I receive payment in super fine ass Russian pussy
"MarquisdeSade1 is a troll, paid and controlled by the Kremlin. It is pointless to try reply with facts. I am genuinely curious about him, and especially how much and how he is paid. Is he paid per post? Per word? How does he receive his payments?
I will gladly accept the title of troll for Putin and the Kremlin as long as you.
Disclose what you get paid for licking Rachel Maddows dirty anus clean each time she shits along with Klaus Schwabs and Xi Jingpings.
Next time any real men are in Moscow, try this place out.
You can enjoy some exquisite caviar whilst relaxing for the day, you won't regret it!!
[URL]https://msk.sanduny.ru/ru[/URL]
US News Best? LMAO according to whom?
"It isn't even close.
USA News Best Countries.
2023 Rankings.
The overall ranking of Best Countries measure global performance on a variety of metrics.
Switzerland is the best country in the world for 2023.
[URL]https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/rankings[/URL]
USA is #5.
Thailand is #29.
Russia is #37. ".
The WEF feminists?
Real men (MAGA men) love Russia Hungary Turkey, much of Eastern Europe and much of the Middle East.
You and Taibbi are lucky the Law is only considering Trump's violation. So far.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2882083]I will let Taibbi take the first part:
Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows decided Thursday to remove Donald Trump from the state's presidential ballot.
Jared Golden, a Democratic congressman from Lewiston who voted to impeach Trump over the January 6th riots, quickly issued a statement:
We are a nation of laws, therefore until he is actually found guilty of the crime of insurrection, he should be allowed on the ballot.
Normally campaign season is a period of heightened engagement, as people scour the Internet to research even the most inane questions, knowing that at the end of the process, they get to cast votes on them. It's why news companies tend to fatten up in election years, like Grizzlies during salmon runs.
People are absorbed by dramas in which they feel themselves to be participants.
This year the public is being forced to research questions in which they have no say. We all understand now that there's a disqualification clause in the 14th Amendment. We also understand that this clause seems to have been written with deliberate vagueness. I'm no lawyer, but I doubt the 14th Amendment was designed to empower unelected state officials to unilaterally strike major party frontrunners from the presidential ballot.
F it was, that's a shock. I must have missed that in AP Insane Legal Loopholes class.
Is there any way this ends well? It feels harder and harder to imagine.
End of link.
Here we have Tooms going off on this bullshit line about "rule of law" while even a Democratic Congressman from man shoots it down. How many politicians have had the 14th amendment used to disqualify them from seeking office Tooms? I will give you a minute.
Are you ready? The answer is none.
And how many people did the "insurrections" murder on January 6? That would be none too.
Yes, you are going to stupidly argue that the same men who passed the 14th amendment, men who did not allow women to vote, passed this amendment to stop the most popular candidate for president from being on the ballot? If it were a Democrat disqualified, you would be screaming bloody murder.
Oh, it is just me? Oh really? Every time you Democratic douches pull a stunt like this Trump's numbers go up. I wondered what it was going to take for Democrats to finally say, "Okay, this is enough. " Maybe this is enough.
The Democrats are playing a game here with the Supreme Court just like they did with the abortion issue. They are asking the Supreme Court to take on this issue so the court can say this is ridiculous and overturn it. That way Democrats get to * about how unfair the Supreme Court is again. But what if they do not take this case on and Trump wins?
You have already seen what is happening with the polls. You think Matt Taibbi, who is objective as they come and you stupidly call a bothsider, saying Trump might start throwing people off a plane is an exaggeration? IMO he is talking to Democrats and telling them to cool it. Because if Trump is elected president, he could legally do this, and it is the fault of Democrats. You dumb fucks brought machine guns to an ex-president's house.
You Democratic douches have determined we do not need trials anymore, and these judges and this Secretary of State are IMO guilty of being a threat to our democracy. If others feel like I do, and they do, these douches should be put down for treason. If Trump wanted to kill these four judges and this Secretary of State for treason without a trial, I am fine with that.
These five idiotic Democratic douches are literally playing chicken with the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court strikes down their decision, no one will care what happens to them, but if they don't? Those people better live the country and quick.[/QUOTE]Here is the text of the USA Constitutional Law at issue:
[URL]https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-14/section-3/[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office[/b]
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.[/QUOTE]See that "having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States" thingy?
Yeah, that means we are talking about people like Trump who have proven their solemn word under oath wasn't worth shit previously, isn't worth shit now or ever and therefore it doesn't matter if they promise to never, ever, ever do it again or are pardoned for their violation of that oath by a future Repub criminal so-called potus and so on. They are disqualified for holding office again. Find a different line of work. Play golf the rest of your life on dumb Repub hillbilly donations. Whatever. But you don't get to stand there again and make a mockery of the Law and the Constitution by taking an Oath in order to hold office again.
Now, see that "or given aid or comfort to enemies thereof" thingy?
Yeah, that means in reality there is a whole shitload of Repub Senators, members of the House, etc, including ChristoFascist Squeaker of the Getting Smaller and Smaller All The Time Pink Tinkle House Mike who are ALSO disqualified from ever holding office again. So be careful or those charged with enforcing those Constitutional principles and laws might start expanding the enforcement of that one beyond just Numbskull Trump. As they should.
However, as I pointed out previously, there are certainly enough traitorous Repub justices on the Supreme Court to carve out another extra magical exception to their principles and established precedent to see to it that Trump can get back in there to produce more disastrous Economic and National Security results as they did for GW Bush. So, you and Taibbi will have a very good shot at enjoying another one of those "once in 100 years Historic Disasters" happening as they do only under Repubs and never under Dems again ASAP.
Here is a link to Scumbag Joes dystopian vision for America
"he is paid per the anti-American lie he tells. Same as Trump. And maybe the same amount as they pay Trump too since Trump needs the money so badly he is probably willing to accept anything.
It wouldn't have to be much. I mean, these guys are happy to eat off the sidewalks of Russia, one of the worst countries on the planet. ".
I remember when I was showing you some pics of putas when I flew to BKK from Moscow and you said if you could get pussy like that you would move there LMAO.
Here are a few pics from outside the Marriott I stayed in, in Moscow near the Bolshoi.
And a few from Soi 4 outside Nana, see if you can pick them out LMAO they are all from the same month.
I've been around much of the world and nothing compares to Moscow or STB with their sheer beauty.
I saw ZERO criminals or filthy homeless junkies etc. ".
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/portland-poop-crisis-triggers-bacteria-outbreak-normally-found-third-world[/URL]
Looking forward to your link
[QUOTE=Jon32;2882345]Oh sure, let's believe [B]US[/B]NEWS that the USA is #5 in the world for best countries? LOL.
Come on this is fucking laughable.
As this being internationalsexguide I believe most of us are very well travelled.
I wouldn't even rank the US in the top 20. That list is a joke and the US is the worst country in the western world to live in.
If someone wanted to put it outside the top 30 I wouldn't argue either probably.[/QUOTE]Well, if you have any link to a list from anyone other than one Repub Trumpster on an international sex website touting Russia as a better country to live in than the USA, which was his suggestion, along with the criteria for such a conclusion, please feel free to post it.
So far the criteria seems only to be regarding his pleasure derived from eating off sidewalks. And even on that basis I suspect he could find plenty of sidewalks in the USA from which to happily dine. Maybe just not in his chosen neighborhood.
