Bangkok Massage Parlors - Except TULIP and ANNIES!

[QUOTE=Bkkdog;1918017]I received this PM today. I don't know how I can help this guy. I posted her photo, name of the massage shop, the location, and her age.

Some members really need to read the threads before sending a PM or posting questions. We post our reports so people can read.[/QUOTE]Bkkdog, what a novel concept! Actually reading the reports. What will you think of next?

These "manager" types need to be spoon-fed and hand-held to the spot. Then they will probably ask your assistance to put their dick in the chick.

Qiuckly now, why are you still dallying? Shake a leg, your help is required urgently.

[QUOTE=Bkkdog;1917220]I don't want her to get too popular and jaided. Dam ISG! LOL. The things I do for my brotherin.[/QUOTE]Well, tried her again and I must say that I found the experience just as meh as the first time. Skill set is just not all that and she is missing that all important nastiness that I enjoy. Don't get me wrong; she is a very nice girl who is polite, funny, and has a good disposition, but that is not what I look for in a PSE oily session.

Let me contrast her with a couple of things about some of my all time favorites. First a Tulip gal; when she and I would enter the grungy rooms in Tulip she would pull her pants down, climb on the bed on all fours, spread her ass, and bark, "eat my ass. " Wonderful. Once I was entering Tulip and she was coming downstairs with a very old dude and she came up and grabbed me and whispered in my ear, "Take me and f*ck me hard. This old guy could not make me come. " And of course I obliged her. That time when we got to the room she pulled my pants down and told me to f*ck her mouth. Once she told me of the time she had a DP with two Korean guys. What a gal. Another Tulip gal asked me to "f*ck her ass hard" as she went after her clit aggressively with a vibrator. Told me not to come until she did. Took about 15 min of intense action before she found release. One of my fav SW gals used to leave her high heels on and position herself to blow me on all fours so that her ass was in full view of the mirror and that I had a perfect view of both her holes. She would gaze in the mirror to see my reactions as well. Also liked very heavy action in all holes, and really preferred to be taken in the rice exit as opposed to the snatch. I could go on about the countless Tulip, and early Mango and SW gals. Apple, Cherry, Bo, Ann, Pond, Cream, Momay, etc. I just don't find gals like these anymore, even in the PSE joints. It is all quite tame compared to what it used to be. The last two of my regulars left last year. In the year since I have not found anyone even close to a replacement. Ninja is nice gal, but nowhere near that league performance wise.

[QUOTE=Goatscrot;1918796]Well, tried her again and I must say that I found the experience just as meh as the first time. Skill set is just not all that and she is missing that all important nastiness that I enjoy. Don't get me wrong; she is a very nice girl who is polite, funny, and has a good disposition, but that is not what I look for in a PSE oily session.

Let me contrast her with a couple of things about some of my all time favorites. First a Tulip gal; when she and I would enter the grungy rooms in Tulip she would pull her pants down, climb on the bed on all fours, spread her ass, and bark, "eat my ass. " Wonderful. Once I was entering Tulip and she was coming downstairs with a very old dude and she came up and grabbed me and whispered in my ear, "Take me and f*ck me hard. This old guy could not make me come. " And of course I obliged her. That time when we got to the room she pulled my pants down and told me to f*ck her mouth. Once she told me of the time she had a DP with two Korean guys. What a gal. Another Tulip gal asked me to "f*ck her ass hard" as she went after her clit aggressively with a vibrator. Told me not to come until she did. Took about 15 min of intense action before she found release. One of my fav SW gals used to leave her high heels on and position herself to blow me on all fours so that her ass was in full view of the mirror and that I had a perfect view of both her holes. She would gaze in the mirror to see my reactions as well. Also liked very heavy action in all holes, and really preferred to be taken in the rice exit as opposed to the snatch. I could go on about the countless Tulip, and early Mango and SW gals. Apple, Cherry, Bo, Ann, Pond, Cream, Momay, etc. I just don't find gals like these anymore, even in the PSE joints. It is all quite tame compared to what it used to be. The last two of my regulars left last year. In the year since I have not found anyone even close to a replacement. Ninja is nice gal, but nowhere near that league performance wise.[/QUOTE]Well that's a little over the top. I will say, she never did those things with me either. Did you try and initiate anything more? I don't want to keep saying YMMV but that could be the case. Maybe she felt more comfortable with me and was able to loosen up sexually. Yes she is not vocal when it comes to starting something but for me, her performance was stellar. Anyways, remember Pim from Tulip and she was more about what you are talking about now with me. Too bad she married an Indian dude and stopped working.

[QUOTE=Bkkdog;1918816]Well that's a little over the top. I will say, she never did those things with me either. Did you try and initiate anything more? I don't want to keep saying YMMV but that could be the case. Maybe she felt more comfortable with me and was able to loosen up sexually. Yes she is not vocal when it comes to starting something but for me, her performance was stellar. Anyways, remember Pim from Tulip and she was more about what you are talking about now with me. Too bad she married an Indian dude and stopped working.[/QUOTE]Pim was sexually charged to the nth degree. That girl could come and come. Told me on her off days she would masturbate two to three times. Her Indian husband must have some stamina to keep up with her. Also gave an amazing BJs. One of the few that have been able to make me come orally. Never became a regular because I just did not find her that attractive.

Interesting that almost all of the gals I was with back in the states were very vocal, very open, nasty, and fun. Thai gals for the most part are very conservative sexually. Even the working girls. Amazing that they have had so many partners, yet really don't know that much about the male or even their own anatomy. I have had a few gals who could bring me to the brink and back again several times without eliciting a pop, but those have been few and far between. The few regulars I have had became regulars because they were constantly adding to their skill set. One of my favs, who has since moved on, had a new trick every time I was with her, which was about once every 6 weeks or so for about 5 years.

[QUOTE=Bkkdog;1918816]Well that's a little over the top. I will say, she never did those things with me either. Did you try and initiate anything more? I don't want to keep saying YMMV but that could be the case. Maybe she felt more comfortable with me and was able to loosen up sexually. Yes she is not vocal when it comes to starting something but for me, her performance was stellar. Anyways, remember Pim from Tulip and she was more about what you are talking about now with me. Too bad she married an Indian dude and stopped working.[/QUOTE]You must realize that Goatscroat expects something completely different to what others like me look for. He looks for extra special skills that very few Thai girls have. Me, I don't care much about skill set if she can give an acceptable soft slow BBBJ.

I look for girls willing to give great GFE and have fun. Its conceivable that girls I like and have chemistry with would have no chemistry with someone demanding all sorts of special services.

I tried one of the Snow White superstars by reputation and her looks were barely acceptable to me including fake tits, probably fake nose too. The service was not special, not particularly GFE. Very "meh" for me. Would not repeat.

We have to understand that ISGers have completely different requirements and taste. My favorite stunner from Crazy House gives me a very good fun time. She is only very part time as has studies to attend to. Fortunately I can contact her. The fact that her BBBJ is fairly weak and she does not have any training, and is inexperienced, is of no consequence to me at all. She is just gorgeous and can play the wicked naughty girl just a little, as she knows her body is worth showing off, but far from a porn star in any way, certainly not "nasty". She can be passionate. She seems to like good sex a lot. A bit of a "screamer" (loud moaning) in the room. However she is not trying to make a "service" as such. She just does what is fun for her. I would not even consider giving her up. She is prettier than the majority of Escort Site pics for my taste, even with teeth braces. Customers agree. She never available for more than a few minutes maximum. Always called to customer almost immediately. When she got rainbow coloured hair, it made no difference. Still stunning.

For me its just stunning girls that can make a good fun time. Very much the same as what Natty Bumpo goes for, but I maybe even more fussy for natural model looks. The exact price is not a major consideration, so for sure I do not look for cheap bargains. My big problem is to find stunning model girls without nose and tit jobs, and not scared of cock. Obviously porn star shop girls are not likely to be scared of cock, but can't find many girls looking pretty enough, to excite me.

The obstacle to me doing Escorts is not so much the price, but that I am very fussy about looks, and fear the bait and switch from the agency or girls posting pics taken 10 years ago when their looks were vastly better. Also the chances of getting sillies or nose job is too high. I cannot take a girl that I have not seen properly. I would not want to meet the girl and send her away immediately. There do exist acceptable nose jobs, but its no more than 10% of them for me. Most girls look stupid or like aliens. Acceptable tit jobs exist too, but again a low portion of them. I also like to be able to check out a girl for some time before choosing, when I don't know them. Snap decisions are more risky.

Hence at Addict I got lucky with one really fun girl, another day got unlucky with a girl that looked good, but a dud. No time to check the character of the girl. I hate rushed decisions. At soapies I used to sit for ages watching the fishbowl girls carefully before deciding or asking reliable mamasan's opinion (at CP2), or calling girls out for a drink first. Annies is not like a real Soapy to me. It's closer to an Oily in style. They don't encourage guys to sit for ages gawking at the girls in the fishbowl. They call girls to a brief line up. In a real Soapy you can sit for a long time. The fact that Annies has a bath is of little relevance. Several Oily MPs have one. The "fish bowl" is of little consequence. It's true I did experience a papasan hassling me at Amsterdam. That was unacceptable so I told him to [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] off. In good Soapies, you can sit at a table and order food and drink, before you choose a girl, same as you can in good bars.

I like that Dr. BJ has a bar where can sit and order a drink while waiting for girl to be available, or even to arrive at work. LOL Can anyone tell me about consultant letter Z? No matter, I will try her in any case. Rather pretty on the web site. That is precisely what I look for.

[QUOTE=Bkkdog;1918017]I received this PM today. I don't know how I can help this guy. I posted her photo, name of the massage shop, the location, and her age.

Some members really need to read the threads before sending a PM or posting questions. We post our reports so people can read.[/QUOTE]That is why we should be selective about who we receive PMs from, personal friends makes sense. PMs from anybody is not desirable in my opinion.

When we rate girls, we should have a few criteria, where give points and can attach a comment:

1. Face, natural?

2. Body, Natural?

3. Enthusiasm. Scared of dick?

4. Chemistry and GFE (with kissing).

5. Skills and name the specific skills.

6. English ability and conversation.

That way I can give a girl, high marks in Categories 1 to 4 and very low marks in Category 5. Goatscrot can give a girl high marks in category 5 and low marks in categories 1 and 2. I left out massage because I don't even like a real massage. I try to avoid massage and hand jobs. I suppose we could rate girls for massage too, but I am there for mongering.

My most recent Snow White girl would be a 6, 6, 8, 5 (no real kissing), 7 for BBBJ (anal not offered), and no idea for English.

My Crazy House girl would be a 9, 9 (all natural beauty), 8, 9, Skills 2, and no idea for English but okay Conversation in Thai. No skills other than how to dance real sexy, but overall score for me is good.

June (ex Snow White) would be 7+, 8, 8, 9, 8 great BBBJ (and managed anal once), 7. Maybe not a super porn star but good all round performer.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1919650]When we rate girls, we should have a few criteria, where give points and can attach a comment:

1. Face, natural?

2. Body, Natural?

3. Enthusiasm. Scared of dick?

4. Chemistry and GFE (with kissing).

5. Skills and name the specific skills.

6. English ability and conversation.

That way I can give a girl, high marks in Categories 1 to 4 and very low marks in Category 5. Goatscrot can give a girl high marks in category 5 and low marks in categories 1 and 2. I left out massage because I don't even like a real massage. I try to avoid massage and hand jobs. I suppose we could rate girls for massage too, but I am there for mongering.

My most recent Snow White girl would be a 6, 6, 8, 5 (no real kissing), 7 for BBBJ (anal not offered), and no idea for English.

My Crazy House girl would be a 9, 9 (all natural beauty), 8, 9, Skills 2, and no idea for English but okay Conversation in Thai. No skills other than how to dance real sexy, but overall score for me is good.

June (ex Snow White) would be 7+, 8, 8, 9, 8 great BBBJ (and managed anal once), 7. Maybe not a super porn star but good all round performer.[/QUOTE]Nice rating system Syg. We should use this as a standard. I would also rate 5 as average.

Body is actually very important to me. More so than face. Namely I just don't like 'them after they have had a kid. "Mommy-body" just doesn't work for me. That used to be my first question when I went into an oily. Show me the gals "mai mi luk. " Was also one of my first questions in Thermae back in the day. Natural is not so important as long as the surgery has been well done. My Thai is good enough that I don't really need a gal who speaks English. Last SW gal would be a 6. 5, 7, 6, 6, 5. 5 (BBBJ average, I was "too big" for anal), 7 (conversation all in Thai but fun). For reference I would rate June 7, 7, 8, 8, 7 (BBBJ was enthusiastic but toothy), 7. Best I have had at an oily would have been Cherry at Mango and she would have rated 9, 9 , 9, 8, 9, 8.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1919643]That is why we should be selective about who we receive PMs from, personal friends makes sense. PMs from anybody is not desirable in my opinion.[/QUOTE]Sorry guys in advance for hijacking the forum for a personal message.

[B]Syzygies[/B] Hey- I have been trying to PM you for awhile but your PM is blocked. Coming back to BKK next month and looking to catch up. PM me since I can't send messages to you.

Lurking this forum for about a year, I finally had the opportunity to go mongering in SEA. I was in Vietnam for several weeks with work prior to this.

First day in Bangkok today. I am staying at a hotel nearby the Nana Plaza area. I wished I booked a hotel closer to the Nana Plaza itself. The main room from my hotel to the area is always full of traffic. I can walk faster than the hotel shuttle can drive.

I went to Chrome, formerly Dr. BJ, for a nuru massage. Best massage ever. I didn't get the girl's name. I don't think they have a number system, I just picked the girl I liked the most. She jumped up with all smiles when she was chosen. She about 5'4", thick in the right way, and very light skin. She said she's full Thai, but I don't think so. Basic English but very cute in the way she speaks. Her enthusiasm is through the roof. She really went out of her way to make me feel good. I recommend this place. I tipped her well for making me very happy.

[QUOTE=Iseeu;1920294]Sorry guys in advance for hijacking the forum for a personal message.

[B]Syzygies[/B] Hey- I have been trying to PM you for awhile but your PM is blocked. Coming back to BKK next month and looking to catch up. PM me since I can't send messages to you.[/QUOTE]Ok fixed. I will start my Bangkok reports soon. About to return. My Crazy House waitress awaits me eagerly. LOL I hope my hotties are around.

[QUOTE=Goatscrot;1919683]Nice rating system Syg. We should use this as a standard. I would also rate 5 as average.

Body is actually very important to me. More so than face. Namely I just don't like 'them after they have had a kid. "Mommy-body" just doesn't work for me. That used to be my first question when I went into an oily. Show me the gals "mai mi luk. " Was also one of my first questions in Thermae back in the day. Natural is not so important as long as the surgery has been well done. My Thai is good enough that I don't really need a gal who speaks English. Last SW gal would be a 6. 5, 7, 6, 6, 5. 5 (BBBJ average, I was "too big" for anal), 7 (conversation all in Thai but fun). For reference I would rate June 7, 7, 8, 8, 7 (BBBJ was enthusiastic but toothy), 7. Best I have had at an oily would have been Cherry at Mango and she would have rated 9, 9 , 9, 8, 9, 8.[/QUOTE]I had Cherry at Mango regularly too. No anal though. I have her photo or two.

7, 8, 8, 8, 8. Face cannot really be a 9 but well above average. Good all round girl. Cat was prettier though, but body less good.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;1919650]When we rate girls, we should have a few criteria, where give points and can attach a comment:

1. Face, natural?

2. Body, Natural?

3. Enthusiasm. Scared of dick?

4. Chemistry and GFE (with kissing).

5. Skills and name the specific skills.

6. English ability and conversation.

My most recent Snow White girl would be a 6, 6, 8, 5 (no real kissing), 7 for BBBJ (anal not offered), and no idea for English.
[/QUOTE]

Great idea, but in order to make it more readable, I'd suggest prefixing the numbers. So, instead of "5, 6, 7, 8, 9", let's do "Face:5, Body:6, Energy:7, Chem:8 (explanation), Skills:9 (explanation), English (10)".

A review is written once, but read 1000 times, so the effort is worthwhile, otherwise all the readers need to refer back to some interpretation guide buried deep in the thread (and we'll have to keep answering the "what do the numbers mean" questions over and over, even if it's in some FAQ).

In addition, it's less error-prone, and allows omitting some numbers (e.g. English) without messing up the rest.

To all this, I'd add the all-important price (all-inclusive, house+girl fee, but not any optional tip).

[QUOTE=Crocodilexp;1920971]Great idea, but in order to make it more readable, I'd suggest prefixing the numbers. So, instead of "5, 6, 7, 8, 9", let's do "Face:5, Body:6, Energy:7, Chem:8 (explanation), Skills:9 (explanation), English (10)".).[/QUOTE]Guys! Wake up! Think about what you're proposing! Should we all carry clipboards? Have multiple colored pens in pocket protectors to color code responses? How about an ISO cert for one or another type sex? BJ 9001? Any sexual encounter is about as intimate as two human beings can get and it strikes me as just plain weird that anyone thinks the experience can be quantified in a way that another human would understand about "chem". I think you can convey much more with simple statements. Such as "she was average looking but gave me a blowjob that rocked my world and we ended up watching TV all night, in between fantastic bouts of sex in multiple positions."

[QUOTE=TimTimGuy;1921097]Guys! Wake up! Think about what you're proposing! Should we all carry clipboards? Have multiple colored pens in pocket protectors to color code responses? How about an ISO cert for one or another type sex? BJ 9001? Any sexual encounter is about as intimate as two human beings can get and it strikes me as just plain weird that anyone thinks the experience can be quantified in a way that another human would understand about "chem". I think you can convey MUCH more with simple statements. Such as "she was average looking but gave me a blowjob that rocked my world and we ended up watching TV all night, in between fantastic bouts of sex in multiple positions. ".[/QUOTE]LOL. I agree. What possible value would this be to anyone other than it being an abbreviated version of one punter's impression of a girl. If a skillful BJ is important to me am I not supposed to bother taking a girl for whom so-and-so on a particular message board gave a 3 rating in that department? What if he gave her that low rating because she gave him a slow BJ (which I prefer) instead of a jackhammer rapid fire one (which I hate)?

And rating girls on looks is particularly worthless unless it is directed to the sight impaired among us having this board read to them by someone else. LOL. And then there is the issue of why a sight impaired punter needs a hot looking girl at all. Uh, can't we all look at girls' noses, faces, legs, waistlines, hairdos, etc. with our own eyes and judge for ourselves? Reporting on hidden major defects? Maybe worth a mention I suppose.

Not saying anyone shouldn't post those kinds of ratings or anything else that pleases them. But we ought to at least mention in passing the inherent flaws and silliness of it.