have sworn, that for decades, the Repubs, were declaring themselves, [i]"as the party of freedoms".[/i]

[b]The Glaring Contradiction of Republicans Rhetoric of Freedom[/b]
[URL]https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2022/07/democrats-republicans-rhetoric-freedom-rollback/661519/[/URL]

But much like the "clown show" and sham that is the QAnon/MAGA Repubs of today, the so called "party of freedom", was all just [i][b]"farcical marketing"[/b][/i], Elvis 2008, much like your thinly veiled arguments.

[QUOTE=Spidy;2870033]Just frickin' hilarious and very apt for Elvis 2008 (methinks)!

BTW, does that make MDS1...Spanky? (...kkkk!)[/QUOTE]Well, when they got older they relinquished Presidential Duties to others because they all too often showed up late for their own Manosphere Club meetings.

Not sure which one is MDS1 and which one is his King in this archival documentary of the Club. But I see MDS1 had already established the rule that their Annual Conventions must always take place in his neighborhood so as to keep everyone as close as possible to where the important news actually happens. Television, the Internet and Live News Streams not yet being invented, you know:

[URL]https://youtu.be/71k0tm8dZqI?si=-Bl3hY7azJKcJKmb[/URL]

[QUOTE=Spidy;2870058](...kkkk!) Elvis 2008, can't you strive to be anything better than a hackneyed QAnon/MAGA clich?[/QUOTE]Soy boy, anything you do not like is Qanon / MAGA. Clarey gives data driven research, and his #1 source for research was the USA Department of Labor.

You would not know a fact if it was fried in soybean oil and bit you in the ass.

"And the soy boys Tooms and Spidy convince themselves they are the sides of women, not the women who respect and co-exist with men, but the women who HATE them. They are so delusional that they do not even see the train wreck they are creating. Well, they are the Demolition Democrats after all.

Clarey actually makes the case, a case I agree with, that what drives society is male sex drive. In other words, men busting their asses to impress women is what pushes society forward and now that these same men are getting their teeth kicked in, insulted, told women have choice while killing their kids but no choice when it comes to child support, and how fucking great women are when they produce most of the important things in society, they are checking out. They are rejecting the lard asses, the women with tattoos everywhere, the women with other men's children, and the women sucking down a smorgasbord of pills for mental illness. Hell, this site is a testament to men saying fuck it when it comes to American women.

What Clarey predicts, and what I have seen in my own life, is men particularly younger men shacking up with their folks, living in one bedroom with a huge TV content to live with video games and porn and never date. Last I checked a webcam gal couldn't falsely claim rape or sexual harassment. Yes, one way to not be accused of victimizing a woman is to never speak to one.

(Having a Colombian gal, I will say that they are similar to their American counterparts but there is one huge difference. There is not this constant playing the victim in Colombia. My gal's daughter tried doing that, and my gal ripped her a new one verbally.).

The typical soy boy / feminazi reaction to the men checking out is to rag on such men as if this is their problem and not a huge issue for society, and it is one. If you got men content to live on $25,000 a year and not wanting to procreate, society will literally collapse.

Yet the Demolition Democratic douches are content to do to society what they have done to our finest cities.

Men suck. Go women! / sarc. What a bunch of sexist punks. ".

Tell me how the fuck this is legit.

She sues him for "rape" 5 yrs later, "towards the end of the relationship"? Are you fucking joking, no police report?? This what these losers vote for more of!!

And Bill hits it out of the park AGAIN.

[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/11/18/news/bill-maher-reveals-reason-he-thinks-trump-is-winning-against-biden?utm_source=gmail&utm_campaign=android_nyp[/URL]